Why are ultra right-wing idiots consumed with just .06% of the population?

WaitingFor2020 said:
Trumpie tweets no more transgenders in the military. Stupid asshat Texas debates public bathroom legislation.
All this bullshit takes time, energy and money. And for fucking what? .06% of the population.

'Pubes constantly talk about what they want to do for the middle class, all the while consuming our time and their time with just .06% of the population.
It's nothing more than another excuse to DO NOTHING, protect the interests of the 1% and then go home on recess.

How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States
By Andrew R. Flores, Jody L. Herman, Gary J. Gates, and Taylor N. T. Brown
June 2016
Utilizing data from the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), which includes representative state-level surveys, Williams Institute scholars provide up-to-date estimates of the percentage and number of adults who identify as transgender in the United States. Approximately 0.6% of adults in the United States, or 1.4 million individuals, identify as transgender.

How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States - Williams Institute
Click to expand...


Why ARE you so infatuated with 0.6% of the population?
 
SassyIrishLass said:
bodecea said:
Mousterian said:
And all those manly men cost us a small fortune.
Analysis | The military spends five times as much on Viagra as it would on transgender troops’ medical care
Click to expand...
They're not manly men if they need viagra.
Click to expand...

That explains California :lmao:Stepped in that one didn't ya?

How Much Viagra Does Your State Use?
Posted by: Don Amerman in Erectile Dysfunction December 6, 2012 0 20240 Views


Summary of Viagra Use By State

Here’s an interesting fact: California accounts for the largest percentage of orders for Viagra, making up 13% of the orders shipped by AccessRx.com.
Click to expand...



Well duh, porn industry.
 
Billo_Really said:
Dale Smith said:
Much appreciated and that is all I ask....you come to a different conclusion than I respect the fact that at the very least you took the time to peruse the info I posted....good on ya.
Click to expand...
I Googled those topics and this is what I got...







You're going to have to post the specific articles you were referring to, because I can't determine what you were talking about.
Click to expand...

I will start with the Iron Mountain Report and what I found. In 1961, the Kennedy admin commissioned a study to be done on what America would be like without the threat of war. JFK knew that the Cold War was being propped up by the military industrial complex that had built the U.S.S.R into a contained but formidable opponent and they we were all being played. He had 15 of the most intelligent men in different fields of endeavors brought together at Iron Mountain, a government facility to hash out their views if the world was to ever enter an age of peace. It was completed in 1966 and it was leaked by someone that after having read it and being horrified by the coldness of it and the disregard for the people that they viewed as mere drones in a hive that have to be controlled, was compelled to get it out there. Of course it was claimed to be nothing but satire and a hoax. Leonard C. Lewin was penned as the one that would say that it was a hoax but here in lies the problem. Pretty much everything discussed in the Iron Mountain Report has come to pass one way or another over the last 50 years. Another problem with it is that it is too detailed with long, boring parts that if it was satire, the average reader would have quit reading long before the ending of it and frankly, there was nothing funny or even mildly amusing about this report. Here is what this "think tank" group said about creating a threat if war wasn't in the equation in order to keep the serfs from becoming non-compliant.

"Previous studies have taken the desirability of peace, the importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest “good” for the greatest number, the “dignity” of the individual, the desirability of maximum health and longevity, and other such wishful premises as axiomatic values necessary for the justification of a study of peace issues. We have not found them so. We have attempted to apply the standards of physical science to our thinking, the principal characteristic of which is not quantification, as is popularly believed, but that, in Whitehead’s words, “…it ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetic and moral judgments.

The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in its “legitimacy,” or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, of reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer…. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood.

Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. This is where the space-race proposals, in many ways so well suited as economic substitutes for war, fall short. The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging.


When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war … the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. In this respect, the possible substitute enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life. … It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. …

It is true that the rate of pollution could be increased selectively for this purpose. … But the pollution problem has been so widely publicized in recent years that it seems highly improbable that a program of deliberate environmental poisoning could be implemented in a politically acceptable manner.
However unlikely some of the possible alternative enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found of credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to come about without social disintegration. It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be invented.
 
