Why Republicans want Bernie Sanders to be the nominee:

[PK1]

Bernie Sanders didn't write a smutty rape fantasy.

A woman enjoys intercourse with her man -- as she fantasizes being raped by three men simultaneously.
Right?

---
Looks like YOU are the one with rape fantasies/fears that are subconscious.
Is that why you cherry-picked the text and took it out of context? Or, was it political?

CONTEXT is important, if you're bright. Bernie wrote that insightful piece at age 30 in 1972 when "women's lib" was taking hold after the freedom-oriented 1960's.
It was an era when USA women were able to break out of their traditional roles (that still exist in Islamic, Indian, other cultures) and confusion existed among hetero male-female relationships.
Evolutionary stage of sex-roles & gender equality, which continues to develop today.

However, if you want to continue cherry picking to suit your political motives, go ahead & continue making an ass of yourself.
.

 

[Liminal]

View attachment 72330

 

[rdean]

Bernie Sanders' supporters are convinced he could win a general election. They're wrong.

So let's consider the kinds of attacks Sanders would face from Republicans. They wouldn't just call him a socialist — in fact, that'd be about the nicest thing they'd say about him. They'd say he's coming to raise your taxes to fund big-government schemes. They'd say he wants to cripple the military. They'd say he's advocated eliminating our intelligence capabilities. They'd say he was part of a Trotskyite party that expressed "solidarity" with the theocratic government of Iran while it was holding Americans hostage. They'd say he wants government to seize the means of production. They'd say he hates America. They'd say he's the author of smutty rape fantasies.

----------------------------

And he did write smutty rape fantasies

--------------------------------

How Bernie Sanders learned to be a real politician

Looks like a smutty rape fantasy to me.

"A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused."
A woman fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.

Really?
Oh Bernie, you slut.

Republicans would tear this guy apart and spit on him. And they would be right.

Hilary Clinton is the most vulnerable candidate, her history and experience are liabilities now.

Her history of beating every GOP lie over 30 years? A liability?
We'll see.

It was the left wing media circling the wagons that beat the true accusations against her. She did little on her own but continually create more work for them. Though that is her biggest asset still, so you're right in a way, as close as you ever get anyway.

Bull shit. We know the media is more negative by far against her than anyone else. It's been proven with data right here on the USMB. The media has been kindest to Kasich and then Bernie.

Absolute fucking horseshit, you're simply lying your ass off right now.

I've been accused of lying before and when I prove I know what I'm talking about, I never get an apology.
Here's a taste of the Interview from the NY Daily News:

Daily News: Okay. Well, let's assume that you're correct on that point. How do you go about doing it?

Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.

Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?

Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.

Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y and Z?"

Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.

Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?

Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.

Daily News: So if you look forward, a year, maybe two years, right now you have...JPMorgan has 241,000 employees. About 20,000 of them in New York. $192 billion in net assets. What happens? What do you foresee? What is JPMorgan in year two of...

Sanders: What I foresee is a stronger national economy. And, in fact, a stronger economy in New York State, as well. What I foresee is a financial system which actually makes affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses. Does not live as an island onto themselves concerned about their own profits. And, in fact, creating incredibly complicated financial tools, which have led us into the worst economic recession in the modern history of the United States.

Daily News: I get that point. I'm just looking at the method because, actions have reactions, right? There are pluses and minuses. So, if you push here, you may get an unintended consequence that you don't understand. So, what I'm asking is, how can we understand? If you look at JPMorgan just as an example, or you can do Citibank, or Bank of America. What would it be? What would that institution be? Would there be a consumer bank? Where would the investing go?

Sanders: I'm not running JPMorgan Chase or Citibank.

TRANSCRIPT: Bernie Sanders meets with News Editorial Board

-------------

See what I mean?

Let's continue, shall we?

Study: Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, gets the most negative media coverage

The biggest news outlets have published more negative stories about Hillary Clinton than any other presidential candidate — including Donald Trump — since January 2015, according to a new analysis of hundreds of thousands of online stories published since last year.

---------------------------------

See what I mean? Again, let's continue:

How Bernie Sanders stepped in it on Fidel Castro and Cuba

Sanders defends past praise of Fidel Castro

He admits to being a socialist, and says he wants a revolution. Fodder for the GOP.

Bernie would be toast.

 

[kaz]

Hilary Clinton is the most vulnerable candidate, her history and experience are liabilities now.

Her history of beating every GOP lie over 30 years? A liability?
We'll see.

It was the left wing media circling the wagons that beat the true accusations against her. She did little on her own but continually create more work for them. Though that is her biggest asset still, so you're right in a way, as close as you ever get anyway.

