Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,094
- Thread starter
- #21
Not all change is for the better.
What say you carve up Cali into ten states.
That way their votes for senators would be closer to your desires.
Not all change is for the better, however one person, one vote IS a change for the better.
Prove it.
Fine. Although this is about what is "better" which is highly subjective.
However we know that when people have one person one vote they vote differently. In Germany 10% of the people will vote for the main two parties in FPTP and then will switch their vote to smaller parties when it comes to proportional representation.
There's a difference, FPTP is negative voting where people will vote for someone in order to stop someone else getting into power. PR is positive voting where people vote for the party they want to represent them.
In the US people ended up voting for two joke candidates and ended up with one of them. In other countries this won't happen because people actually have more choice, which means parties are less likely to go with the joke candidate because they know they can be decimated at the polls.
If I live in a country, I want to have equal say with everyone else. Why? Because then politicians will end up seeing things in an equal way. In a country where there's an imbalance, then those who have less of a say will have less of the benefits of the politicians.
That is why that have states.
Pure and simple.
So pure and simple you can only write 9 words.
And how many words does it take to tell me differently.