- Jul 28, 2015
- 21,430
- 32,492
The issue is a simple one. Legal definition should revolve around the promulgation of reproduction and survival of human race through heterosexual marraige. If you cannot biologically produce based on two people of same birth gender engage in sexual intercourse, then legal marraige should not be extended
That legal definition would last all of five seconds before the courts struck it down. You invent a reproduction standard, but exempt all heterosexuals if they can't or won't have children, and apply it only to gay couples. Why doesn't that standard apply hertosexuals? Just because?
Why did the justices violate the 14th Amendment by not extending those same marriage rights to all mature willing companions?
*****SMILE*****