Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 22,112
- 18,124
- 2,288
Your English is plain. Now that agencies are saying what Republicans have said all along, you say we shouldn't investigate.English.....learn it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your English is plain. Now that agencies are saying what Republicans have said all along, you say we shouldn't investigate.English.....learn it.
So no climate variations before that?In my neck of the woods we have seen the rain patterns change over the last 20 years or so.
First I do not subscribe to that idea. It's just the slant of the article. Here is my biggest gripe with the article.
Many scientists worry that intense focus on what may ultimately be an unsolvable problem is obscuring how critical it is to prevent the next major pandemic.
I don't believe you can address something unless you know the facts as best as you possibly can. If it came from the lab (which I believe) part of the discussion would have to be if we should even be creating these viruses. (we shouldn't be).
The article does much to do what they claim is harmful. Politicizing the virus.
Those adversely effected by this have every right to know the origins. If it were a lab leak, justice to the dead is indeed called for.
There will be no justice. I do NOT say that because that is what I think is right. Justice to me is anyone involved going to prison.
So no climate variations before that?
I think the Dust Bowl of the 1930s had a larger impact on farmers.Of course there were, but this one had a larger impact on the local farmer.
I think the Dust Bowl of the 1930s had a larger impact on farmers.
That was due to a great many things, the climate changing not being on of them.
But hey, I am sure you sitting there in your basement are correct and these farmers are just being stupid![]()
![]()
![]()
Going from normal rainfall to severe drought that lasted several years isn’t a changing climate?
But it is true there were many other contributing factors, but dude, seriously?
Droughts have always been a part of the climate.
So has everything else. Good god!
The draughts of the 30s that led to the dust bowl were a transitory event, unlike the shifting rain patterns.
You might want to go back, get your GED and learn the difference between weather and the climate.
See all the moisture in California. I guess that was transitory as well.
And a GED comment from a dude who thinks gay men can give birth!
No lie at all, you went on for pages trying to justify your insanityActually the rain patterns have changed there as well. Do try and keep up
When you are forced to lie about what I said, it is a sign of how weak you are.
In a congressional hearing, Fauci denied culpability in funding, especially 'gain of function' funding of his organization that definitely has been part of that Wuhan lab, and we now know that he flat out lied or is too dumb to know what his organization or the Wuhan lab are doing. (The lie theory seems more plausible to me.)I've always believed the lab theory from Day One. Too much circumstantial evidence pointing to it. The wet market theory never made much sense to me. We may never know because China covered it up and has been reluctant to work transparently and frankly, our own government can't be trusted either, especially if they had a hand in developing it through gain of function research as evidence has also suggested in Senate hearings. They would never admit culpability if true.