Why Liberalism Must Be Expunged.

[Moonglow]

I'm a very ex-liberal who left the Democrap party when Obama turned it into America's most black-supremacist hate group, whose only language is violence, death-threats and a diet of muslim semen. I have never seen more loathsome, bloodthirsty, America-hating, violently white-hating treason than these unhinged, clinically psychotic liberal filth (YES, God help me, I find their behavior even WORSE than the muslim inbreds they fellate). Utterly the most malicious, predatory testaments to everything mankind has ever done wrong. Liberals are also the ultimate Neo-Nazis who spread their butt cheeks for the most praised-by-Hitler, mass-Jew-beheading hate ideology in history; muslims have been massacring Jews since their pedo-prophet Mohammed bragged about beheading 600 Jewish prisoners in one day. Liberals are so morally degenerate, I've never seen a group of people go through so many mental gymnastics to jusify all the rape, murder and human rights atrocities that form a wake around this religion everywhere it has ever gone! And liberals' psychopath obsession of destroying anyone who doesn't go along with their treason.

What a laughable load of shit. Just do the world a favor and eat a bullet. At the very least, castrate yourself so your retardation does not get passed on.

One can only hope.

 

[dudmuck]

Let's review who colluded with Russia.....

Democrats.



1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.


There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:

The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.

The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.


2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™



Here's why:

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

The first Republican President



And this:

3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.


....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And


4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"

Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


And


5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"

EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia





-------------------------------------------------------------


Democrat collusion???



7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House


Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.



McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.



McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."


Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House




8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work


...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.


How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work




9. And we now know.....

..

a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.


10. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages obtained exclusively by Fox News.

Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele


11. Adam Schiff is the head Democrat on the Intelligence Committee
Remember....if not for double standards, the Democrats would have no standards at all....
The Dems are claiming that the Trump folks colluded with a foreign power to collect damaging material about a political adversary....
And remember: to know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

Schiff orchestrated a plan to get naked and 'kompromat' pictures of Trump, from the Ukrainians!
The problem is.....the 'Ukrainians' who contacted him were comedians who exposed Schiff and the Democrats for what they are.

"Adam Schiff sent his staff to try and collect 'classified materials for the FBI' after Russian pranksters told him Putin has NAKED blackmail pictures of Trump

Adam Schiff spoofed with Russian claim of nude Trump pic | Daily Mail Online




12.“Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had xtensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages…

From Democrat Warner:
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.

"I'm in," Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.



Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …

"Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.” Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele



“ Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …”
"...would rather not have a paper trail...."



“,,,an honest person would ask themselves how’d they react if that was a text message between Donald Trump, Jr., and some fixer paid for by Sergei Lavrov in which he sought a meeting with someone and didn’t want a paper trail.”
Why Did Mark Warner Try to Secretly Meet With Trump Dossier Author and a Blacklisted Russian Oligarch?



13. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.





Part of the reason why it is soooooo simple to destroy you is that you're an imbecile.

You must get tired of folks telling you that, huh?

1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments.

2) Did Hillary Clinton collude with the Russians to get 'dirt' on Trump to feed it to the FBI?

3) false rating on uranium to russia

4) Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin: non existent article
5) Podesta still not arrested... because it was Manafort that broke the law.

6) OAN promotes conspiracies

7) Is Claire doing Russia's bidding? Trump met with Ambassador

8) working with russian companies is different than conspiring to influence election. see #5
9) false rating
10) debunked by Marco Rubio

11) Adam Schiff russian pranksters
A spokesman for Schiff told The Atlantic that the committee reported the call to "appropriate law enforcement and security personnel" and told them "of our belief that it was probably bogus."
12) see 11)

Imagine Obama saying "i can pardon myself".

"1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments."


Link or Lie?

The meaning of 'colluded' is in reference to the election.


Let's see your evidence of such.

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's review who colluded with Russia.....

Democrats.



1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.


There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:

The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.

The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.


2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™



Here's why:

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

The first Republican President



And this:

3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.


....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And


4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"

Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


And


5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"

EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia





-------------------------------------------------------------


Democrat collusion???



7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House


Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.



McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.



McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."


Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House




8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work


...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.


How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work




9. And we now know.....

..

a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.


10. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages obtained exclusively by Fox News.

Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele


11. Adam Schiff is the head Democrat on the Intelligence Committee
Remember....if not for double standards, the Democrats would have no standards at all....
The Dems are claiming that the Trump folks colluded with a foreign power to collect damaging material about a political adversary....
And remember: to know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

Schiff orchestrated a plan to get naked and 'kompromat' pictures of Trump, from the Ukrainians!
The problem is.....the 'Ukrainians' who contacted him were comedians who exposed Schiff and the Democrats for what they are.

"Adam Schiff sent his staff to try and collect 'classified materials for the FBI' after Russian pranksters told him Putin has NAKED blackmail pictures of Trump

Adam Schiff spoofed with Russian claim of nude Trump pic | Daily Mail Online




12.“Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had xtensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages…

From Democrat Warner:
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.

"I'm in," Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.



Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …

"Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.” Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele



“ Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …”
"...would rather not have a paper trail...."



“,,,an honest person would ask themselves how’d they react if that was a text message between Donald Trump, Jr., and some fixer paid for by Sergei Lavrov in which he sought a meeting with someone and didn’t want a paper trail.”
Why Did Mark Warner Try to Secretly Meet With Trump Dossier Author and a Blacklisted Russian Oligarch?



13. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.





Part of the reason why it is soooooo simple to destroy you is that you're an imbecile.

You must get tired of folks telling you that, huh?

1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments.

2) Did Hillary Clinton collude with the Russians to get 'dirt' on Trump to feed it to the FBI?

3) false rating on uranium to russia

4) Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin: non existent article
5) Podesta still not arrested... because it was Manafort that broke the law.

6) OAN promotes conspiracies

7) Is Claire doing Russia's bidding? Trump met with Ambassador

8) working with russian companies is different than conspiring to influence election. see #5
9) false rating
10) debunked by Marco Rubio

11) Adam Schiff russian pranksters
A spokesman for Schiff told The Atlantic that the committee reported the call to "appropriate law enforcement and security personnel" and told them "of our belief that it was probably bogus."
12) see 11)

Imagine Obama saying "i can pardon myself".

"1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments."


Link or Lie?

The meaning of 'colluded' is in reference to the election.


Let's see your evidence of such.

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

 

[Dragonlady]

Just as Stalin, Lenin and Mao were threats to the lives and liberties of societies, people with Pogo's mentality and ignorance promise the expeditious return of worsening human conditions wherever they can get an audience with a low enough IQ to listen.

Same for most of the misinformed Leftists posting here daily.

Given a fraction of a chance, they will gladly destroy America and bring poverty and suffering never imagined from sea to no longer shining sea.

But to do that requires a vast number of good men to do nothing about it.

The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans.

Lack of a living minimum wage - thank Republicans. They have steadfastly refused to raise the federal minimum wage.

Lack of universal health care. Thank Republicans. They refuse to consider a universal health care program as “too expensive”. You already have the most expensive health care in the world. And the least efficient. You have the lowest life expectancy in the first world. You pay more per capita for health care and yet a large percentage of your population has no coverage at all.

Education for the poor. The US and Turkey are the only first world countries where the children of the poor received less education funding than the children of the rich.

Infrastructure: clean drinking water, hydro, and health care are lacking in many parts of rural America. Especially poor regions like Appalachia.

Republican changes to the tax code, starting with Reagan in the 1970’s, tipped the balance of the economy in favour of the wealthy, and started the country on the road to massive deficits.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just as Stalin, Lenin and Mao were threats to the lives and liberties of societies, people with Pogo's mentality and ignorance promise the expeditious return of worsening human conditions wherever they can get an audience with a low enough IQ to listen.

Same for most of the misinformed Leftists posting here daily.

Given a fraction of a chance, they will gladly destroy America and bring poverty and suffering never imagined from sea to no longer shining sea.

But to do that requires a vast number of good men to do nothing about it.

The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans.

Lack of a living minimum wage - thank Republicans. They have steadfastly refused to raise the federal minimum wage.

Lack of universal health care. Thank Republicans. They refuse to consider a universal health care program as “too expensive”. You already have the most expensive health care in the world. And the least efficient. You have the lowest life expectancy in the first world. You pay more per capita for health care and yet a large percentage of your population has no coverage at all.