Billo_Really said:
Dale Smith said:
Much appreciated and that is all I ask....you come to a different conclusion than I respect the fact that at the very least you took the time to peruse the info I posted....good on ya.
Click to expand...
I Googled those topics and this is what I got...







You're going to have to post the specific articles you were referring to, because I can't determine what you were talking about.
Click to expand...


Quotes from the Club Of Rome, an offshoot of the U.N shortly after the release of the Iron Mountain Report.

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warming.. would fit the bill.. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself….” – Club Of Rome

The Club Of Rome’s 1972 environmental best-seller “The Limits To Growth”, examined five variables in the original model: world population, industrialization, pollution, food production and resource depletion. I remember Saturday morning cartoons back in that time but Sunday morning they had kid friendly environmental programming warning of the dangers mentioned above.

Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the
industrialized civilizations collapse?
Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong,

James Delingpole of The Telegraph elaborates :

The reason I have become so obsessed with “global warming” in the last few years is not because I’m particularly interested in the “how many drowning polar bears can dance on the head of a pin” non-argument which hysterical sites like RealClimate and bloggers like Joe Romm are striving so desperately to keep on a life support machine. It’s because unlike some I’ve read widely enough to see the bigger picture. One thing I’ve learned in this wide reading is how obsessed so many of the key thinkers in the green movement are with the notion of “overpopulation.” As one of their favourite think tanks, the Club of Rome, puts it: “Earth has a cancer and the cancer is man.” This belief explains, inter alia, why the “science” behind AGW is so dodgy: because the science didn’t come first. What came first was the notion that mankind was a problem and was doing harm to the planet. The “science” was then simply tortured until it fitted in with this notion.

Dr Tim Ball details how the science of climate change came to be “tortured until it fitted in with [the] notion” :

Almost every aspect of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) work is manipulated, selected, and controlled, to prove human CO2 is causing global warming. The objective was to prove the hypothesis, not to perform objective science.

The goal was established by the Club of Rome whose member, Maurice Strong transmitted and translated it into world government policy through the United Nations.

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warming.. would fit the bill…. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself….we believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or….one invented for the purpose.” — Club of Rome

He was assisted by politicians like Al Gore and Tim Wirth. In 1993 the latter did not hide the naked political objective.

“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.“ – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

They were aided by national weather agencies and bureaucratic scientists with similar political persuasions appointed to the IPCC.

They claimed their goal was achieved in the 2007 IPCC Report which concluded,

“Another unusual aspect of recent climate change is its cause: past climate changes were natural in origin, whereas most of the warming of the past 50 years is attributable to human activities.”

All the CO2 numbers used by the IPCC are very poor estimates and designed to underline the human impact. They are meaningless figures from the total volumes to the annual flows and the human inputs as depicted in the IPCC carbon cycle (diagram). See more »

————

IPCC wanted to prove human CO2 was causing global warming as part of their belief that industrialized populations would exhaust all resources and had to be shut down. Their only objective was to show human production was steadily, inexorably increasing. Their calculations predetermine that, because human CO2 production is directly linked to population increase. A population increase guarantees a CO2 increase. It is another of their circular arguments that has no basis in science.

See more at: IPCC Control Calculations of Annual Human CO2 Production For Political Agenda

•••

So is the planet overpopulated?

Tim Ball has done the numbers and concludes, “The world is not overpopulated. That fallacy is perpetuated in all environmental research, policy and planning including global warming and latterly climate change.”

Overpopulation: The Fallacy Behind The Fallacy Of Global Warming
Posted on WUWT on January 5, 2014

413ai6gfa0l.jpg
Guest essay by Dr. Tim Ball

Global Warming was just one issue The Club of Rome (TCOR) targeted in its campaign to reduce world population. In 1993 the Club’s co-founder, Alexander King with Bertrand Schneider wrote The First Global Revolution stating,

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

They believe all these problems are created by humans but exacerbated by a growing population using technology. “Changed attitudes and behavior” basically means what it has meant from the time Thomas Malthus raised the idea the world was overpopulated. He believed charity and laws to help the poor were a major cause of the problem and it was necessary to reduce population through rules and regulations. TCOR ideas all ended up in the political activities of the Rio 1992 conference organized by Maurice Strong (a TCOR member) under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

The assumptions and objectives became the main structure of Agenda 21, the master plan for the 21st Century. The global warming threat was confronted at Rio through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It was structured to predetermine scientific proof that human CO2 was one contribution of the “common enemy”.

