Why Liberalism Must Be Expunged.

[Dragonlady]

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

 

[dudmuck]

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

"But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties."


That's the lie the Left tells to lamebrains who are willing to accept the fantasy.


I can easily prove my premise.....


Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits....you.... actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.


Ready to admit that you're an imbecile????

 

[dudmuck]

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

"But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties."


That's the lie the Left tells to lamebrains who are willing to accept the fantasy.


I can easily prove my premise.....


Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits....you.... actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.


Ready to admit that you're an imbecile????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

"But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties."


That's the lie the Left tells to lamebrains who are willing to accept the fantasy.


I can easily prove my premise.....


Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits....you.... actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.


Ready to admit that you're an imbecile????

Nonsense.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"Schneiderman let Clinton Foundation skip identifying foreign donors

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the Clinton Foundation a pass on identifying foreign donors in its charitable filings — making it impossible to know if it got any special favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, according to a report Tuesday.

New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.”

But both the foundation and the CHAI failed to do that, and Schneiderman, a member of Clinton’s “leadership council” in New York and a fierce critic of Donald Trump, did nothing about it.” https://nypost.com/2016/09/06/schneiderman-let-clinton-foundation-skip-identifying-foreign-donors/




"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Last but not least, you’re attempts at condescension are noted. It’s charming that you recently learned the meaning of “doublespeak”. I read 1984. I read it in 1965. Watching Donald Trump manipulating fools like you, and promoting his politics of division and hate is like watching much of Orwell’s vision play out for real. From the “alternative facts”, to his promotion if the idea of America as a victim of other countries trade and defence policies, and casting illegals as the villains in much the same way that Hitler scapegoated the Jews in Nazi Germany, is particularly chilling.

Being an intellectual lightweight without critical thinking skills I can see where you lack the ability or the capacity to see the reality or the dangers of the Trump presidency. You might want to actually read Orwell instead of just googling for definitions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

"Schneiderman let Clinton Foundation skip identifying foreign donors

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the Clinton Foundation a pass on identifying foreign donors in its charitable filings — making it impossible to know if it got any special favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, according to a report Tuesday.

New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.”

But both the foundation and the CHAI failed to do that, and Schneiderman, a member of Clinton’s “leadership council” in New York and a fierce critic of Donald Trump, did nothing about it.” https://nypost.com/2016/09/06/schneiderman-let-clinton-foundation-skip-identifying-foreign-donors/

 

[Sahba]

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

As incongruous as it sounds... Liberalism.. even Progressivism is healthy in a free democracy (yeh, I know.. crazy)... Conservatism without constant challenge and sharp descent would become complacent and soft! Just the way of all things I guess... use it or loose it ... iron sharpens iron, etc. etc.

 

[dudmuck]

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

"Schneiderman let Clinton Foundation skip identifying foreign donors

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the Clinton Foundation a pass on identifying foreign donors in its charitable filings — making it impossible to know if it got any special favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, according to a report Tuesday.

New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.”

But both the foundation and the CHAI failed to do that, and Schneiderman, a member of Clinton’s “leadership council” in New York and a fierce critic of Donald Trump, did nothing about it.” https://nypost.com/2016/09/06/schneiderman-let-clinton-foundation-skip-identifying-foreign-donors/

Its a federal responsibility to check foreign donations, but citizens united lets in flow in.

 

[dudmuck]

You providing a video of Russians singing. You’ve never provided actual proof to support any of your lies. Your posts are the absolute definition of “propaganda”.

There was a time when liberals were “expunged”. During the time when fight wing dictators were taking over South America with US support. They killed all of the liberal leaders and tortured those spoke out against the governments. The countries were then free to enacts Friedman’s free market reforms. It lead to decades of increased poverty and despair.

Try reading about the “Argentine Grandmothers”, and the “Disparru”. Your grasp of facts and history is laughable.

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

"But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties."


That's the lie the Left tells to lamebrains who are willing to accept the fantasy.


I can easily prove my premise.....


Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits....you.... actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.


Ready to admit that you're an imbecile????

Nonsense.

If you'd watch the video, it attempts to debunk that southern strategy made republicans racist.
Carol Swain doesnt mention Strom Thurmond or Lee Atwater.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

"Schneiderman let Clinton Foundation skip identifying foreign donors

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the Clinton Foundation a pass on identifying foreign donors in its charitable filings — making it impossible to know if it got any special favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, according to a report Tuesday.

