Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's disastrous for people who live near the coast, that's 2 billion or so peeps who are moving inland, causing problems for the people already living inland. So that's a lot of peeps, 3 or 4 billion out of 7 billion. And don't forget that these displaced people lost their means to grow food, so the rest of us will have to make that up, spiking food price. Yes, it could be really bad.
There is no reliable prediction as to how much sea levels will rise.
Your inevitable doom scenario is best taken with a grain of salt.
What is reliable is that there is no evidence or prediction that sea levels will remain constant or drop over the time period in question.
I keep forgetting. Conservatives are not permitted to learn from sources not approved by cult media propaganda.
OK with me. The more ignorant conservatives are the faster the movement will flush.
Are you even remotely aware of the problems wiki has had with information relating to climate change science, among other things? Asking wiki about any controversial issue is like asking tobacco companies about the dangers of tobacco. Only an idiot would refer to wiki on any topic related to climate science.
The IPCC is a political organization.
Sorry but you cannot with any certainty prove anything you say will happen for a fact.
There are potentially many benefits to a slightly warmer climate.
Why do you ignore what is such a simple idea in favor of your catastrophic mind set?
It's not for the scientists to do anything but dispassionately present their findings with the caveat that their predictions might be completely wrong.
But they don't do that they like you are predicting inevitable catastrophes
That alone is reason not to get too worked up about it.
There is zero evidence that the IPCC is anything but what their mission states. You are counting on a politically motivated conspiracy theory to be true. Trying to avoid that is what inspired the UN to create the IPCC.
The forces of politics are relentless. It is not in the least bit unusual for politicians to employ all manner of truth bending to get their way. On the other hand, it's extremely unusual in legitimate science. Maybe even unprecedented.
People who side with politics and deny science are politicians.
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
There is zero evidence that the IPCC is anything but what their mission states. You are counting on a politically motivated conspiracy theory to be true. Trying to avoid that is what inspired the UN to create the IPCC.
The forces of politics are relentless. It is not in the least bit unusual for politicians to employ all manner of truth bending to get their way. On the other hand, it's extremely unusual in legitimate science. Maybe even unprecedented.
People who side with politics and deny science are politicians.
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
It's disastrous for people who live near the coast, that's 2 billion or so peeps who are moving inland, causing problems for the people already living inland. So that's a lot of peeps, 3 or 4 billion out of 7 billion. And don't forget that these displaced people lost their means to grow food, so the rest of us will have to make that up, spiking food price. Yes, it could be really bad.
OK with me. The more ignorant conservatives are the faster the movement will flush.
I have to disagree with you here P. The more ignorance in the world, the more conservatives. I mean, look at some of the examples around here.
There is zero evidence that the IPCC is anything but what their mission states. You are counting on a politically motivated conspiracy theory to be true. Trying to avoid that is what inspired the UN to create the IPCC.
The forces of politics are relentless. It is not in the least bit unusual for politicians to employ all manner of truth bending to get their way. On the other hand, it's extremely unusual in legitimate science. Maybe even unprecedented.
People who side with politics and deny science are politicians.
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
How do you decide which IPCC findings are convenient enough to accept and which are too inconvenient?
OK with me. The more ignorant conservatives are the faster the movement will flush.
I have to disagree with you here P. The more ignorance in the world, the more conservatives. I mean, look at some of the examples around here.
More wiki crap? Find a better source.
More unjustified Wikipedia cop-out? Find a real argument or just admit the truth.
There is zero evidence that the IPCC is anything but what their mission states. You are counting on a politically motivated conspiracy theory to be true. Trying to avoid that is what inspired the UN to create the IPCC.
The forces of politics are relentless. It is not in the least bit unusual for politicians to employ all manner of truth bending to get their way. On the other hand, it's extremely unusual in legitimate science. Maybe even unprecedented.
People who side with politics and deny science are politicians.
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
How do you decide which IPCC findings are convenient enough to accept and which are too inconvenient?
There is zero evidence that the IPCC is anything but what their mission states. You are counting on a politically motivated conspiracy theory to be true. Trying to avoid that is what inspired the UN to create the IPCC.
The forces of politics are relentless. It is not in the least bit unusual for politicians to employ all manner of truth bending to get their way. On the other hand, it's extremely unusual in legitimate science. Maybe even unprecedented.
