C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
- Apr 28, 2011
- 77,328
- 37,352
Of course he will – regardless the fact he’s unfit to serve on the Supreme Court for reasons having nothing to do with accusations of sexual assault.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Had Kavanaugh been nominated by Jeb!, he would have flown through the process a month ago.You think Kavanaugh is a super right winger? You have to be kidding. He’s about as moderate of a nominee as you’ll ever see from the Republican Party.
Lol! What do you consider right wing ????
Will Kavanaugh be confirmed and seated on the supreme court? Yes or No.
Unfortunately, at this time, I'm kinda of thinking no. The FBI will not find anything relevant, but the pressure on certain Senators will likely cause Kavanaugh to lose this in a tight vote, probably 51 to 49 against. I hope I'm wrong though and he gets confirmed. What do you think?
I do have to say that having your "case law" chestnut rubbed in you big, fat, arrogant face for a generation or more is going to be a source of ceaseless enjoyment.Of course he will – regardless the fact he’s unfit to serve on the Supreme Court for reasons having nothing to do with accusations of sexual assault.
Yes.
Cons only have two goals.
1- pass big ass tax cut for the rich . Done !
2- put a psycho super right judge in the SC.
They don’t care about the backlash as long as they get those two things done . Many gop Congressman are retiring after the tax thing cause they can now cash in.
Why or why not? I personally think republicans are going to come up short on votes.
Will Kavanaugh be confirmed and seated on the supreme court? Yes or No.
Unfortunately, at this time, I'm kinda of thinking no. The FBI will not find anything relevant, but the pressure on certain Senators will likely cause Kavanaugh to lose this in a tight vote, probably 51 to 49 against. I hope I'm wrong though and he gets confirmed. What do you think?
its a go then..The FBI he said she said will turn up nothing..........the other accusations are quite frankly idiotic................
The report will be a nothing burger..........and the vote will go...........may need the vice president to decide if a snowflake from Arizona doesn't say yes............
So..........it's a go..........
Absolutely..............Ram the dang vote down the Dems throats......bunch of unethical hacks........its a go then..The FBI he said she said will turn up nothing..........the other accusations are quite frankly idiotic................
The report will be a nothing burger..........and the vote will go...........may need the vice president to decide if a snowflake from Arizona doesn't say yes............
So..........it's a go..........
![]()
You want Garland.......well you'll have to wait for it........LOLDear Donald,
After Kavanaugh gets rejected, you would make the country very very happy, if you proceed with an amazing gesture and nominate Garland.
Screw that damn list Mitch gave you and be your own man! Make us proud!
TIA
>>
So much has happened in the past two years that many may have forgotten what happened to Merrick Garland in the spring of 2016.
But filling in that recollection goes some distance in explaining a lot of what has happened since.
To recap, Garland was nominated to fill the 2016 vacancy on the Supreme Court created by the death that February of Justice Antonin Scalia, an icon of conservative jurisprudence.
President Barack Obama quickly named Merrick Garland, then 63, to fill the seat. Garland had long been considered a prime prospect for the high court, serving as chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — a frequent source of justices that is sometimes called the "little Supreme Court."
Widely regarded as a moderate, Garland had been praised in the past by many Republicans, including influential senators such as Orrin Hatch of Utah.
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.
"Of course," said McConnell, "the American people should have a say in the court's direction. It is a president's constitutional right to nominate a Supreme Court justice, and it is the Senate's constitutional right to act as a check on the president and withhold its consent."
What Happened With Merrick Garland In 2016 And Why It Matters Now
I can't say. The scum and their media lackeys are running an all out blitz on the man and his family. I wouldn't blame him if he wanted some serious payback.Will Kavanaugh be confirmed and seated on the supreme court? Yes or No.
Unfortunately, at this time, I'm kinda of thinking no. The FBI will not find anything relevant, but the pressure on certain Senators will likely cause Kavanaugh to lose this in a tight vote, probably 51 to 49 against. I hope I'm wrong though and he gets confirmed. What do you think?
You want Garland.......well you'll have to wait for it........LOLDear Donald,
After Kavanaugh gets rejected, you would make the country very very happy, if you proceed with an amazing gesture and nominate Garland.
Screw that damn list Mitch gave you and be your own man! Make us proud!
TIA
>>
So much has happened in the past two years that many may have forgotten what happened to Merrick Garland in the spring of 2016.
But filling in that recollection goes some distance in explaining a lot of what has happened since.
To recap, Garland was nominated to fill the 2016 vacancy on the Supreme Court created by the death that February of Justice Antonin Scalia, an icon of conservative jurisprudence.
President Barack Obama quickly named Merrick Garland, then 63, to fill the seat. Garland had long been considered a prime prospect for the high court, serving as chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — a frequent source of justices that is sometimes called the "little Supreme Court."
Widely regarded as a moderate, Garland had been praised in the past by many Republicans, including influential senators such as Orrin Hatch of Utah.
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.
"Of course," said McConnell, "the American people should have a say in the court's direction. It is a president's constitutional right to nominate a Supreme Court justice, and it is the Senate's constitutional right to act as a check on the president and withhold its consent."
What Happened With Merrick Garland In 2016 And Why It Matters Now