Education for the poor. The US and Turkey are the only first world countries where the children of the poor received less education funding than the children of the rich.

Infrastructure: clean drinking water, hydro, and health care are lacking in many parts of rural America. Especially poor regions like Appalachia.

Republican changes to the tax code, starting with Reagan in the 1970’s, tipped the balance of the economy in favour of the wealthy, and started the country on the road to massive deficits.

"The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans. "



How many times a day do folks remind you that you are a moron?

 

[Dragonlady]

Just as Stalin, Lenin and Mao were threats to the lives and liberties of societies, people with Pogo's mentality and ignorance promise the expeditious return of worsening human conditions wherever they can get an audience with a low enough IQ to listen.

Same for most of the misinformed Leftists posting here daily.

Given a fraction of a chance, they will gladly destroy America and bring poverty and suffering never imagined from sea to no longer shining sea.

But to do that requires a vast number of good men to do nothing about it.

The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans.

Lack of a living minimum wage - thank Republicans. They have steadfastly refused to raise the federal minimum wage.

Lack of universal health care. Thank Republicans. They refuse to consider a universal health care program as “too expensive”. You already have the most expensive health care in the world. And the least efficient. You have the lowest life expectancy in the first world. You pay more per capita for health care and yet a large percentage of your population has no coverage at all.

Education for the poor. The US and Turkey are the only first world countries where the children of the poor received less education funding than the children of the rich.

Infrastructure: clean drinking water, hydro, and health care are lacking in many parts of rural America. Especially poor regions like Appalachia.

Republican changes to the tax code, starting with Reagan in the 1970’s, tipped the balance of the economy in favour of the wealthy, and started the country on the road to massive deficits.

"The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans. "



How many times a day do folks remind you that you are a moron?

I gather you’re so accustomed to be told you’re a moron you think it’s a regular occurrence for others.

Never in my life has a person of any standing or real world credibility, called me a moron. In the real world, condescending and insulting behaviour while pretending to engage in an intellectual discussion will get you treated as a moron. That may be your problem.

Try addressing those who give you the respect of reading your drivel and taking the time of making a well reasoned and thoughtful response to your lies and disinformation, the respect such engagement deserves.

All your “snappy” responses say (other than you’re a rude and condescending), is that you haven’t the intellect or the writing skills to respond in kind.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just as Stalin, Lenin and Mao were threats to the lives and liberties of societies, people with Pogo's mentality and ignorance promise the expeditious return of worsening human conditions wherever they can get an audience with a low enough IQ to listen.

Same for most of the misinformed Leftists posting here daily.

Given a fraction of a chance, they will gladly destroy America and bring poverty and suffering never imagined from sea to no longer shining sea.

But to do that requires a vast number of good men to do nothing about it.

The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans.

Lack of a living minimum wage - thank Republicans. They have steadfastly refused to raise the federal minimum wage.

Lack of universal health care. Thank Republicans. They refuse to consider a universal health care program as “too expensive”. You already have the most expensive health care in the world. And the least efficient. You have the lowest life expectancy in the first world. You pay more per capita for health care and yet a large percentage of your population has no coverage at all.

Education for the poor. The US and Turkey are the only first world countries where the children of the poor received less education funding than the children of the rich.

Infrastructure: clean drinking water, hydro, and health care are lacking in many parts of rural America. Especially poor regions like Appalachia.

Republican changes to the tax code, starting with Reagan in the 1970’s, tipped the balance of the economy in favour of the wealthy, and started the country on the road to massive deficits.

"The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans. "



How many times a day do folks remind you that you are a moron?

I gather you’re so accustomed to be told you’re a moron you think it’s a regular occurrence for others.

Never in my life has a person of any standing or real world credibility, called me a moron. In the real world, condescending and insulting behaviour while pretending to engage in an intellectual discussion will get you treated as a moron. That may be your problem.

Try addressing those who give you the respect of reading your drivel and taking the time of making a well reasoned and thoughtful response to your lies and disinformation, the respect such engagement deserves.

All your “snappy” responses say (other than you’re a rude and condescending), is that you haven’t the intellect or the writing skills to respond in kind.

