Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why are you speaking ill of nazi's and the holocaust?
Does it offend you that I speak ill of Nazis?
Is that the tie you have with Islam? Your desire for genocide of the Jews?
I didn't say anything about arrest,
I'm saying the worst version of christians become bureacrats.
A good example is your hero Bush
WOW, so YOU used that article as YOUR source to support YOUR argument and now are trying to disavow any connection to what was the foundation of your own argument. LOL
senate to hold hearings on anti-muslim bigotry
senate to hold hearings on anti-muslim bigotry
on a day when islamic jihadists exploded a bomb in jerusalem that murdered at least one woman and wounded thirty, and when islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two christians outside a church in pakistan, senator richard durbin (d-il) announced that he was going to hold hearings on the rise in anti-muslim bigotry.
durbin, of course, was retaliating for the hearings recently conducted by rep. Peter king (r-ny), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-muslim human rights activist ayaan hirsi ali and terror analyst walid phares.
Not only was the timing of durbins announcement ironic, but also the fact that his retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy rep. Keith ellison (d-mn), whose pilgrimage to mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the muslim american society, the muslim brotherhood s chief operating arm in the u.s.
Ellison used the bully pulpit king gave him to paint a lurid picture of muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country over the last two years. How can durbin top that?
senate to hold hearings on
Lol well done cutting out the part of me asking if you wanted a genocide of muslims.
I think not answering that question is as good as answering it.
No of course I don't want a genocide of jews, the lowest form of immorality is wanting people to be killed based on their religion.
Wouldn't you agree?
In your quote you made my case! Thanks!
You seriously think so? Really?
ROFL...
The primary difference between common-law opinions and fatwās, however, is that fatwās are not universally binding; as the Sharia is not universally consistent and Islam is very non-hierarchical in structure, fatwās do not carry the sort of weight that secular common-law opinions do.}
Fatw
You don't want the truth. And you ARE overreacting.
Yep, Maj. Hasan is just misunderstood.
Because the real threat to America is neoconservatives and radical Christians(zionists).
Of course!
I didn't say anything about arrest,
So you want to start killing people?
I'm saying the worst version of christians become bureacrats.
Yeah? Well, you're a bigot.
A good example is your hero Bush
Bush is my hero? What makes him my hero? His spending like a drunken monkey, or his assault on the constitution with patriot act?
I mean, if you are assigning him as my hero, I should at least get to know what I like about him?
You like that plausible deniablity thing, don't you?I'd love to see your historical link for that intriguing piece of information.
No you wouldn't - you just think your can distract and blow smoke to obscure the point.
Endl"sung was highly classified, only the top echelon of the SS were privy to the plans and implementation of the extermination.
{As for the implementation of the "Final Solution" and the murder of other undesirable elements, the situation was different. The Nazis attempted to keep the murders a secret and, therefore, took precautionary measures to ensure that they would not be publicized.}
36 Questions About the Holocaust (1-18)
Had you made it into Jr. High, you would know this already.
Ah, but the hive cares for you and instructs you in your every utterance and behavior.
(Hey, your BEE-havior!)
Senate to Hold Hearings on Anti-Muslim Bigotry
Senate to Hold Hearings on Anti-Muslim Bigotry
On a day when Islamic jihadists exploded a bomb in Jerusalem that murdered at least one woman and wounded thirty, and when Islamic jihadists opened fire on and killed two Christians outside a church in Pakistan, Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) announced that he was going to hold hearings on the rise in anti-Muslim bigotry.
Durbin, of course, was retaliating for the hearings recently conducted by Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who himself bowed to politically correct pressure and dropped several witnesses that he had originally announced his intention to call, including ex-Muslim human rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and terror analyst Walid Phares.
Not only was the timing of Durbins announcement ironic, but also the fact that his retaliatory hearings were unnecessary in the first place. King, after all, gave a prime platform at his hearings to the weepy Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), whose pilgrimage to Mecca was paid for with $13,350 from the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood s chief operating arm in the U.S.
Ellison used the bully pulpit King gave him to paint a lurid picture of Muslim victimhood, all the while saying nothing (of course) about the sharp increase in jihad terror plots in this country over the last two years. How can Durbin top that?
Senate to Hold Hearings on
Your question should be "Why do normal folks not act like chicken little when it comes to radical Islam".
And here's why. Take away outside forces trying to interfere with their way of life and/or them trying to radicalise their own countries, they are no threat to other parts of the world. When they do become a threat (and if you can show me one Islamsist country that is bent on expansionism in the past 50 years I'm all ears), then you deal with them.
You said Tea Partiers, not me. I was referring to the idiots in the pics you put in your post.
