Why Do Republicans Feel Compelled To Say "We're The Party of Lincoln?"

Freedom of Speech.

I know you hate the First Amendment and would regulate what someone says because the truth bothers you and those like you.

As I wrote it is to remind ignorant people that the Democrat Party for Generations did all it could to hold those like you down.

Did you know Nixon was more liberal than Obama when it came to Healthcare for all and yet the Democratic party did not pass the Nixon\Kennedy plan, so it seem the GOP until Reagan was more progressive than the party you suckle the tit from.

I know you hate the reality.
I don't give a rats ass about Nixon, he was the most corrupt POS we've had in Office, until the current resident.

Why are you bringing him into this anyway, deflection?

Your answers aren't making any sense either. What's the purpose of reminding us on what you said?

What PURPOSE does it serve?
 
Dude . Monica was 22.
When they got caught maybe but...she was 19 or 20 when they started up....go ahead prove my point that you still worship him....LMAO

I doubt that, but 18 is the legal age to consent and Lewinsky consented.
So then it is okay for the boss to hump the staff?....your undies are showing lib....
The question was about Lincoln. What are you talking about? Porn stars?
 
The question was about Lincoln. What are you talking about? Porn stars?
Isn't it obvious...? Deflection.

deflection_explained.jpg
 
*sigh* I specified the meaning. You just don't like it.
This is what you said "identity politics" was...

"Politics should be the competition of IDEAS - a contest to determine what is best for the society which the political system supports. The victory of one idea over another does not mean that the proponents of the losing idea are banned from society or killed (which at bottom, is the nature of tribalism)"

I'm saying we're already doing that. The "we" being the people YOU and your ilk, like to accuse of using this made up term "identity politics", it's just that it's ideas YOU, and your ilk, don't like. Therefore, because it's something that we already are doing/engaging in, the term "identity politics" is truly made up, because it has no meaning. Which is what I, and others, have been saying for the longest.


No, that is not what Identity Politics is doing. ID is a tribal system in which you either agree with the ID concepts or you are evil and must be destroyed. It is a RELIGION, not an actual political ideology.
 
I like Tucker, but that term has spread into the common vernacular at this point.
That term is only "common" in the farthest of rightwing precincts.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC


Tucker is not Far Right. He is a Libertarian who does not support either the GOP or the Dems.

But thanks for playing!
 
Tucker is not Far Right. He is a Libertarian who does not support either the GOP or the Dems.

But thanks for playing!
That may be what he SAYS out of one side of his neck, but his ACTIONS are relay a different story.

He consistently finds himself in DEFENSIVE positions on Republicans, and in the OFFENSIVE position when referencing Democrats.

So, yeah, uhm....no.
 
No, that is not what Identity Politics is doing. ID is a tribal system in which you either agree with the ID concepts or you are evil and must be destroyed. It is a RELIGION, not an actual political ideology.
Isn't that how Republicans currently view Democrats?

I want you to be honest here.
 
No, that is not what Identity Politics is doing. ID is a tribal system in which you either agree with the ID concepts or you are evil and must be destroyed. It is a RELIGION, not an actual political ideology.
Isn't that how Republicans currently view Democrats?

I want you to be honest here.


Nonsense. But keep telling yourself that if it gives you comfort.
 
Nonsense. But keep telling yourself that if it gives you comfort.
I've seen those sentiments expressed here on USMB from self-professed conservatives/Republicans, so Right back atcha.
 
IM2 said:
No, he would not. I do believe that if Malcolm X was here today he'd be about the issues of today, not 1963 when he made the comments those like you keep repeating.
Nope
It Was 1965
After The Civil Rights Act
And Just Days Before He Was Murdered

His Quotes Are Very Topical Today
As Libs Have Perfected The Art Of Deceit
Haven't They ??

Now Say, "No"...

Wrong answer maggot.

When blacks gave 80 percent of their vote to the Democratic Party in 1964, black activist Malcolm X called them "political chumps."

This is a quote from one of your favorite black sellouts Larry Elders.

So like I said...….
 
What is it, exactly, are they trying to say, or communicate when they spout that line?

I'd love to have the self-professed Republicans, Conservatives and other assorted Rightwingers of USMB weigh in on this.

Proceed...


Lincoln was the first Republican president.
Just like the Democrat party is the party of Jackson.
 
No, he would not. I do believe that if Malcolm X was here today he'd be about the issues of today, not 1963 when he made the comments those like you keep repeating.

Unlike many vocal negros of today, Malcolm knew who the enemy was. He didn't want to crawl into bed with them like so many do today, educate yourself.

He's probably rolling over in his grave.

If he is rolling it is because of how white racists keep trying to misuse his words.

