Who Is The Greater Threat To Our Nation? Dude Who Wants To Be A Girl, Or Ammosexual Posting Top Secret Military Information To His Incel Chat Bros?

Seems i'm in need of an education Doug,...........:oops:~S~
We're all in need of an education! When I was at university, decades ago, two subjects I thought were both hard, and boring, were 'international relations', and 'international economics'. But it turns out that if you don't have at least a minimal grasp of them, you can't really understand what's going on. And the problem is, we're on a bobsled going faster and faster down the slope ... not ideal study conditions.

So it's no wonder so many people just grab on to the latest conspiracy theory. Everything is caused by a small group of powerful people, driven by motiveless malignancy. It's the classic Hollywood narrative, for everything from horror movies to cowboy movies. With a Lone Hero appearing to save the day.

On post-modernism. As usual, Wiki is a good place to start: [ Postmodernism - Wikipedia ]

If you're a book reader, a great place to start is a book written by (sane) liberal academics:

Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science – 1999
by Alan Sokal (Author), Jean Bricmont
[ https:// amazon.com/Fashionable-Nonsense-Postmodern-Intellectuals-Science/dp/0312204078/ ]

In 1996 physicist Alan Sokal published an essay in Social Text--an influential academic journal of cultural studies--touting the deep similarities between quantum gravitational theory and postmodern philosophy.

Soon thereafter, the essay was revealed as a brilliant parody, a catalog of nonsense written in the cutting-edge but impenetrable lingo of postmodern theorists. The event sparked a furious debate in academic circles and made the headlines of newspapers in the U.S. and abroad.

In Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, Sokal and his fellow physicist Jean Bricmont expand from where the hoax left off. In a delightfully witty and clear voice, the two thoughtfully and thoroughly dismantle the pseudo-scientific writings of some of the most fashionable French and American intellectuals. More generally, they challenge the widespread notion that scientific theories are mere "narrations" or social constructions.


But if you want a more up-to-date analysis, which covers how this disease of post-modernism has eaten
into all academic fields, this is the book:

Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault (Expanded Edition)
by Stephen R. C. Hicks (Author) n
[ https:// amazon.com/Explaining-Postmodernism-Skepticism-Socialism-Rousseau-ebook/dp/B005D53DG0/ ]

Tracing postmodernism from its roots in Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant to their development in thinkers such as Michel Foucault and Richard Rorty, philosopher Stephen Hicks provides a provocative account of why postmodernism has been the most vigorous intellectual movement of the late 20th century. Why do skeptical and relativistic arguments have such power in the contemporary intellectual world? Why do they have that power in the humanities but not in the sciences? Why has a significant portion of the political Left - the same Left that traditionally promoted reason, science, equality for all, and optimism - now switched to themes of anti-reason, anti-science, double standards, and cynicism? Explaining Postmodernism is intellectual history with a polemical twist, providing fresh insights into the debates underlying the furor over political correctness, multiculturalism, and the future of liberal democracy.

Once you see how this intellectual disease has taken over the modern Left, you'll see that the 'Left' today has very little in common with the traditional Left ... the Left that began, roughly, with the French Revolution, found its theoreticians in Marx and Engels, and its practitioners in the Bolsheviks and their successors.

A lot of conservative commentators talk about 'cultural Marxism', but that's almost a contradiction in terms. And in my experience most conservative thinkers actually know very little about Marxism. I listened to Jordan Peterson, whom I admire very much, on YouTube the other day, speaking about the Communist Manifesto. He's a good man, but he clearly simply had no understanding of the ABC's of Marxism.

It's not important, though, because Marxists (the real ones) are irrelevant today.
 
We're all in need of an education! When I was at university, decades ago, two subjects I thought were both hard, and boring, were 'international relations', and 'international economics'. But it turns out that if you don't have at least a minimal grasp of them, you can't really understand what's going on. And the problem is, we're on a bobsled going faster and faster down the slope ... not ideal study conditions.

So it's no wonder so many people just grab on to the latest conspiracy theory. Everything is caused by a small group of powerful people, driven by motiveless malignancy. It's the classic Hollywood narrative, for everything from horror movies to cowboy movies. With a Lone Hero appearing to save the day.

