why not break up the US into 10 smaller countries?

[Redfish]

What about the 50 states?

haven't you heard there are 57 ? that is what B.O'Husseinbama says.

and he has visited all 57 of them.

 

[LeftofLeft]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

 

[NYcarbineer]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

You are so FOS. Minority rights would not exist if not for the majority voting them into law. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a complete mental zero?

Why do conservatives want abortion, or same sex marriage, left up to the states?

Because they know that's the best chance they can be banned at least in some states.

Nope, because abortion is murder and same sex marriage is an aberration of human existence.

Just because you and your libtardian friends want to murder unborn human beings and call a gay union a marriage, does not mean that everyone else has to agree with you.

Its called freedom of thought, a concept totally foreign to you left wing sheep and parrots.

You prove my point. Abortion isn't murder it's a constitutional right. Conservatives want it turned back to the states so they can take away that right.

 

[NYcarbineer]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

 

[Redfish]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

You are so FOS. Minority rights would not exist if not for the majority voting them into law. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a complete mental zero?

Why do conservatives want abortion, or same sex marriage, left up to the states?

Because they know that's the best chance they can be banned at least in some states.

Nope, because abortion is murder and same sex marriage is an aberration of human existence.

Just because you and your libtardian friends want to murder unborn human beings and call a gay union a marriage, does not mean that everyone else has to agree with you.

Its called freedom of thought, a concept totally foreign to you left wing sheep and parrots.

You prove my point. Abortion isn't murder it's a constitutional right. Conservatives want it turned back to the states so they can take away that right.

So, abortion isn't murder because you say so??????????? Then why limit it to unborn kids? why not allow kids up to 2 years old to be killed if they are a burden on the mother? If they cry too much? get sick? or just piss her off?

Murdering your children is NOT a right.

 

[Redfish]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

 

[SwimExpert]

each one would STILL have far more power (given a few nukes) than 95% of the rest of the world's countries. What is it that you don't like about the idea, hmm? maybe the split up would mean that you can't sit around on your arse, living off of other people? Maybe you could not feel "tough" while "your" troops go oppress other countries in your name? What makes you afraid of this outcome, hmm? Nobody attacks Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, dozens of other rich, small countries, even tho they AInT got nukes. A VERy few nukes suffice to guarantee that Isreal will never be attacked by any large group of people, in any organized fashion, and Isreal doesn't have nuke missiles, nor missile subs. The 8-10 smaller frags of the US could have a nuke missile sub EACH, and have a treaty to defend each other, too. there's nothing to be afraid of, except your own personal weakness and incompetence.

Actually, there was one point where it was broken up into 13 separate countries. Nobody liked it, so they created a perpetual union with each other. Other states joined later.

 

[NYcarbineer]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

 

[Katzndogz]

It's going to happen. Sooner rather than later. Get used to the idea.

 

[Redfish]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

Yes, the SC ruled on that. Now, let me ask you, is if ok if a majority of americans disagree with that ruling? or are we all now mandated to believe what the government dictates that we must believe?

second question: why do you want innocent unborn human beings killed? Do you realize the most abortions occur in the minority community? so are you a racist like Margaret Sanger (founder of planned parenthood)?

 

[Redfish]

It's going to happen. Sooner rather than later. Get used to the idea.

I think you are right. The country is so divided now on almost every issue that a breakup is almost inevitable.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

Yes, the SC ruled on that. Now, let me ask you, is if ok if a majority of americans disagree with that ruling? or are we all now mandated to believe what the government dictates that we must believe?

second question: why do you want innocent unborn human beings killed? Do you realize the most abortions occur in the minority community? so are you a racist like Margaret Sanger (founder of planned parenthood)?

Margaret Sanger was anti-abortion, like you.

Yes it's okay if a majority of Americans disagree with an SC ruling. That's a check against tyranny of the majority.

 

[Redfish]

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

Yes, the SC ruled on that. Now, let me ask you, is if ok if a majority of americans disagree with that ruling? or are we all now mandated to believe what the government dictates that we must believe?

second question: why do you want innocent unborn human beings killed? Do you realize the most abortions occur in the minority community? so are you a racist like Margaret Sanger (founder of planned parenthood)?

Margaret Sanger was anti-abortion, like you.

Yes it's okay if a majority of Americans disagree with an SC ruling. That's a check against tyranny of the majority.

are you crazy? Sanger founded PP in order to reduce the black birth rate. Look up her quotes. She was a rampant abortionist who wanted to stop blacks from reproducing.

"tyranny of the majority" what a crock of shit. Minority rights would not exist if not for majority vote. Minority rights were created by the majority.

 

[bripat9643]

By the way, regardless of which party is in power, the Federal government will never allow secessionist movements to succeed. Ever. As I said earlier, good luck with that.

The Soviet government said the same thing not less than a year before it collapsed.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

Yes, the SC ruled on that. Now, let me ask you, is if ok if a majority of americans disagree with that ruling? or are we all now mandated to believe what the government dictates that we must believe?

second question: why do you want innocent unborn human beings killed? Do you realize the most abortions occur in the minority community? so are you a racist like Margaret Sanger (founder of planned parenthood)?

Margaret Sanger was anti-abortion, like you.

Yes it's okay if a majority of Americans disagree with an SC ruling. That's a check against tyranny of the majority.

That isn't exactly accurate. Sanger was against illegal abortions. In other words, her opinion was no different than Hillary Clinton's

 

[bripat9643]

To what end?

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

Prove it.

 

[boedicca]

Yeah, let's break the U.S. into 10 countries because the EU has worked So Well for the European economy.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah, let's break the U.S. into 10 countries because the EU has worked So Well for the European economy.

The EU was created by joining together multiple countries, so, if anything, it proves that separating into separate countries is a good thing.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,

they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.

It's really what states' rights come down to.

LOL.... A liberal talking about States' Rights. When a State does not align with what National Liberals want, States' right and will of the people are not even an afterthought.

States rights conservatives hate the Constitution, that's why they want out from under it.

Nope, just the opposite, conservatives want the federal govt to follow the constitution.

It does. Roe v Wade was decided in accordance with the Constitution.

Prove it.

The procedure by which the law was appealed, argued, and ruled on all conform to the Constitution.

 

[boedicca]

Yeah, let's break the U.S. into 10 countries because the EU has worked So Well for the European economy.

The EU was created by joining together multiple countries, so, if anything, it proves that separating into separate countries is a good thing.

My point is that if we did split into separate countries, that the Big Government types would want some type of AU which would make us a dysfunctional as the EU.