Bull shit. We know the media is more negative by far against her than anyone else. It's been proven with data right here on the USMB. The media has been kindest to Kasich and then Bernie.

Absolute fucking horseshit, you're simply lying your ass off right now.

I've been accused of lying before and when I prove I know what I'm talking about, I never get an apology.
Here's a taste of the Interview from the NY Daily News:

Daily News: Okay. Well, let's assume that you're correct on that point. How do you go about doing it?

Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.

Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?

Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.

Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y and Z?"

Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.

Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?

Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.

Daily News: So if you look forward, a year, maybe two years, right now you have...JPMorgan has 241,000 employees. About 20,000 of them in New York. $192 billion in net assets. What happens? What do you foresee? What is JPMorgan in year two of...

Sanders: What I foresee is a stronger national economy. And, in fact, a stronger economy in New York State, as well. What I foresee is a financial system which actually makes affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses. Does not live as an island onto themselves concerned about their own profits. And, in fact, creating incredibly complicated financial tools, which have led us into the worst economic recession in the modern history of the United States.

Daily News: I get that point. I'm just looking at the method because, actions have reactions, right? There are pluses and minuses. So, if you push here, you may get an unintended consequence that you don't understand. So, what I'm asking is, how can we understand? If you look at JPMorgan just as an example, or you can do Citibank, or Bank of America. What would it be? What would that institution be? Would there be a consumer bank? Where would the investing go?

Sanders: I'm not running JPMorgan Chase or Citibank.

TRANSCRIPT: Bernie Sanders meets with News Editorial Board

-------------

See what I mean?

Let's continue, shall we?

Study: Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, gets the most negative media coverage

The biggest news outlets have published more negative stories about Hillary Clinton than any other presidential candidate — including Donald Trump — since January 2015, according to a new analysis of hundreds of thousands of online stories published since last year.

---------------------------------

See what I mean? Again, let's continue:

How Bernie Sanders stepped in it on Fidel Castro and Cuba

Sanders defends past praise of Fidel Castro

He admits to being a socialist, and says he wants a revolution. Fodder for the GOP.

Bernie would be toast.

You're a joke, the media love Hillary

 

[Liminal]

Hilary Clinton is the most vulnerable candidate, her history and experience are liabilities now.

Her history of beating every GOP lie over 30 years? A liability?
We'll see.

It was the left wing media circling the wagons that beat the true accusations against her. She did little on her own but continually create more work for them. Though that is her biggest asset still, so you're right in a way, as close as you ever get anyway.

Bull shit. We know the media is more negative by far against her than anyone else. It's been proven with data right here on the USMB. The media has been kindest to Kasich and then Bernie.

Absolute fucking horseshit, you're simply lying your ass off right now.

I've been accused of lying before and when I prove I know what I'm talking about, I never get an apology.
Here's a taste of the Interview from the NY Daily News:

Daily News: Okay. Well, let's assume that you're correct on that point. How do you go about doing it?

Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.

Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?

Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.

Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y and Z?"

Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.

Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?

Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.

Daily News: So if you look forward, a year, maybe two years, right now you have...JPMorgan has 241,000 employees. About 20,000 of them in New York. $192 billion in net assets. What happens? What do you foresee? What is JPMorgan in year two of...

Sanders: What I foresee is a stronger national economy. And, in fact, a stronger economy in New York State, as well. What I foresee is a financial system which actually makes affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses. Does not live as an island onto themselves concerned about their own profits. And, in fact, creating incredibly complicated financial tools, which have led us into the worst economic recession in the modern history of the United States.

Daily News: I get that point. I'm just looking at the method because, actions have reactions, right? There are pluses and minuses. So, if you push here, you may get an unintended consequence that you don't understand. So, what I'm asking is, how can we understand? If you look at JPMorgan just as an example, or you can do Citibank, or Bank of America. What would it be? What would that institution be? Would there be a consumer bank? Where would the investing go?

Sanders: I'm not running JPMorgan Chase or Citibank.

TRANSCRIPT: Bernie Sanders meets with News Editorial Board

-------------

See what I mean?

Let's continue, shall we?

Study: Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, gets the most negative media coverage

The biggest news outlets have published more negative stories about Hillary Clinton than any other presidential candidate — including Donald Trump — since January 2015, according to a new analysis of hundreds of thousands of online stories published since last year.

---------------------------------

See what I mean? Again, let's continue:

How Bernie Sanders stepped in it on Fidel Castro and Cuba

Sanders defends past praise of Fidel Castro

He admits to being a socialist, and says he wants a revolution. Fodder for the GOP.

Bernie would be toast.

Apology? You should be horse whipped.

 

[Liminal]

 

[Liminal]

Hilary Clinton is the most vulnerable candidate, her history and experience are liabilities now.

