Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never noticed that .He does't realize that I was a lay Preacher before converting to Islam.You sure do rely on Wikipedia a lot for your information. And here I thought Wikipedia was just a leftist encyclopedia full of edited facts. At least that's what most righties claim.
So he has meet his match when it comes to debating the Bible.
You must have not paid that much attention to the Bible, or you would have noticed how the OT stories were twisted to fit the quran.
McVeigh identified himself as an agnostic. Sorry that doesn't meet with your bigotry, it's still the truth. It doesn't mean you can't hate Christians - you just can't hang McVeigh on them.
And YOU posted a link claiming he was an atheist as you use it to try to supprot your spin. So did you forget that you posted or are you willing to admit that your source and arguments made on it were WRONG??
BTW I never said anything about christians, I merely pointed out that mcveigh spoke of God and he making peace with God to show that YOU were wrong when you posted a link claiming he was an atheist. LOL
So thanks again for showing how far you will go to attack those who dare disagree with your bigotry as you make up claims and try to attribute them to people who never made them. LOL
McVeigh and those like him are appropriately scorned and shunned within the Christian religion. Which is why they don't kill as many people, or have as many followers attached to them. They do not rise to power within the echelons of the Christian hierarchy, if there is one.
Islam embraces its monsters, and promotes them.
Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam
Maybe because the threat is trivial?
Cause of Death/Age Range All Ages Under 1 Yr 1-4 yrs 5-14yrs 15-24 yrs 25-34 35-44
Total Number of Deaths 2,403,351 100% 28,035 1.2% 4,979 0.2% 7,413 0.3% 3,1307 1.3% 40,451 1.7% 89,798 3.7%
Major Cardiovasular Diseases 936,923 39.0% 636 2.3% 234 4.7% 362 4.9% 1,309 4.2% 3792 9.4% 16,624 18.5%
Malignant Neoplasms 553,091 23.0% 92 0.3% 420 8.4% 1,014 13.7% 1713 5.5% 3916 9.7% 16,520 18.4%
Chronic Lower Resperitory Dis. 122,009 5.1% 36 0.1% 51 1.0% 139 1.9% 190 0.6% 296 0.7% 930 1.0%
Diabetes Mellitus 69,301 2.9% 4 0.0% 6 0.1% 26 0.4% 162 0.5% 623 1.5% 1,926 2.1%
Influenza and Pneumonia 65,313 2.7% 289 1.0% 103 2.1% 87 1.2% 189 0.6% 364 0.9% 1,068 1.2%
Alzheimers 49,558 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 6 0.0%
Motor Vehicle Accidents 43,354 1.8% 168 0.6% 651 13.1% 1,772 23.9% 10,560 33.7% 6,884 17.0% 6,927 7.7%
Renal Failure 3,6471 1.5% 152 0.5% 11 0.2% 19 0.3% 78 0.2% 221 0.5% 701 0.8%
Septicemia 3,1224 1.3% 274 1.0% 99 2.0% 63 0.8% 100 0.3% 280 0.7% 877 1.0%
Firearms 28,663 1.2% 13 0.0% 46 0.9% 377 5.1% 6,575 21.0% 5,789 14.3% ,5358 6.0%
NOTE: Firearms Statistics Include Gang Warfare, Self Defense Shootings and Criminals Killed by Police
Cause of Death/Age Range 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85 and over Not stated
Total Number of Deaths 160,341 6.7% 240,846 10.0% 441,209 18.4% 700,445 29.1% 658,171 27.4% 356 0.0%
Major Cardiovasular Diseases 43,583 27.2% 77,482 32.2% 156,187 35.4% 296,202 42.3% 340,450 51.7% 62 17.4%
Malignant Neoplasms 48,034 30.0% 89,005 37.0% 150,131 34.0% 165,009 23.6% 77,136 11.7% 11 3.1%
Chronic Lower Resperitory Dis. 3,251 2.0% 10,739 4.5% 31,157 7.1% 47,722 6.8% 27,496 4.2% 2 0.6%
Diabetes Mellitus 4,954 3.1% 9,186 3.8% 1,6674 3.8% 22,184 3.2% 13,556 2.1% 0 0.0%
Influenza and Pneumonia 1,774 1.1% 2,879 1.2% 7,189 1.6% 19,821 2.8% 31,547 4.8% 3 0.8%
Alzheimers 64 0.0% 491 0.2% 3,431 0.8% 17,253 2.5% 28,309 4.3% 2 0.6%
Motor Vehicle Accidents 5,361 3.3% 3,506 1.5% 3,038 0.7% 3,173 0.5% 1,288 0.2% 26 7.3%
Renal Failure 1,590 1.0% 3,023 1.3% 6,848 1.6% 12,223 1.7% 11,603 1.8% 2 0.6%
Septicemia 1,845 1.2% 2,899 1.2% 8,704 2.0% 9,938 1.4% 9,144 1.4% 1 0.3%
Firearms 3,951 2.5% 2,272 0.9% 1,941 0.4% 1,723 0.2% 600 0.1% 18 5.1%
Death from terrorism isn't even listed. Therefore you who keep crying to the heavens over Muslims are fucking idiots.
