Why do men..... ?

[Unkotare]

WTF? ^^^^^

??????

Women are sneaky and kniving.

The have other people to help them in spying, gathering information ; and place others near a " target person "
to get their trust and spy on them..... Also to lead the target person in commenting on a topic of conversation to get answers.

Women sabotage and have others sabotage for them.

A woman's appearance, personality and demeanor..... can be extremely deceptive. The can be misleading.

Gain a " targets trust " and then mess the " target over " and do them wrong.

" Intel - Detail "

Shadow 355

Look, just because you're homosexual doesn't mean you have to hate women to make your bona fides with your 'community.' Accept yourself and get over it.

Your[sic] wrong.

No really, you don't have to hate women just to prove how truly homosexual you are. I'm sure everyone believes you by now.

 

[shadow355]

WTF? ^^^^^

??????

Women are sneaky and kniving.

The have other people to help them in spying, gathering information ; and place others near a " target person "
to get their trust and spy on them..... Also to lead the target person in commenting on a topic of conversation to get answers.

Women sabotage and have others sabotage for them.

A woman's appearance, personality and demeanor..... can be extremely deceptive. The can be misleading.

Gain a " targets trust " and then mess the " target over " and do them wrong.

" Intel - Detail "

Shadow 355

Women are a bit more "covert" then men.
I mean, men will lie too but they are a bit more clumsy about it.

Sorry to hear about the ventilation issues in your Gate.... weird....

And I have to put up with people habitually lying, and misleading me about plant policy's and procedure changes, plant operations, department operations and other things.

People are constantly and repeatedly lying; and changing things.

Shadow 355

 

[danielpalos]

dear, i resort to the fewest fallacies, even in the porn sector; how serious is that.

More bullshit. You have been dishonest or avoiding the topics throughout these threads.

No idea why you added the "porn sector" part, other than your obsession with porn.

i haven't avoided anything; you are merely too incompetent to understand.

Dannyboy, you have avoided numerous subtopics.

nope; you just didn't like the answers.

If they were answers they were not answers to questions I asked.

You avoided answering what military has a doctrine such as you described.

And you avoided answering how you know women say they want a serious relationship but they really don't. The nonsense about fallacies was not even close to an answer. Being dishonest is not an answer. In fact, you have no way of knowing whether a woman try wants a serious relationship or not.

you like to beg the question and resort to red herrings. that is probably why you missed it.

i did not describe a doctrine, but a strategy, dear.

I told you dear, fallacies always give women away. why do you believe they don't want me. they always want the dumb ones they can manipulate.

 

[danielpalos]

.... well at least a few on here, keep posting (whining?) about what they want for women or what they are not getting out of women? What is the point? Looking for someone to agree or commiserate with?

For example:

"Why can't chicks for free have social morals"?
"I want a young student to sit on me and use me for a couch"

I'm sure there are more but it's like over and over and over .....

I have my own wishes but I'm pretty sure they are not going to come true or even that I'll feel better posting about them on here....

Not a criticism, just wondering......

What are you talking about? Usmb is a wishing well and you know it!

women also don't seem to have a sense of humor, either.

 

[danielpalos]

I'll have to think about that... not sure what I'm wishing for... (but I'm sure others are willing to speak for me!)

Not sure what you would wish for, but I am sure you are at the center of plenty of wishes on USMB.

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

nope; i only ask once.

 

[danielpalos]

I'll have to think about that... not sure what I'm wishing for... (but I'm sure others are willing to speak for me!)

Not sure what you would wish for, but I am sure you are at the center of plenty of wishes on USMB.

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

oh, and he's not choosy either! I'm pretty sure he cleans up his act around "real" prospects!
nah.... he's funny - I enjoy watching your banter with him!

You are assuming he has "real prospects"? Quite the optimist, aren't you?

yes; i do. i merely need money to "do it my way". women's way for free sucks too much.

 

[danielpalos]

WTF? ^^^^^

??????

Women are sneaky and kniving.

The have other people to help them in spying, gathering information ; and place others near a " target person "
to get their trust and spy on them..... Also to lead the target person in commenting on a topic of conversation to get answers.

