Typical liberal wanting to trample on constitutional rights.
If that's Lonestar logic....
The Constitution doesn't say a business can't control content. It says the government can't.
No one suggested it did.
My point is that as a typical liberal, Ravi wants to silence (censor) what she doesn't like. If a person doesn't like what they see on social media, then they should excise their right to not engage in social media. But that would be too easy.
Yeah actually you did.
Nothing in the idea of a commercial business controlling its own content relates to any Constitutional issue, and that's what you just invoked. Commercial media controls its own content all the time.
The Constitution still dictates what the government can do with content or opinion, not what Nosebook can.