Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam

Most certainly have...again and again...

Not even close.

You can't show me lying for the simple fact that I don't lie.


Due to that fact that you have been shown to be dishonest, You lied right there. LOL You once claimed that your comments about "trivialization of the threat of islam" were not directed at people on this board and yet bod has shown your posts that show otherwise.

YOU LIED. Therefore claiming that you don't lie when you clearly do is a LIE. LOL You are not very good at this are you??

As I've pointed out before, you are 100% partisan. You find out what the party line is on any given subject, then say whatever in order to promote that position. You blindly attack anything and anyone who contrasts with the party line.

Isn't that the tactic the right is using for this entire thread full of right wing talking points and propaganda meant to label and attack the left?? You seem to be doing exactly what you accuse bod of doing. Imagine that. LOL

Because of this, I mock you. What makes it all the more fun is that you lack the wits to comprehend that you're being mocked.

You're a stupid creature - stupid by choice. Dr. Drock says that a couple of poster's sound like OBL. Me? I'm duty bound as a general smart ass to turn that back on him, so I quip that "it's rude to speak that way of Jillian and Maggie Mae." This caused you to jump right off the tire swing and onto the faux tree, canines bared, hand filled to the brim with feces. "LIAR LIAR LIAR" you shriek as you madly fling feces.

In other words you are a TROLL. Thanks for admitting it.

A feral baboon lacks the wits to grasp that it was Dr. Drock who made the charge, I simply mocked him, and in the the process our resident communists.

You're a fool, a hate filled leftist who can't see even the most blatant and obvious due to the rage of your partisanship.

smith is the same, but you jump and roll and shriek, making you funny to watch. smith is just a drooling retard, boring...

Get thee to a baboonary.

What is sad for you is that in all of what you posted you failed to couter or even address anything that has been said and could only attack those who disagree with you and have exposed you as a liar.


And all i have to say in response to your ad hom posting is to quote someone that you have a lot in common with.

Attacking him with ad hom is not refutation of his statements.

LOL
 
Wasn't bush the one who said he would get obl no matter what and then chose to divert attention away from afghanistan and invade iraq as he later said he doesn't really think about him (obl) anymore??

{Barack Obama Vows To Kill Bin Laden, Conservatives (and Some Liberals) Cry Foul

In a major foreign policy speech today, Barack Obama vowed that if he is elected Commander In Chief, he would do anything to pursue, apprehend, or kill the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks against New York, Washington D.C., and Pennsylvania. This is a position supported by the vast majority of Americans, and was the reason why the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 had such widespread support.}

Oliver Willis: Barack Obama Vows To Kill Bin Laden, Conservatives (and Some Liberals) Cry Foul

Gee you're dumb...
 
Another "closet Biblical scholar" that will not discuss the discrepencies between the Bible and quran. Read it and then we will have a discussion (if necessary).
Careful, you might go up in flames, when you crack one of those books.


I never said I was a scholar i merely asked you to substantiate your claims and the fact that you are doing everything in your poser to avoid doing so I guess that means that you can't.

Funny how you tell me AGAIN to read the bible and the quran instead of backing up your own claims.




So, you making claims that you can't substantiate is on topic but asking you to substantiate those same claims is off topic?? Really??

Oh and thanks again for lying about your "invitation"


You must have not paid that much attention to the Bible, or you would have noticed how the OT stories were twisted to fit the quran.

LOL Why is it that you can't even answer question about your own statements??

My original statement was in response to someone that claimed to be a "Biblical scholar". It was an invitation, a challenge to debate the differences.
Your version of the post is like a person observing from a distance and getting it wrong. It is okay. It is your opinion.
You told me that "you" had read the Bible. I gave you an invitation, a challenge to read "one" story, presented in both books. You threw a tantrum, a hissy fit or however you want to "redefine" your reaction.
There is a difference between the two books on the story of Abraham (as well as other places). You are welcome to read them and give your input. I feel that you are deliberately acting like someone that is incapable of reading, so you can attack the words that I use to state what is written (my opinion).
THIS IS AN INVITATION FOR "YOU" TO COMPARE THE TWO STORIES, AND COMMENT ON THE DIFFERENCES. Will you take up the "invitation"??????
Any more "whining", will be seen as someone that has nothing to contribute, but is only interested in public tantrums until others are silenced.

LYING and trying to claim it was an invitation when your own words show that is was not does not help your case.

