Will Republicans ever admit the mess they left President Obama?

No matter how many fuckin times it has been pointed out democrats still refuse to believe that their guy in office laid a lot of the groundwork for Iraq. George W. Bush wasn't smart enough to realize that democrats would blame him and act like he was the guy who was the genisis for the whole thing. I think if I was him I would not have done anything and let the next democratic president do what he did then democrats would think it is the greatest idea ever. It is like fuckin insanity we are dealing with when we deal with democrats. If you didn't like the invasion of Iraq then you should not have put Clinton into office. TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS!
 
Why do Democrats like Hillary Clinton get a pass for voting for the invasion yet the GOP gets blamed for it, Wilbe






Two reasons..the effort to invade iraq was led by republicans with a republican president.

And I voted for the guy who said not to invade iraq and will vote for the other guy running who didn't support the invasion.

The he'll with Hillary. But she has enough sense to.admit her mistake.

How many repubs admitted their mistake?

Hillary admits mistake...Republicans admit mistake....democrats crow like they are better than everyone else despite the fact their own party mascot (woof woof Hillary) admitted to the same supposed mistake.
What mistakes did Repubs admit too ??? They still put the moron back in the wh after he made one of the greatest mistakes of all time

It is kind of hypocritical to blame others when you do the same thing yourself so why should anyone listen to that?
 
Sorta like how libs never admit any of theirs.

Obama's Red Line was not HIS mistake, it was 'THE WORLD'S'.

Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush...except over a 6 year period Bush only added $2.5 trillion in new debt. In his last 2 years, when the Dems held a near Super majority control over Congress - House and Senate, controlled the budget, controlled spending, and thus controlled the economy the Libs added $1.5 trillion more in new debt, $1 trillion short in only 2 years of what Bush added his 1st 6 with a split Congress. Obama did not inherit a collapsing economy from Bush - he inherited it from his fellow Democrats.

According to Obama his entire history as President has been overshadowed and controlled by his inability to escape the influence of George Bush on is Presidency. Of course, as proven above, it wasn't Bush's Presidency that 'left him in a hole'. He can thank his fellow Dems for that.

Of course he helped add nearly $y trillion in new debt in only his 1st 4 years, a stark contrast to his promise to cut spending and balance the budget by the end of his 1st term. In his 1st term he AVERAGED $1.3 trillion in new debt annually. His 1st financial-impacting bill was his failed Stimulus that failed to address the crumbling infrastructure, need to replace the electrical grid or other projects...and it - 1 Obama spending Bill - cost approx. 1/3rd of the amount of new debt Bush added over 6 years.

'Transparency', 'Balancing the Budget', and 'Accountability' - especially 'Accountability' and 'Transparency' - haven't exactly been Obama's / the Obama administration's strong points.
:p
I won't vote for that damn Obama again Promise ,,,,, Hill will get the job done and your pub friends will continue to bash her for 8 years
 
Obama's economy is mostly low wage and part time jobs. This economy sucks get your head out of your ass:slap:
Full time jobs: 7,629,000 (84%)
1/2009: 115,818,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

Part time jobs: 1,441,000 (16%)
1/2009: 26,377,000
3/2016: 27,818,000


Million jobs a year? Pretty bad actually. if not for so many people dropping out of the workforce think of what the unemployment number would actually be...Low paying, low skilled, service jobs and 2% growth. Obama's "booming" economy
Quite amazing actually when you factor in the Great Recession he inherited which sucked about 4-6 million jobs from his total.

If you wanna see what crap numbers look like, take a gander at the Bush bookends... neither of whom inherited a recession, no less the worst one since the Great Depression...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Carter .... 10,345,000
Reagan .... 16,131,000
Bush ....... 2,637,000
Clinton ... 22,900,000
Bush ....... 1,348,000
Obama ...... 9,721,000

And NO OTHER President has ever faced these events that occurred during G.W. Bush presidency.

NOT ONE president in history ever had all these events that were gigantic earth shaking events and yet idiots like you seem to forget them!