Try to avoid posting totally fallacious and inane posts and you might avoid being recognized as a moron.

 

[Dragonlady]

Just as Stalin, Lenin and Mao were threats to the lives and liberties of societies, people with Pogo's mentality and ignorance promise the expeditious return of worsening human conditions wherever they can get an audience with a low enough IQ to listen.

Same for most of the misinformed Leftists posting here daily.

Given a fraction of a chance, they will gladly destroy America and bring poverty and suffering never imagined from sea to no longer shining sea.

But to do that requires a vast number of good men to do nothing about it.

The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans.

Lack of a living minimum wage - thank Republicans. They have steadfastly refused to raise the federal minimum wage.

Lack of universal health care. Thank Republicans. They refuse to consider a universal health care program as “too expensive”. You already have the most expensive health care in the world. And the least efficient. You have the lowest life expectancy in the first world. You pay more per capita for health care and yet a large percentage of your population has no coverage at all.

Education for the poor. The US and Turkey are the only first world countries where the children of the poor received less education funding than the children of the rich.

Infrastructure: clean drinking water, hydro, and health care are lacking in many parts of rural America. Especially poor regions like Appalachia.

Republican changes to the tax code, starting with Reagan in the 1970’s, tipped the balance of the economy in favour of the wealthy, and started the country on the road to massive deficits.

"The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans. "



How many times a day do folks remind you that you are a moron?

I gather you’re so accustomed to be told you’re a moron you think it’s a regular occurrence for others.

Never in my life has a person of any standing or real world credibility, called me a moron. In the real world, condescending and insulting behaviour while pretending to engage in an intellectual discussion will get you treated as a moron. That may be your problem.

Try addressing those who give you the respect of reading your drivel and taking the time of making a well reasoned and thoughtful response to your lies and disinformation, the respect such engagement deserves.

All your “snappy” responses say (other than you’re a rude and condescending), is that you haven’t the intellect or the writing skills to respond in kind.

Try to avoid posting totally fallacious and inane posts and you might avoid being recognized as a moron.

As a said, no one calls me a moron, except for rude, condescending, mental midgets on the internet who lack the intellect or the critical thinking skills to argue the post in an adult manner.

If you’re wondering what a rude, condescending asshat looks like, look in your mirror.

 

[Pogo]

....and proves the adage: 'To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they blame on the other side.'

I'm not blaming anybody; I'm just referencing actual occurrences.

Who wants to scrap checks and balances?

"Who wants to scrap checks and balances?"

The Democrats/Liberals/Communists, of course.



“As the administrative state distorts the United States’ constitutional architecture, Clarence Thomas becomes America’s indispensable constitutionalist. Now in his 25th year on the Supreme Court, he is urging the judicial branch to limit the legislative branch’s practice of delegating its power….

This subject is central to today’s argument between constitutionalists and progressives. The former favor and the latter oppose holding Congress to its responsibilities and restricting executive discretion.

…the court has “overseen and sanctioned the growth of an administrative system that concentrates the power to make laws and the power to enforce them in the hands of a vast and unaccountable administrative apparatus that finds no comfortable home in our constitutional structure.” Battling the modern American administrative state


Progressives......no checks nor balances on their power!

And that's from the Washington Post no less.


“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Madison, Federalist #47




Now.....why do you hate America????

Republicans have control of all three branches of government.
Democracy is the foundation of what justifies government to exist: that it exists because the people chose it to exist, and it what form. Democracy is also the main characteristics of liberalism. By contrast, we now have the most undemocratic president in our history. Maybe he'll give that a shot. <-- the definition of tyranny here.

You suggested that the Right is somehow opposed to checks and balances.

I PROVED that it is Progressives that work to end said restrictions on power.

Sooo.....you'd like to change the subject.


Just wipe the egg off your face.

Progressive is not a political party if you think to make broad brush strokes that you claim are genius you should show us your true inabilities at pinpointing specific people and acts.

There used to be a political party by that name. Teddy Roosevelt used it for his Prez bid in 1912, The last time it was used was "Fightin' Bob LaFollette" -- and that was 1924.

And both of them were Republicans.

