Why Oprah would be a better President than Trump

[Indeependent]

Oh great, another black democrat? Sheesh, what would we want? To be Burundi?

And for some Trumpsters it is always about race.....

Nope...
Trespassers have committed a crime.

 

[Indeependent]

Perhaps, but he's addressing actual problems.

Trump is speaking to problems that inflame his base.

Which he suddenly became interested in when he ran for President.

But before he ran for President he hired illegal aliens, had his product manufactured overseas and hired foreign workers for his U.S. properties.

Oprah Winfrey has always addressed actual problems of Americans and others.

False or lie.
Trump has been talking about these issues for ovrer 20 years and ignoramouses such as yourself are irrelevant to any discussion of his positions on ANY topic.[/QUOTE
.....

LOL- I love it when someone calls me an 'ignoramus' and misspells two words in the sentence.

Is an ignoramouse a special Conservative kind of mouse?

The irony.

Strawman and ad hominem...
My remark on your intelligence and integrity is based on the thread's topic.
That's my big fingers on an iPhone.

Ad hominem is what you attempted against me- with your hilariously inept attempt to call me ignorant and misspelling two words in the process.

Ad hominem.
You NEVER address facts.
Now practice keeping on topic.

 

[g5000]

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

But by any measure- Oprah Winfrey is a more accomplished business leader than Donald Trump- and certainly has a better temperament, and a proven record of working for others- rather than just her own wealth or self promotion.

Donald Trump- 'self made' Billionaire whose daddy paid for college, gave him a million dollar in seed money, hired him as President of the family corporation, and guaranteed his son's business loans.
Oprah Winfrey- actual self made Billionaire- came from a poor family, went to college on a scholarship, and went from being a local news announcer to talk show personality to publisher and producer.

Donald Trump: Declared business banktruptcies three times
Oprah Winfrey: No business bankruptcies

Donald Trump: Started the defunct Trump University- being sued in three states- with the AG of New York calling it fraudulant
Oprah Winfrey: Started the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls in South Africa, a boarding school for poverty-stricken girls

Oprah Winfrey would be the unifier that Donald Trump can only pretend he would be.

And certainly she is as, or more qualified than Donald Trump.

Oh wait- she didn't 'fight her own personal Vietnam' by risking STD's like Trump did.....

Oprah backed that pile of shit Obama.

/thread

And Obama won. Which is more than Trump will ever be able to say.

/thread

 

[Syriusly]

I used to watch Oprah all the time until I saw her throw a gal out of her audience because she did not stand up and cheer with the standing ovation given to a basketball player that was a guest. When Oprah asked her why she was not standing, the woman said "I don't much care for him". She was then escorted out of the show.

Oprah is for Oprah and nobody else. So...HELL no.

LOL- so Oprah is for 'Oprah' and nobody else because she through someone off of her show.......but when Trump throws people out of his political rallies....

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.
Muslim woman gets kicked out of Trump rally — for protesting silently

Donald Trump said Sunday that the protester who interrupted his rally at a convention center here on Saturday morning was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

To reiterate...
Oprah is a Globalist who won't help Black Americans because they are spoiled.

Why do you think Black Americans are spoiled?

Do you think Trump shares your views?

 

[Syriusly]

Trump is speaking to problems that inflame his base.

Which he suddenly became interested in when he ran for President.

But before he ran for President he hired illegal aliens, had his product manufactured overseas and hired foreign workers for his U.S. properties.

Oprah Winfrey has always addressed actual problems of Americans and others.

False or lie.
Trump has been talking about these issues for ovrer 20 years and ignoramouses such as yourself are irrelevant to any discussion of his positions on ANY topic.[/QUOTE
.....

LOL- I love it when someone calls me an 'ignoramus' and misspells two words in the sentence.

Is an ignoramouse a special Conservative kind of mouse?

The irony.

Strawman and ad hominem...
My remark on your intelligence and integrity is based on the thread's topic.
That's my big fingers on an iPhone.

Ad hominem is what you attempted against me- with your hilariously inept attempt to call me ignorant and misspelling two words in the process.

Ad hominem.
You NEVER address facts.
Now practice keeping on topic.

Ad hominem is what you attempted against me- with your hilariously inept attempt to call me ignorant and misspelling two words in the process.

Now you practice on addressing the topic- rather than attacking the posters.

 

[Syriusly]

Still waiting for anyone to explain why they think Trump would be a better leader than Oprah.

 

[Indeependent]

Perhaps, but he's addressing actual problems.

Trump is speaking to problems that inflame his base.

Which he suddenly became interested in when he ran for President.

But before he ran for President he hired illegal aliens, had his product manufactured overseas and hired foreign workers for his U.S. properties.

Oprah Winfrey has always addressed actual problems of Americans and others.

