Who are the Israelis?

[Hollie]

RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

Twice in one day!

True. That is about when the settler colonial project started.

(QUESTION)

What Settler Colonial Project? Where?

We cannot be talking about Area "C" since the Arab Palestinians agree to full Israeli civil and security control.

When did the UN Committee 24 determine that there were any Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) in the Middle East? The Special Committee on Decolonization only recognizes four (4) countries as colonial powers (UK, US, NZ, France), none of which have holding anywhere in the Middle East.

In any event, we have to remember that the Hostile Arab Palestinians are often caught spreading misinformation and/or disinformation. There is no evidence of a colonial project sponsored by the Israelis anywhere in the Middle East, Mediterranean, or Gulf Region.

Most Respectfully,
R

When did the UN Committee 24 determine that there were any Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) in the Middle East?

The UN did in other resolutions.

Which of those applied to Islamic terrorist enclaves?

I don't know. That is an Israeli propaganda thing.

That is one of your usual sidesteps. It means only that you’re unable to address the salient point.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a very good question.

Which of those applied to Islamic terrorist enclaves?

(COMMENT)

Internationally, HAMAS is a State sponsor of terrorism.

Most Respectfully,
R

How many countries call Hamas terrorists and how many don't?

Why do you think various countries have a reason to identify Hamas as a state sponsor of terrorism?

Can you offer something besides a conspiracy theory?

Nice deflection.

So, yes. You can offer nothing other than a conspiracy theory.

 

[P F Tinmore]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a very good question.

Which of those applied to Islamic terrorist enclaves?

(COMMENT)

Internationally, HAMAS is a State sponsor of terrorism.

Most Respectfully,
R

How many countries call Hamas terrorists and how many don't?

Why do you think various countries have a reason to identify Hamas as a state sponsor of terrorism?

Can you offer something besides a conspiracy theory?

Nice deflection.

A typical pattern of behavior is your stuttering when befuddled.

 

[rylah]

Almagor chairman Meir Indor

Israel National News | Israel's #1 News Site

Wow, dealing out a whole deck of terrorist cards.

You look unpleasantly degraded once those Jihadi feelings of 'pride' are hurt.
Filth of lowest order the Jihadi brides.

 

[Hollie]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

 

[rylah]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

What foreign military?
Your document mentions Lebanon, no mention of any Pal'istan, neither a binding one.

 

[P F Tinmore]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

What foreign military?
Your document mentions Lebanon, no mention of any Pal'istan, neither a binding one.

 

[rylah]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

Then all it needs to not be a bantustan is allow some Jews among them,
but that's of course a racist idea...

Let's face it You have nothing to suggest but skin color baits and total moral degradation.
No discussion at all.

 

[rylah]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

What foreign military?
Your document mentions Lebanon, no mention of any Pal'istan, neither a binding one.

FrakIy, I expected a better duck dance.
You're loosing the bliss.

 

[P F Tinmore]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

Then all it needs to not be a bantustan is allow some Jews among them,
but that's of course a racist idea...

Let's face it You have nothing to suggest but skin color baits and total moral degradation.
No discussion at all.

You need to read up.

 

[rylah]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

Then all it needs to not be a bantustan is allow some Jews among them,
but that's of course a racist idea...

Let's face it You have nothing to suggest but skin color baits and total moral degradation.
No discussion at all.

You need to read up.

Really, think it will make sense of Your obsession with framing everything in terms of skin color?
Try shake someone else's leg.

 

[rylah]

The "2 State Solution" is DEAD!

 

[Hollie]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

I’m betting you don’t know what Bantustan means. Why don’t you identify what a bantustsn government is, why you assign that term to the PA and how you are the spokes-Islamist in charge of what Hamas wants.

 

[Ropey]

Who are the Israeli's

They are still returning ...

… and only two of those tribes are Jews... and only one of those tribes are of Judah.

Get that into you.

 

[P F Tinmore]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the
Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to
self-determination, national independence, territorial integrity, national
unity and sovereignty without outside interference;

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

I’m betting you don’t know what Bantustan means. Why don’t you identify what a bantustsn government is, why you assign that term to the PA and how you are the spokes-Islamist in charge of what Hamas wants.

I know I have posted this before but obviously you have not seen it yet.

Bantustans start @ 15:00

 

[ForeverYoung436]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

I’m betting you don’t know what Bantustan means. Why don’t you identify what a bantustsn government is, why you assign that term to the PA and how you are the spokes-Islamist in charge of what Hamas wants.

I know I have posted this before but obviously you have not seen it yet.

Bantustans start @ 15:00

The Palestinians have only themselves to blame. As Abba Eban once famously said, "They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." The more peace offers they reject and the longer they wait to make an agreement, the more isolated and smaller those Bantustans get. Time is not on their side. But just like their spokesman Tinmore, they aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

I’m betting you don’t know what Bantustan means. Why don’t you identify what a bantustsn government is, why you assign that term to the PA and how you are the spokes-Islamist in charge of what Hamas wants.

I know I have posted this before but obviously you have not seen it yet.

Bantustans start @ 15:00

The Palestinians have only themselves to blame. As Abba Eban once famously said, "They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." The more peace offers they reject and the longer they wait to make an agreement, the more isolated and smaller those Bantustans get. Time is not on their side. But just like their spokesman Tinmore, they aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

The never answered question. Fatah lost the election. How are they the government in the West Bank?

 

[Hollie]

]RE: Who are the Israelis?
⁜→ "P F Tinmore, et al,

You better read this again.

(COMMENT)

This is diplomatic jargon and constructed in a particular way. It is the "union" of two sets.

✦ Set A are "the Palestinian People"
✦ Set B are "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

→ "the Palestinian People" ∪ "all people under foreign and colonial domination"​

The Palestinian people are NOT the same as the peoples under foreign and colonial domination.

It should also be understood that the Arab Palestinian People consider themselves a "state."
IF they are a STATE - THEN they are not a Non-Self-Governing Territory under the administration of a Colonial Power..

Most Respectfully,
R

So who controls Palestine?

A foreign military.

Refute away.

You’re not aware of the Islamic dictators who control two, competing Islamic terrorist mini-caliphates?

One of those Islamic dictatorships was elected as dictatorship in charge.

The PA is a bantustan government and Hamas does not want to get sucked into that.

I’m betting you don’t know what Bantustan means. Why don’t you identify what a bantustsn government is, why you assign that term to the PA and how you are the spokes-Islamist in charge of what Hamas wants.

I know I have posted this before but obviously you have not seen it yet.

Bantustans start @ 15:00

The silly YouTube videos you dump into multiple threads do nothing to address the questions posed previously.

I’m still curious to know why you use slogans that are irrelevant, the definitions of which you don’t understand, and, why anyone would take a hack like Virginia Tilley as an objective source.