BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
If she had allowed to proceed, one of the three officers would have had to engage her physically, leaving only two to hold back the next set of people who would have followed Babbit through the window. The position would have been overrun by protesters in a matter of moments had the officer not used deadly force.Babbitt was unarmed!
What "threat" did she represent to the three armed Capitol Police officers on the other side of that door?
I know the Capitol police budget could easily cover tear gas, tasers or some other form of crowd control.
U.S. Capitol Police – $464.3 million for the U.S. Capitol Police, $8 million above the FY2019 enacted level. Increased funding is included to address concerns related to security on the Capitol complex and Member security off-campus.
I also know trouble on the sixth was expected and a surprise to no one. So tell me why Michael Byrd's point
blank kill shot of Ashli Babbitt was the only form of crowd control Pelosi's mall cops could think of using?
Even scum bags like you should be honest enough to admit that tear gas or tasers were never tried
even though that non lethal option was available to killers like Byrd.