Why Liberalism Must Be Expunged.

[P@triot]

The electricity will cost more than from cleaner sources and will create more pollution, but there it is.

Are all Canadians mindless pathological liars like you or are you just an anomaly up there?

 

[P@triot]

He is forcing the taxpayer to subsidize coal under measures that can only be used in a national security emergency.

The Dumbocrats have forced the American tax payer to subsidize the failed “green energy” industry since the 1970’s and you’ve applauded the entire time. But now you’re suddenly “outraged”? Really? So what you’re saying is that you don’t like a level playing field? Yep...typical progressive.

 

[Pogo]

Wow. That may just be the most ironic statement ever made on USMB. For 8 years, Barack Insane Obama egregiously violated the U.S. Constitution to implement a Marxist ideology where he and his party hand picked the winners and losers (anyone donating to him won, anyone who didn’t lost). And you cheered. You cheered fanatically. You called Obama “the messiah”.

------------- Link?

We sit, and we wait.

And now you’re going to make that idiotic statement?

Ummm I think you just did.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



RicaDid I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

America is so liberal, even old Conservatives love their sic security and Medicare. The clean air and water are nice, too. Thanks liberals. Because of Liberals more people have a say in their government. Without Liberals it would be impossible for this multicultural society to even function. All this prosperity and freedom we have is largely the result of Liberals throughout the ages fighting for the people. Thank you Liberals past and present for helping make us a great country

Liberals???

As is always necessary when dealing with a government school grad....you....definitions are necessary.

By 'Liberal' you mean the Socialist Party that Communist John Dewey convinced to change their name to 'Liberals.'

Classsical Liberals, the Founders, what are known as conservatives today, are very different from Socialists, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Communists, and modern Liberals....all of whom favor:

. ...the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



We, on the Right embrace the doctrines on which this nation was founded:

.... individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.



Don't make that mistake again.

No, you ignorant TWIT. Liberalism is exactly what the fuck FOUNDED this country, WROTE its Constitution and ARTICULATED the Bill of Rights that made those free markets and those individual rights POSSIBLE.

THAT is what you're calling to be "expunged" in the abject black hole of ignorance you squat in. And you've been corrected on this multitudinous times, yet here you are trotting out the same old shit expecting different results BEGGING anyone to expend any more than the spittoon juice it deserves on your pathetic revisionist Bubblistic claptrap.

Clean up your language and try again....and, as always, I'll rip you a new one.

A "new" what?

I don't *NEED* to "try again" --- YOU do. You've been served this notice before and you keep going continuing to dig yourself deeper. You don't have the foggiest clue what the political terms you fling like so many turds even mean, yet you're content to wallow in your ignorant bubble.

Moreover your historical dating is as bad as your ignorance of political science terms --- Liberals' "ascendancy" traces to the 1770s (not the "1960s") so you were only off by less than two centuries. That's if you choose to begin at the formal declarations, and generations before that if you choose to trace back to Rousseau and Locke.

Here's a whole list of Liberalist theorists who get some degree of songwriting credits. Shut up and finally learn something for once in your waste of a life. It's a brief list, only covers about 2300 years.

You're way out of your league here Princess. And the more you keep yammering the same old shit, the deeper you entrench yourself in it.

Now, see.....I've trained you to eschew the vulgarity with the promise to fulfill your need for a response.
I like how you've learned to apply to your betters....moi.

Good start.



Next, learn to institute truth in your posts.

1. Liberals had no input in the formation of this nation.....classical liberals did, what are called conservatives today.

2. You modern Liberals are the remnants of the Socialist Party, that communist John Dewey persuaded to change their name to 'Liberal' and/or 'Progressive.'

3. Memorize this:
a. This is the liberalism that the nation and the Constitution was founded on:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

b. This is the Liberalism/Socialism that your fake liberalism is based on:
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Don't come back until you're learned it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

understand real fascism: the warning signs:
1. Powerful and continuing nationalism
2. Disdain for human rights
3. Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
4. Rampant sexism
5. Controlled mass media
6. Obsession with national security
7. Religion and government intertwined
8. Corporate power protected
9. Labor power suppressed (child labor)
10. Disdain for intellectual and the arts
11. Obsession with crime and punishment
12. Rampant cronyism and corruption

/----/ Yeah, sounds like the democRAT agenda.

