Why is the left still so angry???

[Derideo_Te]

Better yet suggest that tries to abolish SCOTUS like FDR did. After all they have been reduced to a cabinet level position.

.

Actually FDR did not try to "abolish" the SCOTUS at all. Instead he tried to "pack the court" by adding additional justices.

Scalia and Ginsberg are the 2 oldest justices on the court at the present time by my recollection. Holding onto their positions for another 3 years is certainly feasible but sometimes health issues intervene.

There was no "try". He DID pack the court to get his unconstitutional policies deemed constitutional.

The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937[1] (frequently called the "court-packing plan")[2] was a legislative initiative proposed by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to add more justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. Roosevelt's purpose was to obtain favorable rulings regarding New Deal legislation that had been previously ruled unconstitutional.[3] The central and most controversial provision of the bill would have granted the President power to appoint an additional Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court, up to a maximum of six, for every sitting member over the age of 70 years and 6 months.

In which case can you please provide the names of the additional supreme court justices that he added over and above the original 9 justices?

 

[Nosmo King]

so....despite your lies.....it's the nasty Republicans who are forcing you to become a Socialist....?

What is the virtue of the Republican agenda? We did indeed suffer the Great Depression in the 1930s due to Republican indifference to the red hot stock market. We did indeed suffer the effects of business scandals due to Republican indifference to the maleficence. The Real Estate collapse, the global financial collapse were magnified due to Republican indifference. Two wars funded on Chinese credit cards was a Republican tent pole position. Careening from financial crisis to financial crisis is a result of Republican petulance from the Tea Party delegation.

So, I ask again, what is the virtue of Republican policies?

And why should anything that calls Republicans out as indifferent or petty be automatically assumed to be Socialist? Is this just a page from a 60 year old Republican playbook? Or can the Right think no deeper than a bumper sticker?

And now we have a socialist junior Hitler president that has stacked SEVEN TRILLION onto the debt in FIVE YEARS, due to LIBERAL INDIFFERENCE, and that is topped with a nationalist health care take over that will ensure a collapse to our already crippled economy, due to LIBERAL INDIFFERENCE.

Glad you have your blinders on, or you just might see the truth, and you don't want to see that, that's obvious.

Blaming republicans for this DEMOCRAT ECONOMY is just pure PATHETIC and INSINCERE.

Given the results of Republican policies (depression, unfunded wars, financial and real estate market collapses) what is the virtue of Republican policies?

 

[kaz]

so....despite your lies.....it's the nasty Republicans who are forcing you to become a Socialist....?

It is the real answer to the question in the op. The left are so angry because hate is the fuel in their tank. They have no positive agenda to offer. Without hate and anger they would be lost.

Sounds an awful lot like what psychologists call "projecting" to me.

Ask the garden variety Tea Party partisan:

What a dumb ass. You just by definition said it was not projection since you told me to "ask" someone the question. Liberals, wow... As to your questions.

same sex marriage? Hate or accept?

Tea party are fiscal conservatives who think government is spending too much money on this. As a group they have no position and individually they are on both sides. Certainly a lot do thing as you suggest. And clearly many do not.

Environmental safe guards? Hate or accept?

Tea party are fiscal conservatives who think government is spending too much money on this. As a group they have no position and individually they are on both sides. Certainly a lot do thing as you suggest. And clearly many do not.

Medicare, food stamps, housing subsidies? Hate or accept?

Finally you picked a relevant topic to the tea party. They certainly want to reduce spending in those programs, but there isn't much evidence they want to eliminate them.

The current President of the United States of America? Hate or accept?

Do fiscal conservatives hate or accept a socialist. You're on to something there skippy. Fiscal conservatives do hate a socialist President. You get a star for this one, well done.

The radical Right's message is framed in terms of warfare and carried out in terms of a street fight.

The tea party are fiscal conservatives, you're confusing them with neocons. Definitions of words are not your strong suit. Maybe you can bake.

