Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Influence is a subjective opinion. There is no way to prove or disprove the influence of propaganda, misinformation, fake news, creating confusion, etc. has on how people vote, or don't vote. Your purpose in this thread is to intermingle and confuse the words influence and meddle with "collusion". Collusion is an objective claim and totally different than influence, That is the main thrust of your thesis and this thread. Collusion is proven with tangible and provable objective data. Substantial circumstantial evidence can prove a case, but you are demanding objective evidence."Meanwhile- our Intelligence agencies say Russia tried to influence our election."
What they actually say is there is zero evidence of that.
?
No- what they all have actually said is that they believe that Russia tried to influence our election.
So why are you so desperate to cover for Russia?
"No- what they all have actually said is that they believe that Russia tried to influence our election."
Excellent!
So now why don't you care that Russia tried to influence our election?
Are you that deep into Trump that you are okay with Russia attemting to corrupt an election?
Any proof that Russia actually influenced the election?
No?
Soooo the entire pretense is to hide the fact that Bill's wife lost and America rejected the Left?
Got it.
Distortion and the manipulation of factors combined with the omission of other key factors are the trademarks tells of PC threads.
no we don't. the FBI hasn't looked at it. I thought you were about transparency? Let's look at them all. I give two shits. You?Prove I am. Seems you are if you don't want to see the FBI investigate the dnc server derp
The FBI should investigate the RNC server. We know the DNC server was hacked, but the republicans are denying the RNC server was hacked. So the FBI should determine whether or not the RNC server was hacked, and if it was, it would provide proof of Russian collusion.
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
The full court press by the Left and it's allies is to support their failed candidate and failed policies.
1. "Russiagate is falling apart and US lawmakers are scrambling to find any strand of evidence, however flimsy, that Russia interfered in the US election.
2. [In the following] have Professor Stephen Cohen, a real Russia expert fluent in the language, explain in a little over 5 minutes why the entire Russiagate witch hunt is 100% fake news. It is (as Cohen explains in the video below) insulting to the American electorate, irresponsible and very dangerous ....
3. Cohen’s key point…“This figure 17 [intelligence agencies] is bogus.”
“The one agency that could conceivably have done a forensic examination on the Democratic computers is the National Security Agency. We learned from Snowden, they’re in your computer, mine, our e-phones.”
“Everybody else who signed that report, said they were highly confident. The NSA said it was only moderately confident.”
MUST WATCH: Professor Stephen Cohen explains in 5 minutes why RussiaGate is 100% fake news (Video)
4. Democrats "Russia had hijacked our democracy."
The Professor: "...not one piece of factual evidence."
5. All of this is based on a report from CrowdStrike, hired by the Clintons, and not any government agency.....not the NSA, not the FBI
AND.....CrowdStrike has now been forced to admit that their report was BOGUS!!!
6. The Professor: "The question is, why the FBI decided to use that private cyber 'detective' [CrowdStrike]...why the FBI didn't do their own investigation.
....That's all we have."
7. "Yet night after night people come on and say that 17 intelligence agencies....have concluded that Russian government was behind this."
BOGUS!!!!
Bottom line first: the entire farrago about Russia being in any way responsible for Bill's wife losing the election is.....false.
The full court press by the Left and it's allies is to support their failed candidate and failed policies.
1. "Russiagate is falling apart and US lawmakers are scrambling to find any strand of evidence, however flimsy, that Russia interfered in the US election.
2. [In the following] have Professor Stephen Cohen, a real Russia expert fluent in the language, explain in a little over 5 minutes why the entire Russiagate witch hunt is 100% fake news. It is (as Cohen explains in the video below) insulting to the American electorate, irresponsible and very dangerous ....
3. Cohen’s key point…“This figure 17 [intelligence agencies] is bogus.”
“The one agency that could conceivably have done a forensic examination on the Democratic computers is the National Security Agency. We learned from Snowden, they’re in your computer, mine, our e-phones.”
“Everybody else who signed that report, said they were highly confident. The NSA said it was only moderately confident.”
MUST WATCH: Professor Stephen Cohen explains in 5 minutes why RussiaGate is 100% fake news (Video)
4. Democrats "Russia had hijacked our democracy."
The Professor: "...not one piece of factual evidence."
5. All of this is based on a report from CrowdStrike, hired by the Clintons, and not any government agency.....not the NSA, not the FBI
AND.....CrowdStrike has now been forced to admit that their report was BOGUS!!!