The IPCC was very successful. Despite all the revelations about corrupted science and their failed predictions (projections) CO2 remains central to global attention about energy and environment. For example, several websites, many provided by government, list CO2 output levels for new and used cars. Automobile companies work to build cars with lower CO2 output and, if for no other reason than to appear green, use it in advertising. The automotive industry, which has the scientists to know better, collectively surrenders to eco-bullying about CO2. They are not alone. They get away with it because they pass on the unnecessary costs to a befuddled “trying to do the right thing” population. See more »

—————

TCOR and later UNEP’s Agenda 21 adopted and expanded the Malthusian idea of overpopulation to all resources making it the central tenet of all their politics and policies. The IPCC was set up to assign the blame of global warming and latterly climate change on human produced CO2 from an industrialized expanding population. They both developed from false assumptions, used manipulated data and science, which they combined into computer models whose projections were, not surprisingly, wrong. The result is the fallacy of global warming due to human CO2 is a subset built on the fallacy of overpopulation.

See full article here : Overpopulation: The Fallacy Behind The Fallacy Of Global Warming | Watts Up With That?

•••
UPDATE

via Herald Sun – Andrew Bolt :
Paltridge: this warming pause may destroy the reputation of science
Temperatures have not risen for at least 15 years. The pause now threatens to expose how much scientists sold their souls for cash and fame, warns emeritus professor Garth Paltridge, author of The Climate Caper: Facts and Fallacies of Global Warming and a former chief research scientist with the CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research:

…there has been no significant warming over the most recent fifteen or so years…

In the light of all this, we have at least to consider the possibility that the scientific establishment behind the global warming issue has been drawn into the trap of seriously overstating the climate problem … in its effort to promote the cause. It is a particularly nasty trap in the context of science, because it risks destroying, perhaps for centuries to come, the unique and hard-won reputation for honesty which is the basis of society’s respect for scientific endeavour…

The trap was set in the late 1970s or thereabouts when the environmental movement first realised that doing something about global warming would play to quite a number of its social agendas. At much the same time, it became accepted wisdom around the corridors of power that government-funded scientists (that is, most scientists) should be required to obtain a goodly fraction of their funds and salaries from external sources—external anyway to their own particular organisation.

The scientists in environmental research laboratories, since they are not normally linked to any particular private industry, were forced to seek funds from other government departments. In turn this forced them to accept the need for advocacy and for the manipulation of public opinion. For that sort of activity, an arm’s-length association with the environmental movement would be a union made in heaven…

The trap was partially sprung in climate research when a number of the relevant scientists began to enjoy the advocacy business. The enjoyment was based on a considerable increase in funding and employment opportunity. The increase was not so much on the hard-science side of things but rather in the emerging fringe institutes and organisations devoted, at least in part, to selling the message of climatic doom. A new and rewarding research lifestyle emerged which involved the giving of advice to all types and levels of government, the broadcasting of unchallengeable opinion to the general public, and easy justification for attendance at international conferences—this last in some luxury by normal scientific experience, and at a frequency previously unheard of…

The trap was fully sprung when many of the world’s major national academies of science (such as the … Australian Academy of Science) persuaded themselves to issue reports giving support to the conclusions of the IPCC. The reports were touted as national assessments that were supposedly independent of the IPCC and of each other, but of necessity were compiled with the assistance of, and in some cases at the behest of, many of the scientists involved in the IPCC international machinations. In effect, the academies, which are the most prestigious of the institutions of science, formally nailed their colours to the mast of the politically correct.

Since that time three or four years ago, there has been no comfortable way for the scientific community to raise the spectre of serious uncertainty about the forecasts of climatic disaster… It can no longer escape prime responsibility if it should turn out in the end that doing something in the name of mitigation of global warming is the costliest scientific mistake ever visited on humanity.