Don't wrap the Tea Party in the cloak of brotherhood, reconciliation and responsibility when they have yet to display any of those virtues.

Since you don't even know what they stand for, your conclusion is pretty irrelevant.

Google is a wonderful tool. Here are terms for you to look up.

Tea party / fiscal conservative
neocon
socon
libertarian

There are both overlaps and contradictions between those groups, but they are all different groups. Once you learn what the terms mean, come back and we can have a more fruitful discussion of the implications of them.

The problem is that there are more liberals than all those groups combined.

 

[Sallow]

That doesn't even begin to cover the cost of veterans benefits to the 30,000 or so that were wounded in Iraq..which of course isn't tacked to the military cost.

And you've forgotten to add in TARP, The Department of Homeland Security and the brand new Medicare Drug benefit.

That..and No Child Left Behind.

Are you talking about all of those bills that were passed by the Congress with BI-PARTISAN support? That means some Democrats voted FOR them, unlike the ACA where not a single Republican voted FOR it.

BTW, No Child Left Behind was authored by none other than Ted Kennedy in Bush's first attempt to have a civil relationship with the Democrats. Did a poor old dead Kennedy back stab Bush?

Shallow can only continue to debate by movingt he goal posts. It was the wars! Well, AND it was THIS too! And see!? Democrats voted for programs and wars that LOLberals dont like and that shows good negotiations!


You're a fucking despicable liar, and a hoorible debater, Shallow. Negged for being so.

I didn't move any goalposts.

Your boy didn't pay for shit. He actually did worse than that..he cut government revenue while larding on expenses.

He left the bill for the next guy..as well as the mess.

 

[007]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYM6UjwwP90]Top 5 Most Violent Obama Quotes Ever - YouTube[/ame]

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Financial cost of the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Even IF you suggested that Obama didn't continue these wars, it only accounts for about 2.5 trillion by 2017.


You guys are retarded.

And that doesn't take into account the fact that he's added more wars over seas which aren't being watch dogged by LOLberal fucktards since Bush left office. They were anti-war with Bush and now they are all pro-war with Obama. Just like republicans became the anti-war group under Obama while they were pro-war under Bush.

It's that partisan log jam both sides are stuck in. In the end, you've failed to show that all the increased debt is a result of Bush and republicans. But that wont stop you from repeating it ad neaseum. Because that is your main and most important political tactic. Blame republicans for everything. Even though LOLberals voted to go into Iraq too. Its still all republicans an bush.

That doesn't even begin to cover the cost of veterans benefits to the 30,000 or so that were wounded in Iraq..which of course isn't tacked to the military cost.

And you've forgotten to add in TARP, The Department of Homeland Security and the brand new Medicare Drug benefit.

That..and No Child Left Behind.

Just to show what a despicable fuckin' liar you are, lets have some vote roll calls on these measures:

TARP: H.R. 1424 (110th): Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (On the Senate Amendment)

Totals Democrat Republican
Yea 263 61% 172 91
Nay 171 39% 63 108
Required: Simple Majority

H.R. 1424 (110th): Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (On the Senate Amendment) -- GovTrack.us

Department of Homeland Security
HR 5005 Establishing the Department of Homeland Security - Voting Record - U.S. House - Project Vote Smart

Date: July 26, 2002
Issues: Executive Branch, National Security
Bill: Establishing the Department of Homeland Security Roll Number: 367
Yea: 295 Nay: 132
Bill Passed (House) UNANIMOUS


No Child Left Behind
H.R. 1 (107th): No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (On the Conference Report) -- GovTrack.us
(house and senate votes)
Totals Republican Democrat Independent Independent/Republican
Aye 381 88% 182 198 1 0
No 41 9% 33 6 1 1

Yea 87 87% 43 44 0 Nay 10 10% 6 3





You're such a low information, partisan retard Shallow. But exposing you as such sure is delightful! You'll be back around again later to spread more disinformation and lies regarding who's to blame for things.

