Why do so many people deny climate change

[Uncensored2008]

They've melted before in earth's history, so why wouldn't they ever do it again?

Really? All those dino-SUV's pumping out CO2?

ROFL

You cultists are such morons...

 

[mamooth]

I won't even touch on the guy who personally altered over 5000 global warming entries to do away with any of the skeptical arguments, so yes, wiki is unreliable and biased.

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

 

[westwall]

But the ice is melting in Greenland. It's been demonstrated. The question is, if it's melting now, and we have no alternative but to continue putting more megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere, what's to limit the melting?

Oooooh, megatons of CO2, ooooh what a big number! Biggest you could come up with there mr. luddite? Compare millions with quadrillions, which is the weight of the atmosphere. That's why CO2 is measure in PARTS PER MILLION, because there is so little of it.

Is this supposed to have meaning?

If you weren't a scientific illiterate you would know what it meant.

 

[westwall]

So if it has happened before why do you believe we are responsible this time?

Because then they can steal our money. That's WHY!

And you'd rather dump the responsibility for your life on others. Leech!

I'm not the one demanding you give me your cash asshat. The only leeches here are you and yours. You are too lazy to go out and get an education and get a good job so you are part of this fraud hoping to rake in the big bucks when the government go's out and confiscates everything from those who DO work.

 

[itfitzme]

I won't even touch on the guy who personally altered over 5000 global warming entries to do away with any of the skeptical arguments, so yes, wiki is unreliable and biased.

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

"All denialists are required to chant it."

It is well understood that teenage girls make decisions and rules by consensus. The very nature of reality is determined by consensus.

Denialists also, like a bunch of teenage girls, think by consensus.

 

[itfitzme]

Because then they can steal our money. That's WHY!

And you'd rather dump the responsibility for your life on others. Leech!

I'm not the one demanding you give me your cash asshat. The only leeches here are you and yours. You are too lazy to go out and get an education and get a good job so you are part of this fraud hoping to rake in the big bucks when the government go's out and confiscates everything from those who DO work.

"You are too lazy to go out and get an education and get a good job"

Yeah, now you have just gone of the deep end of projections and transference fantasy land.

" the government go's out and confiscates everything from those who DO work."

And have no actual understanding of how the economy works as last I looked, the government hasn't confiscated food, cars, houses, etc.....

We could talk about that eminent domain thing. We could talk about SNAP and the massive assistance given to farmers. We could talk about what "confiscate" means, in an economic sense. Or you can play some word game regarding what you mean by "the government go's out and confiscates everything". But the reality is that you are absolutely clueless, expressing some sort of wild eyed, amygdala driven, cerebellum deficient, fantasy of you're own creation.

Now we know exactly how crazy you really are.

 

[westwall]

I won't even touch on the guy who personally altered over 5000 global warming entries to do away with any of the skeptical arguments, so yes, wiki is unreliable and biased.

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

Sure it was..... You losers are so easy to manipulate!

How Wikipedia’s green doctor rewrote 5,428 climate articles


How Wikipedia?s green doctor rewrote 5,428 climate articles


The Climategate Emails describe how a small band of climatologists cooked the books to make the last century seem dangerously warm.

The emails also describe how the band plotted to rewrite history as well as science, particularly by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period, a 400 year period that began around 1000 AD.

The Climategate Emails reveal something else, too: the enlistment of the most widely read source of information in the world — Wikipedia — in the wholesale rewriting of this history.


Read more at LiveLeak.com - UK Green MP William Connolley - Wikipedia?s climate doctor


Recently, the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee determined that “William M. Connolley has, on a number of occasions misused his administrator tools by acting while involved” and, as a consequence, “William M. Connolley’s administrative privileges are revoked.” [Link: en.wikipedia.org/.../Abd-William_M._Connolley]


Global Warming
Issues with Wikipedia
In general, Wikipedia provides good information on various subjects. However, when it comes to Global Warming, the quality goes down considerably.
The main problem is that the articles push a single point of view ... very strongly. The "rules" are that new information can not be added unless it is published in a peer reviewed journal. Well, for something this controversial, that is a good rule. However, these guys cheat - even when it is in a journal, and even when written by their heroes, these guys remove anything that does not agree with their preconceived position. Really.

There is way too much to say - it is not worth my time to write it all down. This page just gives a few examples.

Global Warming - Issues with Wikipedia

Know-alls - In Depth - theage.com.au

A good example of William M. Connolley?s work on Wikipedia. | Wikipedia Watch

And on and on....

 

[westwall]

I won't even touch on the guy who personally altered over 5000 global warming entries to do away with any of the skeptical arguments, so yes, wiki is unreliable and biased.

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

"All denialists are required to chant it."

It is well understood that teenage girls make decisions and rules by consensus. The very nature of reality is determined by consensus.

