Not real simple. The government will take ownership of all the hospitals. All those employees will become employed by the government. The government will set all pricing and determine all procedures. Research and development - gone."Medicare for All" is just a political line. What they're after is pure Single Payer, not "Medicare (as it actually exists) for All".Medicare for All would be a windfall for insurance companies.
In other words, they're lying.
Exactly. The single biggest selling point of "Medicare for All" is that it's a simple expansion of an existing system, that it requires no new infrastructure. And that's probably how it will play out, despite the intent.
And compensation to MA companies can easily be fixed. It's an issue that can be addressed. We can't just see a problem and give up. When did that start happening?
We can at least recognize our past mistakes and not double down on stupid.
I don't see the government taking ownership of the hospitals. However, their only source of income will be the government and, as you say, they will set all the prices and determine all procedures.
Many smaller hospitals will be forced to close further limiting care available to rural areas.
The only source of income would not be the government, there would be supplements.
Good to see that you at least agree that many smaller hospitals will be forced to close. Further limiting the care to rural areas. Just as it is limited in Canada.