On post-modernism. As usual, Wiki is a good place to start: [ Postmodernism - Wikipedia ]

If you're a book reader, a great place to start is a book written by (sane) liberal academics:

Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science – 1999
by Alan Sokal (Author), Jean Bricmont
[ https:// amazon.com/Fashionable-Nonsense-Postmodern-Intellectuals-Science/dp/0312204078/ ]

In 1996 physicist Alan Sokal published an essay in Social Text--an influential academic journal of cultural studies--touting the deep similarities between quantum gravitational theory and postmodern philosophy.

Soon thereafter, the essay was revealed as a brilliant parody, a catalog of nonsense written in the cutting-edge but impenetrable lingo of postmodern theorists. The event sparked a furious debate in academic circles and made the headlines of newspapers in the U.S. and abroad.

In Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, Sokal and his fellow physicist Jean Bricmont expand from where the hoax left off. In a delightfully witty and clear voice, the two thoughtfully and thoroughly dismantle the pseudo-scientific writings of some of the most fashionable French and American intellectuals. More generally, they challenge the widespread notion that scientific theories are mere "narrations" or social constructions.


But if you want a more up-to-date analysis, which covers how this disease of post-modernism has eaten
into all academic fields, this is the book:

Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault (Expanded Edition)
by Stephen R. C. Hicks (Author) n
[ https:// amazon.com/Explaining-Postmodernism-Skepticism-Socialism-Rousseau-ebook/dp/B005D53DG0/ ]

Tracing postmodernism from its roots in Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant to their development in thinkers such as Michel Foucault and Richard Rorty, philosopher Stephen Hicks provides a provocative account of why postmodernism has been the most vigorous intellectual movement of the late 20th century. Why do skeptical and relativistic arguments have such power in the contemporary intellectual world? Why do they have that power in the humanities but not in the sciences? Why has a significant portion of the political Left - the same Left that traditionally promoted reason, science, equality for all, and optimism - now switched to themes of anti-reason, anti-science, double standards, and cynicism? Explaining Postmodernism is intellectual history with a polemical twist, providing fresh insights into the debates underlying the furor over political correctness, multiculturalism, and the future of liberal democracy.

Once you see how this intellectual disease has taken over the modern Left, you'll see that the 'Left' today has very little in common with the traditional Left ... the Left that began, roughly, with the French Revolution, found its theoreticians in Marx and Engels, and its practitioners in the Bolsheviks and their successors.

A lot of conservative commentators talk about 'cultural Marxism', but that's almost a contradiction in terms. And in my experience most conservative thinkers actually know very little about Marxism. I listened to Jordan Peterson, whom I admire very much, on YouTube the other day, speaking about the Communist Manifesto. He's a good man, but he clearly simply had no understanding of the ABC's of Marxism.

It's not important, though, because Marxists (the real ones) are irrelevant today.
now we know why so many from marxist nations are swimming across our borders.....they had it so good under communism that they couldnt stand it anymore
 
PROVE they are not engaging Russians....
That isn't how evidence works, buddy. You have to prove that they are.
Bob Nocock's rant solidifies who he is; a weak, freightened, insecure, pathetic man who looks to big guns and challenging others manhood to make him feel like he is somebody.
He is the ultimate nobody. He is an embarrassment to manhood and all humanhood.

Now, now, Mormon Bob isn't that bad. He's worse.
 
That isn't how evidence works, buddy. You have to prove that they are.


Now, now, Mormon Bob isn't that bad. He's worse.


No. Your side was BUSTED LYING. There are US troops in Ukraine.

Why was that truth hidden from the American people?

Do you think the President has the right to start wars overseas and fail to inform the public of that???
 
We're all in need of an education! When I was at university, decades ago, two subjects I thought were both hard, and boring, were 'international relations', and 'international economics'. But it turns out that if you don't have at least a minimal grasp of them, you can't really understand what's going on. And the problem is, we're on a bobsled going faster and faster down the slope ... not ideal study conditions.

So it's no wonder so many people just grab on to the latest conspiracy theory. Everything is caused by a small group of powerful people, driven by motiveless malignancy. It's the classic Hollywood narrative, for everything from horror movies to cowboy movies. With a Lone Hero appearing to save the day.

