Why ''Under God'' phrase added on the Pledge of Allegiance in U.S?

[Correll]

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

If you have a point to make, why bury it in babble?

I already made it.

Why no, "religious patriot test", back then?

1, Nothing in your first post makes that point.

2. Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

all there was, was a definite, lack of true faith in capitalism.

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

 

[Unkotare]

United States is a country which is completely based on secular principles. ...

That is incorrect.

 

[danielpalos]

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

If you have a point to make, why bury it in babble?

I already made it.

Why no, "religious patriot test", back then?

1, Nothing in your first post makes that point.

2. Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

all there was, was a definite, lack of true faith in capitalism.

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

 

[Correll]

If you have a point to make, why bury it in babble?

I already made it.

Why no, "religious patriot test", back then?

1, Nothing in your first post makes that point.

2. Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

all there was, was a definite, lack of true faith in capitalism.

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

 

[Rustic]

United States is a country which is completely based on secular principles. So, I just wonder about: why they added that phrase on the Pledge of Allegiance? Actually scientifically; humanity doesn't need any god, spirituel or holy thing in its life to be succesful. Because we know that these beliefs doesn't provide or help anything better.

In the future or currently is there an movement-act to remove that phrase ? Or Americans want to remove that ? (Also I wonder about same thing for the ''in god we trust'')

Show us in the Constitution were says separation of church and state… Shit for brains

 

[whitehall]

The post belongs in "History" or maybe the rubber room.

 

[danielpalos]

I already made it.

Why no, "religious patriot test", back then?

1, Nothing in your first post makes that point.

2. Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

all there was, was a definite, lack of true faith in capitalism.

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

 

[Correll]

1, Nothing in your first post makes that point.

2. Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

all there was, was a definite, lack of true faith in capitalism.

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

 

[danielpalos]

...for the "market based metrics"? We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books.

Conspiracy or coincidence.

all there was, was a definite, lack of true faith in capitalism.

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

 

[Correll]

I can make no sense of your post.

My point stands, until you choose to communicate in a understandable fashion.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

 

[danielpalos]

Only a lack of Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

 

[Correll]

There is nothing in American culture or Ideology that insists on some for of Historical Determinism that requires an assumption of inevitable victory.

IF that is what you meant. I'm guessing based on your possibly less obtuse post this time.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

 

[danielpalos]

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

The right wing has no, "faith in Capitalism"; it really is that simple.

 

[sakinago]

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

The right wing has no, "faith in Capitalism"; it really is that simple.

What does the phrase under god have to do with capitalism? You're equating a single phrase in a PRAYER to government, to the same as abandoning the free market system? Huh?

 

[Correll]

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

The right wing has no, "faith in Capitalism"; it really is that simple.

You seem to not want to address my point.


Your post is nothing but an Appeal to Emotion, by attempting to play on what you perceive as your opponents "buttons".

 

[danielpalos]

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

The right wing has no, "faith in Capitalism"; it really is that simple.

What does the phrase under god have to do with capitalism? You're equating a single phrase in a PRAYER to government, to the same as abandoning the free market system? Huh?

God is not about Capitalism, but Socialism according to His rules, for free.

Faith in Capitalism, means competing.

 

[danielpalos]

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

The right wing has no, "faith in Capitalism"; it really is that simple.

You seem to not want to address my point.


Your post is nothing but an Appeal to Emotion, by attempting to play on what you perceive as your opponents "buttons".

We got a McCarthy era phrase but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books. It really is that simple.

Job 34:30 That the hypocrite reign not, lest the people be ensnared.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Manifest destiny, rings no bell with the right?

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

The topic is "Why was 'under God added on the Pledge of Alliance?", .

The Religion of Cain

Because "under Satan" was already taken by the Islamic countries.

 

[danielpalos]

Confidence against stone age primitives in the 1800s did not translate to confidence against the Soviet Union a century later.


Thus, my answer to why it was done, then instead of at the Founding, stands.



Because there was no enemy, with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.

Only a lack of True Faith in Capitalism does that. That "management" had to rely on "national socialism" instead, is telling.

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

The topic is "Why was 'under God added on the Pledge of Alliance?", .

The Religion of Cain

Because "under Satan" was already taken by the Islamic countries.

are they projecting by claiming we are the, Great Shysters?

 

[Correll]

"True Faith"? WTF is that about? Capitalism is an economic system, not a religion.

The Soviet Union led communist bloc was a real threat. American communists were a part of that threat.

Calling government "national socialism" is you just being weird.

Capitalism requires competition, socialism does not; ask Ding.

THe topic is "Why was under God added on teh Pledge of Alliance?", during the Cold War, and not during the Founding.


I have answered that, because during the Cold War, we had a powerful enemy with a strong internal 5th column, that rejected traditional American culture, including Christianity.


What about that bothers you?

The right wing has no, "faith in Capitalism"; it really is that simple.

You seem to not want to address my point.


Your post is nothing but an Appeal to Emotion, by attempting to play on what you perceive as your opponents "buttons".

We got a McCarthy era phrase but no anti-hypocrisy laws on the books. It really is that simple.

Job 34:30 That the hypocrite reign not, lest the people be ensnared.

"Hypocrisy"? The Soviet Union and the Communist Ideology was strongly anti-Religious.

As the US had Freedom of Religion, including a phrase celebrating the Free Exercise of Religion in the US was not hypocritical.