A Major $8 trillion market loss
Are you aware that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $8 trillion in losses?
Again Clinton laid claim BUT someone had to pay and it occurred during Bush's first year!
$8 trillion in market losses MEAN lost tax revenue.
PLUS JOBS!!!!
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $8 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies.
More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 -
and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
Source: The dot-com bubble: How to lose $5 trillion

The worst attacks on the USA in History.. 3,000 deaths!!!
Obviously most of you are UNAWARE 9/11 cost 3,000 lives, $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
Are you aware this happened???
Now before you idiots say "well Bush should have known"! DUMMIES... ever hear of the Gorelick Memo signed under CLINTON??
Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!!
Looks especially imprudent 10 years later.
Because the memo created a barrier for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with the FBI, one of its unintended consequences may have been to prevent the FBI from receiving the necessary intelligence to stop the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the worst in American history.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1124969/posts
1995 memo [Clinton presidency-concerned about Chinese election sales] Gorelick wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.” GORELICK Memo!
Here read what NOT my words but other sources:
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall.
Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
So, a year before the 9/11 attacks, a special unit in the U.S. military was aware of the presence of an al-Queda cell in Brooklyn, New York, and sought to share its information with the FBI but was stopped cold.Why?Because (as described in the April 16, 2004 Washington Times piece) “on March 4, 1995, [Jamie Gorelick, the then number 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department, sent a 4-page directive] to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures that ‘go beyond what is legally required,’ in order to avoid ‘any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance’ that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461420/posts

The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone. Airlines didn't fly for 3 days!
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source: 10 Events That Rocked the Financial World
Anthrax Attacks...
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on Tuesday, September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two DemocraticU.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.

$1 trillion in losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history.
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
Rank Disaster Year Deaths Damage* $250 Billion in damages in the 8 disasters of the top 15 disasters in history!
1. Hurricane Katrina (LA/MS/AL/FL) 2005 1833 $133,800,000,000
6. Hurricane Ike (TX/LA/MS) 2008 112 $27,000,000,000
7. Hurricane Wilma (FL) 2005 35 $17,100,000,000
8. Hurricane Rita (TX/LA) 2005 119 $17,100,000,000
9. Hurricane Charley (FL) 2004 35 $16,500,000,000
12. Midwest Floods 2008 24 $15,000,000,000
13. Hurricane Ivan (FL/AL) 2004 57 $13,000,000,000
14. 30-State Drought 2002 0 $11,400,000,000
Costliest U.S. Weather Disasters | Weather Underground

THESE events OCCURRED!
YET in SPITE of:
a) 400,000 jobs lost due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita ,
b) 2,800,000 jobs lost in alone due to 9/11,
c) 300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts
... In spite of nearly $8 trillion in lost businesses, market values, destroyed property..
IN SPITE of that:
2002 $157.8 billion deficit.. also 9/11 occurred and tax revenues lowered for years later due to dot.com/9-11 losses against revenue.
2003 $377.6 billion deficit.. BRAND new cabinet Homeland Security, plus loans made to businesses.. again tax revenues down..affect of 9/11
2004 $412.7 billion deficit.. Revenues up by 5.5% spending increased and economy getting back.
2005 $318.3 billion deficit.. revenues up by 14.5% deficit decreasing at rate of 22%
2006 $248.2 billion deficit.. revenues up by 11.7% deficit decrease 22%
2007 $160.7 billion deficit.. revenues up by 6.7% deficit decrease 35%
2008 $458.6 billion deficit.. revenues down and deficit INCREASED TARP loan mostly...
Research & Commentary

AFTER the tax cuts Federal Tax REVENUES Increased an average of 9.78% per year!!!
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historical

OH and yea how about THESE EVENTS that no other President ever experienced: 1) Dot.com bust-- 2) 9/11 3) Worst hurricane SEASONS...All of which made these numbers worse BUT still there was growth!!!
BEA National Economic Accounts
Average annual growth over 8 years 2.9% IN Spite of all the events AND if the housing bubble caused by the below people hadn't occurred it would have
been: 4.4% compared to what now???
2001 2.3% increase
2002 2.4%
2003 6.8%
2004 6.4%
2005 5.4%
2006 4.6%
2007 3.2%
2008 -7.7%
We've been through this already. The Great Recession Bush dumped on Obama cost more than all of those disasters combined.


NO you have NOT disputed the above events.
And by the way Bush didn't cause the minor recession!
Here are what the experts state GWB tried to do to get Democrats Franks/Dodd to do to keep the problem from expanding!

GWB's administration was LAUGHED AT BY Democrats Frank and Dodd after 17 times trying to get Fannie/Freddie fixed!
"Over the past six years, the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of failure to reform GSEs but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties.
President Bush publicly called for GSE reform at least 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted.

Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/12/20081221-2.html

Many prominent Democrats, including House Finance Chairman Barney Frank, opposed any legislation correcting the risks posed by GSEs.
* House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) criticized
the President's warning saying:
"these two entities - Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - are not facing any kind of financial crisis .
The more people exaggerate these problems,
the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."...
(Stephen Labaton, "New Agency Proposed To Oversee Freddie Mac And Fannie Mae," New York Times, 9/11/03)

* Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Chairman Christopher Dodd also ignored the President's warnings and
called on him to "immediately reconsider his ill-advised" position. Eric Dash, "Fannie Mae's Offer To Help Ease Credit Squeeze
Is Rejected, As Critics Complain Of Opportunism," New York Times, 8/11/07)

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/sam-dealey/2008/09/10/barney-franks-fannie-and-freddie-muddle
 
Sorta like how libs never admit any of theirs.

Obama's Red Line was not HIS mistake, it was 'THE WORLD'S'.

Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush...except over a 6 year period Bush only added $2.5 trillion in new debt. In his last 2 years, when the Dems held a near Super majority control over Congress - House and Senate, controlled the budget, controlled spending, and thus controlled the economy the Libs added $1.5 trillion more in new debt, $1 trillion short in only 2 years of what Bush added his 1st 6 with a split Congress. Obama did not inherit a collapsing economy from Bush - he inherited it from his fellow Democrats.

According to Obama his entire history as President has been overshadowed and controlled by his inability to escape the influence of George Bush on is Presidency. Of course, as proven above, it wasn't Bush's Presidency that 'left him in a hole'. He can thank his fellow Dems for that.

Of course he helped add nearly $y trillion in new debt in only his 1st 4 years, a stark contrast to his promise to cut spending and balance the budget by the end of his 1st term. In his 1st term he AVERAGED $1.3 trillion in new debt annually. His 1st financial-impacting bill was his failed Stimulus that failed to address the crumbling infrastructure, need to replace the electrical grid or other projects...and it - 1 Obama spending Bill - cost approx. 1/3rd of the amount of new debt Bush added over 6 years.

'Transparency', 'Balancing the Budget', and 'Accountability' - especially 'Accountability' and 'Transparency' - haven't exactly been Obama's / the Obama administration's strong points.
:p
I won't vote for that damn Obama again Promise ,,,,, Hill will get the job done and your pub friends will continue to bash her for 8 years

Oddly, that's exactly what all the Democrats said about Obama, and look where we are.

Besides that, Hillary has a 20 year track record of lying, about everything, and she's on both sides of every issue there has ever been. For you to believe anything Hillary says.... Well... I guess there really is a sucker for every woman.
 
Why do Democrats like Hillary Clinton get a pass for voting for the invasion yet the GOP gets blamed for it, Wilbe






Two reasons..the effort to invade iraq was led by republicans with a republican president.

And I voted for the guy who said not to invade iraq and will vote for the other guy running who didn't support the invasion.

The he'll with Hillary. But she has enough sense to.admit her mistake.

How many repubs admitted their mistake?

Barry didn't have a vote on the Iraq invasion which works out rather well for him because he has a long history of ducking any tough votes. I respect Bernie Sanders, although I don't think he has a clue about economics, because he voted against the war when it was a tough thing to do politically. Hillary would throw her own mother under a bus if she thought it would help her chances of getting elected so she can scam more money. She's only admitting a "mistake" now because it's politically expedient. She'd do the same thing in a heartbeat if she thought it would work to HER advantage!
 
So "taking on the challenge" consisted of what exactly? Making the passage of ObamaCare his first priority...legislation that hurt the economy and job creation?
Again, you can't prove it hurt the economy or job creation. Especially in the face of...

images

Did it help the economy or job creation? Why would a President who according to you had this "surprise" of a recession dumped on him choose to go after healthcare reform as his number one priority when the economy and jobs were the biggest problem in the country and the biggest concern of the American people?
Now you're lying again. I never employed the word "surprised" when describing how Bush dumped a huge pile of steamy shit on his predecessor.

As far as the ACA hurting the economy, you can't prove it. All you can do is say it. But you say it in the face of....

images

Predecessor?
Sorry... successor.

Just as a hint for next time, Faun...you can remember successor because if kind of sounds like suck...which is what you're doing when you can't come up for an explanation for why Bill Clinton is pushing a cut to the corporate tax rate! Just sayin'...
 
Sorta like how libs never admit any of theirs.

