Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Bush Sr. invaded because of the oil. Period.
BUSH invaded??
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
You just make shit up as you go along, doncha?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bush Sr. invaded because of the oil. Period.
1) REMOVE SADDAM
DONE
2) STABILIZE COUNTRY
DONE
3) HAVE A REPUBLIC BORN OF THESE EVENTS
DONE
Am missing something here?
Yeah, you're missing what should have been #1: We never should have been thereto begin with.
Yeah, you're missing what should have been #1: We never should have been thereto begin with.
Yeah, it diverts resources from Libya and Dear Leader's great quest of liberation.....
It's good we have Zombies like you - indeed....
So, what you're saying is, a war that the previous president started 10 years ago is under criticism from the left because it diverts money from the current rebellion in Libya,
So, what you're saying is, a war that the previous president started 10 years ago is under criticism from the left because it diverts money from the current rebellion in Libya,
No, what I'm doing is highlighting the irony of your reeking hypocrisy.
How am I being hypocritical?
Satans Empire took a rather advanced middle eastern country and destroyed it for one reason and only one.
Operation
Iraqi
Liberation.
So we must have gotten lots of oil from Iraq, brite boi.
How much, exactly have we imported (Stolen, if you prefer) from post Sadam Iraq?
when he posed no significant threat to the worlds remaining superpower.
If you can't comprehend a "threat" of any sort other than tanks rolling up on the beaches, then you are not yet mature enough to really discuss the matter.
Apparently you have no idea how the WORLD oil market works.
Does anyone really want to make an argument that Saddam deserved to continue to rule Iraq?
1) REMOVE SADDAM
DONE
2) STABILIZE COUNTRY
DONE
3) HAVE A REPUBLIC BORN OF THESE EVENTS
DONE
Am missing something here?
The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter.
I hope you haven't given up on those other things you were planning.COMMIE!Because we're STILL THERE.
We're still in Germany.
We're still in Japan.
We're still in Mexico...oops...they're next.
Anyway...stop hating and hand over your Social Security.
Germany, Japan and Mexico, ALSO examples of failures of American foreign policy.
And that is especially surprising as in the cases of Japan and Germany, they started out as successful foreign policies.
AS to Social Security?
It turned out that I was one of its big winners.
NOt that I am especially happy with that winning, since it demanded that my life and health had to disintegrate before I could start winning the SSD game.
But I am thankful to this nation for giving me and my family the support we needed when we needed it.
And, as an added bonus, thanks to my illness I found the time to create CBO: the Rosetta Project.
On balance, I suspect that my overall contributions to this society and the world's commweal are actually greater than they were had I continued to teach or work as a computer consultant for Apple.
The irony of that weird fact often amuses me.
My life happened while I was planning other things.
Bullshit
"Having looked at all of the evidence that was available to us, we find it impossible to confirm the State Department's claim that gas was used in this instance. To begin with there were never any victims produced. International relief organizations who examined the Kurds -- in Turkey where they had gone for asylum -- failed to discover any. Nor were there ever any found inside Iraq. The claim rests solely on testimony of the Kurds who had crossed the border into Turkey, where they were interviewed by staffers of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee."
STEPHEN C. PELLETIERE
US Army War College
CIA analyst
US Army War College: NO PROOF SADDAM GASSED THE KURDS!
Did your link say no victims?
The next morning Iraqi bombers appeared out of a clear blue sky. The people of Halabja were used to the successive attacks and counter-attacks of the Iraq-Iran war that had ravaged the region since September 1980. They thought they were in for the usual reprisal raid.e
Iranians were involved in a war against Iraq, so they are not impartial.
.
Why would anyone continue to claim the iraqi war was a failure?
Yep, you are that ignorant.You got it backwards, shitforbrains. If you are so fucking ignorant STFU until you have some fucking idea what the fuck you are talking about.
Let me re-state the facts.
The administration ADMITTED that it was using CIA agents as UN inspectors. Links were provided.
Congressional Investigators , led by Mr Pelletier, found no evidence that Kurds have been gassed.
So what are you relying upon for your assertions?!?!?!?!?!?!?
.
Ron Paul?..........I guess we shouldn't be surprised of your ignorance.
After all, he attracts the loons like flies to shit.
So you're saying the Marshall Plan was an act of "unimaginable benevolence?"No. Post WWII policy has been a failure. We should be out of Europe and Japan, now.
So you are openly saying that the Marshall plan failed?
Oh, and when you're calculating the cost of the Iraq war, don't forget,
it started in 1991.
your joking right?
well its good thing we put an end to it huh
The war started in 1991, for no good reason we invaded Iraq then; it was temporarily halted by a ceasefire, then resumed, for no good reason, in 2003.
So, yes the cost of the Iraq war starts in 1991.
That should include btw the cost to us of 9/11, since 9/11 was a consequence of our unnecessary meddling in Middle East affairs that put troops in Saudi Arabia.