Why I hate 9-11 Truthers

[eots]

But a conspiracy does.

Who says, physics doesn;t have a motive?

Let's look at the photon and how it changes from a wave to a particle when it is observed.

we are talking Engineering / Mechanical Physics not theoretical quantum physics Einstein

no, you are talking out your ass
...
In physics, classical mechanics is one of the two major sub-fields of mechanics, which is concerned with the set of physical laws describing the motion of bodies under the action of a system of forces. The study of the motion of bodies is an ancient one, making classical mechanics one of the oldest and largest subjects in science, engineering and technology.

Classical mechanics describes the motion of macroscopic objects, from projectiles to parts of machinery, as well as astronomical objects, such as spacecraft, planets, stars, and galaxies. Besides this, many specializations within the subject deal with gases, liquids, solids, and other specific sub-topics. Classical mechanics provides extremely accurate results as long as the domain of study is restricted to large objects and the speeds involved do not approach the speed of light. When the objects being dealt with become sufficiently small, it becomes necessary to introduce the other major sub-field of mechanics, quantum mechanics, which reconciles the macroscopic laws of physics with the atomic nature of matter and handles the wave–particle duality of atoms and molecules. In the case of high velocity objects approaching the speed of light, classical mechanics is enhanced by special relativity. General relativity unifies special relativity with Newton's law of universal gravitation, allowing physicists to handle gravitation at a deeper level.

you plageriarised this....

 

[daws101]

we are talking Engineering / Mechanical Physics not theoretical quantum physics Einstein

no, you are talking out your ass
...
In physics, classical mechanics is one of the two major sub-fields of mechanics, which is concerned with the set of physical laws describing the motion of bodies under the action of a system of forces. The study of the motion of bodies is an ancient one, making classical mechanics one of the oldest and largest subjects in science, engineering and technology.

Classical mechanics describes the motion of macroscopic objects, from projectiles to parts of machinery, as well as astronomical objects, such as spacecraft, planets, stars, and galaxies. Besides this, many specializations within the subject deal with gases, liquids, solids, and other specific sub-topics. Classical mechanics provides extremely accurate results as long as the domain of study is restricted to large objects and the speeds involved do not approach the speed of light. When the objects being dealt with become sufficiently small, it becomes necessary to introduce the other major sub-field of mechanics, quantum mechanics, which reconciles the macroscopic laws of physics with the atomic nature of matter and handles the wave–particle duality of atoms and molecules. In the case of high velocity objects approaching the speed of light, classical mechanics is enhanced by special relativity. General relativity unifies special relativity with Newton's law of universal gravitation, allowing physicists to handle gravitation at a deeper level.

you plageriarised this....

wrong as always ...just forgot....Classical mechanics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
unlike yourself who still has not credited this:
" The AIA should be concerned that a modern, 47 floor, steel framed building, meeting all the applicable building codes in 1985 collapsed at free-fall acceleration for eight stories, uniform and symmetric across its length and breadth. This, the official story says, was due to a minor fire (by historical standards).

In response, NIST developed 47 building and fire code recommendations and shepherded them through the standards process. Virtually all were related to firefighting like intercoms in the stairwells.

All of those that were related to structures were either not accepted by the appropriate committees or simply codified best practices already in-place throughout the industry. The closest NIST got to a structural code change was "the definition of the primary structural frame to be broadened to include bracing members essential to vertical whether or not they carry gravity loads." None … not one … were relevant to competent structural design and construction designed to prevent a catastrophic, accelerating, progressive collapse of a high-rise steel framed skyscraper.

AIA members should be alarmed that no significant structural building codes emanated from this free-fall building collapse. Either unsafe, easily collapsed buildings are acceptable to AIA members ... or AIA members support the underlying fraudulent and misleading NIST reports ... or AIA members haven’t looked."- plagiarized by EOTS.

 

[eots]

no, you are talking out your ass
...
In physics, classical mechanics is one of the two major sub-fields of mechanics, which is concerned with the set of physical laws describing the motion of bodies under the action of a system of forces. The study of the motion of bodies is an ancient one, making classical mechanics one of the oldest and largest subjects in science, engineering and technology.

