Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
!
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
The msm will drag it out though forever..........they know there are enough suckers out there to tune in to CNN and MSNBC every night. But heres the thing..........its a relatively small number of people. CNN, for example, draws less than 1 million viewers each day = laughable. But is just to draw in the suckers who also fell for all the fake polls and fake stories last year before the election. No matter how fake it is, the suckers cant get enough of it........and the msm knows it too!!
Of course they do, to get to the bottom of who has been leaking illegally and the real truth behind the accusations.
Why is Flynn asking for immunity?
Regardless of the zero credibility British tabloid source that you cite, Wikileaks is the one that is working hand in hand with Russia.
Latest WikiLeaks release shows how the CIA uses computer code to hide the origins of its hacking attacks and 'disguise them as Russian or Chinese activity'
- WikiLeaks published 676 source code files today which it claimed are from CIA
- It says the CIA disguised its own hacking attacks to make it appear those responsible were Russian, Chinese, Iranian or North Korean
Read more: WikiLeaks says CIA disguised hacking as Russian activity | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
But I'm not the least bit surprised that you would side with Julian Assange and the Russians over the CIA, because you are nothing more than an un-American, partisan hack turd.
Of course they do, to get to the bottom of who has been leaking illegally and the real truth behind the accusations.
Problem is the strangle hold the Democrats have on the process.....e.g., Lois Lerner is still walking around free....collecting a pension.
Why is Flynn asking for immunity?
"No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch hunt environment without assurance against unfair prosecution."
Flynn willing to be interviewed on Russia in return for immunity
Based on your query, one can only conclude that you didn't hear Democrat Schiff's lying opening statement where he quoted the debunked British spy who made up the dossier about Trump.
Jot this down:
a. Every piece of information from a Democrat source is a lie.
b. Democrats believe that no law, statute, rule or standard applies to them.....sadly, they are too often correct.
Of course Flynn needs protections from them.
Hell, the FBI couldn't crack an iphone and had to have an Israeli firm open the damn thing. Time for an upgrade. The hacks are hacking the hacks and can put any tag they want in the embedded code.
Worse than that.
The 'intelligence community,' often a day late and a dollar short, has become an instrument of political intimidation, at the behest of the Left.
It is not their technical ability that I doubt, it is their corruption that I fear.
Asked in the OP: why would Comey rely on a private firm hired by the DNC, CrowdStrike, rather than perform their own investigation?
The answer should be clear.
The 'intelligence community,' often a day late and a dollar short, has become an instrument of political intimidation, at the behest of the Left.
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
!
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
LOL. Please point out where "influencing" an election is a crime.
You've gotta love these made up crimes the left comes up with. "Collusion" and "influencing" aren't crimes. If it is a crime, then why aren't the people that released the audio and video tape of Trump talking about grabbing pussy accused of "influencing the election"?
Why is Flynn asking for immunity?
Why is Flynn asking for immunity?
"No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch hunt environment without assurance against unfair prosecution."
Flynn willing to be interviewed on Russia in return for immunity
Based on your query, one can only conclude that you didn't hear Democrat Schiff's lying opening statement where he quoted the debunked British spy who made up the dossier about Trump.
Jot this down:
a. Every piece of information from a Democrat source is a lie.
b. Democrats believe that no law, statute, rule or standard applies to them.....sadly, they are too often correct.
Of course Flynn needs protections from them.
He could always plead the 5th. But his lawyer said he has a story to tell. Why would he do that?
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
!
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
LOL. Please point out where "influencing" an election is a crime.
You've gotta love these made up crimes the left comes up with. "Collusion" and "influencing" aren't crimes. If it is a crime, then why aren't the people that released the audio and video tape of Trump talking about grabbing pussy accused of "influencing the election"?
Let's make clear how the terms 'influencing' and 'collusion' apply to this issue:
1. Here is Obama/Bill's wife supporter asking the DNC to OK his story before he publishes it:
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
....Politico reporter called himself a “hack” when he asked Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide John Podesta to look over sections of his unpublished report on the Democratic presidential candidate before publication, ..."
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
2. Here is the punishment he received from the media:
"New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval"
New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval
This is the real story of 'influencing the election' and 'collusion.'
Kind O like colluding with CNN on debate questions... And acting on the colluded information shared...Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
!
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
!
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
LOL. Please point out where "influencing" an election is a crime.
