Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Why do You have a problem if Persons want to stay poor on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.Lowering costs by reducing market share from a more expensive program.
And, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will reduce the market distorting use of the "funny money" known as EBT.
I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
No they aren't you stated earlier that people could move over to unemployment instead of welfare. So now you have 100 million on unemployment and you damn good and well they will stay on unemployment. That is why your solution won't work. Pretty simple.
10 weeks at $236 a week. I'm not going to have any money for gas to look for work. I thought it was 6 months.Employment is at-will. For-cause criteria must be proved by EDD.There is no wrongful termination clause under employment at-will.No we don't.
We have legal recourse to get compensation if wrongfully terminated. That is due process.
Every state provides unemployment compensation for those that are wrongfully terminated. Please name any state that doesn’t have unemployment compensation for those wrongfully terminated.
You have due process in acquiring unemployment in every state. Whether at will or not, you have due process and are able to get unemployment if you are wrongfully terminated.
You have the right to pursue happiness, not have the government provide for you.
Why do You have a problem if Persons want to stay poor on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
No they aren't you stated earlier that people could move over to unemployment instead of welfare. So now you have 100 million on unemployment and you damn good and well they will stay on unemployment. That is why your solution won't work. Pretty simple.
In any case, you keep missing the point about solving for simple poverty, and the effect that will have on any given market.
We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.Lowering costs by reducing market share from a more expensive program.Your plan will double the budget, take out all those that are already on welfare and you are still growing a budget for no real reason other than you somehow think that you need to be paid for sitting home and doing nothing.
And, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will reduce the market distorting use of the "funny money" known as EBT.
I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Lowering costs by reducing market share from a more expensive program.How many are already on, more expensive, means tested welfare?No, it doesn't. Welfare is more expensive.
You are opening the door for over 100 million people to receive $14 for not working. Do the math dummy!
Your plan will double the budget, take out all those that are already on welfare and you are still growing a budget for no real reason other than you somehow think that you need to be paid for sitting home and doing nothing.
And, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will reduce the market distorting use of the "funny money" known as EBT.
I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
Why do You have a problem if Persons want to stay poor on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?
In any case, you keep missing the point about solving for simple poverty, and the effect that will have on any given market.
It should be as long as you are naturally unemployed.10 weeks at $236 a week. I'm not going to have any money for gas to look for work. I thought it was 6 months.Employment is at-will. For-cause criteria must be proved by EDD.There is no wrongful termination clause under employment at-will.We have legal recourse to get compensation if wrongfully terminated. That is due process.
Every state provides unemployment compensation for those that are wrongfully terminated. Please name any state that doesn’t have unemployment compensation for those wrongfully terminated.
You have due process in acquiring unemployment in every state. Whether at will or not, you have due process and are able to get unemployment if you are wrongfully terminated.
You have the right to pursue happiness, not have the government provide for you.
Anyone who doesn't need welfare should go on unemployment; it is more cost effective. That is how we will cut costs. Welfare is simply more expensive.Why do You have a problem if Persons want to stay poor on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
No they aren't you stated earlier that people could move over to unemployment instead of welfare. So now you have 100 million on unemployment and you damn good and well they will stay on unemployment. That is why your solution won't work. Pretty simple.
In any case, you keep missing the point about solving for simple poverty, and the effect that will have on any given market.
You won't be solving anything. You are taking a group and combining them with another group.
I have no issue with you not wanting to work, knock yourself out. I have an issue of you not wanting to work and have taxpayers pay you for being lazy. I dislike government interference in my life, I also realize the government needs to give a hand to those that need one, however, no way should anyone be on unemployment or welfare longer than need be.
When I was young, I was out of work and the state stepped in to help us out, I went to every class I was required to go to and I looked for work everyday until I found it. I was out of work two weeks, I got paid the next week and took the extra food stamps back to the state office to return them, and ask that they not send me anymore, they had a fit! They told me I would need to be reevaluated in 5 months to see if I qualified, I told them I don't want them, I don't need them and I wouldn't use them and it was like I was calling them a dirty name.