Her history of beating every GOP lie over 30 years? A liability?
We'll see.

It was the left wing media circling the wagons that beat the true accusations against her. She did little on her own but continually create more work for them. Though that is her biggest asset still, so you're right in a way, as close as you ever get anyway.

Bull shit. We know the media is more negative by far against her than anyone else. It's been proven with data right here on the USMB. The media has been kindest to Kasich and then Bernie.

Absolute fucking horseshit, you're simply lying your ass off right now.

I've been accused of lying before and when I prove I know what I'm talking about, I never get an apology.
Here's a taste of the Interview from the NY Daily News:

Daily News: Okay. Well, let's assume that you're correct on that point. How do you go about doing it?

Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.

Daily News: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?

Sanders: Well, I don't know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.

Daily News: How? How does a President turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the Treasury turn to any of those banks and say, "Now you must do X, Y and Z?"

Sanders: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.

Daily News: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?

Sanders: Yeah. Well, I believe you do.

Daily News: So if you look forward, a year, maybe two years, right now you have...JPMorgan has 241,000 employees. About 20,000 of them in New York. $192 billion in net assets. What happens? What do you foresee? What is JPMorgan in year two of...

Sanders: What I foresee is a stronger national economy. And, in fact, a stronger economy in New York State, as well. What I foresee is a financial system which actually makes affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses. Does not live as an island onto themselves concerned about their own profits. And, in fact, creating incredibly complicated financial tools, which have led us into the worst economic recession in the modern history of the United States.

Daily News: I get that point. I'm just looking at the method because, actions have reactions, right? There are pluses and minuses. So, if you push here, you may get an unintended consequence that you don't understand. So, what I'm asking is, how can we understand? If you look at JPMorgan just as an example, or you can do Citibank, or Bank of America. What would it be? What would that institution be? Would there be a consumer bank? Where would the investing go?

Sanders: I'm not running JPMorgan Chase or Citibank.

TRANSCRIPT: Bernie Sanders meets with News Editorial Board

-------------

See what I mean?

Let's continue, shall we?

Study: Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, gets the most negative media coverage

The biggest news outlets have published more negative stories about Hillary Clinton than any other presidential candidate — including Donald Trump — since January 2015, according to a new analysis of hundreds of thousands of online stories published since last year.

---------------------------------

See what I mean? Again, let's continue:

How Bernie Sanders stepped in it on Fidel Castro and Cuba

Sanders defends past praise of Fidel Castro

He admits to being a socialist, and says he wants a revolution. Fodder for the GOP.

Bernie would be toast.

Sad......very sad.

 

[oreo]

Bernie Sanders' supporters are convinced he could win a general election. They're wrong.

So let's consider the kinds of attacks Sanders would face from Republicans. They wouldn't just call him a socialist — in fact, that'd be about the nicest thing they'd say about him. They'd say he's coming to raise your taxes to fund big-government schemes. They'd say he wants to cripple the military. They'd say he's advocated eliminating our intelligence capabilities. They'd say he was part of a Trotskyite party that expressed "solidarity" with the theocratic government of Iran while it was holding Americans hostage. They'd say he wants government to seize the means of production. They'd say he hates America. They'd say he's the author of smutty rape fantasies.

----------------------------

And he did write smutty rape fantasies

--------------------------------

How Bernie Sanders learned to be a real politician

Looks like a smutty rape fantasy to me.

"A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused."
A woman fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.

Really?
Oh Bernie, you slut.

Republicans would tear this guy apart and spit on him. And they would be right.

Bernie Sanders has already lost. His refusal to drop out of this race after getting clobbered in New York, says a lot about his character. He was never really a Democrat (who would have dropped out by now) and is only staying in for more idiots that are willing to send him their $27.00. IOW--he's still in it for the $$$. He might as well be working for the Trump campaign now. Clinton should be focused on the General Election, not what's coming out of a failed candidates mouth.

You're right Republicans have been doing "operation" Bernie voting in a lot of these open primary states. Voting for him--because they would wipe him out in the general election. This country is center, it always has been it always will be. It will not elect far left or far right candidates, much less a confirmed and recognized socialist that is out there campaigning on free college tuition, and expanding Federal Government spending by 29 Trillion dollars--when we're already 19 trillion in Red Ink.

But what Republicans would really bury him with, is his praise of Fidel Castro, one of the most brutal--murderous dictators to come out of the 20th century. While Millennials don't remember Fidel Castro, the largest generation in this nation's history (baby boomers) do remember him very well and what he did. In today's time it would equate to a Presidential nominee--praising Sadam Husiene.
Bernie Sanders heaped praise on Fidel Castro in 1985 interview

So if by some remote miracle Bernie Sanders was the nominee of this party, just move the blue part over to the USSR of Vermont and New Hampshire and color the rest of this country RED. Reagan v Mondale--1984

 

[Liminal]

Bernie Sanders' supporters are convinced he could win a general election. They're wrong.