Women sabotage and have others sabotage for them.

A woman's appearance, personality and demeanor..... can be extremely deceptive. The can be misleading.

Gain a " targets trust " and then mess the " target over " and do them wrong.

" Intel - Detail "

Shadow 355

yup; but, they claim to want, equality. and, Only practice manipulation.

 

[danielpalos]

WTF? ^^^^^

??????

Women are sneaky and kniving.

The have other people to help them in spying, gathering information ; and place others near a " target person "
to get their trust and spy on them..... Also to lead the target person in commenting on a topic of conversation to get answers.

Women sabotage and have others sabotage for them.

A woman's appearance, personality and demeanor..... can be extremely deceptive. The can be misleading.

Gain a " targets trust " and then mess the " target over " and do them wrong.

" Intel - Detail "

Shadow 355

Women are a bit more "covert" then men.
I mean, men will lie too but they are a bit more clumsy about it.

Sorry to hear about the ventilation issues in your Gate.... weird....

being good at being "deceptive" is not usually worth more in the non-porn sector.

 

[danielpalos]

WTF? ^^^^^

??????

Women are sneaky and kniving.

The have other people to help them in spying, gathering information ; and place others near a " target person "
to get their trust and spy on them..... Also to lead the target person in commenting on a topic of conversation to get answers.

Women sabotage and have others sabotage for them.

A woman's appearance, personality and demeanor..... can be extremely deceptive. The can be misleading.

Gain a " targets trust " and then mess the " target over " and do them wrong.

" Intel - Detail "

Shadow 355

Women are a bit more "covert" then men.
I mean, men will lie too but they are a bit more clumsy about it.

Sorry to hear about the ventilation issues in your Gate.... weird....

And I have to put up with people habitually lying, and misleading me about plant policy's and procedure changes, plant operations, department operations and other things.

People are constantly and repeatedly lying; and changing things.

Shadow 355

i like to "blame the Right" for having a problem with human sexuality but not the timeless, abomination of hypocrisy. only shills do that.

 

[The Great Goose]

.... well at least a few on here, keep posting (whining?) about what they want for women or what they are not getting out of women? What is the point? Looking for someone to agree or commiserate with?

For example:

"Why can't chicks for free have social morals"?
"I want a young student to sit on me and use me for a couch"

I'm sure there are more but it's like over and over and over .....

I have my own wishes but I'm pretty sure they are not going to come true or even that I'll feel better posting about them on here....

Not a criticism, just wondering......

What are you talking about? Usmb is a wishing well and you know it!

women also don't seem to have a sense of humor, either.

 

[WinterBorn]

More bullshit. You have been dishonest or avoiding the topics throughout these threads.

No idea why you added the "porn sector" part, other than your obsession with porn.

i haven't avoided anything; you are merely too incompetent to understand.

Dannyboy, you have avoided numerous subtopics.

nope; you just didn't like the answers.

If they were answers they were not answers to questions I asked.

You avoided answering what military has a doctrine such as you described.

And you avoided answering how you know women say they want a serious relationship but they really don't. The nonsense about fallacies was not even close to an answer. Being dishonest is not an answer. In fact, you have no way of knowing whether a woman try wants a serious relationship or not.

you like to beg the question and resort to red herrings. that is probably why you missed it.

i did not describe a doctrine, but a strategy, dear.

I told you dear, fallacies always give women away. why do you believe they don't want me. they always want the dumb ones they can manipulate.

You made a claim and then stated that it was military doctrine. You never stated which military has such a doctrine. Of course, I know why you did not state which military has such a doctrine, because none do. Guile is used by superior forces often (probably as often as possible). Your claim that it is only used by inferior forces was a blatant lie. It might have been your ignorance on the topic of military strategy to begin with. But you were shown quite a few examples and told the reasons for using it. You chose to ignore all that in favor of maintaining your original stance.

 

[WinterBorn]

Not sure what you would wish for, but I am sure you are at the center of plenty of wishes on USMB.