Classical mechanics describes the motion of macroscopic objects, from projectiles to parts of machinery, as well as astronomical objects, such as spacecraft, planets, stars, and galaxies. Besides this, many specializations within the subject deal with gases, liquids, solids, and other specific sub-topics. Classical mechanics provides extremely accurate results as long as the domain of study is restricted to large objects and the speeds involved do not approach the speed of light. When the objects being dealt with become sufficiently small, it becomes necessary to introduce the other major sub-field of mechanics, quantum mechanics, which reconciles the macroscopic laws of physics with the atomic nature of matter and handles the wave–particle duality of atoms and molecules. In the case of high velocity objects approaching the speed of light, classical mechanics is enhanced by special relativity. General relativity unifies special relativity with Newton's law of universal gravitation, allowing physicists to handle gravitation at a deeper level.

you plageriarised this....

wrong as always ...just forgot....Classical mechanics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
unlike yourself who still has not credited this:
" The AIA should be concerned that a modern, 47 floor, steel framed building, meeting all the applicable building codes in 1985 collapsed at free-fall acceleration for eight stories, uniform and symmetric across its length and breadth. This, the official story says, was due to a minor fire (by historical standards).

In response, NIST developed 47 building and fire code recommendations and shepherded them through the standards process. Virtually all were related to firefighting like intercoms in the stairwells.

All of those that were related to structures were either not accepted by the appropriate committees or simply codified best practices already in-place throughout the industry. The closest NIST got to a structural code change was "the definition of the primary structural frame to be broadened to include bracing members essential to vertical whether or not they carry gravity loads." None … not one … were relevant to competent structural design and construction designed to prevent a catastrophic, accelerating, progressive collapse of a high-rise steel framed skyscraper.

AIA members should be alarmed that no significant structural building codes emanated from this free-fall building collapse. Either unsafe, easily collapsed buildings are acceptable to AIA members ... or AIA members support the underlying fraudulent and misleading NIST reports ... or AIA members haven’t looked."- plagiarized by EOTS.

lol...I posted it with the link you plagiarist moron

 

[daws101]

you plageriarised this....

wrong as always ...just forgot....Classical mechanics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
unlike yourself who still has not credited this:
" The AIA should be concerned that a modern, 47 floor, steel framed building, meeting all the applicable building codes in 1985 collapsed at free-fall acceleration for eight stories, uniform and symmetric across its length and breadth. This, the official story says, was due to a minor fire (by historical standards).

In response, NIST developed 47 building and fire code recommendations and shepherded them through the standards process. Virtually all were related to firefighting like intercoms in the stairwells.

All of those that were related to structures were either not accepted by the appropriate committees or simply codified best practices already in-place throughout the industry. The closest NIST got to a structural code change was "the definition of the primary structural frame to be broadened to include bracing members essential to vertical whether or not they carry gravity loads." None … not one … were relevant to competent structural design and construction designed to prevent a catastrophic, accelerating, progressive collapse of a high-rise steel framed skyscraper.

AIA members should be alarmed that no significant structural building codes emanated from this free-fall building collapse. Either unsafe, easily collapsed buildings are acceptable to AIA members ... or AIA members support the underlying fraudulent and misleading NIST reports ... or AIA members haven’t looked."- plagiarized by EOTS.

lol...I posted it with the link you plagiarist moron

now your just lying, this link Architects Shy From Trutherism - Architecture - Architect Magazine Page 1 of 3
is the same one I originally posted and you copied.
neither links to the the uncredited crap you posted .
as always you're too much of a coward to own up!

 

[daws101]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-documentary-among-most-watched-on-pbs-3.html

post #34

 

[eots]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-documentary-among-most-watched-on-pbs-3.html

post #34

thats the link you pathetic loser you simply do not know how to scroll down...lol...what a moron

 

[daws101]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-documentary-among-most-watched-on-pbs-3.html

post #34

thats the link you pathetic loser you simply do not know how to scroll down...lol...what a moron

right!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

somone farted in here.Happened two times in a row before Eots last post as well.

 

[eots]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-documentary-among-most-watched-on-pbs-3.html

post #34

thats the link you pathetic loser you simply do not know how to scroll down...lol...what a moron

right!

yes that is exactly right if you click the link scroll down you will see the the above piece...you see.. you post a portion of something then you post a link as to where it came from, you should try it some time..its not my fault you cant scroll down..really its not

 

[Wyld Kard]

quote=rightwinger;5975664]

Did a plane crash into the Pentagon?
Did flight 93 crash in Shanksville?

Why didn't they find the two 6 ton each Pratt & Whitney engines from the Boeing 757 at the Pentagon? why didn't they find the landing gear? What happen to the seats, the luggage, the Tail section ?

Why didn't they find any identifiable plane parts at Shankville. It was pretty devoid of plane parts. Just a whole in the ground. No evidence of blood either. I'd say it was shot down and the plane parts scattered.

They did find the engines as well as the landing gear and American Airline fuselage. They also found body parts of the passengers

Why are you such a scumbag as to tell surviving family that it is not their loved ones?

[/QUOTE]

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.