....and proves the adage: 'To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they blame on the other side.'

I'm not blaming anybody; I'm just referencing actual occurrences.

Who wants to scrap checks and balances?

"Who wants to scrap checks and balances?"

The Democrats/Liberals/Communists, of course.



“As the administrative state distorts the United States’ constitutional architecture, Clarence Thomas becomes America’s indispensable constitutionalist. Now in his 25th year on the Supreme Court, he is urging the judicial branch to limit the legislative branch’s practice of delegating its power….

This subject is central to today’s argument between constitutionalists and progressives. The former favor and the latter oppose holding Congress to its responsibilities and restricting executive discretion.

…the court has “overseen and sanctioned the growth of an administrative system that concentrates the power to make laws and the power to enforce them in the hands of a vast and unaccountable administrative apparatus that finds no comfortable home in our constitutional structure.” Battling the modern American administrative state


Progressives......no checks nor balances on their power!

And that's from the Washington Post no less.


“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Madison, Federalist #47




Now.....why do you hate America????

 

[Pogo]

America is so liberal, even old Conservatives love their sic security and Medicare. The clean air and water are nice, too. Thanks liberals. Because of Liberals more people have a say in their government. Without Liberals it would be impossible for this multicultural society to even function. All this prosperity and freedom we have is largely the result of Liberals throughout the ages fighting for the people. Thank you Liberals past and present for helping make us a great country

Liberals???

As is always necessary when dealing with a government school grad....you....definitions are necessary.

By 'Liberal' you mean the Socialist Party that Communist John Dewey convinced to change their name to 'Liberals.'

Classsical Liberals, the Founders, what are known as conservatives today, are very different from Socialists, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Communists, and modern Liberals....all of whom favor:

. ...the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



We, on the Right embrace the doctrines on which this nation was founded:

.... individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.



Don't make that mistake again.

No, you ignorant TWIT. Liberalism is exactly what the fuck FOUNDED this country, WROTE its Constitution and ARTICULATED the Bill of Rights that made those free markets and those individual rights POSSIBLE.

THAT is what you're calling to be "expunged" in the abject black hole of ignorance you squat in. And you've been corrected on this multitudinous times, yet here you are trotting out the same old shit expecting different results BEGGING anyone to expend any more than the spittoon juice it deserves on your pathetic revisionist Bubblistic claptrap.

Clean up your language and try again....and, as always, I'll rip you a new one.

A "new" what?

I don't *NEED* to "try again" --- YOU do. You've been served this notice before and you keep going continuing to dig yourself deeper. You don't have the foggiest clue what the political terms you fling like so many turds even mean, yet you're content to wallow in your ignorant bubble.

Moreover your historical dating is as bad as your ignorance of political science terms --- Liberals' "ascendancy" traces to the 1770s (not the "1960s") so you were only off by less than two centuries. That's if you choose to begin at the formal declarations, and generations before that if you choose to trace back to Rousseau and Locke.

Here's a whole list of Liberalist theorists who get some degree of songwriting credits. Shut up and finally learn something for once in your waste of a life. It's a brief list, only covers about 2300 years.

You're way out of your league here Princess. And the more you keep yammering the same old shit, the deeper you entrench yourself in it.

Now, see.....I've trained you to eschew the vulgarity with the promise to fulfill your need for a response.
I like how you've learned to apply to your betters....moi.

Good start.



Next, learn to institute truth in your posts.

1. Liberals had no input in the formation of this nation.....classical liberals did, what are called conservatives today.

2. You modern Liberals are the remnants of the Socialist Party, that communist John Dewey persuaded to change their name to 'Liberal' and/or 'Progressive.'

3. Memorize this:
a. This is the liberalism that the nation and the Constitution was founded on:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

b. This is the Liberalism/Socialism that your fake liberalism is based on:
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Don't come back until you're learned it.

No sooner do I articulate the particulate matter of the fallacy than sure enough on cue the costumed clown stumbles onto the stage to demonstrate what we all already know. Complete with her fascisti fantasies of ordering people around. That's so cute.

:>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support civil rights, democracy, secularism, gender and race equality, internationalism and the freedoms of speech, the press, religion and markets.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12] adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract.

.... Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe and South America, whereas it was well-established alongside republicanism in the United States.[15] In Victorian Britain, it was used to critique the political establishment, appealing to science and reason on behalf of the people.[16] --- Wikipedia, the MultisouLeaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe and South America, whereas it was well-established alongside republicanism in the United States.[15] In Victorian Britain, it was used to critique the political establishment, appealing to science and reason on behalf of the people.[16] --- Wikipedia, the Multisourced Community Encyclopedia There Ain't a Damn Thing in the World You Can Do About the Existence Of
​

Sure, you can CLAIM established definitions mean nothing, or even that they mean their own opposite. This is a message board. I could CLAIM the Empire State building is a snail. Guess what --- it wouldn't make the building suddenly slimy. It would make me a liar. But between the two of us I ain't the one who chose that route, now am I.


Oh by the way I don't need your fucking permission to choose my terminology so you can stick that shit right up your fascist ass.

 

[ph3iron]

Me? Let's say a couple of post docs

Hmm. Must have been from Evergreen State University.

Trump university actually

 

[ph3iron]

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



RicaDid I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

America is so liberal, even old Conservatives love their sic security and Medicare. The clean air and water are nice, too. Thanks liberals. Because of Liberals more people have a say in their government. Without Liberals it would be impossible for this multicultural society to even function. All this prosperity and freedom we have is largely the result of Liberals throughout the ages fighting for the people. Thank you Liberals past and present for helping make us a great country

Keep the gov out of my Medicare as the trumpie said

 

[ph3iron]

Liberals???

As is always necessary when dealing with a government school grad....you....definitions are necessary.

By 'Liberal' you mean the Socialist Party that Communist John Dewey convinced to change their name to 'Liberals.'

Classsical Liberals, the Founders, what are known as conservatives today, are very different from Socialists, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Communists, and modern Liberals....all of whom favor:

. ...the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



We, on the Right embrace the doctrines on which this nation was founded:

.... individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.



Don't make that mistake again.

No, you ignorant TWIT. Liberalism is exactly what the fuck FOUNDED this country, WROTE its Constitution and ARTICULATED the Bill of Rights that made those free markets and those individual rights POSSIBLE.

THAT is what you're calling to be "expunged" in the abject black hole of ignorance you squat in. And you've been corrected on this multitudinous times, yet here you are trotting out the same old shit expecting different results BEGGING anyone to expend any more than the spittoon juice it deserves on your pathetic revisionist Bubblistic claptrap.

Clean up your language and try again....and, as always, I'll rip you a new one.

A "new" what?

I don't *NEED* to "try again" --- YOU do. You've been served this notice before and you keep going continuing to dig yourself deeper. You don't have the foggiest clue what the political terms you fling like so many turds even mean, yet you're content to wallow in your ignorant bubble.

Moreover your historical dating is as bad as your ignorance of political science terms --- Liberals' "ascendancy" traces to the 1770s (not the "1960s") so you were only off by less than two centuries. That's if you choose to begin at the formal declarations, and generations before that if you choose to trace back to Rousseau and Locke.

Here's a whole list of Liberalist theorists who get some degree of songwriting credits. Shut up and finally learn something for once in your waste of a life. It's a brief list, only covers about 2300 years.

You're way out of your league here Princess. And the more you keep yammering the same old shit, the deeper you entrench yourself in it.

Now, see.....I've trained you to eschew the vulgarity with the promise to fulfill your need for a response.
I like how you've learned to apply to your betters....moi.

Good start.



Next, learn to institute truth in your posts.

1. Liberals had no input in the formation of this nation.....classical liberals did, what are called conservatives today.

2. You modern Liberals are the remnants of the Socialist Party, that communist John Dewey persuaded to change their name to 'Liberal' and/or 'Progressive.'

3. Memorize this:
a. This is the liberalism that the nation and the Constitution was founded on:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

b. This is the Liberalism/Socialism that your fake liberalism is based on:
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Don't come back until you're learned it.

No sooner do I articulate the particulate matter of the fallacy than sure enough on cue the costumed clown stumbles onto the stage to demonstrate what we all already know. Complete with her fascisti fantasies of ordering people around. That's so cute.

:>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support civil rights, democracy, secularism, gender and race equality, internationalism and the freedoms of speech, the press, religion and markets.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12] adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract.

.... Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe and South America, whereas it was well-established alongside republicanism in the United States.[15] In Victorian Britain, it was used to critique the political establishment, appealing to science and reason on behalf of the people.[16] --- Wikipedia, the MultisouLeaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe and South America, whereas it was well-established alongside republicanism in the United States.[15] In Victorian Britain, it was used to critique the political establishment, appealing to science and reason on behalf of the people.[16] --- Wikipedia, the Multisourced Community Encyclopedia There Ain't a Damn Thing in the World You Can Do About the Existence Of
​

Sure, you can CLAIM established definitions mean nothing, or even that they mean their own opposite. This is a message board. I could CLAIM the Empire State building is a snail. Guess what --- it wouldn't make the building suddenly slimy. It would make me a liar. But between the two of us I ain't the one who chose that route, now am I.


Oh by the way I don't need your fucking permission to choose my terminology so you can stick that shit right up your fascist ass.

Nice foul mouth.
College again?
Zero?

 

[ph3iron]

Phew, I. Feel. Bett

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



Did I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

Generation after generation, liberalism wins. Liberalism is progress and progress has proven inevitable.

You don't think so? Try to bring back segregation, or take away a woman's right to vote, or end Social Security, or bring back child labor, or kick gays out of the military or deny them marriage equality.

You can't win, conservatives. All you can do is slow things down temporarily.

You are like the rear guard defense of a perpetually retreating army.

/——-/ Segregation was started by and maintained by liberals. It was Republicans who ended it. Try reading a history book. Progress to a termite is destroying your home.

No, southern DEMS who became republican after the rights act.
Do you really think current KKK members are. DEMS?
On jobs you do know that fewer jobs were created in 2017 than 2016?

/———-/ There are fewer than 3000 klan members. Non issue wacko fringe group https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2017-08-14/the-kkk-is-still-based-in-22-states-in-the-us-in-2017?context=amp

Phew, I feel better now.
Meetings are active around me.
Don't believe I saw you there

 

[Pogo]

No, you ignorant TWIT. Liberalism is exactly what the fuck FOUNDED this country, WROTE its Constitution and ARTICULATED the Bill of Rights that made those free markets and those individual rights POSSIBLE.

THAT is what you're calling to be "expunged" in the abject black hole of ignorance you squat in. And you've been corrected on this multitudinous times, yet here you are trotting out the same old shit expecting different results BEGGING anyone to expend any more than the spittoon juice it deserves on your pathetic revisionist Bubblistic claptrap.

Clean up your language and try again....and, as always, I'll rip you a new one.

A "new" what?

I don't *NEED* to "try again" --- YOU do. You've been served this notice before and you keep going continuing to dig yourself deeper. You don't have the foggiest clue what the political terms you fling like so many turds even mean, yet you're content to wallow in your ignorant bubble.

Moreover your historical dating is as bad as your ignorance of political science terms --- Liberals' "ascendancy" traces to the 1770s (not the "1960s") so you were only off by less than two centuries. That's if you choose to begin at the formal declarations, and generations before that if you choose to trace back to Rousseau and Locke.

Here's a whole list of Liberalist theorists who get some degree of songwriting credits. Shut up and finally learn something for once in your waste of a life. It's a brief list, only covers about 2300 years.

You're way out of your league here Princess. And the more you keep yammering the same old shit, the deeper you entrench yourself in it.

Now, see.....I've trained you to eschew the vulgarity with the promise to fulfill your need for a response.
I like how you've learned to apply to your betters....moi.

Good start.



Next, learn to institute truth in your posts.

1. Liberals had no input in the formation of this nation.....classical liberals did, what are called conservatives today.

2. You modern Liberals are the remnants of the Socialist Party, that communist John Dewey persuaded to change their name to 'Liberal' and/or 'Progressive.'

3. Memorize this:
a. This is the liberalism that the nation and the Constitution was founded on:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

b. This is the Liberalism/Socialism that your fake liberalism is based on:
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



Don't come back until you're learned it.

No sooner do I articulate the particulate matter of the fallacy than sure enough on cue the costumed clown stumbles onto the stage to demonstrate what we all already know. Complete with her fascisti fantasies of ordering people around. That's so cute.