So let's consider the kinds of attacks Sanders would face from Republicans. They wouldn't just call him a socialist — in fact, that'd be about the nicest thing they'd say about him. They'd say he's coming to raise your taxes to fund big-government schemes. They'd say he wants to cripple the military. They'd say he's advocated eliminating our intelligence capabilities. They'd say he was part of a Trotskyite party that expressed "solidarity" with the theocratic government of Iran while it was holding Americans hostage. They'd say he wants government to seize the means of production. They'd say he hates America. They'd say he's the author of smutty rape fantasies.

----------------------------

And he did write smutty rape fantasies

--------------------------------

How Bernie Sanders learned to be a real politician

Looks like a smutty rape fantasy to me.

"A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused."
A woman fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.

Really?
Oh Bernie, you slut.

Republicans would tear this guy apart and spit on him. And they would be right.

Bernie Sanders has already lost. His refusal to drop out of this race after getting clobbered in New York, says a lot about his character. He was never really a Democrat (who would have dropped out by now) and is only staying in for more idiots that are willing to send him their $27.00. IOW--he's still in it for the $$$. He might as well be working for the Trump campaign now. Clinton should be focused on the General Election, not what's coming out of a failed candidates mouth.

You're right Republicans have been doing "operation" Bernie voting in a lot of these open primary states. Voting for him--because they would wipe him out in the general election. This country is center, it always has been it always will be. It will not elect far left or far right candidates, much less a confirmed and recognized socialist that is out there campaigning on free college tuition, and expanding Federal Government spending by 29 Trillion dollars--when we're already 19 trillion in Red Ink.

But what Republicans would really bury him with, is his praise of Fidel Castro, one of the most brutal--murderous dictators to come out of the 20th century. While Millennials don't remember Fidel Castro, the largest generation in this history (baby boomers) do remember him very well and what he did.
Bernie Sanders heaped praise on Fidel Castro in 1985 interview

So if by some remote miracle Bernie Sanders was the nominee of this party, just move the blue part over to the USSR of Vermont and New Hampshire and color the rest of this country RED. Reagan v Mondale--1984

Like I said already: There are no honest Clinton supporters. The Clintons are far from being progressive, they are the right wing of the Democratic Party.

 

[Liminal]

 

[Agit8r]

Looks like a smutty rape fantasy to me.

I think that the average Democratic voter has decent reading comprehension.

 

[auditor0007]

Bernie Sanders' supporters are convinced he could win a general election. They're wrong.

So let's consider the kinds of attacks Sanders would face from Republicans. They wouldn't just call him a socialist — in fact, that'd be about the nicest thing they'd say about him. They'd say he's coming to raise your taxes to fund big-government schemes. They'd say he wants to cripple the military. They'd say he's advocated eliminating our intelligence capabilities. They'd say he was part of a Trotskyite party that expressed "solidarity" with the theocratic government of Iran while it was holding Americans hostage. They'd say he wants government to seize the means of production. They'd say he hates America. They'd say he's the author of smutty rape fantasies.

----------------------------

And he did write smutty rape fantasies

--------------------------------

How Bernie Sanders learned to be a real politician

Looks like a smutty rape fantasy to me.

"A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused."
A woman fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.

Really?
Oh Bernie, you slut.

Republicans would tear this guy apart and spit on him. And they would be right.

Trump could actually win a debate against Bernie as Bernie just is not very good on the debate stage. On the other hand, Hillary will rip Trump apart in a debate.

 

[auditor0007]

They wanted Obama to be the nominee in 2008!

Whoever said "be careful for what you wish for" was thinking of conservative voters!

Obama is a great president. Smutty Bernie would be a terrible disaster even if he could beat the GOP.

Why is that? Be Specific.

Everything Bernie wants to do is an overreach. He would accomplish nothing. Hillary, on the other hand, might actually be able to move things in the direction that makes sense. Let's use the minimum wage as an example. Bernie insists that we need a national $15 per hour minimum wage. That would actually be a job killer in many parts of the country. $15 in most parts of the US is worth much more than $15 in San Fran or NYC, or a few other major metropolitan areas where the cost of living is much higher. Does Bernie really believe that with a $15 federal minimum that NYC will institute a $25 per hour minimum to be fair? It would take nearly that much to equal $15 per hour in Mississippi and many other parts of the US.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Why Republicans want Bernie Sanders to be the nominee:"

Because they know they can beat him in the GE.

And they’re right.