Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[Papageorgio]

It seems all you have is just talk, you have no concept on how much this will cost or how it would work, you have exactly what you accuse the right of having, nothing but talk. Lots and lots of talk and no idea how it will work, you’d make a great Democratic Congressman.

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Again, you have an idea with absolutely no documentation, when you get the numbers let me know because so far you are all talk and nothing else.

Solving simple poverty simplifies the equation. Unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour and a minimum wage at fifteen dollars an hour; should work very well in our first world economy.

Again, you have nothing but talk, that is why I don’t take you seriously. When you spout ideas and can’t substantiate or communicate how it would work, it is just gibberish.

 

[hadit]

It is about actually solving socioeconomic problems not just being all talk and no action, right wingers.

It seems all you have is just talk, you have no concept on how much this will cost or how it would work, you have exactly what you accuse the right of having, nothing but talk. Lots and lots of talk and no idea how it will work, you’d make a great Democratic Congressman.

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Again, you have an idea with absolutely no documentation, when you get the numbers let me know because so far you are all talk and nothing else.

We both know you won't get any numbers.

 

[danielpalos]

That is not, equal protection of the law.

Yes, it is. Cite the legal justification for your position. Cite the court cases that agree with you. Heck, cite your own case in which you successfully argued that you should be allowed to collect UE without working first. If you won't, give it up.

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

 

[danielpalos]

That is not, equal protection of the law.

Yes, it is. Cite the legal justification for your position. Cite the court cases that agree with you. Heck, cite your own case in which you successfully argued that you should be allowed to collect UE without working first. If you won't, give it up.

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

There isn’t one.

Yes, there is. Only the right wing likes manufacture claims by fiat.

 

[hadit]

Yes, it is. Cite the legal justification for your position. Cite the court cases that agree with you. Heck, cite your own case in which you successfully argued that you should be allowed to collect UE without working first. If you won't, give it up.

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

Cite the language. Until you do, you're blowing smoke.

 

[Papageorgio]

It seems all you have is just talk, you have no concept on how much this will cost or how it would work, you have exactly what you accuse the right of having, nothing but talk. Lots and lots of talk and no idea how it will work, you’d make a great Democratic Congressman.

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Again, you have an idea with absolutely no documentation, when you get the numbers let me know because so far you are all talk and nothing else.

We both know you won't get any numbers.

He just spouts lies and nonsense, the. He accuses the right of being dishonest. I can’t think of a more dishonest poster than he.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but repeal, is worthless, right wingers. Why do you care how much I make or how I make it; should the poor care how much the rich make and how they make it?

If you're trying to take it from what I have legally earned, I have something to say about it.

Like financing tax cuts through public debt?

No. Tax cuts are not expenses.

This is why nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics. Your guys have no balanced budget. It is being financed and being put on the Peoples' tab.

So cut spending.

Abolish the drug war!

 

[Papageorgio]

Yes, it is. Cite the legal justification for your position. Cite the court cases that agree with you. Heck, cite your own case in which you successfully argued that you should be allowed to collect UE without working first. If you won't, give it up.

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

What part of, cite the law, do you not understand?

 

[danielpalos]

No, it won't. It will cost less than what we are paying now for less efficient government.

Then let’s see your numbers, I showed you mine, show me where I am wrong. So far all you have given is pie in the sky BS.

We can work with our current unemployment numbers and welfare numbers. The point about simplification is we would be getting market share from regular welfare rolls. Thus, decreasing the cost of government.

You have no numbers just your idea with absolutely no proof. Sorry, I would need more info than you are willing to provide. If you got any real numbers I’ll take a look but so far I’m going with my numbers because you refuse to give me any.

cheaper than what we have to spend now; and a more efficient economy, to boot.

You have nothing to back your claim. If you had any real numbers I could discuss but all I have is you saying the same idea over and over with nothing to substantiate your idea. I’m show a $9 trillion program and you have nothing.

Cutting costs through simplification. And, more people spending more money more consistently means more consistent revenue. It really is that simple.