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

oh, and he's not choosy either! I'm pretty sure he cleans up his act around "real" prospects!
nah.... he's funny - I enjoy watching your banter with him!

You are assuming he has "real prospects"? Quite the optimist, aren't you?

yes; i do. i merely need money to "do it my way". women's way for free sucks too much.

Your way? LMAO!!! You are so desperate that you have been offering free full body massages with "happy endings".

I have gotten my way with most of the women I have been with. They get their way and I get mine. It is called cooperation. It works well in social & sexual situations.

 

[WinterBorn]

I'll have to think about that... not sure what I'm wishing for... (but I'm sure others are willing to speak for me!)

Not sure what you would wish for, but I am sure you are at the center of plenty of wishes on USMB.

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

nope; i only ask once.

And how is that working out for you so far?

 

[danielpalos]

i haven't avoided anything; you are merely too incompetent to understand.

Dannyboy, you have avoided numerous subtopics.

nope; you just didn't like the answers.

If they were answers they were not answers to questions I asked.

You avoided answering what military has a doctrine such as you described.

And you avoided answering how you know women say they want a serious relationship but they really don't. The nonsense about fallacies was not even close to an answer. Being dishonest is not an answer. In fact, you have no way of knowing whether a woman try wants a serious relationship or not.

you like to beg the question and resort to red herrings. that is probably why you missed it.

i did not describe a doctrine, but a strategy, dear.

I told you dear, fallacies always give women away. why do you believe they don't want me. they always want the dumb ones they can manipulate.

You made a claim and then stated that it was military doctrine. You never stated which military has such a doctrine. Of course, I know why you did not state which military has such a doctrine, because none do. Guile is used by superior forces often (probably as often as possible). Your claim that it is only used by inferior forces was a blatant lie. It might have been your ignorance on the topic of military strategy to begin with. But you were shown quite a few examples and told the reasons for using it. You chose to ignore all that in favor of maintaining your original stance.

That is your red herring. It is a strategy. Guile is not used by truly superior forces since there is no need.

What you describe is simply special pleading.

 

[danielpalos]

I'll have to think about that... not sure what I'm wishing for... (but I'm sure others are willing to speak for me!)

Not sure what you would wish for, but I am sure you are at the center of plenty of wishes on USMB.

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

nope; i only ask once.

And how is that working out for you so far?

it is working out fine; i don't have the same problems you do.

 

[WinterBorn]

Dannyboy, you have avoided numerous subtopics.

nope; you just didn't like the answers.

If they were answers they were not answers to questions I asked.

You avoided answering what military has a doctrine such as you described.

And you avoided answering how you know women say they want a serious relationship but they really don't. The nonsense about fallacies was not even close to an answer. Being dishonest is not an answer. In fact, you have no way of knowing whether a woman try wants a serious relationship or not.

you like to beg the question and resort to red herrings. that is probably why you missed it.

i did not describe a doctrine, but a strategy, dear.

I told you dear, fallacies always give women away. why do you believe they don't want me. they always want the dumb ones they can manipulate.

You made a claim and then stated that it was military doctrine. You never stated which military has such a doctrine. Of course, I know why you did not state which military has such a doctrine, because none do. Guile is used by superior forces often (probably as often as possible). Your claim that it is only used by inferior forces was a blatant lie. It might have been your ignorance on the topic of military strategy to begin with. But you were shown quite a few examples and told the reasons for using it. You chose to ignore all that in favor of maintaining your original stance.

That is your red herring. It is a strategy. Guile is not used by truly superior forces since there is no need.

What you describe is simply special pleading.

Guile is used by most military forces whenever possible. And yes, there IS a need. What you are suggesting is that a military would sacrifice more lives and expend more resources, just to avoid using guile? That is ridiculous.

No special pleading at all. I have presented numerous examples of superior forces using guile and the reasons why they would use guile even if they have an overwhelming advantage. You don't get your men killed when you can avoid it. To claim otherwise is simply ignorant or a lie.

 

[WinterBorn]

Not sure what you would wish for, but I am sure you are at the center of plenty of wishes on USMB.

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

nope; i only ask once.