I'm equally amused that the shamelessly clueless OP unabashedly flies her flag of ignorance about the distinction between "Liberalism" (purportedly her topic here) and "Communism", mashed together with of all things a political party. Cult of Ignorance shows its colors.

 

[Some Guy]

I'm not blaming anybody; I'm just referencing actual occurrences.

Who wants to scrap checks and balances?

"Who wants to scrap checks and balances?"

The Democrats/Liberals/Communists, of course.



“As the administrative state distorts the United States’ constitutional architecture, Clarence Thomas becomes America’s indispensable constitutionalist. Now in his 25th year on the Supreme Court, he is urging the judicial branch to limit the legislative branch’s practice of delegating its power….

This subject is central to today’s argument between constitutionalists and progressives. The former favor and the latter oppose holding Congress to its responsibilities and restricting executive discretion.

…the court has “overseen and sanctioned the growth of an administrative system that concentrates the power to make laws and the power to enforce them in the hands of a vast and unaccountable administrative apparatus that finds no comfortable home in our constitutional structure.” Battling the modern American administrative state


Progressives......no checks nor balances on their power!

And that's from the Washington Post no less.


“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Madison, Federalist #47




Now.....why do you hate America????

Republicans have control of all three branches of government.
Democracy is the foundation of what justifies government to exist: that it exists because the people chose it to exist, and it what form. Democracy is also the main characteristics of liberalism. By contrast, we now have the most undemocratic president in our history. Maybe he'll give that a shot. <-- the definition of tyranny here.

You suggested that the Right is somehow opposed to checks and balances.

I PROVED that it is Progressives that work to end said restrictions on power.

Sooo.....you'd like to change the subject.


Just wipe the egg off your face.

Progressive is not a political party if you think to make broad brush strokes that you claim are genius you should show us your true inabilities at pinpointing specific people and acts.

There used to be a political party by that name. Teddy Roosevelt used it for his Prez bid in 1912, The last time it was used was "Fightin' Bob LaFollette" -- and that was 1924.

And both of them were Republicans.

I'm equally amused that the shamelessly clueless OP unabashedly flies her flag of ignorance about the distinction between "Liberalism" (purportedly her topic here) and "Communism", mashed together with of all things a political party. Cult of Ignorance shows its colors.

A lot of people today who pledge support for socialism call themselves "liberals." It's one of the many great ironies of the current political landscape considering where the term "liberal" is derived from. So, that's where it's coming from.

If someone is intellectually honest enough to identify themselves as a progressive or socialist rather than a liberal then good on them. One thing that bothers me to no end is both sides that blatantly mis-use the term liberal: those socialists on the left who claim to be "liberal" and the ones on the right who attack "liberals" in general. Even moreso than identity politics, it's illustrative of the dangers of labeling people.

 

[Pogo]

"Who wants to scrap checks and balances?"

The Democrats/Liberals/Communists, of course.



“As the administrative state distorts the United States’ constitutional architecture, Clarence Thomas becomes America’s indispensable constitutionalist. Now in his 25th year on the Supreme Court, he is urging the judicial branch to limit the legislative branch’s practice of delegating its power….

This subject is central to today’s argument between constitutionalists and progressives. The former favor and the latter oppose holding Congress to its responsibilities and restricting executive discretion.

…the court has “overseen and sanctioned the growth of an administrative system that concentrates the power to make laws and the power to enforce them in the hands of a vast and unaccountable administrative apparatus that finds no comfortable home in our constitutional structure.” Battling the modern American administrative state


Progressives......no checks nor balances on their power!

And that's from the Washington Post no less.


“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Madison, Federalist #47




Now.....why do you hate America????

Republicans have control of all three branches of government.
Democracy is the foundation of what justifies government to exist: that it exists because the people chose it to exist, and it what form. Democracy is also the main characteristics of liberalism. By contrast, we now have the most undemocratic president in our history. Maybe he'll give that a shot. <-- the definition of tyranny here.

You suggested that the Right is somehow opposed to checks and balances.

I PROVED that it is Progressives that work to end said restrictions on power.

Sooo.....you'd like to change the subject.


Just wipe the egg off your face.

Progressive is not a political party if you think to make broad brush strokes that you claim are genius you should show us your true inabilities at pinpointing specific people and acts.

