We've defined it ad nauseum, Pogo. So I won't bother again. But here's a start for you:
Edit (to fix link)
Modern liberalism in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wrong page Foxy. The definition of the topic here, from the same site, is here.
Again that is, if we want a finite and specific definition. If OTOH what we want is a vague wispy idea of "them"ness, well have fun in the echo chamber because that's all it is.
I gave you the proper link. And I won't comment further on it out of respect for the integrity of the thread and because of my experience that I can give you a dozen authorities who will concur that modern American social liberalism bears no resemblance to classical liberalism, and you have refused to even read the commentaries, much less acknowledge them. And I really try to resist in engaging in exercises of futility..
I figure, if the thread meant "social liberalism" it would have said that. And again, the fact that a few leftists may call themselves Liberals when it suits a purpose doesn't make them poster children, any more than David Duke calling himself conservative does.
As I've said before I am a linguistic archconservative. I don't cotton to you "liberal" dictionaristas
![rofl :rofl: :rofl:](/styles/smilies/rofl.gif)
We can re-agree to disagree; all I know is I'm the one with the working definition.
![eusa_whistle :eusa_whistle: :eusa_whistle:](/styles/smilies/eusa_whistle.gif)
And let's toss this in: it occurs to me that "liberalism", however we define it, is secondary in the question of this thread. The primary question is "why do people hate?".
That's a legitimate query, it's what brought me here originally, and to the best of my knowledge hasn't been touched.
In that sense the question posed by the thread really isn't about liberalism or about political philosophies. It's about the tenor of discourse in general, on this board and in the greater public. Just a scan back of the last few pages in this thread alone gives these adjectives attributed to alleged "liberals":
"arrogant", "spew lie after lie", "gullible", "blame everyone else", "ends justify the means", "know it all freeloaders" and of course "libtards". Perhaps Brownie summed it up in a convenient bite-size morsel: "Liberalism is all about being stupid, ignorant, lazy, and good for nothing anchors on society. The only work a liberal does is steal from people and whine and complain about their shitty little lives". -- and that's just this thread; we could fill the page with the vitriol from countless other threads.
What do we notice about all of these terms? Not just that they're blanket statements, that's fallacious enough, but that they're all personal traits and none are political. This isn't political analysis. It's demonization pure and simple. It's the Eliminationist mindset that seeks not to understand but to destroy. And the question of this thread as originally laid out was why this dynamic is.
Last edited: