- Thread starter
- #281
Polichick... you and Sam Cooke
Yet you can't find any of my linked, sourced, documented quotes to be in error.
You must be an idiot, huh?
The error starts right after you say -- how about a little history...
Your Glen Beck University degree is toilet paper, baby.
You make these unsubstantiated links between mainstream left-of-center dems and atrocities committed by tyrants under the banner of "communism" and "socialism"... yet you fail to understand, communism never really existed except on paper.
Nazi Germany is a dictatorship -- they called themselves socialist, but capitalists got rich, you dumb cow.
Read Animal Farm. No body was every equal in the USSR.
You've got this extreme narrow-minded, dimwitted understanding of history, politics... Jesus you are so far gone, brainwashed.... it would be impossible to bring you back to normalcy, so we'll just mock you like a screeching train wreck on American Idol who doesn't realize she can't sing....
What you're trying to discuss is really too complicated for your small mind to wrap around.
I bet you're the girl who runs out of the community college history class, crying when the prof mocks her for regurgitating some Fox News/Glenn Beck re-write of history.
I bet you think FDR was a bad President... because that's what Beck told you to think.
You have no sense or understanding of history.
Still can't find a single error in my posts, huh?
The vitriol is totally understandable. You simply cannot admit, even to yourself, that you have been so fooled, for so many years, to accept and endorse the very same beliefs as Stalin, Hitler, and pretty much every totalitarian in modern history. Even when the proof is right before your eyes.
I pointed out the error -- right after you say, how about a little history... nothing after that is valid or correct.
See how easy that was.
Your notion that mainstream American Dems love "communism" as represented by Russia is fucking retarded.
Not only do you not really understand what communism was as a failed experiment, nor do you prove in any way form or shape that the modern Democratic party has any connection or like for the concept.
Also, when you number things...
1.
2.
3.
Try to have them relate to one another in such a way that numbering is needed. You know, logic.
Here's what your numbering system looks like:
1. My cat.
2. Bacon.
3. Devil.
4. Obama.
See, only in your crazy head does that make sense.
Get right back to me after you read
Paul Hollander, “Political Pilgrims,”
and
"Dupes: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century,"
by Paul Kengor