There used to be a political party by that name. Teddy Roosevelt used it for his Prez bid in 1912, The last time it was used was "Fightin' Bob LaFollette" -- and that was 1924.

And both of them were Republicans.

I'm equally amused that the shamelessly clueless OP unabashedly flies her flag of ignorance about the distinction between "Liberalism" (purportedly her topic here) and "Communism", mashed together with of all things a political party. Cult of Ignorance shows its colors.

A lot of people today who pledge support for socialism call themselves "liberals." It's one of the many great ironies of the current political landscape considering where the term "liberal" is derived from. So, that's where it's coming from.

If someone is intellectually honest enough to identify themselves as a progressive or socialist rather than a liberal then good on them. One thing that bothers me to no end is both sides that blatantly mis-use the term liberal: those socialists on the left who claim to be "liberal" and the ones on the right who attack "liberals" in general. Even moreso than identity politics, it's illustrative of the dangers of labeling people.

The deliberate Doublethink deflection ploy began as rhetorical snake oil sold by Republican demagogues (Hoe McCarthy's fellow travelers) just after WW2 when, desperate for the power that had escaped thed them since Herbert Hoover, they tried to conflate the company line of contempt for "communism" with their own rivals on "the left" (i.e. Democrats) and merge them into the same thing, despite the obvious contradictory meaning of Liberalism.

It certainly wasn't limited to that period either; I distinctly recall George H.W. Bush using the same Orwellian tactic in his 1988 campaign rhetoric, sneering the philosophy that birthed this country as if it were some kind of dirty word.

You are correct, way too many people play way too loosely with terms of which they have not the slightest clue, trying to mine them for emotional value only, which is evidently the only level of intellect they have. Even if it means deliberately misusing a term to mean its own opposite.

The OP is one of them. She'll actually be in shortly to hail Hoe McCarthy the mendacious political hack as some kind of oracle, digging herself ever deeper while continuing to exhibit no comprehension whatsoever of the actual definitions of terms she uses as they-all-look-alike-to-me troll bait synonyms.

 

[Dragonlady]

Let's review who colluded with Russia.....

Democrats.



1. There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.


There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:

The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.

The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.


2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™



Here's why:

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

The first Republican President



And this:

3. "Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.


....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And


4. "Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"

Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


And


5. "EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"

EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



6. News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia





-------------------------------------------------------------


Democrat collusion???



7. "Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House


Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.



McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.



McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."


Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House




8. Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work


...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well.


How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work




9. And we now know.....

..

a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.


10. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had extensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages obtained exclusively by Fox News.

Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele


11. Adam Schiff is the head Democrat on the Intelligence Committee
Remember....if not for double standards, the Democrats would have no standards at all....
The Dems are claiming that the Trump folks colluded with a foreign power to collect damaging material about a political adversary....
And remember: to know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

Schiff orchestrated a plan to get naked and 'kompromat' pictures of Trump, from the Ukrainians!
The problem is.....the 'Ukrainians' who contacted him were comedians who exposed Schiff and the Democrats for what they are.

"Adam Schiff sent his staff to try and collect 'classified materials for the FBI' after Russian pranksters told him Putin has NAKED blackmail pictures of Trump

Adam Schiff spoofed with Russian claim of nude Trump pic | Daily Mail Online




12.“Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee who has been leading a congressional investigation into President Trump's alleged ties to Russia, had xtensive contact last year with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch who was offering Warner access to former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, according to text messages…

From Democrat Warner:
"We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country," Warner texted the lobbyist, Adam Waldman, on March 22, 2017.

"I'm in," Waldman, whose firm has ties to Hillary Clinton, texted back to Warner.



Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …

"Throughout the text exchanges, Warner seemed particularly intent on connecting directly with Steele without anyone else on the Senate Intelligence Committee being in the loop -- at least initially. In one text to the lobbyist, Warner wrote that he would "rather not have a paper trail" of his messages.” Democratic Sen. Mark Warner texted with Russian oligarch lobbyist in effort to contact dossier author Christopher Steele



“ Secrecy seemed very important to Warner …”
"...would rather not have a paper trail...."