The lying sack of shit known as Shallow strikes again.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Are you talking about all of those bills that were passed by the Congress with BI-PARTISAN support? That means some Democrats voted FOR them, unlike the ACA where not a single Republican voted FOR it.

BTW, No Child Left Behind was authored by none other than Ted Kennedy in Bush's first attempt to have a civil relationship with the Democrats. Did a poor old dead Kennedy back stab Bush?

Shallow can only continue to debate by movingt he goal posts. It was the wars! Well, AND it was THIS too! And see!? Democrats voted for programs and wars that LOLberals dont like and that shows good negotiations!


You're a fucking despicable liar, and a hoorible debater, Shallow. Negged for being so.

I didn't move any goalposts.

Your boy didn't pay for shit. He actually did worse than that..he cut government revenue while larding on expenses.

He left the bill for the next guy..as well as the mess.

Yes, you did. You're just far too stupid and intellectually bankrupt to understand that. But you're a LOLberal, so we can't expecta whole lot. Basically we can expect lying, logical fallacies, moving the goal posts, general blather and spreading disinformation.

 

[mamooth]

Yes, the determination to make everyone part of the hive and leave no agenda item up for discussion. It's working too. But eventually, like other radicals, such as the jihadists, you will turn on each other as not LOLberal enough once you've removed all the oppositon to your Detroit utopian agenda.

You sound ... angry.

You've convinced both the country and the Republican party that the Republicans are not the majority party in the House, and if they are it's irrelevant because Obama is emperor. You're not only "in Berlin" but you're sipping a glass of wine on the streets of Berlin in front of a cafe.

Hence the op. Read the comments by liberals, you're still steam out your ears angry. What would it take for you to be happy. You've won utterly. Why are you still so completely freaking angry?

You also sound ... angry.

What we have here is a pack of of bug-eyed, red-faced, spittle-flecked conservatives declaring how everyone else is "angry". It's an interesting exhibition of projection.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I don't call you LOLberals for nothing. I'm laughing AT you daily.

 

[bravoactual]

Maybe because the TeaTerrorists owe the American People $24,000,000,000.00 for their misguided attempt to subvert the Government.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Maybe because the TeaTerrorists owe the American People $24,000,000,000.00 for their misguided attempt to subvert the Government.

Did the teaterrorists loose again, Dullard?

 

[007]

Oh yes... the left is VERY angry... VERY angry... like a petulant little child that isn't getting it's way... they scream, they rant, they stomp their feet, and yes, THEY CALL NAMES...​

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33SK78BT7FM]Top Democrats Call Tea Party Members "Terrorists" - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Sallow]

Shallow can only continue to debate by movingt he goal posts. It was the wars! Well, AND it was THIS too! And see!? Democrats voted for programs and wars that LOLberals dont like and that shows good negotiations!


You're a fucking despicable liar, and a hoorible debater, Shallow. Negged for being so.

I didn't move any goalposts.

Your boy didn't pay for shit. He actually did worse than that..he cut government revenue while larding on expenses.

He left the bill for the next guy..as well as the mess.

Yes, you did. You're just far too stupid and intellectually bankrupt to understand that. But you're a LOLberal, so we can't expecta whole lot. Basically we can expect lying, logical fallacies, moving the goal posts, general blather and spreading disinformation.

Each and every post puts you into a deeper hole man.



You seriously do not know how a functional government..well..functions.

You are with the totalitarians.

AKA my way or highway politics.

 

[kaz]

Yes, the determination to make everyone part of the hive and leave no agenda item up for discussion. It's working too. But eventually, like other radicals, such as the jihadists, you will turn on each other as not LOLberal enough once you've removed all the oppositon to your Detroit utopian agenda.

You sound ... angry.