 

[rightwinger]

quote=rightwinger;5975664]

Did a plane crash into the Pentagon?
Did flight 93 crash in Shanksville?

Why didn't they find the two 6 ton each Pratt & Whitney engines from the Boeing 757 at the Pentagon? why didn't they find the landing gear? What happen to the seats, the luggage, the Tail section ?

Why didn't they find any identifiable plane parts at Shankville. It was pretty devoid of plane parts. Just a whole in the ground. No evidence of blood either. I'd say it was shot down and the plane parts scattered.

They did find the engines as well as the landing gear and American Airline fuselage. They also found body parts of the passengers

Why are you such a scumbag as to tell surviving family that it is not their loved ones?

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.[/QUOTE]





You have proof from Boeing or just Truther websites?

Of course all the pieces were from a Boeing 757 and the serial numbers match to the specific plane and the DNA matches to the passengers as well as luggage and personal effects

But you are too much scum to tell family members that the remains they buried do not belong to their loved ones

You sir, are despicable

 

[Wyld Kard]

quote=rightwinger;5975664]

Why didn't they find the two 6 ton each Pratt & Whitney engines from the Boeing 757 at the Pentagon? why didn't they find the landing gear? What happen to the seats, the luggage, the Tail section ?

Why didn't they find any identifiable plane parts at Shankville. It was pretty devoid of plane parts. Just a whole in the ground. No evidence of blood either. I'd say it was shot down and the plane parts scattered.

They did find the engines as well as the landing gear and American Airline fuselage. They also found body parts of the passengers

Why are you such a scumbag as to tell surviving family that it is not their loved ones?

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.

You have proof from Boeing or just Truther websites?

Of course all the pieces were from a Boeing 757 and the serial numbers match to the specific plane and the DNA matches to the passengers as well as luggage and personal effects

But you are too much scum to tell family members that the remains they buried do not belong to their loved ones

You sir, are despicable[/QUOTE]

Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you abuse the priviledge.

Let's see if your small & feeble mind can answer these questions:

Why, after all these years, haven't we seen any clear photos of the "plane" that struck the Pentagon?

Why are there NO HOLES in the Pentagon where the plane's enormous engines would have impacted?

Why are there NO BROKEN WINDOWS one either side of the hole or damage to the outer wall from the wings?

Where is the tail section, vertical stabilizer and fuselage?

Why is the Pentagon lawn all torn up, a significant sign of an airplane crash?

A Boeing 757 is 60 tons and IF a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon, it would leave 60 tons of scrap, NOT A FEW PIECES.

There is NO PROOF AT ALL that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on 9/11. You Rightwinger ARE WRONG, HAVE BEEN WRONG, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WRONG! Deal with it.

Good thing that you indicated that you work in a sewer, after all you are FULL OF SHIT!!

 

[eots]

Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.
Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic.

Essay:

"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …

As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." Physics911, by Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven, 9/11/2001

 

[rightwinger]

quote=rightwinger;5975664]

They did find the engines as well as the landing gear and American Airline fuselage. They also found body parts of the passengers

Why are you such a scumbag as to tell surviving family that it is not their loved ones?

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.

You have proof from Boeing or just Truther websites?

Of course all the pieces were from a Boeing 757 and the serial numbers match to the specific plane and the DNA matches to the passengers as well as luggage and personal effects

But you are too much scum to tell family members that the remains they buried do not belong to their loved ones

You sir, are despicable

Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you abuse the priviledge.

Let's see if your small & feeble mind can answer these questions:

Why, after all these years, haven't we seen any clear photos of the "plane" that struck the Pentagon?

Why are there NO HOLES in the Pentagon where the plane's enormous engines would have impacted?

Why are there NO BROKEN WINDOWS one either side of the hole or damage to the outer wall from the wings?

Where is the tail section, vertical stabilizer and fuselage?

Why is the Pentagon lawn all torn up, a significant sign of an airplane crash?

A Boeing 757 is 60 tons and IF a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon, it would leave 60 tons of scrap, NOT A FEW PIECES.

There is NO PROOF AT ALL that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on 9/11. You Rightwinger ARE WRONG, HAVE BEEN WRONG, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WRONG! Deal with it.

Good thing that you indicated that you work in a sewer, after all you are FULL OF SHIT!![/QUOTE]

There were holes, there were broken windows, there was tons of traceable wreckage, there were dead passengers

Truther denial does not equate to fact

 

[daws101]

Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force career.
Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic.

Essay:

"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …

As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." Physics911, by Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven, 9/11/2001

invalid source!

 

[daws101]

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.

You have proof from Boeing or just Truther websites?