On post-modernism. As usual, Wiki is a good place to start: [ Postmodernism - Wikipedia ]

If you're a book reader, a great place to start is a book written by (sane) liberal academics:

Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science – 1999
by Alan Sokal (Author), Jean Bricmont
[ https:// amazon.com/Fashionable-Nonsense-Postmodern-Intellectuals-Science/dp/0312204078/ ]

In 1996 physicist Alan Sokal published an essay in Social Text--an influential academic journal of cultural studies--touting the deep similarities between quantum gravitational theory and postmodern philosophy.

Soon thereafter, the essay was revealed as a brilliant parody, a catalog of nonsense written in the cutting-edge but impenetrable lingo of postmodern theorists. The event sparked a furious debate in academic circles and made the headlines of newspapers in the U.S. and abroad.

In Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, Sokal and his fellow physicist Jean Bricmont expand from where the hoax left off. In a delightfully witty and clear voice, the two thoughtfully and thoroughly dismantle the pseudo-scientific writings of some of the most fashionable French and American intellectuals. More generally, they challenge the widespread notion that scientific theories are mere "narrations" or social constructions.


But if you want a more up-to-date analysis, which covers how this disease of post-modernism has eaten
into all academic fields, this is the book:

Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault (Expanded Edition)
by Stephen R. C. Hicks (Author) n
[ https:// amazon.com/Explaining-Postmodernism-Skepticism-Socialism-Rousseau-ebook/dp/B005D53DG0/ ]

Tracing postmodernism from its roots in Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant to their development in thinkers such as Michel Foucault and Richard Rorty, philosopher Stephen Hicks provides a provocative account of why postmodernism has been the most vigorous intellectual movement of the late 20th century. Why do skeptical and relativistic arguments have such power in the contemporary intellectual world? Why do they have that power in the humanities but not in the sciences? Why has a significant portion of the political Left - the same Left that traditionally promoted reason, science, equality for all, and optimism - now switched to themes of anti-reason, anti-science, double standards, and cynicism? Explaining Postmodernism is intellectual history with a polemical twist, providing fresh insights into the debates underlying the furor over political correctness, multiculturalism, and the future of liberal democracy.

Once you see how this intellectual disease has taken over the modern Left, you'll see that the 'Left' today has very little in common with the traditional Left ... the Left that began, roughly, with the French Revolution, found its theoreticians in Marx and Engels, and its practitioners in the Bolsheviks and their successors.

A lot of conservative commentators talk about 'cultural Marxism', but that's almost a contradiction in terms. And in my experience most conservative thinkers actually know very little about Marxism. I listened to Jordan Peterson, whom I admire very much, on YouTube the other day, speaking about the Communist Manifesto. He's a good man, but he clearly simply had no understanding of the ABC's of Marxism.

It's not important, though, because Marxists (the real ones) are irrelevant today.
Thx Doug
seems i've been "Postmodernism" for quite a while now......~S~
 
No. Your side was BUSTED LYING. There are US troops in Ukraine.

Why was that truth hidden from the American people?

Do you think the President has the right to start wars overseas and fail to inform the public of that???

There are a few advisor and trainers showing them how to use the weapons, and that was never really a secret. There were advisors and trainers over there before Putin invaded.

What Biden has done in Ukraine, he got Congress to go along every step of the way.
 
The leaker, described in the Post story as a lonely young man and gun enthusiast, was part of a chatroom of about two dozen people on Discord – a social media platform popular with video gamers – that shared a love of guns and military gear, The Post reported, citing an interview with the leaker’s friend who was also part of the group.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/13/politics/pentagon-leaked-documents-military-base/index.html


I guess not everyone who favors camo is a patriot.


Tactical X Treason.
He was a soldier wannabe child.
He was not a member of the actual military, probably couldn't hack the actual military.
His life revolved around a small group of wannabe manboys playing video games.
He was a typical 2020s weak, basement dwelling wannabe 20 something with no life and no prospect of a life.
 
He was a soldier wannabe child.
He was not a member of the actual military, probably couldn't hack the actual military.
His life revolved around a small group of wannabe manboys playing video games.
He was a typical 2020s weak, basement dwelling wannabe 20 something with no life and no prospect of a life.