So if i got it wrong go back and quote the exact post and SHOW how it was an invitation.

If it is true then it should be too hard for you to accomplish. However, my guess is that based on how you are currently avoiding your own words you won't do it because you know you can't.

If you want to "invite" someone to go and read a book to find something that you claim is there but fail to show where it is then you should cite a specific book or verse from each and actually compare the two instad of telling others to go look it up.

I know shite about the quran so telling me to go look for something that you claim is there is beyond absurd and only serves to further expose your dishonesty.
 
Due to that fact that you have been shown to be dishonest, You lied right there.

Wow, really?

So my guilt is proven by my denial of guilt? Is that the final verdict of the Junta?

ROFL


LOL You once claimed that your comments about "trivialization of the threat of islam" were not directed at people on this board and yet bod has shown your posts that show otherwise.

Hardly - but you lack the integrity to debate such a point with.

YOU LIED.

Nope. You being a partisan **** doesn't equate to a lie on my part.

Stick to stuffing ballot boxes to serve your shameful party, logic ain't your forte'
 
As a matter of fact, it was a Democrat President who tried to take out OBL (yes he missed) and passed on that concern to the next president.

Someday, somewhere, OBL is determined to strike....

Fucking brilliant..

Say -- why hasn't your Messiah® taken OBL into custody? He attacked Bush for not getting him - what's going on?

My messiah? who's my Messiah?

Bumping for uncensored where he clearly said that Obama was MY Messiah.


Still waiting for proof that I think of Obama as my Messiah.
 
No, he isn't. And the odd thing is, the ONLY people I see calling Obama a Messiah are righties. The ONLY ones.

Wow, really? (snicker)

Are you people trying to tell us something? :eusa_eh:

Yes, but you're far too fucking dense to grasp it.

Notice where I said that Obama is not my messiah and get a snicker from uncensored.


And now he backtracks.....oh....he didn't mean ME.....really?
 
Notice where I said that Obama is not my messiah and get a snicker from uncensored.

No stupid, you got a snicker because you demonstrated that you are too dull witted to grasp that we mock you morons. We mock you because of your fawning and cult-like behavior with Obama.

Oh, and by "you," I mean you leftists - I realize that you lack the IQ points needed to grasp indirect reference.
 
You will have to tell us, considering you are the one denying your own words again.

If retardation is genetic, then does that mean your entire family has low two-digit IQ's?

Unless it's fetal alcohol syndrome, or something...
 
Actually Senator McCaskill said she doesn't think the threat is a day-to-day emergency. And of course she is right.


No, she is FARRR left. If she were right, you'd condemn her for starving children and tax breaks for the rich. But because she is left, she could LITERALLY cut the head off of Justin Bieber on national TV and you would make excuses while blaming Bush...

That there is no imminent threat of an attack today doesn't mean that the al Queda groups of the world aren't going to try and sucker punch us again.

McCasckill is fool, but regardless of whether you agree with her or not, you claimed that no dims were diminishing the threat from Islamic terrorists - clearly they are
Since 2004 how many terrorist attacks have been successfully carried out in America?

Irrelevant. You denied that the left is downplaying the threat of Islamic terrorism.

BTW, two - including the Ft. Hood attack that left 13 dead and 27 wounded.


Yeah all 18 seconds of it.Y'all are a joke, but it isn't funny.

So, it doesn't count if it's less than 5 minutes?

Facts and evidence mean nothing to you - you make that clear.

ROFL - Boo the formula for you is 100% partisanship, 0% integrity.

Hey, I understand, you're full up, no room for silly things like ethics. Besides, your party frowns on the whole honesty and integrity thingy.


I'm afraid your don't understand at all. Just because they don't play into the fears that Islam will attack today, with another attack on the way tomorrow, doesn't mean they do not believe that there is a real threat from the Radical Islamics.

Here's there's a couple of Democrats on this bipartisan center.

Bipartisan Policy Center Report Finds Homegrown Terrorism Presents Key Challenge for the United States | Bipartisan Policy Center

“The threat that the U.S. is facing today remains significant and dangerous, but has developed since the 9/11 Commission presented its report six long years ago,” said Congressman Hamilton. “The changing nature of the terrorist threat makes it necessary for America to constantly reexamine its counterterrorism assumptions and approaches. The level of threat posed by al-Qaeda and its allies is not fading into the past.”