Death Statistics Tables
No, because it involves the principle of standing up to protect people from something that is inherently evil and deadly.
Not all Nazis killed Jews, btw. But Nazism was still evil and needed to be confronted and wiped out. Nobody did.
I stand up and protect people from evil every day. We have a far more serious threat to the safety of our citizens from violence in our streets than any Ebul Muslims. I know it isn't much but the elderly patrons of Rob's 125th St Grill appreciate my efforts. I doubt they have to worry about Muslims. If they start showing up I guess I will deal with them as well. So far it's just Gangs and drug dealers, Pimps, prostitutes, homeless and overly aggressive pan handlers. Muslim terrorists...not so much..
As far as not standing up to Hitler. Well....duh...That's one of my major beefs with the stupid Jews. They should have invested some of their wealth into financing some serious immediate payback to Hitler and his ilk rather than selfishly hording their resources or sending it out of the country. Doncha think there is a teeny weenie difference in Hitler and the brown shirts/NAZI's and Muslim terrorism? How many Muslims drag non muslims out of their houses, beat them and put them in cattle cars? Kinda a dumb comparison.
If Nazi Germany were to rise up today, the same people who defend the right of Islam to butcher and terrorize would be right there defending them as well.
Because people who embrace an idealogy that devalues human life will always support other idealogies that do the same.
I never noticed that .He does't realize that I was a lay Preacher before converting to Islam.
So he has meet his match when it comes to debating the Bible.
You must have not paid that much attention to the Bible, or you would have noticed how the OT stories were twisted to fit the quran.
Please provide an example ..
You have to forgive Uncensored. He's got this twisted Idea that anyone who doesn't hate Islam and Muslims just because it is Islam and they are Muslims, it's because they are "promoting radical Islam".
when you choose to delete and romove facts that you wish to avoid, YES it is.
ROFL
What a fucking moron.
says the hack running away from facts that counter his spin and pretending that his PROVEN contradictions don't exist. LOL BTW you still haven't defined promote. What are you afraid of??
You're not too bright. (Seems a common condition among those of the left - what an oddity...)
I've stated about a dozen times that the attacks on those who condemn Islamic radicalism is the promotion of Islamic radicalism.
The left has taken to attacking anyone who dares criticize or condemn Islam for the acts and actions of the followers of that faith.
Some on the left, such as you, are particularly vigilant in attacking anyone who fails to kowtow to the Islamists.
Clear enough for you, sparky?
NO I attack YOU for making arguments and claims that you can't back up as you turn tail and run away from your own words.
I'm right here sparky - try tactic 7 from the "how to defeat a conservative" pamphlet, it might work better...
I condemn any muslim who engages in terrorist activity but unlike you I am not willing to condemn them all for actions of the few.
You are not willing to condemn a creed for the actions of it's followers.
You condemn the GOP and all on the right for any misdeed by anyone on the right,
but if Islam teaches {Surah 9:5 Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. } AND tens of thousands of acts are done which follow such command - WELL, they are the religion of peace, we can't judge them...
It's not just the fucking hypocrisy;
it's the embrace of the most vile and dangerous movement since the Third Reich which makes you leftists such scum.
How many different shapes of cross were used in crucifiction??
Oh pul-leeze! Stop waving the bloody shirt. Intelligent people know the difference between being against acts of barbarism, corruption, human rights violations and oppression as I am ...and being against an entire religion and an entire people. That's for simpletons.
