Why does Speaker Pelosi need to know how McConnell will conduct the Senate impeachment trial?

[Hellokitty]

Anyone who says Speaker Pelosi has no role in how McConnell conducts the Senate impeachment trial doesn't understand how the system works. She has a major role - since her appointed managers will be presenting and prosecuting the case before the Senate.

The case is coming from the house so she can appoint her manager based on the case she is sending over.

 

[MAGAman]

Only because Trump* got caught - thanks to the whistleblower. Anyway, that's irrelevant in the commission of a crime.

Is that the approved hater's troll line?

Sometimes I forget how many Leftists make such obvious lies because they're ok with looking stupid if it forward their false claims.

 

[Dragonlady]

She does not need to know.

She is abusing her power in an attempt to dictate to the Senate how they will proceed on Impeachment, a violation of the Separation of Powers.

SHE is perpetrating an 'Impeachable Offense'.

Good luck with that. Trump thought that once the Impeachment passed that Democrats would lose all power in the process, just like he thought that when he walked out on Nancy Pelosi in the budget meeting, she'd have to come to him. Pelosi told Donald Trump not to underestimate the power she brings, and yet he consistently thinks he can outwit her. So far she's gotten her way completely, and Trump ends up looking stupid every time he takes her on.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

She doesn't. She has no say in the Senate process.

Maybe not directly - but she has a lot of indirect say.

Nope. No say whatsoever.

That's funny - especially since she is still holding the articles of impeachment.

She can hold them between her legs. She still had no influence over the Senate.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Pelosi has no say in the administration of the a trial in the senate.

Speaker Pelosi has a MAJOR role! Especially since McConnell and Graham said they are not impartial jurors.

Dream on genius. Once the House passes impeachment articles its in the hands of the senate. Pelosi can appoint whomever she wants as prosecutors, but that is the extent. And your BS about McConnell and Graham is funny particularly since the dems in 1998 were not impartial either. You left wing clowns wanted this....so eat it.

Blowjobs and election bribery/extortion are two completely different things.

What bribery?? Other than left wing wet dreams.

The bribery that was proven in the House impeachment. It falls under "abuse of power".

Read the Articles of Impeachment Against President Trump

Why worry about a trial.

You already know he's guitly.

Send him a text. I am sure he'll leave in the morning.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

She doesn't. She has no say in the Senate process.

Maybe not directly - but she has a lot of indirect say.

She won't have any say if there is no trial.

And if there is a trial....she still won't have any say.

She keep sitting on them (and getting off on it) for as long as she likes.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Did she ask Mitch what witness to call?

Pelosi has no say in the administration of the a trial in the senate.

Speaker Pelosi has a MAJOR role! Especially since McConnell and Graham said they are not impartial jurors.

Dream on genius. Once the House passes impeachment articles its in the hands of the senate. Pelosi can appoint whomever she wants as prosecutors, but that is the extent. And your BS about McConnell and Graham is funny particularly since the dems in 1998 were not impartial either. You left wing clowns wanted this....so eat it.

Blowjobs and election bribery/extortion are two completely different things.

What bribery?? Other than left wing wet dreams.

Well, Adam "the proven liar" Schiffhead said so........

 

[The Original Tree]

Because she is going Senile and does not understand we have a bicameral legislature that she has no power over.

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

 

[S.J.]

McConnell should just say: We're gonna use the same rules you used in the House.

 

[deannalw]

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

She doesn't. She has no say in the Senate process.

Maybe not directly - but she has a lot of indirect say.

HAHAHA @ indirect say.

Like howling, growling, and whining like a rabid weasel from the sidelines?

 

[The Original Tree]

She should go have more cancer removed from her face.

When she sends over the articles....she'll get her answer.

Not before then.

Until then, they can continue to function as a high-fiber suppository for the idiotic speaker.

 

[MAGAman]

Good luck with that. Trump thought that once the Impeachment passed that Democrats would lose all power in the process, just like he thought that when he walked out on Nancy Pelosi in the budget meeting, she'd have to come to him. Pelosi told Donald Trump not to underestimate the power she brings, and yet he consistently thinks he can outwit her. So far she's gotten her way completely, and Trump ends up looking stupid every time he takes her on.

Keep telling yourself that.

The MSN isn't America.

 

[OKTexas]

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

BS they know their case, they should be prepared to present it. If they're not they can just sit there, McConnell doesn't want it anyway.

.

 

[The Original Tree]

Adam Schiff has to lie, and his reputation is irreparably damaged, and neither So Called Whistleblower wants to testify about their falsified reports.

Trump releasing The Transcript exposes The DemTard’s Idiocy and Treachery.

Between Nancy battling Cancer and Senility, and her own weak case, she knows she’s in deep shit, so she does what all Democrats do.

When you lose an argument move The Goal Post 100 times.

Only because Trump* got caught - thanks to the whistleblower. Anyway, that's irrelevant in the commission of a crime.

Is that the approved hater's troll line?

Sometimes I forget how many Leftists make such obvious lies because they're ok with looking stupid if it forward their false claims.

 

[MAGAman]

The case is coming from the house so she can appoint her manager based on the case she is sending over.

Oh please. Don't pretend to be a complete brainless loser.

You really think that knowing the witnesses called will change which liars she sends out?

I wish you were around when I sold my car.

 

[OKTexas]

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

She doesn't. She has no say in the Senate process.

Maybe not directly - but she has a lot of indirect say.

Nope. No say whatsoever.

That's funny - especially since she is still holding the articles of impeachment.

Why do you think it's OK for the bitch to obstruct congress?

.

 

[WillowTree]

She does not need to know.

She is abusing her power in an attempt to dictate to the Senate how they will proceed on Impeachment, a violation of the Separation of Powers.

SHE is perpetrating an 'Impeachable Offense'.

Good luck with that. Trump thought that once the Impeachment passed that Democrats would lose all power in the process, just like he thought that when he walked out on Nancy Pelosi in the budget meeting, she'd have to come to him. Pelosi told Donald Trump not to underestimate the power she brings, and yet he consistently thinks he can outwit her. So far she's gotten her way completely, and Trump ends up looking stupid every time he takes her on.

Did the pissant CBC tell ewe that?

 

[Lakhota]

The answer is very simple: Speaker Pelosi will need to appoint House managers with the appropriate skill-sets to serve as prosecutors to present evidence in the case before the Senate. That is another reason why she needs to know if witnesses will be allowed - and which witnesses. Different scenarios would require House managers/prosecutors with different skill-sets.

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

BS they know their case, they should be prepared to present it. If they're not they can just sit there, McConnell doesn't want it anyway.

.

You mean because McConnell says he doesn't want it? That's funny...

 

[Lakhota]

She does not need to know.

She is abusing her power in an attempt to dictate to the Senate how they will proceed on Impeachment, a violation of the Separation of Powers.

SHE is perpetrating an 'Impeachable Offense'.

Good luck with that. Trump thought that once the Impeachment passed that Democrats would lose all power in the process, just like he thought that when he walked out on Nancy Pelosi in the budget meeting, she'd have to come to him. Pelosi told Donald Trump not to underestimate the power she brings, and yet he consistently thinks he can outwit her. So far she's gotten her way completely, and Trump ends up looking stupid every time he takes her on.

Amen!

 

[Lakhota]

McConnell should just say: We're gonna use the same rules you used in the House.

Well, that would include witnesses.