Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit. I am from the NYC area. I asked my brother. One can carry what one wishes. The thing is, in the NYC area, people are not very afraid of each other. This fear must be a Midwestern thing. I live in the DC area now. We do not know this fear of the people among us, and we have very diverse communities.Sounds a lot like New York City. My sister, who moved here to Florida, from New York, says they're not even allowed to carry a pepper spray up there. Insanity.Maryland has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, yet cities like Baltimore have very high Black, on Black murder rates. Criminals can get guns, but the law abiding can not get a permit to carry, and must buy a license just to own a gun. Many guns are banned. It is a socialist HELL HOLE.
So democrats are dumb. We knew that already.Which is why I asked a question. Duh!Learning to read might help you. Did I say that they chose? Or did I pose a question in response to your question.
The simple fact is, you don't know either.
And why I gave a perfectly valid suggestion as to one possible reason.
Do a little research. Maryland is overwhelmingly democrat. To suggest that people in the news media would choose not to own or carry a firearm makes sense.
Didn't help when Dallas cops were getting slaughtered.It makes sense to obey the law. If it had not been the law, it would not make sense (to voluntarily be vulnerable)And why I gave a perfectly valid suggestion as to one possible reason.
Do a little research. Maryland is overwhelmingly democrat. To suggest that people in the news media would choose not to own or carry a firearm makes sense.
People in Maryland need to elect some Republicans, and start owning some gun rights.
Nor did I say it did. You're posting pretty good stuff here. No need to be defensive.None of that changes the validity of my suggested reason why the people in question were unarmed.
Amazingly a lot of you die every year due to crime. Not so much in the “scared” parts of the country. How do you explain that?Bullshit. I am from the NYC area. I asked my brother. One can carry what one wishes. The thing is, in the NYC area, people are not very afraid of each other. This fear must be a Midwestern thing. I live in the DC area now. We do not know this fear of the people among us, and we have very diverse communities.Sounds a lot like New York City. My sister, who moved here to Florida, from New York, says they're not even allowed to carry a pepper spray up there. Insanity.Maryland has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, yet cities like Baltimore have very high Black, on Black murder rates. Criminals can get guns, but the law abiding can not get a permit to carry, and must buy a license just to own a gun. Many guns are banned. It is a socialist HELL HOLE.
They were ambushed, weren't they ? If so, that's not the same as Annapolis, Parkland, Newtown, San Bernardino, Pulse Club, Fort Hood, etc.Didn't help when Dallas cops were getting slaughtered.
Well no, those folks were armed, they live by the adage "The pen is mightier than the sword"Good idea. In Trump's Amerika, journalists need to arm themselves or hire security. Probably better off with both.
You do know they’re dead right? They took that we ain’t scared and don’t need no guns right to the final resting place under a desk. Unarmed but democrat. They must feel good about that. I’m sure their families are happy they weren’t armed.they weren't paranoid nutbars like the op
you're welcome
Don’t bring a pen to a gun fight. Just sayinWell no, those folks were armed, they live by the adage "The pen is mightier than the sword"Good idea. In Trump's Amerika, journalists need to arm themselves or hire security. Probably better off with both.
Nor did I say it did. You're posting pretty good stuff here. No need to be defensive.None of that changes the validity of my suggested reason why the people in question were unarmed.
Which proves things do not always work out to yer Hollywood fantasies.They were ambushed, weren't they ? If so, that's not the same as Annapolis, Parkland, Newtown, San Bernardino, Pulse Club, Fort Hood, etc.Didn't help when Dallas cops were getting slaughtered.
What Hollywood fantasy would that be? The one where you’re disarmed but all about the democrat agenda? That should comfort you in the end.Which proves things do not always work out to yer Hollywood fantasies.They were ambushed, weren't they ? If so, that's not the same as Annapolis, Parkland, Newtown, San Bernardino, Pulse Club, Fort Hood, etc.Didn't help when Dallas cops were getting slaughtered.
Don't call me bullshit. asshole. I was born in New York City, and lived there for 30 years. It's as gun-free as any place ever was. I remember having to go to the Firearms Control Board, and jump through a lot of hoops just to obtain a .22 rifle, and even that wasn't allowed to be carried around.Bullshit. I am from the NYC area. I asked my brother. One can carry what one wishes. The thing is, in the NYC area, people are not very afraid of each other. This fear must be a Midwestern thing. I live in the DC area now. We do not know this fear of the people among us, and we have very diverse communities.
Good idea. In Trump's Amerika, journalists need to arm themselves or hire security. Probably better off with both.I don't understand how it can be that 5 good people are shot dead by some lunatic, and all of them were walking around in public unarmed. I rarely go anywhere unarmed, and have my gun with me 99% of the time. If they had been armed (or even just 1 of them), the following scenario would have played out. Either >>>
1. The shooter would have been deterred and never would have showed up.
2. The shooter would have ran away as soon as he realized he had firearm resistance.
3. The shooter would have been shot dead, thereby saving at least some (if not all) of the lives that were lost.
I have heard that Maryland (blue state) is an entire, statewide gun-free zone. Not sure about that, but I do know that gun-free zones are getting people killed like flies, so I wouldn't doubt if that was part of the scenario here.
Does anybody know an answer to the question (title) of this OP ?
Hello. I'm here with the newspaper. Can I interview you?
People shouldn't NEED to be "required" to arm themselves. They should have enough common sense to do so. Should one walk through the woods in Alaska without a rifle ? Less people are killed by brown bears there, than by people here in the lower 48.People don't usually arm themselves in the workplace nor should they be required to. The survivors should feel lucky that Police were there in a minute. Contrast that with the Columbine school shootings where responding Police apparently waited for the shooting to stop before storming the building or Va.Tech Blacksburg where the local Police were interviewing witnesses while the shooter was murdering people across campus or Ft. Hood where M.P.'s were unarmed and had to call the local police or the Fla. school shooting where the Police Officer apparently ran the other way.
Does anybody know an answer to the question (title) of this OP ?
Something close to everyone?I agree with the OP
Somebody should have been armed in there.