Um, he's a member of the Air Force National Guard. They are every bit members of the military as anyone else in uniform, and he's probably going be charged under the UCMJ.

There were advisors and TRAITORS over there

Um, how are they traitors, exactly? I'm not sure why you are Rootin' for Putin here. Any of you folks on the crazy right.
 
Um, how are they traitors, exactly?



Easy.

Ukraine is a huge laundromat for corrupt treasonous US politicians.

Obviously you are huge supporter of US taxdollars going to Ukraine to fund bioweapons cough cough virus labs...

And the fact that resulted in a KICKBACK to Hunter Biden is of no concern to your treasonous ass. Anything that bankrupts America is good to you. Anything that takes US taxdollars and flushes them into the sewer is GOOD for you. You love ALL of that because YOU HATE TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, and AMERICA
 
Easy.

Ukraine is a huge laundromat for corrupt treasonous US politicians.

Obviously you are huge supporter of US taxdollars going to Ukraine to fund bioweapons cough cough virus labs...

And the fact that resulted in a KICKBACK to Hunter Biden is of no concern to your treasonous ass. Anything that bankrupts America is good to you. Anything that takes US taxdollars and flushes them into the sewer is GOOD for you. You love ALL of that because YOU HATE TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, and AMERICA
That's a load of utter bollocks.



Post some of your sources..
 
Easy.

Ukraine is a huge laundromat for corrupt treasonous US politicians.

Obviously you are huge supporter of US taxdollars going to Ukraine to fund bioweapons cough cough virus labs...

And the fact that resulted in a KICKBACK to Hunter Biden is of no concern to your treasonous ass. Anything that bankrupts America is good to you. Anything that takes US taxdollars and flushes them into the sewer is GOOD for you. You love ALL of that because YOU HATE TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, and AMERICA
JoeB doesn't believe that the Biden family is corrupt. He thinks Hunter is The Good Son, that the Big Guy is doing a Jim Dandy job as President and that Joe Potatohead never sexually abused his daughter and isn't a pedo. He beleived Biden the other day when Biden said the AWB reduced crime and that he never talked business with Hunter. He doesn't think that Potatohead caused this massive inflation or that he screwed up the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Everything bad in the world is Trump's fault. He even thinks The Worthless Negro was a great President, is not married to transsexual and was actually born in Hawaii. He even thinks Obamacare was a good idea. The stupid sonofabitch is glad that the Communitsts in Vietnam killed Americans. He is bat shit crazy with hate of Kyle Rittenhouse. JoeB is really that confused of a Moon Bat.
 
That's a load of utter bollocks.



Post some of your sources..


The Dems and the Zionist 911 W "Biden Republicans" have an army of taxpayer funded shills like this poster....

WE pay for them = BIG GOVERNMENT AT "WORK"
 
Wow... if you weren't so vapid, you'd be amusing

oeB doesn't believe that the Biden family is corrupt. He thinks Hunter is The Good Son, that the Big Guy is doing a Jim Dandy job as President and that Joe Potatohead never sexually abused his daughter and isn't a pedo.

I think Hunter has a lot of issues, as do millions of Americans who suffer from substance abuse.
Biden is doing a fine job as President. I'm not seeing riots in the streets

He beleived Biden the other day when Biden said the AWB reduced crime and that he never talked business with Hunter. He doesn't think that Potatohead caused this massive inflation or that he screwed up the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Nope, most of the causes of inflation are global (commodity price increases, which we could solve by dropping Trump's tariffs) and due to a labor shortage (which we could cure by admitting more immigrants) You guys got what you wanted, and you are unhappy with the results.

For Afghanistan, I'm glad Biden finally got us out of there... the thing was beyond pointless by 2021.



Everything bad in the world is Trump's fault.
Pretty much.
He even thinks The Worthless Negro was a great President, is not married to transsexual and was actually born in Hawaii. He even thinks Obamacare was a good idea.
The 22 million people who got health insurance do, definitely.

The stupid sonofabitch is glad that the Communitsts in Vietnam killed Americans.
No, I'm unhappy that we killed so many people because our politicians lied to us. (Both parties.)

He is bat shit crazy with hate of Kyle Rittenhouse.
The same way I'd be with anyone who gunned down two unarmed people in the middle of the street.
 

Forum List

Back
Top