iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
you just said you'd believe the accuser first - this would most certainly make you partisan.those 65 women also said he wouldn't have been either.yea, she had to clean up her profiles first. why is that?Because Dr. Ford wasn't ready to go public.
also - do you believe 1 person over 65? if so, why?
those 65 women weren't in the room with her.
you're taking it on faith a highly cleaned up "profile" is telling the truth w/o proof or witnesses. just her own word.
if this were coming after someone you supported, would it be enough to change your mind or suddenly hate the accused? esp if 65 people said that was WAY out of character? if you say it's enough then all i need is 1 person to say you did this to them and then it must be true.
that is in essence what you are saying so unless you're willing to be found "guilty" by the same actions, you'd be a hypocrite to do it here.
lol... i am a female & would believe the accuser first. you seem to think i am partisan when it comes to something like this. you are mistaken.
alcohol is playing a role in this. someone who wouldn't normally act like an animal sober - can very well turn into one after having a belly full of it.
did you stop & think that this line of questioning & the inevitable course that it is taking already had anything to do with her reluctance? imagine what it would have been like back then.
THIS is why females always weigh one way or the other what they are risking by going public. i wonder what rush limbaugh has in his bag of goodies ready to go when he opens his show today. look what he did to sandra fluke's reputation & that had nothing to do with an attempted rape.
BUTnow, the victim is willing to go under oath. so..... perhaps it will be *you* who is the hypocritical partisan one. btw... the (D)s went right after franken demanding his resignation & he complied.
also - just because she said alcohol was involved doesn't mean there was. you're choosing to believe it to help you justify believing the one doing the accusing. the fact you will believe the accuser w/o proof is quite telling and *why* we have a legal system in place that is not supposed to get emotional and just base off facts.