This is why scientific organisations have – tragically – become almost the last places to hear the truth about the global warming pause. Too many reputations are now at stake.

(Climatism emboldened)

•••

UPDATE

MUST SEE You Tube – James Corbett of the Corbett Report, debunks the myth of overpopulation.


The Corbett Report | The Last Word on Overpopulation

•••

FINAL WORD :

The ultimate prize to the eco-activists and their big government benefactors is the control of carbon, which would touch every aspect of our daily lives. Consequently, greenhouse gases and global climate change are of paramount importance to the eco-activist agenda. While much has been written about global climate change over many years, the basic aspects of the issue haven’t changed; we are asked to forget things we once knew and ignore the simplest hypothesis that the earth’s climate is ever changing.

Climate Change Deliberation: Taking Occam’s Razor to Proxy Data — The Patriot Post

•••

UPDATE

UN still pushing discredited “overpopulation” crisis

•••


Related :
United Nations Related :

Club Of Rome Related:

CACA Hot Links :

Quote Source : The Green Agenda
•••

“Global Warming” is just the latest in a long line of hysterical crusades to which we seem to be increasingly susceptible. – Thomas Sowell

•••

Advertisements
Share this:
Related
12-l.jpg

The Creator, Fabricator And Proponent Of Global Warming - Maurice Strong
In "Agenda 21"

screen-shot-2015-02-13-at-february-13-10-11-59-pm.png

Shock News : UN Wants To Ban Private Property And Create "Human Habitat Settlement Zones"
In "Agenda 21"

screen-shot-2013-08-26-at-august-26-12-22-16-pm.png

UN-Settled Science
In "Agenda 21"

19 Comments on ““In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming””

  1. f300eac052c98d1a1a62d6c71965d289
    #Agenda21-In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming | CACA | Defending Sanity in the Uppity Down World
    January 25, 2014 at 2:11 am
    Trackback :

    #Agenda21-In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming | CACA | Defending Sanity in the Uppity Down World

    Like

    Reply
    • 761576cc6b7eb5c97649e142b322195a
      esms1999
      September 5, 2016 at 9:16 pm
      if you wish to unite man you need an evil or a thing we must fear every second of our lives. like annihilation by a force beyond our reach or another intelligent species trying to exterminate a being with power beyond comprehension we must fight. we need not find our enemy we must create it.

      Like

      Reply
  2. c1e9826e23d060cc7057828ab43e130e
    Ken McMurtrie
    February 9, 2014 at 8:32 am
    Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
    This is either the real truth or it is not.
    How can it not be true? These statements have been made. The ensuing activities of all “global warming” activists have confirmed the truth. Prostituting themselves and insulting scientific intelligence.
    Brainwashing the public and governments. All convincingly being show to be a fraud by the truths in this post.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. f300eac052c98d1a1a62d6c71965d289
    #Agenda21-“In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Climatism | Defending Sanity in the Uppity Down World
    June 29, 2014 at 1:04 pm
    […] “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming”; […]

    Like

    Reply
  4. 0e6d3879ff80f3979d9f9d641ec6a32a
    Don’t Trust But Verify: Questioning Corrupt and Politicized Climate Science | Nice Deb
    February 3, 2015 at 6:23 am
    […] Climatism: “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” […]

    Like

    Reply
  5. de0a287bc1e3a2a58f5b7eb8f6cebd19
    didyouhear
    July 18, 2015 at 7:17 pm
    Reblogged this on http://www.didyouhearpodcast.com [email protected].

    Like

    Reply
  6. Snap! Warmists Come Up With New Way To Combat Hotcoldwetdry » Pirate's Cove
    December 3, 2015 at 7:04 am
    […] But, really, would Warmists want a fix (for their mostly made up issue)? Not likely, because ‘climate change’ allows them to push for more fascistic policies and higher taxes/fees. Don’t ever forget what the leftist Club For Rome stated […]

    Like

    Reply
  7. “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | www.didyouhearpodcast.com [email protected]
    December 15, 2015 at 8:49 pm
    […] Source: “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” […]