New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.”

But both the foundation and the CHAI failed to do that, and Schneiderman, a member of Clinton’s “leadership council” in New York and a fierce critic of Donald Trump, did nothing about it.” https://nypost.com/2016/09/06/schneiderman-let-clinton-foundation-skip-identifying-foreign-donors/

Its a federal responsibility to check foreign donations, but citizens united lets in flow in.

You still have some of Bill 'the rapist' Clinton's shoe polish on your tongue....you should look into that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And.....the party you support:


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Careful now!

If this is the first time you've ever tried thinking, you might be subject to an aneurysm.

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

"But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties."


That's the lie the Left tells to lamebrains who are willing to accept the fantasy.


I can easily prove my premise.....


Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits....you.... actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.


Ready to admit that you're an imbecile????

Nonsense.

If you'd watch the video, it attempts to debunk that southern strategy made republicans racist.
Carol Swain doesnt mention Strom Thurmond or Lee Atwater.

The Republicans were never racist.
Here's your party:
1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.

 

[dudmuck]

1) Prior to the era of dixiecrat->Strom Thurmond party switch, the democrats were the party of slavery. But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties.
2) you cant put Planned Parenthood in with the KKK, its like putting nazis in with communists. Planned Parenthood is 2nd most popular in USA, according to fox news.
3) Hodgkinson? He's one of the 2nd amendment people
4) see #1
5) Read the actual story on Iran payments
6) Farrakhan is a nutter and isnt supported.
7) False rating on obama ecouraging illegals to vote
8) Obama Castro? unbearably stupid
9) see #1
10) chicago problems stem from Indiana

"But the southern strategy resulted in a role reversal of the parties."


That's the lie the Left tells to lamebrains who are willing to accept the fantasy.


I can easily prove my premise.....


Some of the Left's lies are so transparent that it is hard to imagine any but the most committed simpletons believing them.


Yet they do....or claim they do.


Like this: "Well...yeah, everyone knows that early Democrats were the party of slavers...but then...around the 1960s the two parties flip-flopped their positions on slavery, segregation and black people....and it is the Republicans who decided to become the racists!!!

Yup.....that's it!"

(I left out all the 'duh's' that would be appropriate for said dialogue.)


Since their acolytes cannot deny that that the inception of the Republican Party was motivated by a hatred of slavery and segregation, while the Democrats were the party of Jim Crow laws and the KKK, they claim that circa 1960, while the Democrats suddenly had an epiphany, and saw the error of their ways.....the Republicans suddenly developed a hatred of blacks and a desire for segregation.


Yes....many of the dimwits....you.... actually claim that.

Hard to imagine that they believe it...but they claim it.



The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.


Ready to admit that you're an imbecile????

Nonsense.

If you'd watch the video, it attempts to debunk that southern strategy made republicans racist.
Carol Swain doesnt mention Strom Thurmond or Lee Atwater.

The Republicans were never racist.
Here's your party:
1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.

 

[Dragonlady]

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Charles Ortel??? This is your source. An obsessed staff writer with the Moonie Times. The guy is a deranged loon with no credibility whatsoever.

And again, you display your utter lack of critical thinking skills or the ability to engage in a discussion without cutting and pasting other people’s ideas.

Your problem is that the people you’re trusting, aren’t credible and neither are you.

 

[P@triot]

You're a loser.

 

[P@triot]

Are you embarrassed that you can't figure out the difference between "Liberals" and "Democrats"? You damn sure should be.

Hey...remember when you said that progressives and Democrats were “not” the same and then you were violently adamant that progressives “didn’t exist anymore” only to have thanatos144 own your ignorant ass by posting a video of Hitlery Clinton proudly declaring herself a progressive?

Uh Nnnnnnnno Buttsoiler I "rememeber" no such hallucination.

No one else has to “remember” - they can see it now for themselves thanks to the links I posted!

 

[P@triot]

Buttsoiler is why I invented the phrase "Having it both ways --- Priceless"

Wait...now you’re telling everyone you “INVENTED” the phrase “having it both ways”? Ok, Al Gore!

 

[P@triot]

Oh and btw Hillary Clinton is not a political scientist and has no clue about that history.

So after worshipping her for over 4 years, you’re new official position is that Hitlery is incapable of deciding for herself what she is?!?

 

[P@triot]

Cult of Ignorance shows its colors.

You prove that every day...