False or lie.
Trump has been talking about these issues for ovrer 20 years and ignoramouses such as yourself are irrelevant to any discussion of his positions on ANY topic.[/QUOTE
.....

LOL- I love it when someone calls me an 'ignoramus' and misspells two words in the sentence.

Is an ignoramouse a special Conservative kind of mouse?

The irony.

Strawman and ad hominem...
My remark on your intelligence and integrity is based on the thread's topic.
That's my big fingers on an iPhone.

Ad hominem is what you attempted against me- with your hilariously inept attempt to call me ignorant and misspelling two words in the process.

By the way, point to my ad hominem...the one I never posted.

 

[Indeependent]

I used to watch Oprah all the time until I saw her throw a gal out of her audience because she did not stand up and cheer with the standing ovation given to a basketball player that was a guest. When Oprah asked her why she was not standing, the woman said "I don't much care for him". She was then escorted out of the show.

Oprah is for Oprah and nobody else. So...HELL no.

LOL- so Oprah is for 'Oprah' and nobody else because she through someone off of her show.......but when Trump throws people out of his political rallies....

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.
Muslim woman gets kicked out of Trump rally — for protesting silently

Donald Trump said Sunday that the protester who interrupted his rally at a convention center here on Saturday morning was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

To reiterate...
Oprah is a Globalist who won't help Black Americans because they are spoiled.

Why do you think Black Americans are spoiled?

Do you think Trump shares your views?

Are you illiterate?
OPRAH said Black Americans are spoiled.

 

[Correll]

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.
.....

THis is obviously NOT true.

Try to be less of a liar.

Yet you weren't able to come up with any others.....LOL

His ideas and his stance on the issues were what supercharged his primary campaign.

What I said:

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

So now you are saying you are pro-Trump based entirely on his ideas and stance on the issues?

No, you said that his only claim to lead was his "business success" and I pointed out, correctly, that it was his ideas and positions on the issues, that supercharged his primary campaign.

I have not "now" reversed or changed anything with that post, as you seem to be implying.

I also note that you moved the discussion from Trump's overall support to just me, for some odd and probably dishonest reason of yours.


Are you going to address what I said now, or are you going to try to gin up a strawman to attack?

 

[washamericom]

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

But by any measure- Oprah Winfrey is a more accomplished business leader than Donald Trump- and certainly has a better temperament, and a proven record of working for others- rather than just her own wealth or self promotion.

Donald Trump- 'self made' Billionaire whose daddy paid for college, gave him a million dollar in seed money, hired him as President of the family corporation, and guaranteed his son's business loans.
Oprah Winfrey- actual self made Billionaire- came from a poor family, went to college on a scholarship, and went from being a local news announcer to talk show personality to publisher and producer.

Donald Trump: Declared business banktruptcies three times
Oprah Winfrey: No business bankruptcies

Donald Trump: Started the defunct Trump University- being sued in three states- with the AG of New York calling it fraudulant
Oprah Winfrey: Started the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls in South Africa, a boarding school for poverty-stricken girls

Oprah Winfrey would be the unifier that Donald Trump can only pretend he would be.

And certainly she is as, or more qualified than Donald Trump.

Oh wait- she didn't 'fight her own personal Vietnam' by risking STD's like Trump did.....

she picked the last president man...

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

And Obama won. Which is more than Trump will ever be able to say.

/thread

Poor G-Tard...

 

[PredFan]

Oprah would also be a better president than Hillary, but then so would my dog, or Bernie Madoff, or any inmate in the local looney bin.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.
.....

THis is obviously NOT true.

Try to be less of a liar.

Yet you weren't able to come up with any others.....LOL

His ideas and his stance on the issues were what supercharged his primary campaign.

What I said:

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

So now you are saying you are pro-Trump based entirely on his ideas and stance on the issues?

No, you said that his only claim to lead was his "business success" and I pointed out, correctly, that it was his ideas and positions on the issues, that supercharged his primary campaign

So you responded to my OP with something completely different.

So I agree with you- his followers are excited by his ideas and all of his various and changing positions on the issues.

But that has nothing to do with me pointing out that Oprah has as much demonstrated leadership ability as Donald Trump.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump is speaking to problems that inflame his base.

Which he suddenly became interested in when he ran for President.

But before he ran for President he hired illegal aliens, had his product manufactured overseas and hired foreign workers for his U.S. properties.

Oprah Winfrey has always addressed actual problems of Americans and others.

False or lie.
Trump has been talking about these issues for ovrer 20 years and ignoramouses such as yourself are irrelevant to any discussion of his positions on ANY topic.[/QUOTE
.....

LOL- I love it when someone calls me an 'ignoramus' and misspells two words in the sentence.

Is an ignoramouse a special Conservative kind of mouse?

The irony.

Strawman and ad hominem...
My remark on your intelligence and integrity is based on the thread's topic.
That's my big fingers on an iPhone.