And YOU posted a link claiming he was an atheist as you use it to try to supprot your spin.
Which is confirmed fact.
Put down the bong - seriously.
So mcveigh wasn't an atheist as u2008 claimed earlier? Thanks for coutnering u2008s argument. LOL
McVeigh identified himself as an agnostic. Sorry that doesn't meet with your bigotry, it's still the truth. It doesn't mean you can't hate Christians - you just can't hang McVeigh on them.
And YOU posted a link claiming he was an atheist as you use it to try to supprot your spin. So did you forget that you posted or are you willing to admit that your source and arguments made on it were WRONG??
BTW I never said anything about christians, I merely pointed out that mcveigh spoke of God and he making peace with God to show that YOU were wrong when you posted a link claiming he was an atheist. LOL
So thanks again for showing how far you will go to attack those who dare disagree with your bigotry as you make up claims and try to attribute them to people who never made them. LOL
No, the people on the left haven't.
What they do is downplay these horrors and pretend it isn't symptomatic of Islam.
It certainly IS symptomatic of Islam.
They further insult anyone with a brain,
and ever person who has ever suffered human rights violations at the hands of Islam, by comparing said offenses with infrequent and uncommon allegedly parallel violations among the Christian world.
senate to hold hearings on “anti-muslim bigotry
senate to hold hearings on “anti-muslim bigotry”
on a day when islamic jihadists exploded a bomb in jerusalem that murdered at least one woman and wounded thirty, and when islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two christians outside a church in pakistan, senator richard durbin (d-il) announced that he was going to hold hearings on the rise in “anti-muslim bigotry.”
durbin, of course, was retaliating for the hearings recently conducted by rep. Peter king (r-ny), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-muslim human rights activist ayaan hirsi ali and terror analyst walid phares.
Not only was the timing of durbin’s announcement ironic, but also the fact that his retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy rep. Keith ellison (d-mn), whose pilgrimage to mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the muslim american society, the muslim brotherhood ‘s chief operating arm in the u.s.
Ellison used the bully pulpit king gave him to paint a lurid picture of muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country over the last two years. How can durbin top that?
senate to hold hearings on
how sad to be so paranoid and manipulated that you hate us for our freedoms
NO they are NOT.
a·the·ist
n.
One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.
ag·nos·tic
n.
1.
a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
b. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
{Synonyms: abnegation, agnosticism, anarchy, atheism , denial, disbelief, disorder, lawlessness, mob rule, nonbelief, rejection, renunciation, repudiation, skepticism, terrorism }
What a dumbfuck....
Main Entry: nihilism
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: refusal to believe
Synonyms: abnegation, agnosticism, anarchy, atheism , denial, disbelief, disorder, lawlessness, mob rule, nonbelief, rejection, renunciation, repudiation, skepticism, terrorism
Wow....is that the best you've got? Calling me a Nazi sympathizer?
I never noticed that .
Please provide an example ..
You saying it doesn't make it so.
You sure do rely on Wikipedia a lot for your information. And here I thought Wikipedia was just a leftist encyclopedia full of edited facts. At least that's what most righties claim.
I wrote a paper on Wiki and tested it against the Encyclopedia Britannica. Wikipedia had a higher rate of accuracy. There are a lot of eyes leading to a lot of fact checking. (Not that you know what a "fact" is...)
You have to forgive Uncensored. He's got this twisted Idea that anyone who doesn't hate Islam and Muslims just because it is Islam and they are Muslims, it's because they are "promoting radical Islam".
I thought it was more like those isolated incidents
Arid Uka killed two soldiers and wounded 2 others while shouting "Allahu Akbar." Just an isolated incident.
Nidal Malik Hasan kills 13 and wounds 29 others while screaming "Allahu Akbar" - just an isolated incident.
Faisal Shahzad puts a car bomb in downtown Manhattan, when caught declares "Allahu Akbar" - Just an isolated incident.
Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab tries to detonate a bomb in his underwear while screaming "Allahu Akbar" - Just an isolated incident.
Hosam Maher Husein Smadi tries to bomb the Fountain Place sky scraper in Dallas. When arrested declares "Allahu Akbar" - Just an isolated incident.
Hey, we can't criticize Islam, it's just an isolated incident...
It's not that you're covering for terrorists, it's just an isolated incident.
And those are all horrible things and I blame the people who did them...
