Why Scott Walker's Views On Evolution Are Totally Relevant

Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

that not his job. the Presidents job is to PROTECT us and our country. learn about our government
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.

Yeah, and look at the bullshit that has been foisted on us by the "pro-science" crowd based on the AGW lie...

Sorry, your argument doesn't hold water.
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.

Again you people voted Obama a Christian church going God praying man President and Pelosi a Catholic Speaker of the House and you didn't seem to have any problem with them so why all the hub bub over Gov. Walker hmmm?
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.

Again you people voted Obama a Christian church going God praying man President and Pelosi a Catholic Speaker of the House and you didn't seem to have any problem with them so why all the hub bub over Gov. Walker hmmm?

Because they aren't batshit religious crazy.
 
who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.

Again you people voted Obama a Christian church going God praying man President and Pelosi a Catholic Speaker of the House and you didn't seem to have any problem with them so why all the hub bub over Gov. Walker hmmm?

Because they aren't batshit religious crazy.

Whatever.. batshit crazy is batshit crazy... who cares what they're batshit crazy over. Makes no difference.
 
Here's the deal, the radical left is out of ideas and issues so everything that doesn't pertain to real issues or the president or foreign and domestic policy is "relevant".
 
Walkers views on evolution and religion are only relevant when and if they affect his decisions as Governor. Do you believe atheist should be subject to scrutiny and ridicule for their beliefs when they are in a position of power?

Silly beliefs don't become LESS silly because you dress them up in vestments and call them "Religion".

latest
Can't answer the question? OK Joey. Have a cookie and shut up.
 
If a candidate professed to be a devout Muslim, I'd likely chose him over a militant atheist. Our personal beliefs should not color our political decisions, but our lack of personal beliefs; a moral compass, if you will, affects every action we take.

Horseshit. Atheists are more moral than Christians. When Christians do the right thing, it's becuase they are afraid that their Magic Sky Pixie will punish them. Therefore, eating meat during Lent is just as serious a sin as rape.

An Atheist actually makes moral decisions on reason and logic.
So your morality compels you to attack and ridicule the beliefs of others?

How reasonable and logical. Have another cookie, little one.
 
What are Walker's views on evolution? Why is it even important to know? What are Obama's views on broccoli?
You use specious logic the way civilized people use toilet tissue: every day and without regard to the final disposition. Broccoli? Are we concerned that broccoli cultivation will be taught in lieu of science?
Are you concerned Walker will somehow order schools to teach Creationism instead of science? You dont even know what Walker's views on evolution are.
Why hasn't Walker clearly outlined his views? Does he want to pander to the knuckle draggers and call for support of Creationism as science? Will he advocate funding to teach mythology rather than science?

What is Walker afraid of? Why not tell us what he thinks?

Or is that too embarrassing to mention in London?
Why is it any business of yours?
Has he ever advocated teaching myths instead of science? See, unlike Obama Walker actually has a track record you can consult
What are you afraid of?
purposely vague answers to perfectly phrased questions.
Irrelevant questions deserve no answers.
The truth is you couldnt give a shit about his views. You're just hoping for something so you can stick a label like "anti science whacko" on him. If some woman comes forward and claims that Walker pinched her ass in junior highschool you'd claim he was unfit for the presidency.
 
You use specious logic the way civilized people use toilet tissue: every day and without regard to the final disposition. Broccoli? Are we concerned that broccoli cultivation will be taught in lieu of science?
Are you concerned Walker will somehow order schools to teach Creationism instead of science? You dont even know what Walker's views on evolution are.
Why hasn't Walker clearly outlined his views? Does he want to pander to the knuckle draggers and call for support of Creationism as science? Will he advocate funding to teach mythology rather than science?

What is Walker afraid of? Why not tell us what he thinks?