Ad hominem is what you attempted against me- with your hilariously inept attempt to call me ignorant and misspelling two words in the process.

By the way, point to my ad hominem...the one I never posted.

The hilariously ironic misspelled ad hominem

ignoramouses such as yourself

 

[Syriusly]

I used to watch Oprah all the time until I saw her throw a gal out of her audience because she did not stand up and cheer with the standing ovation given to a basketball player that was a guest. When Oprah asked her why she was not standing, the woman said "I don't much care for him". She was then escorted out of the show.

Oprah is for Oprah and nobody else. So...HELL no.

LOL- so Oprah is for 'Oprah' and nobody else because she through someone off of her show.......but when Trump throws people out of his political rallies....

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.

Black students ejected from Trump rally in Ga.
Muslim woman gets kicked out of Trump rally — for protesting silently

Donald Trump said Sunday that the protester who interrupted his rally at a convention center here on Saturday morning was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

To reiterate...
Oprah is a Globalist who won't help Black Americans because they are spoiled.

Why do you think Black Americans are spoiled?

Do you think Trump shares your views?

Are you illiterate?
OPRAH said Black Americans are spoiled.

When did she say that?

I do remember Trump saying American workers are paid too much....
Donald Trump doubles down: 'Our wages are too high'
"We have to become competitive with the world. Our taxes are too high, our wages are too high.

 

[Correll]

THis is obviously NOT true.

Try to be less of a liar.

Yet you weren't able to come up with any others.....LOL

His ideas and his stance on the issues were what supercharged his primary campaign.

What I said:

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

So now you are saying you are pro-Trump based entirely on his ideas and stance on the issues?

No, you said that his only claim to lead was his "business success" and I pointed out, correctly, that it was his ideas and positions on the issues, that supercharged his primary campaign

So you responded to my OP with something completely different.

So I agree with you- his followers are excited by his ideas and all of his various and changing positions on the issues.

But that has nothing to do with me pointing out that Oprah has as much demonstrated leadership ability as Donald Trump.

I consider having good ideas and good policies to be a great claim to "ability to lead".

 

[Syriusly]

Oprah would also be a better president than Hillary, but then so would my dog, or Bernie Madoff, or any inmate in the local looney bin.

So we are in agreement that Oprah would be a better President than Trump.

 

[Syriusly]

Yet you weren't able to come up with any others.....LOL

His ideas and his stance on the issues were what supercharged his primary campaign.

What I said:

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

So now you are saying you are pro-Trump based entirely on his ideas and stance on the issues?

No, you said that his only claim to lead was his "business success" and I pointed out, correctly, that it was his ideas and positions on the issues, that supercharged his primary campaign

So you responded to my OP with something completely different.

So I agree with you- his followers are excited by his ideas and all of his various and changing positions on the issues.

But that has nothing to do with me pointing out that Oprah has as much demonstrated leadership ability as Donald Trump.

I consider having good ideas and good policies to be a great claim to "ability to lead".

We are still waiting for Trump to come up with good ideas and policies.

 

[Correll]

His ideas and his stance on the issues were what supercharged his primary campaign.

What I said:

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

So now you are saying you are pro-Trump based entirely on his ideas and stance on the issues?

No, you said that his only claim to lead was his "business success" and I pointed out, correctly, that it was his ideas and positions on the issues, that supercharged his primary campaign

So you responded to my OP with something completely different.

So I agree with you- his followers are excited by his ideas and all of his various and changing positions on the issues.

But that has nothing to do with me pointing out that Oprah has as much demonstrated leadership ability as Donald Trump.

I consider having good ideas and good policies to be a great claim to "ability to lead".

We are still waiting for Trump to come up with good ideas and policies.

No, you are waiting.

I and about half the nation are fairly happy with his ideas.

Hell, the number would be higher if so many independents had not been lied to about Trump being "racist" or "scary".

 

[Syriusly]

What I said:

Trump's only claim to ability to lead are his claims to business success.

So now you are saying you are pro-Trump based entirely on his ideas and stance on the issues?

No, you said that his only claim to lead was his "business success" and I pointed out, correctly, that it was his ideas and positions on the issues, that supercharged his primary campaign

So you responded to my OP with something completely different.

So I agree with you- his followers are excited by his ideas and all of his various and changing positions on the issues.

But that has nothing to do with me pointing out that Oprah has as much demonstrated leadership ability as Donald Trump.

I consider having good ideas and good policies to be a great claim to "ability to lead".

We are still waiting for Trump to come up with good ideas and policies.

No, you are waiting.

I and about half the nation are fairly happy with his ideas.

Hell, the number would be higher if so many independents had not been lied to about Trump being "racist" or "scary".

Yeah...because the 'independents' just aren't as smart as you Trumpsters.....LOL