“,,,an honest person would ask themselves how’d they react if that was a text message between Donald Trump, Jr., and some fixer paid for by Sergei Lavrov in which he sought a meeting with someone and didn’t want a paper trail.”
Why Did Mark Warner Try to Secretly Meet With Trump Dossier Author and a Blacklisted Russian Oligarch?



13. The ONLY ones with any collusion with Russia are Democrats.

The Democrats colluded, collaborated, conspired with Moscow, the Kremlin, Putin.....to sink the Trump candidacy.

And the Kremlin was happy to do so: they wanted the candidate that they had a history of bribing, to be President.


The only group that we know has colluded with, conspired with, contracted with, been bribed by, paid the Russians, the Kremlin, Moscow....


...are Democrats.





Part of the reason why it is soooooo simple to destroy you is that you're an imbecile.

You must get tired of folks telling you that, huh?

1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments.

2) Did Hillary Clinton collude with the Russians to get 'dirt' on Trump to feed it to the FBI?

3) false rating on uranium to russia

4) Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin: non existent article
5) Podesta still not arrested... because it was Manafort that broke the law.

6) OAN promotes conspiracies

7) Is Claire doing Russia's bidding? Trump met with Ambassador

8) working with russian companies is different than conspiring to influence election. see #5
9) false rating
10) debunked by Marco Rubio

11) Adam Schiff russian pranksters
A spokesman for Schiff told The Atlantic that the committee reported the call to "appropriate law enforcement and security personnel" and told them "of our belief that it was probably bogus."
12) see 11)

Imagine Obama saying "i can pardon myself".

"1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments."


Link or Lie?

The meaning of 'colluded' is in reference to the election.


Let's see your evidence of such.

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

 

[Moonglow]

Just as Stalin, Lenin and Mao were threats to the lives and liberties of societies, people with Pogo's mentality and ignorance promise the expeditious return of worsening human conditions wherever they can get an audience with a low enough IQ to listen.

Same for most of the misinformed Leftists posting here daily.

Given a fraction of a chance, they will gladly destroy America and bring poverty and suffering never imagined from sea to no longer shining sea.

But to do that requires a vast number of good men to do nothing about it.

The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans.

Lack of a living minimum wage - thank Republicans. They have steadfastly refused to raise the federal minimum wage.

Lack of universal health care. Thank Republicans. They refuse to consider a universal health care program as “too expensive”. You already have the most expensive health care in the world. And the least efficient. You have the lowest life expectancy in the first world. You pay more per capita for health care and yet a large percentage of your population has no coverage at all.

Education for the poor. The US and Turkey are the only first world countries where the children of the poor received less education funding than the children of the rich.

Infrastructure: clean drinking water, hydro, and health care are lacking in many parts of rural America. Especially poor regions like Appalachia.

Republican changes to the tax code, starting with Reagan in the 1970’s, tipped the balance of the economy in favour of the wealthy, and started the country on the road to massive deficits.

"The only people bringing poverty and suffering to Americans are Republicans. "



How many times a day do folks remind you that you are a moron?

Wow did you see where they raised taxes and fees in other sectors?
Like social security deductions went up..Duh, you dipshitz get duped every time with that hook...

 

[PoliticalChic]

1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments.

2) Did Hillary Clinton collude with the Russians to get 'dirt' on Trump to feed it to the FBI?

3) false rating on uranium to russia

4) Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin: non existent article
5) Podesta still not arrested... because it was Manafort that broke the law.

6) OAN promotes conspiracies

7) Is Claire doing Russia's bidding? Trump met with Ambassador

8) working with russian companies is different than conspiring to influence election. see #5
9) false rating
10) debunked by Marco Rubio

11) Adam Schiff russian pranksters
A spokesman for Schiff told The Atlantic that the committee reported the call to "appropriate law enforcement and security personnel" and told them "of our belief that it was probably bogus."
12) see 11)

Imagine Obama saying "i can pardon myself".

"1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments."


Link or Lie?

The meaning of 'colluded' is in reference to the election.


Let's see your evidence of such.

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

 

[Dragonlady]

"1) Trump aides colluded with foreign governments."


Link or Lie?

The meaning of 'colluded' is in reference to the election.


Let's see your evidence of such.