Of course all the pieces were from a Boeing 757 and the serial numbers match to the specific plane and the DNA matches to the passengers as well as luggage and personal effects

But you are too much scum to tell family members that the remains they buried do not belong to their loved ones

You sir, are despicable

Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you abuse the priviledge.

Let's see if your small & feeble mind can answer these questions:

Why, after all these years, haven't we seen any clear photos of the "plane" that struck the Pentagon?

Why are there NO HOLES in the Pentagon where the plane's enormous engines would have impacted?

Why are there NO BROKEN WINDOWS one either side of the hole or damage to the outer wall from the wings?

Where is the tail section, vertical stabilizer and fuselage?

Why is the Pentagon lawn all torn up, a significant sign of an airplane crash?

A Boeing 757 is 60 tons and IF a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon, it would leave 60 tons of scrap, NOT A FEW PIECES.

There is NO PROOF AT ALL that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on 9/11. You Rightwinger ARE WRONG, HAVE BEEN WRONG, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WRONG! Deal with it.

Good thing that you indicated that you work in a sewer, after all you are FULL OF SHIT!!

There were holes, there were broken windows, there was tons of traceable wreckage, there were dead passengers

Truther denial does not equate to fact[/QUOTE]bump

 

[eots]

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.

You have proof from Boeing or just Truther websites?

Of course all the pieces were from a Boeing 757 and the serial numbers match to the specific plane and the DNA matches to the passengers as well as luggage and personal effects

But you are too much scum to tell family members that the remains they buried do not belong to their loved ones

You sir, are despicable

Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you abuse the priviledge.

Let's see if your small & feeble mind can answer these questions:

Why, after all these years, haven't we seen any clear photos of the "plane" that struck the Pentagon?

Why are there NO HOLES in the Pentagon where the plane's enormous engines would have impacted?

Why are there NO BROKEN WINDOWS one either side of the hole or damage to the outer wall from the wings?

Where is the tail section, vertical stabilizer and fuselage?

Why is the Pentagon lawn all torn up, a significant sign of an airplane crash?

A Boeing 757 is 60 tons and IF a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon, it would leave 60 tons of scrap, NOT A FEW PIECES.

There is NO PROOF AT ALL that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on 9/11. You Rightwinger ARE WRONG, HAVE BEEN WRONG, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WRONG! Deal with it.

Good thing that you indicated that you work in a sewer, after all you are FULL OF SHIT!!

There were holes,

TALK ABOUT DENIAL...there was one hole

there were broken windows,

no broken windows...

there was tons of traceable wreckage,

not one serial number on any recovered peice

there were dead passengers

no body parts of any kind..the bodies recovered are pentagon employees

Truther denial does not equate to fact

I am unsure what happened at the pentagon but at least stick to the facts

 

[daws101]

quote=rightwinger;5975664]

They did find the engines as well as the landing gear and American Airline fuselage. They also found body parts of the passengers

Why are you such a scumbag as to tell surviving family that it is not their loved ones?

You are the FIRST dumb-ass to say that both engines were found.

One engine was found and it is too small to have come from a Boeing 757. Same deal for the landing gear, it is too small to have come from Boeing 757, and I bet you didn't know that a wheel hub was found as well, and guess what - it's too small as well.

They also found body parts? 100% BULLSHIT

There is NO PROOF of a plane ever hitting the Pentagon. The engine found most likely came from a Global Hawk Airforce Drone.

You have proof from Boeing or just Truther websites?

Of course all the pieces were from a Boeing 757 and the serial numbers match to the specific plane and the DNA matches to the passengers as well as luggage and personal effects

But you are too much scum to tell family members that the remains they buried do not belong to their loved ones

You sir, are despicable

Everyone is entitled to be stupid but you abuse the priviledge.

Let's see if your small & feeble mind can answer these questions:

Why, after all these years, haven't we seen any clear photos of the "plane" that struck the Pentagon?

Why are there NO HOLES in the Pentagon where the plane's enormous engines would have impacted?

Why are there NO BROKEN WINDOWS one either side of the hole or damage to the outer wall from the wings?

Where is the tail section, vertical stabilizer and fuselage?

Why is the Pentagon lawn all torn up, a significant sign of an airplane crash?

A Boeing 757 is 60 tons and IF a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon, it would leave 60 tons of scrap, NOT A FEW PIECES.

There is NO PROOF AT ALL that a Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on 9/11. You Rightwinger ARE WRONG, HAVE BEEN WRONG, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WRONG! Deal with it.

Good thing that you indicated that you work in a sewer, after all you are FULL OF SHIT!![/QUOTE]

 

[eots]

Account of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...



It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...


I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[daws101]

Account of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...



It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...


I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report