Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not off limits when in our office.The difference is the public felt sympathy for Clinton. While they objected to the blow job, they thought his sex life should be off limits
Few have sympathy for Trump.
Yeah, Bill would hang his head and bite his lower lip. Good actor.Not off limits when in our office.The difference is the public felt sympathy for Clinton. While they objected to the blow job, they thought his sex life should be off limits
Few have sympathy for Trump.
Clinton went up in the polls after impeachment. People felt sorry for him
Few people have sympathy for Trump. 70 percent think he screwed up. While Clinton was remorseful, Trump is arrogant and vindictive.
And still better than the rapist Clinton.Not off limits when in our office.The difference is the public felt sympathy for Clinton. While they objected to the blow job, they thought his sex life should be off limits
Few have sympathy for Trump.
Clinton went up in the polls after impeachment. People felt sorry for him
Few people have sympathy for Trump. 70 percent think he screwed up. While Clinton was remorseful, Trump is arrogant and vindictive.
The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.
Lying under OATH.The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.
Lying under OATH.The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.
Funny. Why should a president be placed in such a position regarding personal sexual indiscretions that have nothing to do with national security or abuse of power?
They know that, but they have to keep pushing that false narrative. That's their nature. They're liars.Snowflakes still trying to re-write history by claiming Clinton was Impeached because of a BJ?
Again, Slick Willy was not held in Contempt of Court & stripped of his license to practice law for getting a BJ...
Why was President Clinton impeached?
Lying under oath. It doesn't matter why, or for what.
Funny. Why should a president be placed in such a position regarding personal sexual indiscretions that have nothing to do with national security or abuse of power?
Because he opens himself up to blackmail. Definitely national security.
No. Lying to congress is not perjury.Very Simple he lied to congress and that is called perjury.
Lying under oath is called "perjury," you fucking numskull.The blunt answer is for lying about receiving blowjobs from a consenting adult not his wife. How many married men would want to publicly announce that to the world? In fact, some of the same Congressmen who impeached President Clinton were exposed as also having adulterous affairs with women not their wives. That is why I find it so hypocritical when I hear someone like Ken Starr (who prosecuted President Clinton) defending Trump*. Lying about blowjobs is not the same as jeopardizing our national security to rig a presidential election. That is also why I find it extremely hypocritical when I hear Trump* supporters talking about "payback" for impeaching Trump*. If anything, Democrats deserve some "payback" for what Ken Starr did to President Clinton. However, the Trump* impeachment is not about "payback". The Trump* impeachment is about exactly what the House impeached him for: Abuse of power and Obstruction of Congress. In short - for trying to rig the 2020 presidential election.
You mean American citizens are not entitled to a fair and speedy trial if the President is involved?He lied under oath to gain an advantage in a civil lawsuit.
He should of never been under oath in the first place.
Apparently not in today's world otherwise Schiff would already be in jailNo. Lying to congress is not perjury.Very Simple he lied to congress and that is called perjury.