6. The Professor: "The question is, why the FBI decided to use that private cyber 'detective' [CrowdStrike]...why the FBI didn't do their own investigation.
....That's all we have."
7. "Yet night after night people come on and say that 17 intelligence agencies....have concluded that Russian government was behind this."
BOGUS!!!!
This thread is all about diverting attention away from the original misinformation promoted by the OP with a common propaganda technique. The link that focuses on an official stating he has not seen or is aware of proof of collusion has been used over and over. It is the foundation of the false narrative the OP must focus on to establish the misinformative nature of the thread. Collusion would require specific persons in the trump campaign working with specific persons in the Russian government to implement a specific incident or event. That is totally different than for instance, planting fake news to "influence" voters. When trump or his administration repeated this "fake news" and propaganda it may be hard or impossible to prove actual collusion, but that does not mean it can not be proven with subjective circumstantial evidence.
" planting fake news to "influence" voters. When trump or his administration repeated this "fake news" and propaganda it may be hard or impossible to prove actual collusion, but that does not mean it can not be proven with subjective circumstantial evidence."
Soooo.....why are you unable to come up with any examples?
Could it be you're simply lying?
" planting fake news to "influence" voters. When trump or his administration repeated this "fake news" and propaganda it may be hard or impossible to prove actual collusion, but that does not mean it can not be proven with subjective circumstantial evidence."
Soooo.....why are you unable to come up with any examples?
Could it be you're simply lying?
Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
The flood of “fake news” this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.
Russia’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human “trolls,” and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems
" planting fake news to "influence" voters. When trump or his administration repeated this "fake news" and propaganda it may be hard or impossible to prove actual collusion, but that does not mean it can not be proven with subjective circumstantial evidence."
Soooo.....why are you unable to come up with any examples?
Could it be you're simply lying?
See if this helps:
" planting fake news to "influence" voters. When trump or his administration repeated this "fake news" and propaganda it may be hard or impossible to prove actual collusion, but that does not mean it can not be proven with subjective circumstantial evidence."
Soooo.....why are you unable to come up with any examples?
Could it be you're simply lying?
Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
This propaganda machinery also helped push the phony story that an anti-Trump protester was paid thousands of dollars to participate in demonstrations, an allegation initially made by a self-described satirist and later repeated publicly by the Trump campaign.
See if this helps:
Didn't you exceed your spam limit by posting that about a zillion times?
This propaganda machinery also helped push the phony story that an anti-Trump protester was paid thousands of dollars to participate in demonstrations, an allegation initially made by a self-described satirist and later repeated publicly by the Trump campaign.
All you have to do is provide examples of the 'fake news' that the Russians provided that folks didn't know about the career criminal and congenital liar.
Waiting.
" planting fake news to "influence" voters. When trump or his administration repeated this "fake news" and propaganda it may be hard or impossible to prove actual collusion, but that does not mean it can not be proven with subjective circumstantial evidence."
Soooo.....why are you unable to come up with any examples?
Could it be you're simply lying?
Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
This propaganda machinery also helped push the phony story that an anti-Trump protester was paid thousands of dollars to participate in demonstrations, an allegation initially made by a self-described satirist and later repeated publicly by the Trump campaign.
This propaganda machinery also helped push the phony story that an anti-Trump protester was paid thousands of dollars to participate in demonstrations, an allegation initially made by a self-described satirist and later repeated publicly by the Trump campaign.
All you have to do is provide examples of the 'fake news' that the Russians provided that folks didn't know about the career criminal and congenital liar.
Waiting.
I thought I just did. The phony paid protestor story that Trump repeated on the campaign trail.
Though widely seen as a propaganda organ, the Russian site has gained credibility with some American conservatives. Trump sat for an interview with RT in September. His nominee for national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, traveled to Russia last year for a gala sponsored by the network. He later compared it to CNN.Gads, you're a fool!
Though widely seen as a propaganda organ, the Russian site has gained credibility with some American conservatives. Trump sat for an interview with RT in September. His nominee for national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, traveled to Russia last year for a gala sponsored by the network. He later compared it to CNN.Gads, you're a fool!
Got more anonymous 'experts' who agree with you?
Got more anonymous 'experts' who agree with you?
Why do you have a russian IP address?
87.226.xxx.xxx
Ready to retract your 'experts' post, not that I've destroyed it????
Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
.