Or is that too embarrassing to mention in London?
Why is it any business of yours?
Has he ever advocated teaching myths instead of science? See, unlike Obama Walker actually has a track record you can consult
What are you afraid of?
purposely vague answers to perfectly phrased questions.
Irrelevant questions deserve no answers.
The truth is you couldnt give a shit about his views. You're just hoping for something so you can stick a label like "anti science whacko" on him. If some woman comes forward and claims that Walker pinched her ass in junior highschool you'd claim he was unfit for the presidency.

That really is the correct perspective. Why should we worry about whether a candidate believes in evolution or not when we already have a president who claimed he would lower the sea levels and be able to give high quality, low cost health insurance to millions more people than already have it while driving down the cost of health insurance to everyone else, AND allow you to keep your existing plan and doctor? Why should we worry about whether a candidate believes in evolution or not when we already have a president who believes he can tax the wealthy just a little bit more and pay for not only massive new spending, but pay down the national debt? That's the kind of fantasy based thinking I don't want to see in the White House.
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.
How does Walker's views on evolution affect his thinking about the a-bomb? Do you even know what Walker's views are?
 
Would NaziCons want an Atheist president to pick future Supreme Court justices? Well, that works both ways.
Seeing it's a given that an atheist President would be a Liberal puke like you, no. Conservatives would not want him picking future Supreme Court Justices.

Would you want a Conservative Southern Baptist picking them?

The difference here is, Conservatives have moral values derived in part by their religion, but shouldn't and for the most part, don't legislate based on religious conviction.
I really don't care if a candidate believes in a Higher Power or not. I may pity him, but I would expect, if elected, he would legislate guided by the Constitution and whatever moral compass he might possess.

What irks me most about you and people like JoeB and the others I call "militant atheists", is your contempt for religion and people who believe in God. It's as if you're having difficulty justifying your denial of God and are talking to yourself as reassurance.
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.
How does Walker's views on evolution affect his thinking about the a-bomb? Do you even know what Walker's views are?
No, that's what vetting is all about, know the candidate, his views and so forth. Failure to vet Obama is a Republican battle cry, and if it was a failure it was a Republican failure. If Walker is going to run he can expect more questions, and now more in the science area.
 
Would NaziCons want an Atheist president to pick future Supreme Court justices? Well, that works both ways.
Seeing it's a given that an atheist President would be a Liberal puke like you, no. Conservatives would not want him picking future Supreme Court Justices.

Would you want a Conservative Southern Baptist picking them?

The difference here is, Conservatives have moral values derived in part by their religion, but shouldn't and for the most part, don't legislate based on religious conviction.
I really don't care if a candidate believes in a Higher Power or not. I may pity him, but I would expect, if elected, he would legislate guided by the Constitution and whatever moral compass he might possess.

What irks me most about you and people like JoeB and the others I call "militant atheists", is your contempt for religion and people who believe in God. It's as if you're having difficulty justifying your denial of God and are talking to yourself as reassurance.

They are as evangelistic as any theist.
 
who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.
How does Walker's views on evolution affect his thinking about the a-bomb? Do you even know what Walker's views are?
No, that's what vetting is all about, know the candidate, his views and so forth. Failure to vet Obama is a Republican battle cry, and if it was a failure it was a Republican failure. If Walker is going to run he can expect more questions, and now more in the science area.

He's already faced the democrat smear machine, and defeated it. If this is the worst they can come up with, I don't see it being a problem at all.
 
Is this part of that vetting process the Republicans talked so much about?

who gives a shit about creation or evolution. You all believe in evolution because you claimed, Obama EVOLVED on his lies when he said marriage is between a man a women then lied again to say he's for homosexual marriage

give us a break. the people aren't as stupid as Gruber believes you people are. well he might be right about the Democrat base.
It's about science and presidents and government have decisions to make involving science.

What decision would a President Walker have to make that would in any way involve evolution? Have you list your mind?
It isn't about evolution, it's about science. Government is often involved in legislation involving science. An example is a-bomb; the list of scientific decisions is long and will get longer.
FDR was Episcopalian. He decided to build it. How did his religion effect his decision.
 

Forum List

Back
Top