- Jul 21, 2009
- 133,120
- 69,782
- Thread starter
- #21
Nope........they never even had a real Batcave while Bale was Batman. Keaton was pretty decent when it came to being Bruce Wayne because he was trying to be what he was, a spoiled rich guy with a split personality. Bale, also, felt that his raspy voice would disguise who he was. All it did was make him sound ridiculous.So far Michael Keaton has been the best Batman. They opted for Ben Afleck in the latest go around. George Clooney sucked. You'd think they would have learned.agreed that she should look something like Rhonda Rousy.Hollywood seems to always fuck up the casting of superhero characters in film these days. they never should have allowed tim burton near a batman movie.i still cant get over it to this day how he cast short,skinny runt, half balding receding hairline michael keaton for tall,muscular,handsome,full set of hair bruce wayne.he only cast him cause he was friends with him,he did not care about making the best casting choice possible.
now back to the OP,first hollywood screws it up in the movies with supergirl casting helen slater who was a skinny wimp as well but could not act worth a shit either.
Hollywood is repeating history again with supergirl.
obviously you have a mancrush on keaton the fact you ignored everything i posted.
wrong.christian bale is the best so far hands down,no contest and this is why. Keaton was a good Batman but a horrible Bruce Wayne acting nothing like him. Kilmer was a better batman because he at least LOOKED the part.Kilmer was just the opposite,good Bruce Wayne but not a very good Batman. you did get Clooney right though.Clooney sucked in both roles.
Bale however was the only one of the four who was great in BOTH roles.He was great as BOTH Bruce Wayne AND Batman.
You have been taken to school son.