:>> Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support civil rights, democracy, secularism, gender and race equality, internationalism and the freedoms of speech, the press, religion and markets.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Liberalism became a distinct movement in the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among Western philosophers and economists. Liberalism sought to replace the norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, the divine right of kings and traditional conservatism with representative democracy and the rule of law. Liberals also ended mercantilist policies, royal monopolies and other barriers to trade, instead promoting free markets.[11] Philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition, arguing that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[12] adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract.

.... Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe and South America, whereas it was well-established alongside republicanism in the United States.[15] In Victorian Britain, it was used to critique the political establishment, appealing to science and reason on behalf of the people.[16] --- Wikipedia, the MultisouLeaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[14] the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe and South America, whereas it was well-established alongside republicanism in the United States.[15] In Victorian Britain, it was used to critique the political establishment, appealing to science and reason on behalf of the people.[16] --- Wikipedia, the Multisourced Community Encyclopedia There Ain't a Damn Thing in the World You Can Do About the Existence Of
​

Sure, you can CLAIM established definitions mean nothing, or even that they mean their own opposite. This is a message board. I could CLAIM the Empire State building is a snail. Guess what --- it wouldn't make the building suddenly slimy. It would make me a liar. But between the two of us I ain't the one who chose that route, now am I.


Oh by the way I don't need your fucking permission to choose my terminology so you can stick that shit right up your fascist ass.

Nice foul mouth.
College again?
Zero?

Thank you.
Verbs?

 

[Pogo]

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



Did I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

Generation after generation, liberalism wins. Liberalism is progress and progress has proven inevitable.

You don't think so? Try to bring back segregation, or take away a woman's right to vote, or end Social Security, or bring back child labor, or kick gays out of the military or deny them marriage equality.

You can't win, conservatives. All you can do is slow things down temporarily.

You are like the rear guard defense of a perpetually retreating army.

/——-/ Segregation was started by and maintained by liberals. It was Republicans who ended it. Try reading a history book. Progress to a termite is destroying your home.

Wow, the shit you miss when you're doing something productive like sleeping...

It is impossible for Liberals to engage in racism, by definition. Segregation was started and maintained by conservatives, and that doesn't mean a political term or a political party. Neither segregation nor racism requires a political party.

Liberalism is embodied in the famous phrase "all men are created equal". Maybe you've heard of it. That's a reference directly to the heavy hand of the First and Second Estates --- the Church and the Aristocracy --- that Liberalism sprang up to OPPOSE. Perhaps you've heard of King George? Anyway that tenet does not allow for a striated hierarchy where some are "more equal than others". That's a conservative trait. And that doesn't mean "Republican" or "Democrat"; it means a personal social philosophy. Because, again, you don't need a political party organization to hold a social hierarchy philosophy, which is what racism is.

And btw if you think anybody "ended" segregation, I'd like you to take a look at a bridge I've got for sale. Oh it ended legally --- that's how Rump and his father got sued by the government for their housing units where they were doing exactly that (and where Rump told the federal investigator during a break, "Come on Elise -- you don't want to live with 'them' either") -- but yeah it continues to exist in practice.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ You Libs never stop rewriting history. And I take the word of National Review over your dogma anyday.:
Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Democratic Party's Racist History | [site:name] | National Review
June 26, 2015 4:00 AM

Senator Robert Byrd
The less racist the South gets, the more Republican it becomes.
Here’s what the former president of the United States had to say when he eulogized his mentor, an Arkansas senator:

We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of J. William Fulbright, a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better. . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.

So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “Southern Manifesto” in 1956. (Two Republicans also signed it.) The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education and their commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That filibuster continued for 83 days.

 

[Pogo]

/----/ You Libs never stop rewriting history. And I take the word of National Review over your dogma anyday.:
Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Democratic Party's Racist History | [site:name] | National Review
June 26, 2015 4:00 AM

Senator Robert Byrd
The less racist the South gets, the more Republican it becomes.
Here’s what the former president of the United States had to say when he eulogized his mentor, an Arkansas senator:

We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of J. William Fulbright, a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better. . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.

So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “Southern Manifesto” in 1956. (Two Republicans also signed it.) The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education and their commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That filibuster continued for 83 days.

Backed into a corner he goes to the well of an infamously bullshitious blog that's already been debunked over and over and over. Desperation strikes deep.

And yet another nickel for Pogo's Law. Faced with the topic of "Liberalism", he panics and tries to switch to a political party.

