Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To what end?
Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,
they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.
It's really what states' rights come down to.
You are so FOS. Minority rights would not exist if not for the majority voting them into law. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a complete mental zero?
To what end?
So we don't have to put up with goose stepping Nazis like you.
To what end?
So we don't have to put up with goose stepping Nazis like you.
Gee, you folks are sounding more and more like the old south every day. Good luck with that.
Keep pushing dieversity and you may get your wish OP. Blacks will have a couple, whites will have one, Asians by ethnic group get a few or more and on down the list.
Keep pushing it!!!
I think it was Grotius in 1600's that wrote about dividing Europe in 15 divisions. Great idea.
Three would be fine.each one would STILL have far more power (given a few nukes) than 95% of the rest of the world's countries. What is it that you don't like about the idea, hmm? maybe the split up would mean that you can't sit around on your arse, living off of other people? Maybe you could not feel "tough" while "your" troops go oppress other countries in your name? What makes you afraid of this outcome, hmm? Nobody attacks Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, dozens of other rich, small countries, even tho they AInT got nukes. A VERy few nukes suffice to guarantee that Isreal will never be attacked by any large group of people, in any organized fashion, and Isreal doesn't have nuke missiles, nor missile subs. The 8-10 smaller frags of the US could have a nuke missile sub EACH, and have a treaty to defend each other, too. there's nothing to be afraid of, except your own personal weakness and incompetence.
To what end?
So we don't have to put up with goose stepping Nazis like you.
Gee, you folks are sounding more and more like the old south every day. Good luck with that.
Is that supposed to be an argument of some kind?
More localized rule.To what end?
To what end?
Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,
they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.
It's really what states' rights come down to.
You are so FOS. Minority rights would not exist if not for the majority voting them into law. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a complete mental zero?
Why do conservatives want abortion, or same sex marriage, left up to the states?
Because they know that's the best chance they can be banned at least in some states.
More localized rule.To what end?
Three would be fine.each one would STILL have far more power (given a few nukes) than 95% of the rest of the world's countries. What is it that you don't like about the idea, hmm? maybe the split up would mean that you can't sit around on your arse, living off of other people? Maybe you could not feel "tough" while "your" troops go oppress other countries in your name? What makes you afraid of this outcome, hmm? Nobody attacks Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, dozens of other rich, small countries, even tho they AInT got nukes. A VERy few nukes suffice to guarantee that Isreal will never be attacked by any large group of people, in any organized fashion, and Isreal doesn't have nuke missiles, nor missile subs. The 8-10 smaller frags of the US could have a nuke missile sub EACH, and have a treaty to defend each other, too. there's nothing to be afraid of, except your own personal weakness and incompetence.
Great Lakes and Northeast, Flyover Country and the Gulf States, and the Left Coast.
To what end?
Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,
they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.
It's really what states' rights come down to.
and the "conservative" states would be successful, safe, and fiscally sound. While the "liberal states would all look like Detroit or Baltimore.
Lets do it.
Right. That would explain why the red states are more dependent on Federal dollars than blue states. Oh wait, I doesn't.
To what end?
Tyranny of the majority. Conservatives are in the minority at the national level. If they could create smaller countries, enclaves of conservatism so to speak,
they could become the majority in those new states and thus impose their will.
It's really what states' rights come down to.
You are so FOS. Minority rights would not exist if not for the majority voting them into law. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a complete mental zero?
Why do conservatives want abortion, or same sex marriage, left up to the states?
Because they know that's the best chance they can be banned at least in some states.
By the way, regardless of which party is in power, the Federal government will never allow secessionist movements to succeed. Ever. As I said earlier, good luck with that.
So much for the melting pot.
What about the 50 states?