Welfare and unemployment are temporary and while you are on them you should work like hell to get off of them.
It is a different program. And, more people spending money will create demand.We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.Lowering costs by reducing market share from a more expensive program.
And, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will reduce the market distorting use of the "funny money" known as EBT.
I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Renaming a thing does not change that thing.
You simply don't understand the issues.Lowering costs by reducing market share from a more expensive program.How many are already on, more expensive, means tested welfare?You are opening the door for over 100 million people to receive $14 for not working. Do the math dummy!
Your plan will double the budget, take out all those that are already on welfare and you are still growing a budget for no real reason other than you somehow think that you need to be paid for sitting home and doing nothing.
And, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will reduce the market distorting use of the "funny money" known as EBT.
I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
Dude Dan is a broken record. You'd think he'd get smarter just by osmosis from us, but no.
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment.Why do You have a problem if Persons want to stay poor on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?
In any case, you keep missing the point about solving for simple poverty, and the effect that will have on any given market.
The problem is you want help while being poor through your own choice. Grab a piece of cardboard, marker and a cup, then collect money on the streets
The law is employment at will; not work-or-die.P.S. I would suggest the sign read Will work at gunpoint or $5 says I don't bother you for two days.
Lowering costs by reducing market share from a more expensive program.How many are already on, more expensive, means tested welfare?You are opening the door for over 100 million people to receive $14 for not working. Do the math dummy!
Your plan will double the budget, take out all those that are already on welfare and you are still growing a budget for no real reason other than you somehow think that you need to be paid for sitting home and doing nothing.
And, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment will reduce the market distorting use of the "funny money" known as EBT.
I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
Dude Dan is a broken record. You'd think he'd get smarter just by osmosis from us, but no.
It is a different program. And, more people spending money will create demand.We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.I'm not going over this again, you don't get it, you will be spending more money, you would increase spending, I am against spending more so you can sit home and do nothing. You have no solution for you wanting to be lazy, too bad, life nor the government owe us a living.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Renaming a thing does not change that thing.
How many people would opt for welfare, if they had recourse to unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed?It is a different program. And, more people spending money will create demand.We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Renaming a thing does not change that thing.
You have to first take that money away from other people, who then cannot spend it.
It is a different program. And, more people spending money will create demand.We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.Welfare is more expensive and actually pays people to have more kids. Unemployment compensation merely compensates for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment for Individuals.
We could be lowering our costs and improving the efficiency of our economy.
More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Renaming a thing does not change that thing.
You have to first take that money away from other people, who then cannot spend it.
Capitalism has a Natural Rate of Unemployment.It is a different program. And, more people spending money will create demand.We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.More BS as you already stated the current cost for welfare is $14 so it isn't less as you keep claiming. You keep presenting facts that have already been refuted, you seem to find it hard to communicate other than your unsubstantiated BS.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Renaming a thing does not change that thing.
You have to first take that money away from other people, who then cannot spend it.
He doesn’t care, he is a selfish greedy person who wants to take from those who have worked hard and give to those who are lazy. He believe the government is smarter than the people it governs. Very pessimistic view of the world.
Capitalism has a Natural Rate of Unemployment.It is a different program. And, more people spending money will create demand.We could be lowering that ratio and actually improving the efficiency of our economy. People on unemployment are usually ready, or getting ready to enter the labor market.
Welfare costs that much, and doesn't solve most of our problems. Unemployment compensation could actually be solving most of our problems.
Renaming a thing does not change that thing.
You have to first take that money away from other people, who then cannot spend it.
He doesn’t care, he is a selfish greedy person who wants to take from those who have worked hard and give to those who are lazy. He believe the government is smarter than the people it governs. Very pessimistic view of the world.