You're helpless dood. You have no retort whatsoever.

Oh and thanks for the reading glasses font. I had to get in my car and drive down the street to read it, only to find out "this shit again".

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ You Libs never stop rewriting history. And I take the word of National Review over your dogma anyday.:
Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Democratic Party's Racist History | [site:name] | National Review
June 26, 2015 4:00 AM

Senator Robert Byrd
The less racist the South gets, the more Republican it becomes.
Here’s what the former president of the United States had to say when he eulogized his mentor, an Arkansas senator:

We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of J. William Fulbright, a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better. . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.

So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “Southern Manifesto” in 1956. (Two Republicans also signed it.) The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education and their commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That filibuster continued for 83 days.

Backed into a corner he links an infamously bullshitious blog that's already been debunked over and over and over. Desperation strikes deep.

And yet another nickel for Pogo's Law. Faced with the topic of "Liberalism", he panics and tries to switch to a political party.

You're helpless dood. You have no retort whatsoever.

/----/
Before Charlottesville, Democrats voted for racist policies for more than 100 years
by Jennifer Kerns
Before Charlottesville, Democrats voted for racist policies for more than 100 years
| August 18, 2017 11:21 AM

 

[Cellblock2429]

Wow. That may just be the most ironic statement ever made on USMB. For 8 years, Barack Insane Obama egregiously violated the U.S. Constitution to implement a Marxist ideology where he and his party hand picked the winners and losers (anyone donating to him won, anyone who didn’t lost). And you cheered. You cheered fanatically. You called Obama “the messiah”.

------------- Link?

We sit, and we wait.

And now you’re going to make that idiotic statement?

Ummm I think you just did.

/----/ Like a typical Alinskyite you demand links then dismiss any evidence given.

 

[Imissbush]

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



RicaDid I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

America is so liberal, even old Conservatives love their sic security and Medicare. The clean air and water are nice, too. Thanks liberals. Because of Liberals more people have a say in their government. Without Liberals it would be impossible for this multicultural society to even function. All this prosperity and freedom we have is largely the result of Liberals throughout the ages fighting for the people. Thank you Liberals past and present for helping make us a great country

/——/ Liberals has nothing to do with that. If you like clean air and water, thank Richard Nixon who created the EPA and signed the laws.

Ha ha, no you see, we Liberals are so awesome, we get little Republicans to do what we want. Remember how have the house, Senate and presidency would mean the end of Obamacare?

 

[Imissbush]

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



RicaDid I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

America is so liberal, even old Conservatives love their sic security and Medicare. The clean air and water are nice, too. Thanks liberals. Because of Liberals more people have a say in their government. Without Liberals it would be impossible for this multicultural society to even function. All this prosperity and freedom we have is largely the result of Liberals throughout the ages fighting for the people. Thank you Liberals past and present for helping make us a great country

Liberals???

As is always necessary when dealing with a government school grad....you....definitions are necessary.

By 'Liberal' you mean the Socialist Party that Communist John Dewey convinced to change their name to 'Liberals.'

Classsical Liberals, the Founders, what are known as conservatives today, are very different from Socialists, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Communists, and modern Liberals....all of whom favor:

. ...the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



We, on the Right embrace the doctrines on which this nation was founded:

.... individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.



Don't make that mistake again.

When did America have "free markets"?

Check this out:


In 1960, the Code of Federal Regulations had 22,877 pages. In 2012, there were 174,545 pages. Charles Murray, “By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission,” pg 6

Now....whose ascendancy can be traced to the 60s?


Liberals.

You mean before we had civil rights legislation? Ya, fewer laws= more racism and oppression

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here is a rule which is the hermeneutical key to understanding how the Left differs, in a most deleterious way, from the right:

The Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.



1. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it, and has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

Leftists believe that an end to social and economic inequality and one will have Utopia! Dennis Prager, ”Still The Best Hope”



2. Claims of 'racism' are linked to demands for increased minimum wage laws by this view of the world.
No matter that it has been tried, and not only failed, failed miserably, but resulted in well over 100 million human beings slaughtered.




3. And, more bad news for the Left from the LA Times:
"Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice

California’s minimum wage jumped to $10.50 an hour at the start of the new year. As the founder of a small fashion design house and clothing manufacturer in San Fernando, I’m not a disinterested observer in this change.

