Why is trump so quiet about Stormy Daniels?

[theDoctorisIn]

No, a breach of contract is not an "illegal act". It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

You can tell that by the fact that no one has ever gone to jail for breaching a contract.

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

No, the argument that Trump never signed it. But Cohen did on his behalf, which as his lawyer, is not uncommon.

That is one of the arguments - and a weaker one, as Jillian pointed out. But it's not the only argument.

 

[Redfish]

I did not say it was a criminal matter. I said it was a violation of a binding legal document and breaching a legal document is a violation of law, it is illegal. and yes, people have gone to jail for such acts, recently a nuclear submariner for taking pictures after signing an NDA.

Hillary Clinton should be in jail for breaching an NDA whereby she agreed to protect classified data from disclosure.

don't choose to argue with me on this, I know this subject much better than you do.

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

if the lawyer representing one of the parties disclosed the details in a public forum, you might be correct. But it would depend on the language of the NDA, snooks.

 

[jillian]

they are alleging it isn't binding, snooks.

you don't get to determine if it's binding or not. the court does.

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

if the lawyer representing one of the parties disclosed the details in a public forum, you might be correct. But it would depend on the language of the NDA, snooks.

so why are you stamping your feet over conjecture that the agreement might well have been violated by Donald's guy?

you know that he isn't you, right? you aren't the one bonking porn actresses.

 

[JimH52]

He is being very quiet....WHY?

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

Come on dude....THE AUDIT WAS A LIE!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

What argument can possibly be made that it isn't binding?

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

if the lawyer representing one of the parties disclosed the details in a public forum, you might be correct. But it would depend on the language of the NDA, snooks.

so why are you stamping your feet over conjecture that the agreement might well have been violated by Donald's guy?

you know that he isn't you, right? you aren't the one bonking porn actresses.

You certainly state a lot of things to be fact when you haven't a clue one way or another.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

nooooo..... it's more like all that talk about donny not showing his taxes....

it's more like THAT.

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

Come on dude....THE AUDIT WAS A LIE!

You certainly state a lot of things to be fact when you haven't a clue one way or another.

 

[jillian]

The argument is that the NDA is no longer binding because Mr. Cohen, Esq. made in null by speaking about it on TV.

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

if the lawyer representing one of the parties disclosed the details in a public forum, you might be correct. But it would depend on the language of the NDA, snooks.

so why are you stamping your feet over conjecture that the agreement might well have been violated by Donald's guy?

you know that he isn't you, right? you aren't the one bonking porn actresses.

You certainly state a lot of things to be fact when you haven't a clue one way or another.

see the word "conjecture" in my post. that was pretty clear

 

[JimH52]

Is the audit still going on? Or was that a lie...another lie....a lie one many.

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he release them, so moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

you're so confused. his 1099's would tell us where his money came from. his schedules would show his loans

have you ever seen a tax return. the number of pages isn't an issue.

and every one of the people you just slurred in a sentence is waaaaaaay smarter than your orange sociopath.

I expect Mueller already has his tax returns for many years past. The jig is up for the orange clown...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he release them, so moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

you're so confused. his 1099's would tell us where his money came from. his schedules would show his loans

have you ever seen a tax return. the number of pages isn't an issue.

and every one of the people you just slurred in a sentence is waaaaaaay smarter than your orange sociopath.

I expect Mueller already has his tax returns for many years past. The jig is up for the orange clown...

I know, any day now, any day now.

 

[PixieStix]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

 

[jillian]

that's a good question.

no its not, rich people get audited every year. A guy like Trump has a team of tax lawyers to make sure that his returns are in 100% compliance with the tax code.

& he can still show them. but hasn't.


hmmmm.....

correct, and here's why

His return is hundreds of pages. if he release them, so moron like you, Behar, obozo, blitzer, or Madcow would pull out one page and make up lies about what it says, then Trump and his staff would have to waste hundreds of hours refuting the lies. Then you would pull out another page and make up lies about it.

He is smart not to release them. But you do remember that Madcow got a copy of his 05 return and there was nothing they could find wrong with it, don't you?

you're so confused. his 1099's would tell us where his money came from. his schedules would show his loans

have you ever seen a tax return. the number of pages isn't an issue.

and every one of the people you just slurred in a sentence is waaaaaaay smarter than your orange sociopath.

I expect Mueller already has his tax returns for many years past. The jig is up for the orange clown...

he absolutely has his tax returns. no doubt about that.

