Why did Feinstein sit on the Kavanaugh letter?

[LordBrownTrout]

The one person the Fake Accuser cites as being a witness denies the incident took place.

the other dude in the room? shocker.

She presented no evidence and only mentioned one other person.

You are a dupe for the Left who insist that Kavanaugh prove his innocence.

Creep.

So what if he's gullty....confirm and move on.

An anonymous and fake accusation is not proof of guilt, bub.

This is all "He said, she said".

And it is coming out now ?

If the left is conisistent, there will be 20 women start to come forward with the same line of bullshit.

Yep.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

/----/ Can't you address the democRAT double standard? "lol.... but but HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" is not a rebuttal.

It is actually when BUT HILLARY!!! is not a rebuttal from your end of the stick.

/----/ But Hillary set the standard for harassing women accusers. She deserves the credit, don't ya think?.

That's stupid, so no

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

If the dems owned the senate and Hillary won...Garland could be accused of being Jack the Ripper and he'd still be confirmed.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It is actually when BUT HILLARY!!! is not a rebuttal from your end of the stick.

/----/ But Hillary set the standard for harassing women accusers. She deserves the credit, don't ya think?.

That's stupid, so no

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

If the dems owned the senate and Hillary won...Garland could be accused of being Jack the Ripper and he'd still be confirmed.

Yep, and the dems would confirm him.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Diane Feinstein Sat on Letter With Bogus Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh for Months | LifeNews.com

So here Brett Kavanaugh was brought in to answer any and all questions and concerns, and the whole time Diane Feinstein sat on the letter about him assaulting that woman, that is, up until they are all ready to vote.

Really? How does that work exactly?

Might want to ask why the entire committee sat on the letter. They all knew...that's why the GOP could parade all those other women out so quickly.

That is a complete fabrication on your part. You disgust even libtards sometimes.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Notice how.....

When someone shows up and says "Who cares ?"

The left all shut up.

The right has no need to defend anything.

Confirm him and move on.

 

[Vel]

Diane Feinstein Sat on Letter With Bogus Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh for Months | LifeNews.com

So here Brett Kavanaugh was brought in to answer any and all questions and concerns, and the whole time Diane Feinstein sat on the letter about him assaulting that woman, that is, up until they are all ready to vote.

Really? How does that work exactly?

The woman didn’t want to go public with the accusation. And who can blame her. There is nothing ahead for her but attacks and abuse.

She changed her mind. She hoped he would be stopped some other way. When it didn’t happen, she went public.

What crap. Kindly tell me what woman is attacked and doesn't remember exactly where it happened, when it happened and didn't even tell her closest friends? This is the democrats made up hail mary attempt to delay this nomination beyond the midterms. Nothing else. This woman can lie with impunity, knowing that democrats never have to answer for it. Example.. Keith Ellison

 

[DrLove]

/----/ But Hillary set the standard for harassing women accusers. She deserves the credit, don't ya think?.

That's stupid, so no

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

If the dems owned the senate and Hillary won...Garland could be accused of being Jack the Ripper and he'd still be confirmed.

Yep, and the dems would confirm him.

Nonsense ^ But we expect that from you Orangelings

 

[Polishprince]

Diane Feinstein Sat on Letter With Bogus Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh for Months | LifeNews.com

So here Brett Kavanaugh was brought in to answer any and all questions and concerns, and the whole time Diane Feinstein sat on the letter about him assaulting that woman, that is, up until they are all ready to vote.

Really? How does that work exactly?

The idea was to hold it off to the end, to leave insufficient time for Mr. Kavanaugh to defend himself on the charges before the vote.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

That's stupid, so no

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

If the dems owned the senate and Hillary won...Garland could be accused of being Jack the Ripper and he'd still be confirmed.

Yep, and the dems would confirm him.

Nonsense ^ But we expect that from you Orangelings

When assholes of Mass. keep electing the famous "Liar of the Senate" when he should have been doing time.....

There is your nonsense.

Fuck off.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Diane Feinstein Sat on Letter With Bogus Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh for Months | LifeNews.com

So here Brett Kavanaugh was brought in to answer any and all questions and concerns, and the whole time Diane Feinstein sat on the letter about him assaulting that woman, that is, up until they are all ready to vote.

Really? How does that work exactly?

The idea was to hold it off to the end, to leave insufficient time for Mr. Kavanaugh to defend himself on the charges before the vote.

They will confirm him and the left will lose more votes for this kind of bullshit.

They can't do enough to lose.

 

[DrLove]

/----/ Can't you address the democRAT double standard? "lol.... but but HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" is not a rebuttal.

It is actually when BUT HILLARY!!! is not a rebuttal from your end of the stick.

/----/ But Hillary set the standard for harassing women accusers. She deserves the credit, don't ya think?.

That's stupid, so no

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

She'll be testifying. Collins, Corker, Heitkamp, Flake and others will insist on it prior to a vote.
Sorry, but for the ladies especially, not holding out on a vote prior to a hearing would be political suicide.

 

[DrLove]

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

If the dems owned the senate and Hillary won...Garland could be accused of being Jack the Ripper and he'd still be confirmed.

Yep, and the dems would confirm him.

Nonsense ^ But we expect that from you Orangelings

When assholes of Mass. keep electing the famous "Liar of the Senate" when he should have been doing time.....