Denialists also, like a bunch of teenage girls, think by consensus.

"The Science is Settled"

 

[bripat9643]

I won't even touch on the guy who personally altered over 5000 global warming entries to do away with any of the skeptical arguments, so yes, wiki is unreliable and biased.

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

"All denialists are required to chant it."

It is well understood that teenage girls make decisions and rules by consensus. The very nature of reality is determined by consensus.

Denialists also, like a bunch of teenage girls, think by consensus.

Turds like you and PMS are the ones who are always chanting the "concensus" mantra.

 

[itfitzme]

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

"All denialists are required to chant it."

It is well understood that teenage girls make decisions and rules by consensus. The very nature of reality is determined by consensus.

Denialists also, like a bunch of teenage girls, think by consensus.

"The Science is Settled"

Seems to be what you keep claiming.

 

[itfitzme]

Ah yes, the William Connelly conspiracy theory. All denialists are required to chant it. It's Based on Lawrence Solomon's wacky fabrications. It is an interesting illustration of how conspiracy theories sweep through the denialosphere. Because this one reinforces their sense of victimhood, they believe it with all their little hearts, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise.

And yes, the story is BS. That kind of goes without saying. I could say more, but it would be more fun to get Westwall to double down on it first.

"All denialists are required to chant it."

It is well understood that teenage girls make decisions and rules by consensus. The very nature of reality is determined by consensus.

Denialists also, like a bunch of teenage girls, think by consensus.

Turds like you and PMS are the ones who are always chanting the "concensus" mantra.

In your imagination.

 

[bripat9643]

World heats up, then ice caps melt in Greenland and antarctica... Sea levels will rise, as well as the water itself expands as it's heated. Geez, don't you guys know anything?

Only the most deluded nutburger warmist cult member believes the ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica are going to melt.

The evidence supporting what you want to be true is?

Try the IPCC report AR5, for one.

 

[bripat9643]

They've melted before in earth's history, so why wouldn't they ever do it again?

The last time they were free of ice was 20 million years ago. Because of Continental drif and thei current locations of thee land masses, that can't happen any longer. Because of the circum polar current, Atarctica is climactically isolated from the rest of the world. Warm water can't reach it. That wasn't the case when it was attached to South America.

But the ice is melting in Greenland. It's been demonstrated. The question is, if it's melting now, and we have no alternative but to continue putting more megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere, what's to limit the melting?

Horeshit. I haven't seen any convincing evidence of that.

 

[bripat9643]

"All denialists are required to chant it."

It is well understood that teenage girls make decisions and rules by consensus. The very nature of reality is determined by consensus.

Denialists also, like a bunch of teenage girls, think by consensus.

Turds like you and PMS are the ones who are always chanting the "concensus" mantra.

In your imagination.

It's recorded here in the forum.

 

[itfitzme]

The last time they were free of ice was 20 million years ago. Because of Continental drif and thei current locations of thee land masses, that can't happen any longer. Because of the circum polar current, Atarctica is climactically isolated from the rest of the world. Warm water can't reach it. That wasn't the case when it was attached to South America.

But the ice is melting in Greenland. It's been demonstrated. The question is, if it's melting now, and we have no alternative but to continue putting more megatons of GHGs into the atmosphere, what's to limit the melting?

Horeshit. I haven't seen any convincing evidence of that.

Study finds Greenland rebounding fast in response to ice loss - implications?

Greenland bedrock rebounding fast as ice departs - earthquake risk? - Fairfax Climate Watch

June | 2012 | Dr. Steve Best

Are you just stupid on purpose?

NASA is shut down but Google has archived alot of images at

https://www.google.com/search?q=gre...noaa.gov%2Fdetect%2Fice-glacier.shtml;540;270

 

[SSDD]

And this post in a nutshell demonstrates PmsMZ's complete break with reality....

Stunning, isn't it? Just when you think you have set the bar as low as possible for them, they slip under it like a limbo king.

 

[SSDD]

Now as soon as you admit that the IPCC is a group of politicians, you'll be on your way to recovery.

The believe that a real scientific body would put an ex railroad engineer / soft core porn writer in charge of their organization.

 

[SSDD]

Because that is the impact of returning the carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere from being being sequestered in the ground for lo these millions of years. We did that. Mother nature was happy with it in the ground where she put it.

You think the earth thinks about where CO2 goes and actually has feelings about it? You just keep providing insights into your thinking. It doesn't look good for you.

 

[SSDD]

Turds like you and PMS are the ones who are always chanting the "concensus" mantra.

I honestly think that they don't think anyone has noticed.

 

[itfitzme]

Turds like you and PMS are the ones who are always chanting the "concensus" mantra.

In your imagination.

It's recorded here in the forum.

Pull it forward, seeing as you are so confident.

BTW, have you figured out photosynthesis and soil carbon yet?