    Like

    Reply
  8. Bare with me as I show you how your textbooks want to kill you – Sovereign Viper's Den
    February 25, 2016 at 3:22 am
    […] Holmgren even claims in the book that he is basing much of his ideology off of the Club of Rome and … […]

    Like

    Reply
  9. db00c2be1dba05947db073565c2a7033
    Climate Change Won’t Kill You – Having No Electrical Power Will | Climatism
    April 15, 2016 at 1:35 am
    […] “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming”; […]

    Like

    Reply
  10. db00c2be1dba05947db073565c2a7033
    David Attenborough & The Population Matters Organisation | Climatism
    May 12, 2016 at 8:07 am
    […] A misanthropic agenda engineered by the environmental movement in the mid 1970’s, who realised that doing something about “global warming” would play to quite a number of its social agendas “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming”; […]

    Like

    Reply
  11. db00c2be1dba05947db073565c2a7033
    Today’s UN Climate Fraud | Climatism
    June 2, 2016 at 9:34 am
    […] “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Clima… […]

    Like

    Reply
  12. db00c2be1dba05947db073565c2a7033
    Blotting Out Global Warming Fantasies… | Climatism
    August 29, 2016 at 10:27 am
    […] “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warm…” – Club Of Rome […]

    Like

    Reply
  13. db00c2be1dba05947db073565c2a7033
    The Great “Extreme Weather” Climate Change Propaganda Con | Climatism
    February 23, 2017 at 1:37 am
    […] “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Clima… […]

    Like

    Reply
  14. db00c2be1dba05947db073565c2a7033
    UN “Green Climate Fund” Running Dry | Climatism
    April 20, 2017 at 10:44 am
    […] “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming”; […]

    Like

    Reply
  15. Who the 'Establishment' Really Is
    May 5, 2017 at 4:29 am
    […] “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat with demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned namely mistaking systems for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” – ‘The First Global Revolution’, a Report by the Council of the Club of Rome by Alexander … […]

    Like

    Reply
  16. cropped-aeclogo.png
    Climate Change – Abrupt Earth Changes
    July 31, 2017 at 1:43 am
    […] “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming”; […]

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

Leave a Reply

← New study suggests global warming decreases storm activity and extreme weather
Shock news : UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity →
Search for:
Recent Posts
Follow Climatism via Email
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



Categories
Archives
Blogroll
Blogs I Follow
January 2014
M T W T F S S
« Dec Feb »
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

How many people have to conveniently die around the Clintons before someone starts looking into it?

< Previous Thread

More proof MSM bias... watched CBS evening news... 3,000 new jobs by Foxconn...

Next Thread >

Similar threads

berg80
  • Locked
We are finding out just how ineffectual the remedy is when norms are shattered.
2 3 4
Replies
66
Views
637
AyeCantSeeYou
AyeCantSeeYou
Doc7505
DEI efforts in US Armed Forces ineffective, run ‘opposite of the military ethos’: study
Replies
5
Views
217
ThunderKiss1965
ThunderKiss1965
FranklinRoosevelt_FTW
Why aren’t the politicians talking about one of the greatest issues facing America. The Obesity rate and our unhealthy population
7 8 9
Replies
173
Views
2K
22lcidw
2
H
Zone1 They caught the murderer of the store clerk.
2
Replies
21
Views
384
Carl in Michigan
Carl in Michigan
mudwhistle
Maxine Waters Says Millions Of Americans Are Threatened By MAGA While Ignoring All Of The Attacks Against Jews Going On This Weekend
2 3
Replies
53
Views
1K
Hollie
H

Latest Discussions

BackAgain
Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!
617 618 619
Replies
12K
Views
1M
NotfooledbyW
NotfooledbyW
bigrebnc1775
Trump's New York conviction
Replies
2
Views
12
wamose
W
Missouri_Mike
Schumer, clapping for himself
2
Replies
36
Views
172
22lcidw
2
excalibur
Elderly Trump Supporter In Critical Condition After ‘Politically Motivated’ Attack, Police Say
Replies
11
Views
62
j-mac
j-mac
Doc7505
Trump Is Suddenly Too Old
2
Replies
29
Views
98
22lcidw
2
View more…

Forum List

Back
Top