Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You said that Gore had no impact outside of the USA.
Sweden is outside of the USA.
.
Denial. It's not just a vector for Schistosomiasis anymore, is it?I think he meant to say that Algore has almost no influence IN the United States. He's lauded by the rest of the ecofascisti world wide.
That really is the most staggering drivel.
What percent of Mozambique was heavily instrumented to measure climate change in 1880? Any of the land masses you cite? Again, where is the basis for your claims?
If there is no instrumental record, there is no point in citing the instrumental record.
Most of the Southern Hemisphere is water and a reliable method of measuring the temperature of Ocean water was not in place until about 5 years ago.
So if measurements could not be made until 5 years ago - what places in the Northern Hemisphere were heavily instrumented in 1880?
Jesus man..this is just nosensical!!
What percent of Mozambique was heavily instrumented to measure climate change in 1880? Any of the land masses you cite? Again, where is the basis for your claims?
If there is no instrumental record, there is no point in citing the instrumental record.
Most of the Southern Hemisphere is water and a reliable method of measuring the temperature of Ocean water was not in place until about 5 years ago.
So if measurements could not be made until 5 years ago - what places in the Northern Hemisphere were heavily instrumented in 1880?
Jesus man..this is just nosensical!!
You said that Gore had no impact outside of the USA.
Sweden is outside of the USA.
.
Ha! Really?
Wonderful stuff....and how many people around the world are aware of people like Jose Saramago, Adam G. Riess or Dan Shechtman?
Because they have also won Nobel Prizes, haven't they?
Al Gore has never been a major public figure outside of the US. Never and nowhere.
They did as good a job as I've seen of trying to make them look aesthetic, but they're still ugly buggers wherever they are. But the Copenhagen ones weren't as ugly as the Pickens group south of Lamar all the way down the road through Oklahoma's panhandle to Amarillo. Barf.
They aren't as ugly, nor as smelly and health hazardous as oil derricks, strip mines and smoke stacks, but we still seem to have them all around the nation.
Indeed they aren't.
I don't particularly like the look of wind mills, but if they are set alongside highways or out at sea, they don't bother me.
The plant did fine with the earthquake and it would have weathered the tsunami as well if they had bothered to place the back up generators on the roofs of the containment buildings like they had been told to do. The tsunami wiped out the generators and that is what led to the meltdown.
Basically the Japanese got complacent because they think they know everything there is to know about earthquakes and tsunamis. Complacency kills.
Complacency with wind, solar or tidal is not dangerous to the wider community, and in a democracy, that matters too.
Nuclear accidents are not common, but when they do occur, they can threaten the entire country. That fact has to be part of the equation when choosing the best overall policy for energy as well as other factors.
No, fucktard, we have enough data to show greenhouse theory, trends, and more trends, including ongoing disaster scenarios. We have a game, called hockey, where we are at a standoff, headed for a face-off, since you keep spamming puckey, hooking without a stick, to skate off, leaving theorists to cross-check your non-links.So, in view of what we can actually rely on as accurate measurements of the wold's climate, we are limited to a period of about 35 years for the mid Troposphere and about 5 years for the oceans.
You are recommending destroying the already shaky economies of the world based on this?
How many trillions do you want us to waste on CO2 reduction?
How much is western civilization worth to you?
How much lower will the temperature be in 2080 if we follow your advice?
Unlikely enough lower to avoid a lot of expensive consequences, but hopefully enough lower to avoid the irrecoverable consequences. Most of the next century is already in the pipeline, at least as far as the changes we are likely to see in the next 50 years, we can make things worse, but due to lags in system response and the momentum the system has already been given, there isn't much we can do that will make the next half century retreat from the course we are currently influencing.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM-G0bkl8MQ]That don't make no sense - YouTube[/ame]No, fucktard, we have enough data to show greenhouse theory, trends, and more trends, including ongoing disaster scenarios. We have a game, called hockey, where we are at a standoff, headed for a face-off, since you keep spamming puckey, hooking without a stick, to skate off, leaving theorists to cross-check your non-links.So, in view of what we can actually rely on as accurate measurements of the wold's climate, we are limited to a period of about 35 years for the mid Troposphere and about 5 years for the oceans.
You are recommending destroying the already shaky economies of the world based on this?
You skate off, like your form is so awesome, how could you not get a '10' for form? But you are like a parading punk, in speedos, who wants the only public agenda to be for new bath-houses, never mind how we have all heard of HIV, by now. Screw you, with plastic, punk!
You mean by 'destoying the already shaky economies of the world,' we will have to lose the oil companies, somehow! One more try, pull your stupid head, out of your fat, spotted ass! Your head only lives up your ass because you like the taste, of your own shit. Try some Jack Daniels and doughnuts, like your wingnutty wingmen scarf.
No thanks for the spam, Big Poof.
It's Saturday. Are all the wild wingnut wingmen going to marry each other, adopt us kids, and make us eat gay spam-sandwiches at the local Log Cabin Club diner?
No, fucktard, we have enough data to show greenhouse theory, trends, and more trends, including ongoing disaster scenarios. We have a game, called hockey, where we are at a standoff, headed for a face-off, since you keep spamming puckey, hooking without a stick, to skate off, leaving theorists to cross-check your non-links.So, in view of what we can actually rely on as accurate measurements of the wold's climate, we are limited to a period of about 35 years for the mid Troposphere and about 5 years for the oceans.
You are recommending destroying the already shaky economies of the world based on this?
You skate off, like your form is so awesome, how could you not get a '10' for form? But you are like a parading punk, in speedos, who wants the only public agenda to be for new bath-houses, never mind how we have all heard of HIV, by now. Screw you, with plastic, punk!
You mean by 'destoying the already shaky economies of the world,' we will have to lose the oil companies, somehow! One more try, pull your stupid head, out of your fat, spotted ass! Your head only lives up your ass because you like the taste, of your own shit. Try some Jack Daniels and doughnuts, like your wingnutty wingmen scarf.
I don't drink, Savethetards. I haven't had a drop of beer, in years of knowing you were queer. I don't know why you don't go out. I did a nice workout, today
The true instrument record started in about 1980 when the satellite measuring was documented. This method lends itself well to worldwide measurements and is not subjected to the constant rigging needed for the various land stations to be made sensical.
So, in view of what we can actually rely on as accurate measurements of the wold's climate, we are limited to a period of about 35 years for the mid Troposphere and about 5 years for the oceans.
You are recommending destroying the already shaky economies of the world based on this?
Denial. It's not just a vector for Schistosomiasis anymore, is it?I think he meant to say that Algore has almost no influence IN the United States. He's lauded by the rest of the ecofascisti world wide.
That really is the most staggering drivel.
The true instrument record started in about 1980 when the satellite measuring was documented. This method lends itself well to worldwide measurements and is not subjected to the constant rigging needed for the various land stations to be made sensical.
So, in view of what we can actually rely on as accurate measurements of the wold's climate, we are limited to a period of about 35 years for the mid Troposphere and about 5 years for the oceans.
You are recommending destroying the already shaky economies of the world based on this?
I'm recommending we utilise what we can learn from ice core samples, and what we know about climate dating back at least hundreds of years.
Of course our understanding of climate improves as our ability to monitor climate improves - but we have temperature records going back to the 1850s, and I see no reason not to consider it.