Obama's Red Line was not HIS mistake, it was 'THE WORLD'S'.

Obama inherited a bad economy from Bush...except over a 6 year period Bush only added $2.5 trillion in new debt. In his last 2 years, when the Dems held a near Super majority control over Congress - House and Senate, controlled the budget, controlled spending, and thus controlled the economy the Libs added $1.5 trillion more in new debt, $1 trillion short in only 2 years of what Bush added his 1st 6 with a split Congress. Obama did not inherit a collapsing economy from Bush - he inherited it from his fellow Democrats.

According to Obama his entire history as President has been overshadowed and controlled by his inability to escape the influence of George Bush on is Presidency. Of course, as proven above, it wasn't Bush's Presidency that 'left him in a hole'. He can thank his fellow Dems for that.

Of course he helped add nearly $y trillion in new debt in only his 1st 4 years, a stark contrast to his promise to cut spending and balance the budget by the end of his 1st term. In his 1st term he AVERAGED $1.3 trillion in new debt annually. His 1st financial-impacting bill was his failed Stimulus that failed to address the crumbling infrastructure, need to replace the electrical grid or other projects...and it - 1 Obama spending Bill - cost approx. 1/3rd of the amount of new debt Bush added over 6 years.

'Transparency', 'Balancing the Budget', and 'Accountability' - especially 'Accountability' and 'Transparency' - haven't exactly been Obama's / the Obama administration's strong points.
:p
I won't vote for that damn Obama again Promise ,,,,, Hill will get the job done and your pub friends will continue to bash her for 8 years

Which is really easy to do behind those prison bars.
 
Why do Democrats like Hillary Clinton get a pass for voting for the invasion yet the GOP gets blamed for it, Wilbe






Two reasons..the effort to invade iraq was led by republicans with a republican president.

And I voted for the guy who said not to invade iraq and will vote for the other guy running who didn't support the invasion.

The he'll with Hillary. But she has enough sense to.admit her mistake.

How many repubs admitted their mistake?

Don't act like she's a Fn saint. If there was more support of the Iraq war by Democrats constituents, she would be bragging how she voted for it from coast to coast.

I swear these lib politicians play you sheep like violin and you don't even realize it.
 
Faun? Since you can't name a single Obama policy that created jobs...and you can't explain why Bill Clinton says that we should cut the corporate tax rate if we want the economy to grow....why are you even here?

All you're doing is blowing smoke. Using misleading statistics in a failed attempt to paint an economic picture that doesn't exist.
As pointed out, no one can prove any policy was good for the economy since accurate studies are not performed on policies. You can claim Reagan's tax cuts were good for the economy, but you can't prove causation. It just bugs the shit out of you that Obama's job approval is higher than Reagan's was at this point. I get that. Sucks for you.
Approval ratings mean exactly nothing..There are many more stupid people in the country now. Many more dependent on government then ever before. Obama's economy sucks. His lousy 2% growth is a joke
 
Faun? Since you can't name a single Obama policy that created jobs...and you can't explain why Bill Clinton says that we should cut the corporate tax rate if we want the economy to grow....why are you even here?

All you're doing is blowing smoke. Using misleading statistics in a failed attempt to paint an economic picture that doesn't exist.
As pointed out, no one can prove any policy was good for the economy since accurate studies are not performed on policies. You can claim Reagan's tax cuts were good for the economy, but you can't prove causation. It just bugs the shit out of you that Obama's job approval is higher than Reagan's was at this point. I get that. Sucks for you.
Approval ratings mean exactly nothing..There are many more stupid people in the country now. Many more dependent on government then ever before. Obama's economy sucks. His lousy 2% growth is a joke
Unemployment rate (BLS):

3/1988: 5.7%
3/2016: 5.0%

President's JAR (Gallup)

4/4/1988: 51%
4/4/2016: 53%
 
The failed economy.
The Iraq debacle.
The deficit creating Bush Tax Cuts.
The millions of jobs moved oversea.
The over 40,000 factories closed.
Medical bills becoming the number one cause of bankruptcy.
Not getting Bin Laden.

Republicans were able to use reconciliation three times which shows they controlled the entire government.
Will they ever take any responsibility for what happened on their watch?

:spam:
I thought you stupid Republicans want to run the country like a business? Have you seen the debt? So why would you give the rich (ceo's) a tax break when we are in the red?

And in your business (country) do the workers get screwed?
 
