Why the hell should Trump take an oath to accept a fishy election?

[Wolfstrike]

1) Why the hell should Trump take an oath to accept a fishy election?

2) Why the hell do the Democrats and the media keep bringing this issue up, like they KNOW they're going to pull some BS?

What they're worried about, if they fix the election, Trump is a billionaire and can tie up the courts for years. The only thing the Democrats can do is expose themselves ever more-so, as anti-democratic, by having some corrupt judge tell him "tough sht, we say you lose"

The Democrats are trying to convince us there's some honorable tradition of being beat in a fixed election.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The election doesn't magically become "fishy" just because Donald Trump claims that it is.

 

[Stratford57]

The election doesn't magically become "fishy" just because Donald Trump claims that it is.

The elections are fishy because somebody is making them fishy. And it's not Donald's fault that he's been able to notice it. Whom he should believe: you or his lying eyes?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The election doesn't magically become "fishy" just because Donald Trump claims that it is.

The elections are fishy because somebody is making them fishy. And it's not Donald's fault that he is able to notice it. Whom he should believe: you or his lying eyes?

He's not "noticing" anything, he's hallucinating it. It's not real, it's just part of his own narcissism.

But I have no doubt that you'll believe him anyway. You seem to have quite the hard-on for autocratic, insecurely "strong" leaders.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Remember the pledge that republicans would support the nominee?

You do! So does Trump.

 

[waltky]

Is interesting to note on this point...

... that the only person to file a challenge to a Presidential election...

... was a fellow democrat - Al Gore.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Why the hell should Trump take an oath to accept a fishy election?"

It's not an 'oath,' and there's nothing 'fishy' about the General Election.

"Why the hell do the Democrats and the media keep bringing this issue up, like they KNOW they're going to pull some BS?"

It's Trump who keeps bringing it up, he has only himself to blame.

Since the advent of the Republic those seeking elected public office would acknowledge and respect the democratic process and the will of the people - Trump refuses to do that.

 

[Skylar]

1) Why the hell should Trump take an oath to accept a fishy election?

2) Why the hell do the Democrats and the media keep bringing this issue up, like they KNOW they're going to pull some BS?

What they're worried about, if they fix the election, Trump is a billionaire and can tie up the courts for years. The only thing the Democrats can do is expose themselves ever more-so, as anti-democratic, by having some corrupt judge tell him "tough sht, we say you lose"

The Democrats are trying to convince us there's some honorable tradition of being beat in a fixed election.

What fixed election? See, that's the problem with Trump's narrative; the evidence.

To Birther Donald, anything he can possibly imagine must be true because he imagined it. But the peaceful transition of power in our democracy doesn't hinge on the imagination of a conspiracy theorist.

Or at the very least, shouldn't.

 

[EverCurious]

Brought about by a tradition of political friendliness - it was a face saving statement for career politicians. Guess what, Trump ain't a politician. He has no need to protect his future career in politics, nor does he need to play nice with these career politicians.

Meaningless platitudes of bullshit the media have brought up to dupe the moron rubes into outrage, again. And all the poor snowflakes can't stand to /not/ have something to bitch and whine about, so we get this bologna for awhile. ~ ho hum ~

 

[Siete]

Trump and his Trumpbots bitch about millions of dead people that are still registered, but can't produce one name to prove they actually voted.

Thats whats fishy.