After two years in business, my company now has more than 150 clients from all over the world and 18 employees. It’s what’s known as a cut-and-sew house, part of the garment industry that generates about $17 billion in annual economic activity in Los Angeles County, including $6.9 billion in payroll, according to a 2016 industry report by the California Fashion Assn. This is the epicenter of apparel design and manufacturing in the United States; domestically manufactured clothing is more expensive, but retail and wholesale customers who care about quality and working conditions have historically been willing to pay for it.

Unfortunately, the industry is on a downward trend. Los Angeles County used to have more than 5,000 apparel factories; today, my company is one of roughly 2,000 — and many (e.g. American Apparel) are looking for a way out. One Los Angeles Times headline, quoting a California State University economist, warned that “the exodus has begun."


If not for the $15 minimum wage, I’d have zero interest in leaving California."
Leaving for Las Vegas: California's minimum wage law leaves businesses no choice



RicaDid I mention that the Left does not value prosperity....it values equality.

Think about that.

America is so liberal, even old Conservatives love their sic security and Medicare. The clean air and water are nice, too. Thanks liberals. Because of Liberals more people have a say in their government. Without Liberals it would be impossible for this multicultural society to even function. All this prosperity and freedom we have is largely the result of Liberals throughout the ages fighting for the people. Thank you Liberals past and present for helping make us a great country

Liberals???

As is always necessary when dealing with a government school grad....you....definitions are necessary.

By 'Liberal' you mean the Socialist Party that Communist John Dewey convinced to change their name to 'Liberals.'

Classsical Liberals, the Founders, what are known as conservatives today, are very different from Socialists, Progressives, Nazis, Fascists, Communists, and modern Liberals....all of whom favor:

. ...the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



We, on the Right embrace the doctrines on which this nation was founded:

.... individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.



Don't make that mistake again.

When did America have "free markets"?

Check this out:


In 1960, the Code of Federal Regulations had 22,877 pages. In 2012, there were 174,545 pages. Charles Murray, “By the People: Rebuilding Liberty Without Permission,” pg 6

Now....whose ascendancy can be traced to the 60s?


Liberals.

You mean before we had civil rights legislation? Ya, fewer laws= more racism and oppression

Rule #1: every pronouncement by Democrats/ Liberals....is a lie.

I believe you've just proved Rule #1


The only racism is by Democrats/Liberals....


The Democrat Party:

1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.


Are you embarrassed?

 

[dudmuck]

understand real fascism: the warning signs:
1. Powerful and continuing nationalism
2. Disdain for human rights
3. Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
4. Rampant sexism
5. Controlled mass media
6. Obsession with national security
7. Religion and government intertwined
8. Corporate power protected
9. Labor power suppressed (child labor)
10. Disdain for intellectual and the arts
11. Obsession with crime and punishment
12. Rampant cronyism and corruption

/----/ Yeah, sounds like the democRAT agenda.

....and proves the adage: 'To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they blame on the other side.'

I'm not blaming anybody; I'm just referencing actual occurrences.

Who wants to scrap checks and balances?

"Who wants to scrap checks and balances?"

The Democrats/Liberals/Communists, of course.



“As the administrative state distorts the United States’ constitutional architecture, Clarence Thomas becomes America’s indispensable constitutionalist. Now in his 25th year on the Supreme Court, he is urging the judicial branch to limit the legislative branch’s practice of delegating its power….

This subject is central to today’s argument between constitutionalists and progressives. The former favor and the latter oppose holding Congress to its responsibilities and restricting executive discretion.

…the court has “overseen and sanctioned the growth of an administrative system that concentrates the power to make laws and the power to enforce them in the hands of a vast and unaccountable administrative apparatus that finds no comfortable home in our constitutional structure.” Battling the modern American administrative state


Progressives......no checks nor balances on their power!

And that's from the Washington Post no less.


“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Madison, Federalist #47




Now.....why do you hate America????

Republicans have control of all three branches of government.
Democracy is the foundation of what justifies government to exist: that it exists because the people chose it to exist, and it what form. Democracy is also the main characteristics of liberalism. By contrast, we now have the most undemocratic president in our history. Maybe he'll give that a shot. <-- the definition of tyranny here.