You've gotta love these made up crimes the left comes up with. "Collusion" and "influencing" aren't crimes. If it is a crime, then why aren't the people that released the audio and video tape of Trump talking about grabbing pussy accused of "influencing the election"?
Let's make clear how the terms 'influencing' and 'collusion' apply to this issue:
1. Here is Obama/Bill's wife supporter asking the DNC to OK his story before he publishes it:
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
....Politico reporter called himself a “hack” when he asked Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide John Podesta to look over sections of his unpublished report on the Democratic presidential candidate before publication, ..."
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
2. Here is the punishment he received from the media:
"New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval"
New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval
This is the real story of 'influencing the election' and 'collusion.'
And the left wonders why we call the MSM the "state run media".
Many are walking around, still working that hould have been fired,( and prosecuted), but due to their union contract, it never happened.Of course they do, to get to the bottom of who has been leaking illegally and the real truth behind the accusations.
Problem is the strangle hold the Democrats have on the process.....e.g., Lois Lerner is still walking around free....collecting a pension.
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
!
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
LOL. Please point out where "influencing" an election is a crime.
You've gotta love these made up crimes the left comes up with. "Collusion" and "influencing" aren't crimes. If it is a crime, then why aren't the people that released the audio and video tape of Trump talking about grabbing pussy accused of "influencing the election"?
Let's make clear how the terms 'influencing' and 'collusion' apply to this issue:
1. Here is Obama/Bill's wife supporter asking the DNC to OK his story before he publishes it:
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
....Politico reporter called himself a “hack” when he asked Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide John Podesta to look over sections of his unpublished report on the Democratic presidential candidate before publication, ..."
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
2. Here is the punishment he received from the media:
"New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval"
New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval
This is the real story of 'influencing the election' and 'collusion.'
And the left wonders why we call the MSM the "state run media".
The left sees no ambiguity in that statement. It's readily apparent that anyone who says that is a loon.
Why is Flynn asking for immunity?
"No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch hunt environment without assurance against unfair prosecution."
Flynn willing to be interviewed on Russia in return for immunity
Based on your query, one can only conclude that you didn't hear Democrat Schiff's lying opening statement where he quoted the debunked British spy who made up the dossier about Trump.
Jot this down:
a. Every piece of information from a Democrat source is a lie.
b. Democrats believe that no law, statute, rule or standard applies to them.....sadly, they are too often correct.
Of course Flynn needs protections from them.
He could always plead the 5th. But his lawyer said he has a story to tell. Why would he do that?
You must be an Obama supporter, huh?
Hell, the FBI couldn't crack an iphone and had to have an Israeli firm open the damn thing. Time for an upgrade. The hacks are hacking the hacks and can put any tag they want in the embedded code.
Worse than that.
The 'intelligence community,' often a day late and a dollar short, has become an instrument of political intimidation, at the behest of the Left.
It is not their technical ability that I doubt, it is their corruption that I fear.
Asked in the OP: why would Comey rely on a private firm hired by the DNC, CrowdStrike, rather than perform their own investigation?
The answer should be clear.
Illegally ATTEMPTING to influence an election is a crime, whether it succeeds or not.
Attempt - Wikipedia
LOL. Please point out where "influencing" an election is a crime.
You've gotta love these made up crimes the left comes up with. "Collusion" and "influencing" aren't crimes. If it is a crime, then why aren't the people that released the audio and video tape of Trump talking about grabbing pussy accused of "influencing the election"?
Let's make clear how the terms 'influencing' and 'collusion' apply to this issue:
1. Here is Obama/Bill's wife supporter asking the DNC to OK his story before he publishes it:
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
....Politico reporter called himself a “hack” when he asked Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide John Podesta to look over sections of his unpublished report on the Democratic presidential candidate before publication, ..."
'Please don't . . . tell anyone I did this': Politico reporter ran article past Podesta, WikiLeaks reveals
2. Here is the punishment he received from the media:
"New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval"
New York Times Hires Reporter Who Sent Stories To Clinton Staffers For Approval
This is the real story of 'influencing the election' and 'collusion.'
And the left wonders why we call the MSM the "state run media".
The left sees no ambiguity in that statement. It's readily apparent that anyone who says that is a loon.
We're "loons" for saying that? Despite the evidence just cited that indeed they pass material to the Dems in power for approval.