And how is that working out for you so far?

it is working out fine; i don't have the same problems you do.

You have very low numbers and a lack of experience. I have neither. I am enjoying a very active social life and sex life. What problems do you suppose I have?

 

[danielpalos]

nope; you just didn't like the answers.

If they were answers they were not answers to questions I asked.

You avoided answering what military has a doctrine such as you described.

And you avoided answering how you know women say they want a serious relationship but they really don't. The nonsense about fallacies was not even close to an answer. Being dishonest is not an answer. In fact, you have no way of knowing whether a woman try wants a serious relationship or not.

you like to beg the question and resort to red herrings. that is probably why you missed it.

i did not describe a doctrine, but a strategy, dear.

I told you dear, fallacies always give women away. why do you believe they don't want me. they always want the dumb ones they can manipulate.

You made a claim and then stated that it was military doctrine. You never stated which military has such a doctrine. Of course, I know why you did not state which military has such a doctrine, because none do. Guile is used by superior forces often (probably as often as possible). Your claim that it is only used by inferior forces was a blatant lie. It might have been your ignorance on the topic of military strategy to begin with. But you were shown quite a few examples and told the reasons for using it. You chose to ignore all that in favor of maintaining your original stance.

That is your red herring. It is a strategy. Guile is not used by truly superior forces since there is no need.

What you describe is simply special pleading.

Guile is used by most military forces whenever possible. And yes, there IS a need. What you are suggesting is that a military would sacrifice more lives and expend more resources, just to avoid using guile? That is ridiculous.

No special pleading at all. I have presented numerous examples of superior forces using guile and the reasons why they would use guile even if they have an overwhelming advantage. You don't get your men killed when you can avoid it. To claim otherwise is simply ignorant or a lie.

What you are describing is not true superiority. How much guile did the US employ in Iraq?

 

[danielpalos]

yeah yeah...... whatevah!!!! but thank you!

I'm sure Daniel wishes you would Role Play with him. LMAO! Sorry if you were eating when you read that.

nope; i only ask once.

And how is that working out for you so far?

it is working out fine; i don't have the same problems you do.

You have very low numbers and a lack of experience. I have neither. I am enjoying a very active social life and sex life. What problems do you suppose I have?

having to shill for it.

 

[WinterBorn]

If they were answers they were not answers to questions I asked.

You avoided answering what military has a doctrine such as you described.

And you avoided answering how you know women say they want a serious relationship but they really don't. The nonsense about fallacies was not even close to an answer. Being dishonest is not an answer. In fact, you have no way of knowing whether a woman try wants a serious relationship or not.

you like to beg the question and resort to red herrings. that is probably why you missed it.

i did not describe a doctrine, but a strategy, dear.

I told you dear, fallacies always give women away. why do you believe they don't want me. they always want the dumb ones they can manipulate.

You made a claim and then stated that it was military doctrine. You never stated which military has such a doctrine. Of course, I know why you did not state which military has such a doctrine, because none do. Guile is used by superior forces often (probably as often as possible). Your claim that it is only used by inferior forces was a blatant lie. It might have been your ignorance on the topic of military strategy to begin with. But you were shown quite a few examples and told the reasons for using it. You chose to ignore all that in favor of maintaining your original stance.

That is your red herring. It is a strategy. Guile is not used by truly superior forces since there is no need.

What you describe is simply special pleading.

Guile is used by most military forces whenever possible. And yes, there IS a need. What you are suggesting is that a military would sacrifice more lives and expend more resources, just to avoid using guile? That is ridiculous.

No special pleading at all. I have presented numerous examples of superior forces using guile and the reasons why they would use guile even if they have an overwhelming advantage. You don't get your men killed when you can avoid it. To claim otherwise is simply ignorant or a lie.

What you are describing is not true superiority. How much guile did the US employ in Iraq?

Don't be ridiculous, of course it is true If you were a military commander, wouldn't you want to fool the enemy to save some of the lives of the men serving under you?

The US employed plenty of guile against Iraq. We used guile to mislead the Iraq military as to when and where we would be attacking.