Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No crap science and agendas do not hold water.Because the U.S. holds 1/3 of the entire world population of evangelical Christians, and they make up the base of the republican party. And science is not compatible with Christian fundamentalism. To them Jesus is in charge of the climate, so who cares?
They already look stupid and the congress that has help the science based agendas that have said, "Well we should do this consequences be dam" or "if there is a problem then we can deal with it" should be neutered and tossed back into the fray with the common folk.Why don't we all just do this, wait until the sky falls and the world comes to an end. I'm patient!!Probably because we actually understand the scientific method.
Every time reality doesn't fit the conclusions, climate-change defenders never consider the conclusion is flawed...they go back and change the data to fit the conclusion. The conclusion is set in stone and the data is malleable, where the scientific method requires the opposite.
Just as an example:
Scientists conclude that global warming never went on 'hiatus'
If we do that, and the sky doesn't fall and the world doesn't come to an end, there will be no faith in science whatsoever. The scientific community will look stupid, academia will look stupid, the folks who defended them will be resentful, as they will also look stupid, politicians who promoted the errant, misinformed, misguided policies will look stupid, the UN will look stupid and the President will look stupid.
That's a lot of incentive NOT to do nothing. So, what they will do is do something...anything...spent billions, force ridiculous regulations, stifle the economy, increase energy costs...then claim victory saying what they did saved the world...when instead, they just saved their reputations...saved face.
Why don't we all just do this, wait until the sky falls and the world comes to an end. I'm patient!!Probably because we actually understand the scientific method.
Every time reality doesn't fit the conclusions, climate-change defenders never consider the conclusion is flawed...they go back and change the data to fit the conclusion. The conclusion is set in stone and the data is malleable, where the scientific method requires the opposite.
Just as an example:
Scientists conclude that global warming never went on 'hiatus'
If we do that, and the sky doesn't fall and the world doesn't come to an end, there will be no faith in science whatsoever. The scientific community will look stupid, academia will look stupid, the folks who defended them will be resentful, as they will also look stupid, politicians who promoted the errant, misinformed, misguided policies will look stupid, the UN will look stupid and the President will look stupid.
That's a lot of incentive NOT to do nothing. So, what they will do is do something...anything...spent billions, force ridiculous regulations, stifle the economy, increase energy costs...then claim victory saying what they did saved the world...when instead, they just saved their reputations...saved face.
STUNNING program of hype and propaganda.
Ya bro.No crap science and agendas do not hold water.Because the U.S. holds 1/3 of the entire world population of evangelical Christians, and they make up the base of the republican party. And science is not compatible with Christian fundamentalism. To them Jesus is in charge of the climate, so who cares?
The Earth is ever changing concerning water and land masses. Buried cities in watery graves throughout the world are evidence of that. Even the fauna buried under the polar ice show that once it was thriving with plant life before it was buried. The center of the United States is full of limestone quarries where you can go even today and discover that these places were once ocean floor bottoms.
Why don't we all just do this, wait until the sky falls and the world comes to an end. I'm patient!!Probably because we actually understand the scientific method.
Every time reality doesn't fit the conclusions, climate-change defenders never consider the conclusion is flawed...they go back and change the data to fit the conclusion. The conclusion is set in stone and the data is malleable, where the scientific method requires the opposite.
Just as an example:
Scientists conclude that global warming never went on 'hiatus'
Because, we won't be wasting 80 trillion. Instead we will be investing in energy that does not pollute, is cheaper, and does not require that we destroy the environment to use it.Why don't we all just do this, wait until the sky falls and the world comes to an end. I'm patient!!Probably because we actually understand the scientific method.
Every time reality doesn't fit the conclusions, climate-change defenders never consider the conclusion is flawed...they go back and change the data to fit the conclusion. The conclusion is set in stone and the data is malleable, where the scientific method requires the opposite.
Just as an example:
Scientists conclude that global warming never went on 'hiatus'
Why don't we waste $80 trillion to cool the planet 0.1 degrees in 2080?
hell I dunno!!
Because, we won't be wasting 80 trillion. Instead we will be investing in energy that does not pollute, is cheaper, and does not require that we destroy the environment to use it.Why don't we all just do this, wait until the sky falls and the world comes to an end. I'm patient!!Probably because we actually understand the scientific method.
Every time reality doesn't fit the conclusions, climate-change defenders never consider the conclusion is flawed...they go back and change the data to fit the conclusion. The conclusion is set in stone and the data is malleable, where the scientific method requires the opposite.
Just as an example:
Scientists conclude that global warming never went on 'hiatus'
Why don't we waste $80 trillion to cool the planet 0.1 degrees in 2080?
Some of us don't want or have forty thousand on a new vehicle. So we will keep our old ones.And who gives a damn about running an inefficient slow old rust bucket like that?
Why don't we all just do this, wait until the sky falls and the world comes to an end. I'm patient!!Probably because we actually understand the scientific method.
Every time reality doesn't fit the conclusions, climate-change defenders never consider the conclusion is flawed...they go back and change the data to fit the conclusion. The conclusion is set in stone and the data is malleable, where the scientific method requires the opposite.
Just as an example:
Scientists conclude that global warming never went on 'hiatus'
Why don't we waste $80 trillion to cool the planet 0.1 degrees in 2080?
Uh.....uh, because they're stupid white people who's brain consist of concrete and gator spit. Uh, because they're bought and paid for with special interest money...uh, because they're from a country that can see Russia from its porch, hell I dunno!!
And who gives a damn about running an inefficient slow old rust bucket like that?
