EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 78,743
- 54,716
- 2,645
Democrat socialists will work as hard as they can to make it so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
He sure didObama warned about a trade war. Trump should have listened
He did listen, and did exactly the opposite of what your meat puppet faggot messiah suggested because Trump is promoting US interests over that of globalist sociopaths.
.
It has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
They didn’t become solventIt has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
No it wasn’t. Once the banks became solvent again investors put money back in equity
They didn’t become solventIt has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
No it wasn’t. Once the banks became solvent again investors put money back in equity
They came to Obama for more money
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.Time for another irresponsible tax cut to prop up the market and add billions to the national debt.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.Time for another irresponsible tax cut to prop up the market and add billions to the national debt.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
The weak TARP Bush passed did nothing to stop the Great Bush Recession of 2008. It was not until the Great Obama passed his Stimulus that the recession reversedThey didn’t become solventIt has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
No it wasn’t. Once the banks became solvent again investors put money back in equity
They came to Obama for more money
No they didn’t. Bush graciously let Hussein apportion some of the capital to fund the banks, but the entire TARP legislation was signed by boooooosh. The stimulus was just wasted money. TARP actually saved the country, and the treasury got the money back plus interest.
/——/ Obozo couldn’t run a kool aide stand without adult supervisionThe weak TARP Bush passed did nothing to stop the Great Bush Recession of 2008. It was not until the Great Obama passed his Stimulus that the recession reversedThey didn’t become solventLol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
No it wasn’t. Once the banks became solvent again investors put money back in equity
They came to Obama for more money
No they didn’t. Bush graciously let Hussein apportion some of the capital to fund the banks, but the entire TARP legislation was signed by boooooosh. The stimulus was just wasted money. TARP actually saved the country, and the treasury got the money back plus interest.
BorderFive billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.Time for another irresponsible tax cut to prop up the market and add billions to the national debt.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.Time for another irresponsible tax cut to prop up the market and add billions to the national debt.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.Time for another irresponsible tax cut to prop up the market and add billions to the national debt.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Fine...then where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that the wall will cut illegal immigration by at least 50%. Or even 20%. Hell...even just 10%.
Without that - you are just asking for money with ZERO factual proof to back it up that it will be money well spent.
The fiscal deficit is COMPLETELY out of control. Last year it was $1.3 trillion. This year, it appears to be on pace for $1.6 trillion so far.
And now, you want even more money - that Trump promised the Mexicans would pay for anyway - for something that you have not even proven is money well spent.
So...where is this link to UNBIASED, FACTUAL PROOF (not opinions - factual proof) that this wall will cut illegal immigration by even 10%, please?
Hypocrisy is mind blowing.
It has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Fine...then where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that the wall will cut illegal immigration by at least 50%. Or even 20%. Hell...even just 10%.
Without that - you are just asking for money with ZERO factual proof to back it up that it will be money well spent.
The fiscal deficit is COMPLETELY out of control. Last year it was $1.3 trillion. This year, it appears to be on pace for $1.6 trillion so far.
And now, you want even more money - that Trump promised the Mexicans would pay for anyway - for something that you have not even proven is money well spent.
So...where is this link to UNBIASED, FACTUAL PROOF (not opinions - factual proof) that this wall will cut illegal immigration by even 10%, please?
There are no facts, because a wall in this country is unprecedented. However common sense leads me to believe that a wall would deter illegal immigration to at least some degree. Do you agree?
That sounds like Trumps business plan. How could they not back it ?Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate./——/ Cut spending and leave the tax cuts as they are.
Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Fine...then where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that the wall will cut illegal immigration by at least 50%. Or even 20%. Hell...even just 10%.
Without that - you are just asking for money with ZERO factual proof to back it up that it will be money well spent.
The fiscal deficit is COMPLETELY out of control. Last year it was $1.3 trillion. This year, it appears to be on pace for $1.6 trillion so far.
And now, you want even more money - that Trump promised the Mexicans would pay for anyway - for something that you have not even proven is money well spent.
So...where is this link to UNBIASED, FACTUAL PROOF (not opinions - factual proof) that this wall will cut illegal immigration by even 10%, please?