Key findings of the report identify an increase in homegrown terrorists in the United States underscoring how much the threat has changed since September 11, 2001. Al-Qaeda leadership is becoming increasingly ‘Americanized’ and U.S.-based jihadist militants do not fit any particular “ethnic, economic, educational, or social profile,” according to the assessment.

M Moore can says some off the wall stuff but of course you have taken this clip way out of context. There is no time limit to show context.
 
Yes, really.

Yer just as sharp as a marble....



Pssttt... Stupid fuck, we're mocking you and the other mindless leftists for your cult-like adoration of Obama...

Well, kindly explain. You are smart enough to do that, aren't you?

You wouldn't grasp it.

{Newsweek editor Evan Thomas brought adulation over President Obama’s Cairo speech to a whole new level on Friday, declaring on MSNBC: "I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."}

Read more: Newsweek

{I have to tell you, you know, it's part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama's speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don't have that too often.} Chris Matthews, MSDNC

Chris Matthews: "I Felt This Thrill Going Up My Leg" As Obama Spoke

Obama%20reuters%20halo.jpg

You again say I have a cult like adoration of Obama. Let's see you prove it....


Try to do better than you did in "proving" we support muslim terrorists....that was a major fail on your part.

Don't you get it yet??
The mere fact that you dare to disagree with u2008 means that he can attribute anything he wants to use to try and define you based on his predisposed opinions and beliefs.
It doesn't have to be true and he makes it up as he goes along but that doesn't stop him from believing that the fact that he said it makes it true. LOL
 
I'm afraid your don't understand at all. Just because they don't play into the fears that Islam will attack today, with another attack on the way tomorrow, doesn't mean they do not believe that there is a real threat from the Radical Islamics.


Who is "they?" I gave you half a dozen cites of leftists who do deny an eminent threat.

BUT - and here is the who thing, those stupid claims were made while Bush was in office. Now that the Messiah® is at the helm, well terrorism is a grave threat to be contained at any cost...


Here's there's a couple of Democrats on this bipartisan center.

M Moore can says some off the wall stuff but of course you have taken this clip way out of context. There is no time limit to show context.

Moore is the epitome of the left. Sleazy, lying, hypocritical and a complete scumbag.

Dude, where's your integrity?
 
I'm afraid your don't understand at all. Just because they don't play into the fears that Islam will attack today, with another attack on the way tomorrow, doesn't mean they do not believe that there is a real threat from the Radical Islamics.


Who is "they?" I gave you half a dozen cites of leftists who do deny an eminent threat.

BUT - and here is the who thing, those stupid claims were made while Bush was in office. Now that the Messiah® is at the helm, well terrorism is a grave threat to be contained at any cost...


Here's there's a couple of Democrats on this bipartisan center.

M Moore can says some off the wall stuff but of course you have taken this clip way out of context. There is no time limit to show context.

Moore is the epitome of the left. Sleazy, lying, hypocritical and a complete scumbag.

Dude, where's your integrity?

There is no denying you have accused posters on this very thread of supporting radical Islam. Several times.

There is no denying you have accused ME in particular of calling Obama my messiah.

Why oh why should anyone take what you say as having any truth? Your integrity is made up of lies.
 
Actually Senator McCaskill said she doesn't think the threat is a day-to-day emergency. And of course she is right.


No, she is FARRR left. If she were right, you'd condemn her for starving children and tax breaks for the rich. But because she is left, she could LITERALLY cut the head off of Justin Bieber on national TV and you would make excuses while blaming Bush...



Apparently u2008 is too ignorant to understand that you were claiming that mccaskill was "correct" as you used the word "right". LOL


And he accuses boo of partisanship and yet he is the one that can only see right or left instead of right or wrong. LOL
 
There is no denying you have accused posters on this very thread of supporting radical Islam. Several times.

You do support Islam, that is irrefutable.

Where I hold your baboon feet (paws?) to the fire is in pointing out that claiming you only like water, not WET water, is a claim without distinction.

(Okay, I know you're too stupid to get this. What this means is that since all water is wet, calling some water "wet water" is meaningless. Calling some Islam "radical Islam" is a simile in that all Islam is radical by nature. - These examples work better on people who have some capacity to grasp them...)


There is no denying you have accused ME in particular of calling Obama my messiah.

ROFL

Holy fuck but you're retarded.

Seriously.
 

Forum List

Back
Top