There is your nonsense.

Fuck off.

WTF are you babbling about now?

 

[iceberg]

Notice how.....

When someone shows up and says "Who cares ?"

The left all shut up.

The right has no need to defend anything.

Confirm him and move on.

at first it was kavanaugh put her in a closet. no one cared.
then it was in the bathroom he tried to bust a move. no one cared.
now it's in a bedroom with 2 drunk boys and loud music to stifle the screaming.

if no one cares i'm sure the story will get worse.

 

[The Purge]

Professor accusing Kavanaugh is radical SJW with some damning student reviews

It's true that Bill Clinton's liberal '90s apologists justified his sexual misconduct with the claim "Character doesn’t matter." It nonetheless does, and since Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hopes are being influenced by accusations that may speak to his character, it's only fair to examine the character of his accuser. And this woman, Palo Alto University psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford, is a radical social-justice warrior with some damning student reviews - including one from a person who wrote "I am honestly scared of her."

Ford's accusation goes back to her high-school days, in approximately 1982, when she would have been 15 and Kavanaugh 17. She claims that Kavanaugh laid on top of her and groped her while heavily intoxicated and that the incident ended when a friend of his, Mark Judge, jumped on both of them, sending them all tumbling (you can read a more thorough account here).

Whatever the truth of the matter, however, certainly true is that Ford is a radical leftist who'd be inclined to zealously oppose a Kavanaugh nomination. For example, Breitbart reports that she not only has attended anti-Trump events, but actually donned a pink "brain pu**y hat" for a 2017 anti-Trump march.

Just as telling, though, may be her student reviews. Consider the following screen grab of one of her reviews (now scrubbed) from the popular site Rate My Professors:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It is actually when BUT HILLARY!!! is not a rebuttal from your end of the stick.

/----/ But Hillary set the standard for harassing women accusers. She deserves the credit, don't ya think?.

That's stupid, so no

/----/ In case you missed it:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.

In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

She'll be testifying. Collins, Corker, Heitkamp, Flake and others will insist on it prior to a vote.
Sorry, but for the ladies especially, not holding out on a vote prior to a hearing would be political suicide.

You are confused yet again. She has no right to testify and they want Kavanaugh to answer these charges.

If I were him, I would relate it like this:

"Yes, we were at a party and both of us had a few. We both went into the bedroom to get frisky. When I started to take off her bra, all of the Kleenex fell out and I realized she was a carpenter's dream - flat as a board. I ran from the room screaming and had ED issues for many years thereafter."

Then let her try to prove he is lying!

 

[DrLove]

Who really cares ?

So what if this happened ?

Confirm him and get on with it.

Seriously? ^ Just WoW

Seriously what, moron ?
Something that happened 35 years ago....matters now ?
Please make the connection.
You lost the election.
Suck on it.

If true, this is a serious matter and you should know that.
My country doesn't send gropers/ attempted rapists to lifetime appointments.
And PARTICULARY when the nominee has a history of frowning on women's rights.
You are beyond moronic - You're a Deplorable

 

[Votto]

Diane Feinstein Sat on Letter With Bogus Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Brett Kavanaugh for Months | LifeNews.com

So here Brett Kavanaugh was brought in to answer any and all questions and concerns, and the whole time Diane Feinstein sat on the letter about him assaulting that woman, that is, up until they are all ready to vote.

Really? How does that work exactly?

Because Feinstein promised total and complete unanimity to her constituent.
The existence of the letter was LEAKED .. and not by Feinstein.
See how easy that was?

Well, it's not like he drove her into a lake and let her drown, assuming this happened at all.

 

[Polishprince]

She'll be testifying. Collins, Corker, Heitkamp, Flake and others will insist on it prior to a vote.
Sorry, but for the ladies especially, not holding out on a vote prior to a hearing would be political suicide.

I don't think they can "insist on it".

If McConnell and Chairman Grassley want to have a vote, they can have the vote and they should.

If these senators want to vote "no", they can certainly do that if they want.

 

[Votto]

Who really cares ?

So what if this happened ?

Confirm him and get on with it.

Seriously? ^ Just WoW

Seriously what, moron ?
Something that happened 35 years ago....matters now ?
Please make the connection.
You lost the election.
Suck on it.

If true, this is a serious matter and you should know that.
My country doesn't send gropers/ attempted rapists to lifetime appointments.
And PARTICULARY when the nominee has a history of frowning on women's rights.
You are beyond moronic - You're a Deplorable

Stop faking outrage.

It really gets old.

If you really cared about the issue, and if the press really cared, they would be all over this story 24/7, but they are not

Congress paid $17 million in settlements. Why we know so little about that money. - CNNPolitics

Congress has, for a long time, used taxpayer money to keep women silent whom they have assaulted.

But alas, our problem is Trump, isn't it, and not the Swamp.

In fact, why not focus on drunk 17 year olds instead, right?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.

If the dems owned the senate and Hillary won...Garland could be accused of being Jack the Ripper and he'd still be confirmed.

Yep, and the dems would confirm him.

Nonsense ^ But we expect that from you Orangelings

When assholes of Mass. keep electing the famous "Liar of the Senate" when he should have been doing time.....

There is your nonsense.

Fuck off.

WTF are you babbling about now?

Please spare us the "nonsense" bullshit when you dicks have been at it for decades.