 

[JimH52]

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

if the lawyer representing one of the parties disclosed the details in a public forum, you might be correct. But it would depend on the language of the NDA, snooks.

so why are you stamping your feet over conjecture that the agreement might well have been violated by Donald's guy?

you know that he isn't you, right? you aren't the one bonking porn actresses.

You certainly state a lot of things to be fact when you haven't a clue one way or another.

see the word "conjecture" in my post. that was pretty clear

Ya gotta give him time to Google it....

 

[MisterBeale]

He is being very quiet....WHY?

You remember when there was all that talk about Obama's birth certificate, and Obama would never address it?

Yeah, it's sort of like that.

Except he provided the document...and the nuts keep lying.

So you ADMIT. . . . . you want to see pictures?


Sick bastards.

 

[jillian]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

awwwww... almost funny. but you don't get the high ground when your boy Donald is the biggest pig our government has ever seen.

or do you think it's normal for the president's son in law to be denied a bribe by a country and magically that country loses US support?

ten to one you don't even know what I'm referring to since they don't talk about it on fauxnews.

how ya doing pix?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

acknowledging the existence of an NDA does not make it null or void.

depends on what is said snooks.

if the lawyer representing one of the parties disclosed the details in a public forum, you might be correct. But it would depend on the language of the NDA, snooks.

so why are you stamping your feet over conjecture that the agreement might well have been violated by Donald's guy?

you know that he isn't you, right? you aren't the one bonking porn actresses.

You certainly state a lot of things to be fact when you haven't a clue one way or another.

see the word "conjecture" in my post. that was pretty clear

So, you didn't claim Trump is bonking porn actresses?

 

[PixieStix]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

awwwww... almost funny. but you don't get the high ground when your boy Donald is the biggest pig our government has ever seen.

or do you think it's normal for the president's son in law to be denied a bribe by a country and magically that country loses US support?

ten to one you don't even know what I'm referring to since they don't talk about it on fauxnews.

how ya doing pix?

FYI I don't watch fox news. I watch OANN. you should try it. They actually tell the news and it's not fake like CNN and such. As for my boy Donald. (If) he slept with that skank, she asked for it unlike Juanita Broderick.

I am doing okay considering. You?

 

[JimH52]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

awwwww... almost funny. but you don't get the high ground when your boy Donald is the biggest pig our government has ever seen.

or do you think it's normal for the president's son in law to be denied a bribe by a country and magically that country loses US support?

ten to one you don't even know what I'm referring to since they don't talk about it on fauxnews.

how ya doing pix?

FIX news is the reason many of the RW idiots are clueless to current events. Maybe after Murdoch kicks off...his liberal sons will start putting real news on the news station.

 

[PixieStix]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

awwwww... almost funny. but you don't get the high ground when your boy Donald is the biggest pig our government has ever seen.

or do you think it's normal for the president's son in law to be denied a bribe by a country and magically that country loses US support?

ten to one you don't even know what I'm referring to since they don't talk about it on fauxnews.

how ya doing pix?

FIX news is the reason many of the RW idiots are clueless to current events. Maybe after Murdoch kicks off...his liberal sons will start putting real news on the news station.

Stop projecting. You and your leftists buds are the ones who get memos every morning noon and night

 

[jillian]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

awwwww... almost funny. but you don't get the high ground when your boy Donald is the biggest pig our government has ever seen.

or do you think it's normal for the president's son in law to be denied a bribe by a country and magically that country loses US support?

ten to one you don't even know what I'm referring to since they don't talk about it on fauxnews.

how ya doing pix?

FIX news is the reason many of the RW idiots are clueless to current events. Maybe after Murdoch kicks off...his liberal sons will start putting real news on the news station.

that would be nice. but then we'll have to deal with the psychos at Sinclair.

anyway... this is the reality:

We tracked the Trump scandals on right-wing news sites. Here’s how they covered it.

it's really sad

 

[jillian]

seems to me that's what they like.....like pigs they like playing in the mud

Leave the Clintons out of this shees

awwwww... almost funny. but you don't get the high ground when your boy Donald is the biggest pig our government has ever seen.

or do you think it's normal for the president's son in law to be denied a bribe by a country and magically that country loses US support?

ten to one you don't even know what I'm referring to since they don't talk about it on fauxnews.

how ya doing pix?

FIX news is the reason many of the RW idiots are clueless to current events. Maybe after Murdoch kicks off...his liberal sons will start putting real news on the news station.

Stop projecting. You and your leftists buds are the ones who get memos every morning noon and night

okie dokie pix. if you say so.