Democrats artificially believe they are better than everyone else. Hillary is the only democrat that I know of who has publically said she regretted voting to give Bush authorization to invade Iraq. Democrats expect republicans to admit their mistakes. Democrats then go around acting like they are better but the fact is their own part voted and agreed with Bush on everything else. The proceding democratic president also thought Iraq should be invaded but republican have to admit their mistake. Democrats high five themselves like their shit don't stink but why would they think they are any better? It is like they have just declared themselves morallly superior to everyone else and have a right to judge everyone else because of that. It is the fucking strangest thing that goes on in the mind of some democrats.
It wasn't B Clinton it wasn't Obama that pulled the trigger,, that hungered for war with iraq ,,it was the moron, the republican ah gwb that is guilty of the worst mistake a president can make
 
Faun? Since you can't name a single Obama policy that created jobs...and you can't explain why Bill Clinton says that we should cut the corporate tax rate if we want the economy to grow....why are you even here?

All you're doing is blowing smoke. Using misleading statistics in a failed attempt to paint an economic picture that doesn't exist.
As pointed out, no one can prove any policy was good for the economy since accurate studies are not performed on policies. You can claim Reagan's tax cuts were good for the economy, but you can't prove causation. It just bugs the shit out of you that Obama's job approval is higher than Reagan's was at this point. I get that. Sucks for you.
Approval ratings mean exactly nothing..There are many more stupid people in the country now. Many more dependent on government then ever before. Obama's economy sucks. His lousy 2% growth is a joke
No you are a joke. Typical Republican. Your way produces big booms and busts. Our way slow n steady growth.

Do you blame Rick Snyder because poor cities like yours (Detroit) isn't feeling the recovery? The poor always are.
 
Faun? Since you can't name a single Obama policy that created jobs...and you can't explain why Bill Clinton says that we should cut the corporate tax rate if we want the economy to grow....why are you even here?

All you're doing is blowing smoke. Using misleading statistics in a failed attempt to paint an economic picture that doesn't exist.
As pointed out, no one can prove any policy was good for the economy since accurate studies are not performed on policies. You can claim Reagan's tax cuts were good for the economy, but you can't prove causation. It just bugs the shit out of you that Obama's job approval is higher than Reagan's was at this point. I get that. Sucks for you.
Approval ratings mean exactly nothing..There are many more stupid people in the country now. Many more dependent on government then ever before. Obama's economy sucks. His lousy 2% growth is a joke
Does your business cater to people with money or the masses? Because I know small business owners in metro Detroit that get it. If people have money they spend it.

The cheap gas alone has put billions of extra $ in our collective pockets. If your business is struggling maybe it's not the government.
 
Democrats artificially believe they are better than everyone else. Hillary is the only democrat that I know of who has publically said she regretted voting to give Bush authorization to invade Iraq. Democrats expect republicans to admit their mistakes. Democrats then go around acting like they are better but the fact is their own part voted and agreed with Bush on everything else. The proceding democratic president also thought Iraq should be invaded but republican have to admit their mistake. Democrats high five themselves like their shit don't stink but why would they think they are any better? It is like they have just declared themselves morallly superior to everyone else and have a right to judge everyone else because of that. It is the fucking strangest thing that goes on in the mind of some democrats.
It wasn't B Clinton it wasn't Obama that pulled the trigger,, that hungered for war with iraq ,,it was the moron, the republican ah gwb that is guilty of the worst mistake a president can make

Obviously you never heard of the 1991 CEASE FIRE!
 
Democrats artificially believe they are better than everyone else. Hillary is the only democrat that I know of who has publically said she regretted voting to give Bush authorization to invade Iraq. Democrats expect republicans to admit their mistakes. Democrats then go around acting like they are better but the fact is their own part voted and agreed with Bush on everything else. The proceding democratic president also thought Iraq should be invaded but republican have to admit their mistake. Democrats high five themselves like their shit don't stink but why would they think they are any better? It is like they have just declared themselves morallly superior to everyone else and have a right to judge everyone else because of that. It is the fucking strangest thing that goes on in the mind of some democrats.
It wasn't B Clinton it wasn't Obama that pulled the trigger,, that hungered for war with iraq ,,it was the moron, the republican ah gwb that is guilty of the worst mistake a president can make

Obviously you never heard of the 1991 CEASE FIRE!
Obviously you never heard of 9/11!
 

Forum List

Back
Top