- Moderator
- #21
Why does abortion always come up here? Nobody wants to discuss it.
And yet, we have a number of people, including you, discussing it.
Does "Nobody" mean something different than i think it means?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Why does abortion always come up here? Nobody wants to discuss it.
Great response to Dean's logic. You really knocked it out of the park, left me breathless.
What logic. It was a stupid troll post that is pure emotion.
You think "Steven" that getting pregnant and having a baby is just an emotional experience, "Steven"? Or are you just another dunder-headed guy who doesn't have to worry about such things because it ain't your body someone is trying to control?
It's really simple. Every man who is against a woman's right to have an abortion should take it upon themselves to provide birth control. So get thee down to the drugstore, stock up on condoms, make sure you use one EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU WHIP THAT LITTLE THING OUT OF YOUR PANTS.
Then the argument is moot. You control pregnancy, no more abortions. Wear the rubber or just please STFU.
because it is the only straw man argument left to abortion nazis defending murder of children in utero.
Why does abortion always come up here? Nobody wants to discuss it.
because it is the only straw man argument left to abortion nazis defending murder of children in utero.
Great response to Dean's logic. You really knocked it out of the park, left me breathless.
What logic. It was a stupid troll post that is pure emotion.
You think "Steven" that getting pregnant and having a baby is just an emotional experience, "Steven"? Or are you just another dunder-headed guy who doesn't have to worry about such things because it ain't your body someone is trying to control?
It's really simple. Every man who is against a woman's right to have an abortion should take it upon themselves to provide birth control. So get thee down to the drugstore, stock up on condoms, make sure you use one EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU WHIP THAT LITTLE THING OUT OF YOUR PANTS.
Then the argument is moot. You control pregnancy, no more abortions. Wear the rubber or just please STFU.
because it is the only straw man argument left to abortion nazis defending murder of children in utero.
And repubs love to murder children out of the womb, take Iraq for example.
because it is the only straw man argument left to abortion nazis defending murder of children in utero.
And repubs love to murder children out of the womb, take Iraq for example.
They want abortion banned because they need more cannon fodder for the illegal wars.
Why is it, that when arguing against abortion, conservatives always bring up late term abortions, even though less than 1% of abortions are performed after 24 weeks?
And repubs love to murder children out of the womb, take Iraq for example.
They want abortion banned because they need more cannon fodder for the illegal wars.
or cheap labor.
Why is it, that when arguing against abortion, conservatives always bring up late term abortions, even though less than 1% of abortions are performed after 24 weeks?
Why is it liberals use children to exude the false aura of caring about children, such as school shootings, healthcare, welfare, etc., when they advocate killing children in the womb regardless of their stage of development?
Dilemma A: You mourn the loss of children who were shot and killed in some elementary school.
Liberal Response: Ban guns to save children. Nevermind the children, just ban the guns.
Dilemma B: You want affordable healthcare and welfare for children so they won't have to suffer in poverty and squalor
Liberal Response: Republicans are doing anything they can to stand in the way of it, they hate children and want them to suffer or die (Google Bill Pascrell for your example and Harry Reid's statements during the government shutdown for a counterexample).
Dilemma C: Hundreds of thousands of unborn children are slaughtered in utero each year, 54 million since Roe v. Wade. Some of these abortions have been carried out by less then acceptable means which in turn can endanger or kill the the woman.
Liberal Response: Those are just women simply exercising their choice to have an abortion.
Now, why the double standard? Why the complete disregard for life in regards to abortion?
An acorn is a tree yet to be born, an egg is a bird yet to be hatched, and unborn child is a human being about to be born. (Or so I thought)
Why is it, that when arguing against abortion, conservatives always bring up late term abortions, even though less than 1% of abortions are performed after 24 weeks?
Why is it liberals use children to exude the false aura of caring about children, such as school shootings, healthcare, welfare, etc., when they advocate killing children in the womb regardless of their stage of development?
Dilemma A: You mourn the loss of children who were shot and killed in some elementary school.
Liberal Response: Ban guns to save children. Nevermind the children, just ban the guns.
Dilemma B: You want affordable healthcare and welfare for children so they won't have to suffer in poverty and squalor
Liberal Response: Republicans are doing anything they can to stand in the way of it, they hate children and want them to suffer or die (Google Bill Pascrell for your example and Harry Reid's statements during the government shutdown for a counterexample).
Dilemma C: Hundreds of thousands of unborn children are slaughtered in utero each year, 54 million since Roe v. Wade. Some of these abortions have been carried out by less then acceptable means which in turn can endanger or kill the the woman.
Liberal Response: Those are just women simply exercising their choice to have an abortion.
Now, why the double standard? Why the complete disregard for life in regards to abortion?
An acorn is a tree yet to be born, an egg is a bird yet to be hatched, and unborn child is a human being about to be born. (Or so I thought)
I don't see a double standard, TK. There is a difference between someone who has been born and someone who has not...
Why is it, that when arguing against abortion, conservatives always bring up late term abortions, even though less than 1% of abortions are performed after 24 weeks?
Why is it liberals use children to exude the false aura of caring about children, such as school shootings, healthcare, welfare, etc., when they advocate killing children in the womb regardless of their stage of development?
Dilemma A: You mourn the loss of children who were shot and killed in some elementary school.
Liberal Response: Ban guns to save children. Nevermind the children, just ban the guns.
Dilemma B: You want affordable healthcare and welfare for children so they won't have to suffer in poverty and squalor
Liberal Response: Republicans are doing anything they can to stand in the way of it, they hate children and want them to suffer or die (Google Bill Pascrell for your example and Harry Reid's statements during the government shutdown for a counterexample).
Dilemma C: Hundreds of thousands of unborn children are slaughtered in utero each year, 54 million since Roe v. Wade. Some of these abortions have been carried out by less then acceptable means which in turn can endanger or kill the the woman.
Liberal Response: Those are just women simply exercising their choice to have an abortion.
Now, why the double standard? Why the complete disregard for life in regards to abortion?
An acorn is a tree yet to be born, an egg is a bird yet to be hatched, and unborn child is a human being about to be born. (Or so I thought)
I don't see a double standard, TK. There is a difference between someone who has been born and someone who has not...
Elizabeth Williams said:Here’s the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides. She’s the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always.
Why is it liberals use children to exude the false aura of caring about children, such as school shootings, healthcare, welfare, etc., when they advocate killing children in the womb regardless of their stage of development?
Dilemma A: You mourn the loss of children who were shot and killed in some elementary school.
Liberal Response: Ban guns to save children. Nevermind the children, just ban the guns.
Dilemma B: You want affordable healthcare and welfare for children so they won't have to suffer in poverty and squalor
Liberal Response: Republicans are doing anything they can to stand in the way of it, they hate children and want them to suffer or die (Google Bill Pascrell for your example and Harry Reid's statements during the government shutdown for a counterexample).
Dilemma C: Hundreds of thousands of unborn children are slaughtered in utero each year, 54 million since Roe v. Wade. Some of these abortions have been carried out by less then acceptable means which in turn can endanger or kill the the woman.
Liberal Response: Those are just women simply exercising their choice to have an abortion.
Now, why the double standard? Why the complete disregard for life in regards to abortion?
An acorn is a tree yet to be born, an egg is a bird yet to be hatched, and unborn child is a human being about to be born. (Or so I thought)
I don't see a double standard, TK. There is a difference between someone who has been born and someone who has not...
So an acorn isn't a tree? An egg doesn't have a baby chick inside of it? Geez, my biology teacher must have lied to me, Noomi.