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The meaning of 'colluded' is in reference to the election.


Let's see your evidence of such.

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

 

[Dragonlady]

Why would Viktor Vekselberg pay half a million to Cohen?

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Last but not least, you’re attempts at condescension are noted. It’s charming that you recently learned the meaning of “doublespeak”. I read 1984. I read it in 1965. Watching Donald Trump manipulating fools like you, and promoting his politics of division and hate is like watching much of Orwell’s vision play out for real. From the “alternative facts”, to his promotion if the idea of America as a victim of other countries trade and defence policies, and casting illegals as the villains in much the same way that Hitler scapegoated the Jews in Nazi Germany, is particularly chilling.

Being an intellectual lightweight without critical thinking skills I can see where you lack the ability or the capacity to see the reality or the dangers of the Trump presidency. You might want to actually read Orwell instead of just googling for definitions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why would Russia pay $145 million to the Clintons?

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

 

[dudmuck]

They didn’t. One Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation to support the Foundation’s work in Third World Countries - like providing drugs to treat AIDS.

Both governmental organizations and NGO’s have consistently praised the Foundation’s work in Africa. When Trump cancelled funding for women’s health groups in Third World Countries, Canada donated $74 million dollars to ensure the programs continued.

Meanwhile the Trump Foundation has been shut down for fundraising without a license and fined numerous times for misuse of donated funds. The State of New York has ordered them to submit proper financial reports.

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...Russian businessman paid $145 million to The Clinton Foundation..."


Exactly.

Exactly WHAT? The payment was never secret. It went to the Foundation and is accounted for in the Foundation’s operating statements.

The Foundation’s publishes their audited financial statements publicly. It’s not like they’re some deep dark secret like Trump’s tax returns.

Aside from slander and innuendo, what exactly are you trying to say?

The payment was a bribe....as was the inflated payment to the rapist, Bill, for 'speeches.'

Your post is simply spin, you imbecile....er, I mean moron.




And....another lesson for you:

Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

A lie which has somehow been legitimized by an uneducated public. Seenewspeak, doublespeak

Public relations term, referring to slightly altering facts to portray a desired version of a story.

There you go, lying without evidence, saying the money was a bribe. If it was a bribe, what did it paid for. Don’t even try with that Uranium One bullshit.

If the money was a bribe, why did it go to the Foundation? The Clintons take no money from the Foundation and, in fact, contribute a large chunk of their income to the Foundation. In order for these funds to be a bribe, it would have have to go to the Clintons.

This stands in stark contrast to the atrumo Foundation. Dumb Donald hasn’t donated to his own foundation since 2008, and the Trump Corporation skimmed $3 million off the top from the money Eric raised for St. Jude’s hospital. How does it cost Trump $3 million to host a golf tournament at a Trump property?

Trump is far more open with his bribes. For example, you have the $500 million the Chinese government just shelled out to Trump Resort Indonesia to get the sanctions against a the electronics company lifted. The trade marks for Ivanka.

Everyone knows what that bribe was.....and what a moron you are.
November 8, 2016 was the answer to the question, while you morons are still posting 'is not, issssss noooootttttttt!!!'



Charles Ortel


FALSE PHILANTHROPY


Summary Review of Selected Intentionally FalseRepresentations in Clinton Foundation Public Filings

To informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that hasneither been organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions.In particular, the Clinton Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas. Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants.In contrast to this stark reality, Bill Clinton recently continued a long pattern ofdissembling, likening himself to Robin Hood and dismissing critics of his“philanthropic” post-presidency, despite mounting concerns over perceived conflictsof interest and irregularities.
Bill Clinton compares himself, foundation to Robin Hood


Normally, evaluating the efficacy of a charity objectively is performed lookingclosely into hard facts only-specifically, determining whether monies spent upon“program service expenditures” actually have furthered the limited, authorized“tax-exempt purposes” of entities such as the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea ClintonFoundation, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures, and its affiliates (together, the“Clinton Charity Network”).

Clinton Foundation got high marks from charity watchdogs. If you have a problem with the foundation, i defer to Citizens United.
You get a gold star for irrelevancy, consider the train wreck of the current administration.

Yet, I just provided proof of the very opposite.