I know.
You would certainly never call Muslims "idiots," so it's obvious that you refer to the vile creature who DARES to oppose bailouts for Obama's massahs at Goldman Sachs.
You know, the idiot muslims you seem to think (or are lying about) I embrace.
My opinion on WHY you defend and support radical Islam is that you share a common enemy with them - Americans.
Lol well done cutting out the part of me asking if you wanted a genocide of muslims.
Why would I give credence to such stupidity?
I think not answering that question is as good as answering it.
Yawn...
Have you stopped molesting little boys yet?
No of course I don't want a genocide of jews, the lowest form of immorality is wanting people to be killed based on their religion.
Wouldn't you agree?
No.
Any wanton slaughter of people is equally reprehensible. The murder of 22 million Kulaks by Stalin because he wanted to destroy the landed class in the Ukraine was just as immoral.
The murder of 35 million for failing to meet the political goals of Mao was just as immoral.
The murder of 3000 Americans by Muslims who hated those not of their religion was just as immoral.
Any blind slaughter of a captive people is just as immoral.
I've never called for or suggested the death of Muslims, not on a singular nor mass basis.
Hell no I don't deny that, never have, never will. Uncensored is the type who thinks if he repeats something enough it'll magically become truth.
Nah, I just figure it will expose the lies of you who promote radical Islam.
I didn't say that "crucifixion" wasn't the method used on Jesus.The idea of the "cross" was an innovation that was introduced to the Christian community several hundred years later.
You're full of shit.
{Crucifixion was in use particularly among the Seleucids, Carthaginians, and Romans from about the 6th century BC to the 4th century AD. In the year 337, Emperor Constantine I abolished it in the Roman Empire, out of veneration for Jesus Christ, the most famous victim of crucifixion.[2][3] It was also used as a form of execution in Japan for criminals, inflicted also on some Christians.}
.
I just said that the word "cross" is not used in the original Greek to describe the execution device used for his alleged crucifixion.
Please try to keep up and read what I specifically stated.
Hell no I don't deny that, never have, never will. Uncensored is the type who thinks if he repeats something enough it'll magically become truth.
Nah, I just figure it will expose the lies of you who promote radical Islam.
You mean you promote radical islam?? Since the only lies that you are exposing are your own as you make up works of fiction and falsely attribute them to others it would appear that you are talking about yourself. LOL
Apparently you haven't been paying attention to the actual content of this thread where rightwinger after right winger has failed to provide the substance to back up their claims and would rather call people names than actually engage in a debate.
Are you thinking you did real well in this debate? Or Maggie?
Really?
Against someone who thinks "winning" the way Charlie Sheen does is right? You betcha.
You've forgotten the Catholic priesthood?
Please show me "Catholic teachings" that encourage pedophilia. Where are priests "permitted" and accepted for doing that crime? I am not saying it doesn't happen. It does and it is a blasphamy against the Lord. It is a crime and those doing it should be punished as crimminals (though that will not compare to what the Lord's punishment will be).
Where in the Quran is pedophilia "encouraged"? Dancing boys? Altar Boys? They're both at risk of being raped by frustrated perverts, and those kind come in all colors, religions and nationalities.
Nah, I just figure it will expose the lies of you who promote radical Islam.
You mean you promote radical islam?? Since the only lies that you are exposing are your own as you make up works of fiction and falsely attribute them to others it would appear that you are talking about yourself. LOL
You have to forgive Uncensored. He's got this twisted Idea that anyone who doesn't hate Islam and Muslims just because it is Islam and they are Muslims, it's because they are "promoting radical Islam".
I think it speaks volumes that whomever came up with the name "Tea Party" was too dumb to realize it would very quickly be dubbed "Teabaggers."
Most of the "Taxed Enough Already" demonstrators, did not know that term (and probably could have went the rest of their lives without learning that term), before the lowest forms of name calling lefties chose to try to humiliate them by using that term. The same people that will use names like teabagger, racist, bigot, will not debate, will not present an alternative arguement, just hatred and names. Please don't break the trend, continue to show your depraved status in society (throwing yourself into gutter to pull others in with you).
Oh puleeze, the greatest number of clowns attending those tea party protests represented the great unwashed. They most certainly knew the cliché "teabagger" had another, more perverse meaning.
It's interesting that you decided to go on a rant, however, assuming you KNOW how I feel about the Tea Party movement, when of course you do not. Once again, I think the ones who are thinkers, not assholes, are worth listening to and I encourage their voices.
"Depravity" comes from the idiots who presume to know what someone else is thinking and they act like holier-than-thou pricks about it. That'd be you and your ilk.