You've convinced both the country and the Republican party that the Republicans are not the majority party in the House, and if they are it's irrelevant because Obama is emperor. You're not only "in Berlin" but you're sipping a glass of wine on the streets of Berlin in front of a cafe.

Hence the op. Read the comments by liberals, you're still steam out your ears angry. What would it take for you to be happy. You've won utterly. Why are you still so completely freaking angry?

You also sound ... angry.

What we have here is a pack of of bug-eyed, red-faced, spittle-flecked conservatives declaring how everyone else is "angry". It's an interesting exhibition of projection.

Other than no self awareness and a lack of observation of those around you ... well, you still got nothing.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I didn't move any goalposts.

Your boy didn't pay for shit. He actually did worse than that..he cut government revenue while larding on expenses.

He left the bill for the next guy..as well as the mess.

Yes, you did. You're just far too stupid and intellectually bankrupt to understand that. But you're a LOLberal, so we can't expecta whole lot. Basically we can expect lying, logical fallacies, moving the goal posts, general blather and spreading disinformation.

Each and every post puts you into a deeper hole man.



You seriously do not know how a functional government..well..functions.

You are with the totalitarians.

AKA my way or highway politics.

More retardation from the king of retarded posts. I already exposed your lying goofy ass, Shallow. But by all means, conitnue to dig. it's not like anything else is expected from a guy who's hit his head too many times and drools all over the board.

 

[kaz]

I didn't move any goalposts.

Your boy didn't pay for shit. He actually did worse than that..he cut government revenue while larding on expenses.

He left the bill for the next guy..as well as the mess.

Yes, you did. You're just far too stupid and intellectually bankrupt to understand that. But you're a LOLberal, so we can't expecta whole lot. Basically we can expect lying, logical fallacies, moving the goal posts, general blather and spreading disinformation.

Each and every post puts you into a deeper hole man.



You seriously do not know how a functional government..well..functions.

You are with the totalitarians.

AKA my way or highway politics.

The Republicans just collapsed and not only gave you everything your way but threw in party favors like a raise for Federal workers. But "they" are still the "my way or the highway" party.

Just demonstrating the op. They are on the floor in a fetal position while you continue to kick them and pound them with a baseball bat shouting at them to stop attacking you.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

They are radical extremists, kaz. Similar to jihadists.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yes, the determination to make everyone part of the hive and leave no agenda item up for discussion. It's working too. But eventually, like other radicals, such as the jihadists, you will turn on each other as not LOLberal enough once you've removed all the oppositon to your Detroit utopian agenda.

You sound ... angry.

You've convinced both the country and the Republican party that the Republicans are not the majority party in the House, and if they are it's irrelevant because Obama is emperor. You're not only "in Berlin" but you're sipping a glass of wine on the streets of Berlin in front of a cafe.

Hence the op. Read the comments by liberals, you're still steam out your ears angry. What would it take for you to be happy. You've won utterly. Why are you still so completely freaking angry?

You also sound ... angry.

What we have here is a pack of of bug-eyed, red-faced, spittle-flecked conservatives declaring how everyone else is "angry". It's an interesting exhibition of projection.

You sound like an idiot.

 

[candycorn]

the "extatic" candycorn commie is having a good day.....meanwhile stating another hateful destructive goal....

That will be the crown jewel of the Obama administration...he should appoint Sandra Fluke to fill Scalia's. That would be great.

Her prayers would be answered, a Federal job would pay for her birth control, so she'd be relieved she would not longer experience the humiliation of going into a pharmacy only to suffer the shame and embarrassment of learning she had to pay for her own sex. What a terrible ordeal that poor girl went through.

Your ignorance/conscious repetition of lies is worse. Have a nice weekend.

 

[kaz]

Maybe because the TeaTerrorists owe the American People $24,000,000,000.00 for their misguided attempt to subvert the Government.

Democrats are costing us trillions. Demonstrating my point isn't answering the question.