bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
I thought the book was better, because as Redford says the movie was about Woodward and Bernstein. And that sort of detrects. Bernstein in in left field, but Woodward certainly isn't. The Wash Post was left leaning, but the irony was that deep throat turned out to be the RW FBIer who oversaw the illegal spying on Vietnam protestorsBadk in July of 16, some were positing whether Trump committed a high crime or misdeameanor by publically calling on Putin to hack the dems.
Foreign Governments Have Been Tampering With U.S. Elections for Decades
I never saw a poll, but I think most of us either thought Trump was the bees knees or at worst he was such an uncivil cretin that nothing was beneath him, but he was running against one of the most loathsome policitcians of our times, so.........
But now, the FBI apparently has records to team Trump meeting directily with Russians, and then Trump's campaign seeming to know exactly what lies/hack the Russian were going to leak. Imo, there will have to be someone who is willing to rat Trump out, but if there is ....if he's not impeached the next campaign will name him a traitor
I found this interesting..
Robert Redford: 45 years after Watergate, the truth is again in danger
Opinion | Robert Redford: 45 years after Watergate, the truth is again in danger
But yeah, if Trump broke the law, it'll come out. I'm leaning towards thinking he really did connect with the Russians. And That really is illegal.
Of course you are, dear, and we all think it's charming.