 

[danielpalos]

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

You forget about the people from whom it is taken in the first place. They no longer can spend it to increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Yes, they can; and the left is also advocating for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.

You're delusional. If I take money from you, you can't spend that money. I can spend it, but it's still the same money, and you don't have it any more.

Somebody is spending less than you. Taking from some and giving to others means capital keeps circulating. The show must go on and Capital must circulate!

 

[danielpalos]

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Again, you have an idea with absolutely no documentation, when you get the numbers let me know because so far you are all talk and nothing else.

Solving simple poverty simplifies the equation. Unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour and a minimum wage at fifteen dollars an hour; should work very well in our first world economy.

Again, you have nothing but talk, that is why I don’t take you seriously. When you spout ideas and can’t substantiate or communicate how it would work, it is just gibberish.

It is really simple; only the right wing claims to have nothing but repeal. Sound familiar? Let me know when you want to get more serious about the Body Politic.

 

[danielpalos]

It seems all you have is just talk, you have no concept on how much this will cost or how it would work, you have exactly what you accuse the right of having, nothing but talk. Lots and lots of talk and no idea how it will work, you’d make a great Democratic Congressman.

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Again, you have an idea with absolutely no documentation, when you get the numbers let me know because so far you are all talk and nothing else.

We both know you won't get any numbers.

Unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour and a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage!

 

[danielpalos]

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

Cite the language. Until you do, you're blowing smoke.

that is the language. only the right wing never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

Care to try to "break it"? All Labor need do is apply for unemployment compensation if they don't have a job.

It could not be simpler.

Name all the left wingers that have presented this in a form of a bill in Congress.

You have no ways to implement or no way that you have showed how the cost would work . So far you have words with no solid how to’s. So all talk and no action.

It really is that simple. Equal protection of the law is all it requires. People spending that money will increase demand and stabilize our economy.

Again, you have an idea with absolutely no documentation, when you get the numbers let me know because so far you are all talk and nothing else.

We both know you won't get any numbers.

He just spouts lies and nonsense, the. He accuses the right of being dishonest. I can’t think of a more dishonest poster than he.

y'all have, nothing but repeal.

 

[danielpalos]

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

What part of, cite the law, do you not understand?

Employment is at the will of either party, not just the employer for unemployment compensation purposes. Only the right wing, believes in inequality and wage-slavery.

 

[hadit]

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

Cite the language. Until you do, you're blowing smoke.

that is the language. only the right wing never gets it.

And, right on cue, you descend into yet more meaningless and destroyed slogans.

 

[danielpalos]

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

Cite the language. Until you do, you're blowing smoke.

that is the language. only the right wing never gets it.

And, right on cue, you descend into yet more meaningless and destroyed slogans.

I don't believe y'all are actually serious about this topic and really just want to be full of fallacy.

 

[hadit]

You are doing EXACTLY what I expected you to do, nothing. You won't cite the language because it isn't there.

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

Cite the language. Until you do, you're blowing smoke.

that is the language. only the right wing never gets it.

And, right on cue, you descend into yet more meaningless and destroyed slogans.

I don't believe y'all are actually serious about this topic and really just want to be full of fallacy.

It won't be long now. You're going to slip away for a bit, then pop up again with the exact same failed slogans.

 

[danielpalos]

What part of, employment at will, do you not understand?

Cite the language. Until you do, you're blowing smoke.

that is the language. only the right wing never gets it.

And, right on cue, you descend into yet more meaningless and destroyed slogans.

I don't believe y'all are actually serious about this topic and really just want to be full of fallacy.

It won't be long now. You're going to slip away for a bit, then pop up again with the exact same failed slogans.

You are the one who prefers to appeal to ignorance, not me.

 

[Papageorgio]

Yes, it is. Cite the legal justification for your position. Cite the court cases that agree with you. Heck, cite your own case in which you successfully argued that you should be allowed to collect UE without working first. If you won't, give it up.

A federal doctrine and State laws.

Which ones? Cite the language.

A federal doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will.

There isn’t one.

Yes, there is. Only the right wing likes manufacture claims by fiat.

Cite it then.