Why is trump so quiet about Stormy Daniels?

[Redfish]

He is being very quiet....WHY?

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

 

[hadit]

As we all know, Trump loooooooves to tweet.

I bet he loves texting even more. Especially before Twitter.

Stormy and her lawyer probably have hundreds of texts overflowing with Trump's drooling.

If Trump is depositioned, and he lies, it's over for him.

exactly how would it be over? was it over for Hillary when she was proven guilty of violating national security laws?

what do you think he could say in a deposition that would make it "over" for him?

In the simplistic world, everything is black and white, no grays. The simplistic mind thinks they "got him" if anything at all happens to him, no matter how innocuous. If his wife looks sideways at him, they think they got him.

 

[Redfish]

Coerced? Boy, it just keeps getting better. What were the stakes if she refused to sign it and who made the threats?

And, digging a little deeper, why would she have to deny anything if she had honored the spirit of the contract for which she was paid?

she said she was threatened. no one has denied that as of this time. so why are you acting as if there's been a denial?

you seem to do that a lot when it comes to the Donald.

and there's a law suit that should sort all that out. I can't wait til Donald's deposition.

Who threatened her and with what? It's easy to claim you're coerced into signing something that later becomes inconvenient when you're looking for a big payoff. IOW, I'm skeptical regarding that claim. Convince me.

She only has to convince a court. Not you.

All of this opens the door to Trump being depositioned. That's why he is being quiet.

IOW, smart. I've noticed a pattern. If Trump comments about something, the haters fall all over themselves screaming condemnation on him. Now he's not saying much and they're congratulating him for not commenting?

I'll let you be the judge.

They want him to start WW III over Russia, bitch about his hard-line approach to NK, claim consensual sex is between two people.... these folks have lost it.

its getting so pathetic its actually funny.

 

[playtime]

He is being very quiet....WHY?

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

over how? is texting illegal? is screwing a porn star illegal? is signing a NDA illegal?

the only illegality here would be if she breached the NDA by talking about it.

It's not "illegal" to violate an NDA, it just opens you up to monetary damages.

a breach of contract is an illegal act. the NDA usually specifies the penalty or damages for a breach. Yes, it is illegal.

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

 

[hadit]

Scenario A: Trump admits he humped the porn star.

Melania sues for divorce and takes him to court for half of everything he owns. That leads to tax returns being made a matter of public record. Uh oh! What's this line item deduction for a donation to Planned Parenthood?!? Greenpeace? The Clinton Foundation! What's this Russian investment shit all about?

This also leads to the revelation Trump isn't nearly as wealthy as he has told the rubes he is.

There's just no positive outcome here.


Scenario B: Trump denies he humped the porn star.

Stormy's lawyer unveils texts from Trump whining he wants to hump her AGAIN. Texts about how great she was in bed. Texts about making her his next Apprentice.

Boom. Impeachment for perjury. It's over for Trump.

Lose/lose. So Trump is in STFU mode for now.

You left out scenario C:

Suit gets thrown out of court.

Whereupon the haters immediately run to the fainting couch shrieking incoherently about "marriage of justice", and "biased judges", etc.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

What would be actually funny would be it came out she basically blackmailed him.

 

[Redfish]

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he released them, some moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

2 people, you hope.

If there are records of texts between them, it's over for Trump.

over how? is texting illegal? is screwing a porn star illegal? is signing a NDA illegal?

the only illegality here would be if she breached the NDA by talking about it.

It's not "illegal" to violate an NDA, it just opens you up to monetary damages.

a breach of contract is an illegal act. the NDA usually specifies the penalty or damages for a breach. Yes, it is illegal.

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

No, you clearly don't.

The submariner went to jail for violating the Espionage Act (which is a criminal law), not for violating an NDA.

 

[jillian]

He is being very quiet....WHY?

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

people who aren't rich get audited too. but you have no idea if Donald is being audited. you don't know if it's done. even if his other return(s) were being audited, he could have turned them over. and he could have turned over the one from January 2017 for the year 2016. you should probably stop defending him because everyone knows that those assertions are meaningless and he could have turned over his tax returns, whether under audit or not.

you sould stop lying for him. he wouldn't lie for you.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It's not "illegal" to violate an NDA, it just opens you up to monetary damages.

a breach of contract is an illegal act. the NDA usually specifies the penalty or damages for a breach. Yes, it is illegal.

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

 

[jillian]

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he release them, so moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

you're so confused. his 1099's would tell us where his money came from. his schedules would show his loans

have you ever seen a tax return. the number of pages isn't an issue.

and every one of the people you just slurred in a sentence is waaaaaaay smarter than your orange sociopath.

 

[Redfish]

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he released them, some moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

dumbass jelly thinks this is fully, got anything to offer besides a smiley face, jelly?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

What would be actually funny would be it came out she basically blackmailed him.

When you say "funny", you mean "I desperately want this to be true".

 

[Redfish]

a breach of contract is an illegal act. the NDA usually specifies the penalty or damages for a breach. Yes, it is illegal.

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

That is a question that the judge will have to decide.

 

[jillian]

a breach of contract is an illegal act. the NDA usually specifies the penalty or damages for a breach. Yes, it is illegal.

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

there is also an argument that she was coerced or that the terms are so abusive that it can't be binding. I think the argument that Donald didn't sign it is less compelling because it only has to be signed by her to be enforceable against her..... unless, of course, cohen vitiated the agreement when he went public. that would amuse me.

 

[jillian]

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

a breach of contract is an illegal act. the NDA usually specifies the penalty or damages for a breach. Yes, it is illegal.

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

No, the argument that Trump never signed it. But Cohen did on his behalf, which as his lawyer, is not uncommon.

 

[Redfish]

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he release them, so moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

you're so confused. his 1099's would tell us where his money came from. his schedules would show his loans

have you ever seen a tax return. the number of pages isn't an issue.

and every one of the people you just slurred in a sentence is waaaaaaay smarter than your orange sociopath.

probably more than you ever will and with bigger numbers than you could ever imagine. You think his income is on 1099s? really? you are even dumber than I thought.

and not one of those people is smarter than me, not even close.