There are no facts, because a wall in this country is unprecedented. However common sense leads me to believe that a wall would deter illegal immigration to at least some degree. Do you agree?
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate.Agree
Cut the wall
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Fine...then where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that the wall will cut illegal immigration by at least 50%. Or even 20%. Hell...even just 10%.
Without that - you are just asking for money with ZERO factual proof to back it up that it will be money well spent.
The fiscal deficit is COMPLETELY out of control. Last year it was $1.3 trillion. This year, it appears to be on pace for $1.6 trillion so far.
And now, you want even more money - that Trump promised the Mexicans would pay for anyway - for something that you have not even proven is money well spent.
So...where is this link to UNBIASED, FACTUAL PROOF (not opinions - factual proof) that this wall will cut illegal immigration by even 10%, please?
There are no facts, because a wall in this country is unprecedented. However common sense leads me to believe that a wall would deter illegal immigration to at least some degree. Do you agree?
To some degree? Sure. Not many, IMO. Hundreds...maybe. But that is a drop in the bucket. And 'not many' is not worth many billions of dollars we do not have.
If illegal immigrants can get over a 20 foot wall easily. Then I see no reason they cannot get over a 30 foot wall almost as easily.
Not to mention tunneling. Or just blowing a hole/cutting a hole in the wall at an isolated spot and flood hundreds through at that point.
There are a myriad number of ways to get around/through Trump's wall.
The solution is obvious - make the penalties for those who hire illegal immigrants through the roof. Take their businesses away, throw them in jail for years.
That will slow illegal immigration FAR more then raising the wall a few feet. Do you agree?
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that will do nothing to address border security, five billion dollars wasted the consequence of rightwing fear, bigotry, and hate.
Five billion dollars for a ‘wall’ that won't even be built.
So much for Republicans being the party of ‘fiscal responsibility.’
What’s hateful about wanting to secure your boarders? Your post is proof that when conservatives propose legislation you disagree with, the liberal default position is to say it’s hateful legislation. What’s more alarming is you don’t want to secure our boarder. I’m not saying it because you’re against a wall, I’m saying it because you have no ideas to solve the problem. So obviously don’t have a problem with open boarders, which is what we have now
Fine...then where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that the wall will cut illegal immigration by at least 50%. Or even 20%. Hell...even just 10%.
Without that - you are just asking for money with ZERO factual proof to back it up that it will be money well spent.
The fiscal deficit is COMPLETELY out of control. Last year it was $1.3 trillion. This year, it appears to be on pace for $1.6 trillion so far.
And now, you want even more money - that Trump promised the Mexicans would pay for anyway - for something that you have not even proven is money well spent.
So...where is this link to UNBIASED, FACTUAL PROOF (not opinions - factual proof) that this wall will cut illegal immigration by even 10%, please?
There are no facts, because a wall in this country is unprecedented. However common sense leads me to believe that a wall would deter illegal immigration to at least some degree. Do you agree?
To some degree? Sure. Not many, IMO. Hundreds...maybe. But that is a drop in the bucket. And 'not many' is not worth many billions of dollars we do not have.
If illegal immigrants can get over a 20 foot wall easily. Then I see no reason they cannot get over a 30 foot wall almost as easily.
Not to mention tunneling. Or just blowing a hole/cutting a hole in the wall at an isolated spot and flood hundreds through at that point.
There are a myriad number of ways to get around/through Trump's wall.
The solution is obvious - make the penalties for those who hire illegal immigrants through the roof. Take their businesses away, throw them in jail for years.
That will slow illegal immigration FAR more then raising the wall a few feet. Do you agree?
Possibly
It has been ten years since Republicans crashed the stock market
Trump is showing signs of collapsing the economy
Lol no chance. Under Bush many of the biggest banks in the world were set to become defunct. Bush of course saved the banks and as the market was retracing Hussein took all the credit.
Actually the market continued to drop after Obama took office. If Bush had already reversed it, the market would have been going up by the time Obama took office
It was the Obama Stimulus that reversed the market
Not even close.