People who side with politics and deny science are politicians.
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
It's disastrous for people who live near the coast, that's 2 billion or so peeps who are moving inland, causing problems for the people already living inland. So that's a lot of peeps, 3 or 4 billion out of 7 billion. And don't forget that these displaced people lost their means to grow food, so the rest of us will have to make that up, spiking food price. Yes, it could be really bad.
It's disastrous for people who live near the coast, that's 2 billion or so peeps who are moving inland, causing problems for the people already living inland. So that's a lot of peeps, 3 or 4 billion out of 7 billion. And don't forget that these displaced people lost their means to grow food, so the rest of us will have to make that up, spiking food price. Yes, it could be really bad.
There is no reliable prediction as to how much sea levels will rise.
Your inevitable doom scenario is best taken with a grain of salt.
What is reliable is that there is no evidence or prediction that sea levels will remain constant or drop over the time period in question.
Go to this link and locate for us "climate change", global warming" or "agw"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_controversial_issues
Yeah, amazing command of the facts you've got there Sid.
I keep forgetting. Conservatives are not permitted to learn from sources not approved by cult media propaganda.
OK with me. The more ignorant conservatives are the faster the movement will flush.
Are you even remotely aware of the problems wiki has had with information relating to climate change science, among other things? Asking wiki about any controversial issue is like asking tobacco companies about the dangers of tobacco. Only an idiot would refer to wiki on any topic related to climate science.
I have yet to find an error or non-objective presentation. You object because they don't report denialists lies. They shouldn't.
Go to this link and locate for us "climate change", global warming" or "agw"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_controversial_issues
Yeah, amazing command of the facts you've got there Sid.
As I said, more wiki BS. Here is just one example of the shenanigans that go's on at wiki. I won't even touch on the guy who personally altered over 5000 global warming entries to do away with any of the skeptical arguments, so yes, wiki is unreliable and biased.
"The accuracy of Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, came into question again when a long-standing article on 'NPA personality theory' was confirmed to be a hoax. Not only had the article survived at Wikipedia for the better part of a year, but it had even been listed as a 'Good Article,' supposedly placing it in the top 0.2-0.3% of all Wikipedia articles despite being almost entirely written by the creator of the theory himself."
Long-Term Wikipedia Vandalism Exposed - Slashdot
What is reliable is that there is no evidence or prediction that sea levels will remain constant or drop over the time period in question.
In other words, no one has a clue about what will happen with sea levels.
World heats up, then ice caps melt in Greenland and antarctica... Sea levels will rise, as well as the water itself expands as it's heated. Geez, don't you guys know anything?
World heats up, then ice caps melt in Greenland and antarctica... Sea levels will rise, as well as the water itself expands as it's heated. Geez, don't you guys know anything?
Only the most deluded nutburger warmist cult member believes the ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica are going to melt.
They've melted before in earth's history, so why wouldn't they ever do it again?
What is reliable is that there is no evidence or prediction that sea levels will remain constant or drop over the time period in question.
In other words, no one has a clue about what will happen with sea levels.
World heats up, then ice caps melt in Greenland and antarctica... Sea levels will rise, as well as the water itself expands as it's heated. Geez, don't you guys know anything?
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
How do you decide which IPCC findings are convenient enough to accept and which are too inconvenient?
A good rule of thumb is to ignore everything coming from a proven gang of discredited con artists.
I have never denied the science.
The earth is warming slightly
People have an effect on climate.
I am of the mind that the predictions are overblown and exaggerated and is the result of politicizing the science.
Sorry but to say that a couple degree rise in temperature will be disastrous for the entire planet is just as bad as saying the climate is not changing.
It's disastrous for people who live near the coast, that's 2 billion or so peeps who are moving inland, causing problems for the people already living inland. So that's a lot of peeps, 3 or 4 billion out of 7 billion. And don't forget that these displaced people lost their means to grow food, so the rest of us will have to make that up, spiking food price. Yes, it could be really bad.
it's hardly disasterous. In the next 100 years, people will have to move inland approximately 6 feet. I think society can manage that change.
There is no reliable prediction as to how much sea levels will rise.
Your inevitable doom scenario is best taken with a grain of salt.
What is reliable is that there is no evidence or prediction that sea levels will remain constant or drop over the time period in question.
In other words, no one has a clue about what will happen with sea levels.