Barry Goldwater Declares That the 1964 Civil Rights Act Is a Dire Threat to the Liberties of African Americans and Will Create in America the Hallmarks of the Police State: Live from Lynnhaven Fish House CCII: June 23, 2014

Barry Goldwater Declares That the 1964 Civil Rights Act Is a Dire Threat to the Liberties of African Americans and Will Create in America the Hallmarks of the Police State: Live from Lynnhaven Fish House CCII: June 23, 2014

The republican presidential nominee in 1964 opposed 2 important provisions of the civil rights act. Public accommodations and employment. This is what you disingenuous fucks never talk abut. Educate yourself.
 
IM2 said:
Wrong answer maggot.
Nope
Right Answer, Worm

You've Said You Only Accept History From Black Scholarship
But You Could Rip Your Opinions
From The Top Of Any Main-Stream Liberal Rag

They Have Perfected The Art Of Deceit
And You're Gagging On It

Drone On
You'll Never See The Light
Because Your Mind Is Too Dark
 
IM2 said:
If he is rolling it is because of how white racists keep trying to misuse his words..
Nope
Direct Quotes

You Black Racists
Are Just Unable To Think For Yourselves
 
And Willy was a womanizer by the way .
Two years tops......away from being a kid toucher with a cigar....yuck!

Dude . Monica was 22.

And trumpers complaining about Willy? Glass houses....

And Clinton got serviced for free. Trump had to pay $130 k for stormy. Guess we know which president had more brains.


What a vile response. Clinton abused a subordinate employee. Have you read anything about the impact it had on Monica's life? Trump paid Stormy to sign a confidentiality agreement, which he respected. He did nothing to try to destroy her life (which sadly, has been made much more difficult by her exploitive Creepy Porn Lawyer Avenatti).

Oh so vile I am sez you. Monica was 22 years old. As far as her suffering....a matter of opinion.
 
MarcATL said:
That may be what he SAYS out of one side of his neck, but his ACTIONS are relay a different story.
Because Your Mind Is Wired To Translate And Interpret
What You See And Hear, Rather Than What Is Really There
Plain Language In, Gobbledy-Gook Out
That's Why You Can't Seem To Even Understand Each Other
Unless You Repeat Like Parrots What You're Told To Believe
Plus You're All Miserable By Nature

That's The Prog's Primary Affliction
 
And Willy was a womanizer by the way .
Two years tops......away from being a kid toucher with a cigar....yuck!

Dude . Monica was 22.

And trumpers complaining about Willy? Glass houses....

And Clinton got serviced for free. Trump had to pay $130 k for stormy. Guess we know which president had more brains.


What a vile response. Clinton abused a subordinate employee. Have you read anything about the impact it had on Monica's life? Trump paid Stormy to sign a confidentiality agreement, which he respected. He did nothing to try to destroy her life (which sadly, has been made much more difficult by her exploitive Creepy Porn Lawyer Avenatti).
Was stormy and Avenatti after Larry Flint's offer if anyone that could bring Trump down ?? Why do they think that Trump poses such a danger to them ??? Never mind... Off topic.
 
Get back to us when you loons quit worshipping Obabble.
First Rightwing response, no answer.
That was an answer all right. The answer was Republicans are racist.
African Americans are second on their list of hate. Right after gays. But just before Hispanics.
Gotta tie all the gullables (in your mind) together eh ?? The break up of the gullables (in your mind), would be devastating to the agenda, and to the left.
 
No, he would not. I do believe that if Malcolm X was here today he'd be about the issues of today, not 1963 when he made the comments those like you keep repeating.

Unlike many vocal negros of today, Malcolm knew who the enemy was. He didn't want to crawl into bed with them like so many do today, educate yourself.

He's probably rolling over in his grave.

If he is rolling it is because of how white racists keep trying to misuse his words.

Barry Goldwater Declares That the 1964 Civil Rights Act Is a Dire Threat to the Liberties of African Americans and Will Create in America the Hallmarks of the Police State: Live from Lynnhaven Fish House CCII: June 23, 2014

Barry Goldwater Declares That the 1964 Civil Rights Act Is a Dire Threat to the Liberties of African Americans and Will Create in America the Hallmarks of the Police State: Live from Lynnhaven Fish House CCII: June 23, 2014

The republican presidential nominee in 1964 opposed 2 important provisions of the civil rights act. Public accommodations and employment. This is what you disingenuous fucks never talk abut. Educate yourself.


Fuck you, the link is taking everything out of context asshole race baitor


.
 
Dude . Monica was 22.
When they got caught maybe but...she was 19 or 20 when they started up....go ahead prove my point that you still worship him....LMAO

I doubt that, but 18 is the legal age to consent and Lewinsky consented.
So then it is okay for the boss to hump the staff?....your undies are showing lib....
Yeah, he's not considering the power involved, and how that power can be used in a very pervasive and persuasive way against a subordinate. Its wrong, but he is here trying to spin like crazy, but only he will fall dizzy in the end to his bullcrap. LOL
 

Forum List

Back
Top